True, perhaps it isn't. That hasn't stopped other non-native English speakers from being able to make sense on these boards. I just want to see the meaning of the question clarified because as it stands I don't know what the poster is actually asking about. I searched and found that Scott Nails was in a movie called "Girl Pirates 2" (as well as #1) so it really is hard to tell what the original poster is asking about. It is not unusual for similar porn titles to get mistaken for one another. Also the way it is worded makes "Pirates 2" sound like a live show of some kind, with multiple "performances".
[Link]
BigMMoney Deactivated User
164 Posts 11/07
Posted - Jan 5 2008 : 3:24PM
I think he will likely be in Pirates 2. He was in Pirates 1 as a member of Jesse Jane and Evan Stones' crew. Scott is very popular in Digital Playground movies, so I would think he would be in Pirates 2 as well. If Lacie Heart is in Pirates 2, Scott will almost certainly be in the movie because Lacie only does him currently, I believe.
Conquistador, I could understand what he was trying to ask, and I'm sure most others could as well. Maybe it's your English comprehension that needs some work. Cut him some slack.
I think Scott Nails is no longer active and is living with Lacie Heart in the AZ. They seem to believe that you can't fuck other people in front of a camera, and still have a committed relationship. So, the only way Scott will be in Digital Playground's "Pirates 2" is if they have some old footage of him, or if he/Lacie make a one-time come back and work together on this sexvid. BTW, since they only have Jesse Jane representing "glam porn" under contract, I'm not sure if Digital can get "Pirates 2" made without filling out the cast with girls who are not under contract to them. In the original "Pirates" they got Carmen Luvana from Adam & Eve. For "Pirates 2" I strongly recommend they ask A&E for Kayden Kross.
That's too bad Scott is on sabbatical. He's one of a few that don't get on my nerves.
[Link]
BigMMoney Deactivated User
164 Posts 11/07
Posted - Jan 6 2008 : 11:52AM
Yeah, I didn't mind Scott either except when he was cast in POV movies or Virtual Sex movies. His tattooed arm ruined the fantasy of being there for me.
I wouldn't be surprised. Stormy would add some "glam" to this sexvid. Right now Digital only has Jesse Jane. BTW, I read on another thread that Teagan offered to work in "Pirates 2" but was turned down.
Nothing says I love you so much as a tongue in the ass. 2884 Posts 1/03
Posted - Jan 6 2008 : 3:56PM
Is that an unreasonable attitude or philosophy? I'm only surprised that Nails was mature enough to make that kind of determination. More power to them both, and good luck.
We're getting off topic...and I must be showing my age. In the early days of porn (the 1970s), it was about "sexual freedom" and America's "counter-culture" movement. Having porn sex, or sex with numerous partners (like at the Woodstock Music Festival) wasn't viewed as harmful to relationships. There was even a mainstream movie, "Bob & Carol & Ted & Alice" about sex outside of committed relationships. I also remember when porn people (Kobe Tai, Dyanna Lauren, Jenteal) did interviews on TV's "Entertainment Tonight" saying how porn sex is only "work"--and does not harm their real-life relationships. Plus, today, we have something called "friends with benefits" that lets us fuck people without commitments. What Scott & Lacie are doing seems out of sync with these past attitudes that, in part, allowed porn to grow as an industry. Just a thought.
Nothing says I love you so much as a tongue in the ass. 2884 Posts 1/03
Posted - Jan 6 2008 : 9:57PM
It's a very nice ideology, and some people can talk the talk and walk the walk, but most people are more insecure about their relationships than can withstand extramarital sex, regardless of the circumstances (work or play). Leaving porn isn't a guarantee that the relationship will survive, but it does say something for both of them that they value it more than the quick cash (at least for the moment). I also grew up during the 60's, and the idea of a more sexually free society still holds its appeal, but I can't shut out the reality of human frailty that will always complicate the sexual landscape.