I just saw a bangbros episode with her lactating. Does anyone if this is this pre or post child birth? http://www.bangbrosnetwork.com/t1/pps=oxpass/intro?s=btcp6039 Topic Moved by - heynow on Sep 18 2009
[Link]
realtip Deactivated User
2301 Posts 6/04
Posted - Sep 19 2009 : 12:52AM
I saw that scene. It is really hot. Definitely one of her best scenes. She can breastfeed me anytime. To answer your question, I assume that she was not pregnant at the time of the scene. For one thing, women usually don't start being able to lactate until later in the gestation period, which is also around the time that they are showing. Since Sativa's body looked pretty tight in that scene with no signs at all of being pregnant, it indicates that, if she was pregnant, her pregnancy has already ended.
The real question is "Who is the father?". An active porn actress could have ten different candidates for daddy and it means some guy that intended to get a little pussy and $500 ends up paying $100K in child support enforced by the State of California! Maybe porn actors should ask for a current Depo-Provera certification as well as that AIM test.
^What does it matter who the father is? Or more importantly, what business is it of yours? For all you don't know she probably has a boyfriend or a husband who is the father. Just because she is a pornstar doesn't mean the father is automatically going to be a pornstar. And it doesn't mean it was an accidental result of a scene. *****The Dr. of Nasty*****
I didn't say for sure. Unfortunately, if you have sex with five different people over a month, you have no control over who the father is unless you are a condom user. That was my point. I made it so that people would think about that if they go into porn for a living. Sativa is not scum, not a slut and not a whore just because she fucks for a living and her husband (if she has one) is not either. My point is that it could happen!
[Link]
bellend Deactivated User
570 Posts 9/09
Posted - Sep 20 2009 : 12:22AM
I'm guessing the amount of women on birth control is pretty high in the adult industry. So I don't see what you've typed regarding "surprise pregnancy" as being relevant.
From Wikipedia: Lactation without pregnancy Milk production can be "artificially" and intentionally obtained in the absence of pregnancy in the woman. It is not necessary that the woman has ever been pregnant, and she can be well in her post-menopausal period. Women who have never been pregnant are sometimes able to induce enough lactation to breastfeed. This is called "induced lactation". Women who have breastfed before can re-start. This is called "relactation". This is how some adoptive mothers, usually beginning with a supplemental nursing system or some other form of supplementation, can breastfeed. There is thought to be little or no difference in milk composition whether lactation is artificially induced or a result of pregnancy. Lactation can be induced by physical stimulation and by drugs. In principle—with considerable patience and perseverance—it is possible to induce lactation by sucking on the nipples alone. The nipples may need to be consistently stimulated by a breast pump or actual suckling (several times a day), and the breasts massaged and squeezed ("milked") to encourage flow of any milk. Temporary use of galactagogue (milk-inducing) drugs is also effective; galactagogue herbs may also be of use. Once established, lactation responds to demand. In other words, she might not have even been pregnant.
[Link]
realtip Deactivated User
2301 Posts 6/04
Posted - Sep 22 2009 : 8:54PM
The ability of women who have never been pregnant to lactate is possible, but very rare.
[Link]
Taylor Von Bailey Deactivated User
2116 Posts 8/06
Posted - Sep 22 2009 : 9:50PM
Interesting conversation. I'm glad to learn this. I wonder how her milk tastes.
Sativa Rose @ Adult Empire
Posted - Sep 18 2009 : 10:21PM
