My %$#^@&^!! she is in almost every flick nowadays. Please directors... give us a flick without her every now and then. Edited by - tintintin on Sep 10 2007 Please choose your titles more carefully, the first thought that popped into my mind was either she was dead or was in the hospital, thanks. Edited by - bono-ONE on Sep 10 2007
Not quite sure what the point of this thread is. Sativa rules, I wouldn't mind if she was in every porno produced from now until the end of the universe, as long as Rebeca was in them too Nothing says romance like anal sex.
Its like that with plenty of girls. It all depends on how much/many scenes a girl films and their popularity. If the people want her or there is a lot of buzz surrounding her, then you better believe companies are going to have her in everything.
Sativa only became interesting to me in her more recent iteration ... Seems like she had a makeover or two along the way and became a much better performer. She went from someone whose scenes I skipped over to someone who I think is really underrated ... I'm NOT saying it's because she started doing anal, but she became a lot more appealing.
Riiiiiight. (Oh wait, was confusing you with Neech for a moment there). Please return to your regularly scheduled thread. On second thought, riiiiiight, nonetheless.
The people have spoken. I'm a nitpicking dick. Woo! 8757 Posts 1/04
Posted - Sep 11 2007 : 1:00AM
I've got about 10 DVDs in the past three weeks and Sativa is not in any of them. How can that be if she's in almost every flick nowadays? I keep running across Brianna Love and Bree Olson and more Brianna and more Bree. Chelsie Rae seems to be in a bunch of them too.
[Link]
Porn Scout Deactivated User
3735 Posts 10/02
Posted - Sep 11 2007 : 1:21AM
Your opinion is wrong. 1. There is no such thing as too much Sativa Rose 2. There aren't many new releases coming out with her in them right now anyway
She's not annoying at all. Once I saw enough of her, I still thought her presence helped a movie instead of hurting it. The only thing that sucks is I saw a bunch of her early on, before the makeover, so I don't have hardly anything of her newer kickass look.
Sativa Rose is very Entertaining and Versatile.She is not so one Dimensional like the overhyped Alexis Texas. Miss Texas has graced boxcovers of way too many Flicks than necessary and her work has become too predictable and stale.It all ends with the same butt cum shot and moves the same way all the time.Unless she does anything different or New,I am not enthused by any of her future work if she continues that used up formular of hers. Where as in the case of Sativa,she is very diverse in her work and does some daring projects and works really hard to adapt.I cannot get enough of her. So I strongly disagree with the thread starter,although he is entitled to his rather ''bizarre'' opinion.
[Link]
Luvvy Duvvy Deactivated User
228 Posts 5/04
Posted - Sep 12 2007 : 11:15AM
I prefer Sativa with no make up. She doesn't need it, she's a natural beauty.
I'll buy a movie just because Sativa's in it, so I'd have to say, please, directors, keep using her. As many titles as she's willing to do, that works for me.
I ain't got no problem with Sativa at all, no overload here. Love her body and attitude, some of the stuff that comes out of her mouth is divine, great dirty talker. Sativa rocks.
Some say 'Make love, not war'.....I say you can do both, if you budget your time 578 Posts 9/04
Posted - Sep 26 2007 : 2:11PM
There's no such thing as too much Sativa. Those thick, pouty lips, that round -- and now fully-funcitonal -- culo, those bouncy tits and lovely eyes. Man, if you don't like Sativa, you just need to move on to something else. Sativa rules! Arriba!!!
[Link]
pussyluvme Deactivated User
I love conquistador & wana fuck him in his ass 70 Posts 12/07
Posted - Dec 8 2007 : 9:09PM
you cant have watched much porn if your saying she's in almost every porn flick but what wood i no i'm not a scientist