Shutterfly prints on Fuji paper and I know has been praised by some of my friends. Dotphoto is okay if you stick to glossy paper and is real cheap. Their matte photos came out horrible for me. Ofoto (Kodak) is a little bit expensive. Some people have been happy with Adorama's digital printing service.
I just have my pics printed at the closest labs to me since they both use a Fuji Frontier digital printing system. I use their online submission form and pick up the prints an hour later.
Anyway you do it, most digital photolabs are actually cheaper than printing at home so don't fuss too much about price.
I've used Clark Color Labs for years with my film rolls and now with digital media. They do a fine job especially when my local one hour photo places used to scratch my negatives. It takes about a week for the prints to come back.
I use my dsl provider (yahoo) in the photos. they're pretty cheap, the quality depends on your pics but they warning you before you do any order. i did my xmas cards that way it was fun.
Naaah, your DSL provider is someone else (like SBC). Your DSL provider has partnered with Yahoo! for content but you don't need DSL to use Yahoo! Photos. Anyone can use Yahoo! Photos.
I like Shutterfly myself for mundane stuff; I've used their services off and on since they got started. I've even had one of the largest size prints (2 hex 30", I think) done and it's a steal considering the price. I didn't do a calendar this year, but those are pretty swank, too.
If you want to dabble with high-end digital printing services (and pay the price), you can the same labs that the pros use since everyone ships FedEx, UPS, or snail mail.
Locally, I'd try Calypso Imaging in Santa Clara. I forget if West Coast Imaging has printing services, but their drum scans are king. The de facto standard for SoCal labs is A&I (Alexander & Ishihara); it has been years since I checked, they may still run their own Kodachrome line (one of the few in the country and possibly the reference K-14 line, including Kodak's). I would not hesitate to try out their digital printing services (I've had a PhotoCD or two scanned there years ago).
Considering where you are, if you're looking into the pro digital lab, you have to consider Portland Color (www.portlandcolor.com). Possibly the best pro lab in New England, according to some old photo buddies.
Some of these high-end shops will have access to other output devices. A few years ago, the IRIS inkjet was the rage. It could print onto almost any thin substrate including cloth, watercolor paper, plastic film, thin sheets of metal, etc. Artists loved it. It really kicked ass. I don't know what's the hot output device these days.
All of the consumer-grade digital printing services have specials, sign-up bonuses, etc. from time to time. I remember when Shutterfly had fifty free 4x6" prints for new users a while back.
Sign up for all the services and check out what they have to offer. It costs nothing to register and upload a few images.
Porno movies, sexy videos, xxx. Adult DVD Talk at your service. 6409 Posts 11/99
Posted - Mar 8 2005 : 2:10PM
Thanks, guys. I am looking for both consumer quality and professional quality (for the really good pics that I want to hang in the house.) I'll look thru all the options...
#SDNY he's all yours. -- Michael Steele 5110 Posts 3/03
Posted - Mar 8 2005 : 4:23PM
For the consumer stuff, if you can stomach Walmart, you can just take your memory cards in and make prints at the self-service kiosk in the camera department. I used one in one of the Midcoast cities (Rockland?); it made decent quality prints. The machine lets you do at least a limited amount of playing around with the image (cropping, etc.).
It's going to be the same anywhere whether it's a "pro" or a "consumer" lab if they use the same equipment. Most labs use either one of two printing equipment. A fuji frontier to print on fuji paper or a noritsu to print pn kodak paper. There is a third party digital lab systems run on agfa and konica papers but you rarely see them in the states.
The difference between a "pro" and a "consumer" lab is the color correction when it comes to printing negatives (and the fact that they develop your rolls cleanly). Something that doesn't apply to digital images that you take yourself (and correct yourself). They don't do any color correction when you submit a digital photo to them. They'll print it out and how much it'll be different from what you see from your screen will be determined by whether they have the correct ICC profile.
So forget about whether it's a "pro" or "consumer" lab. Focus more on the paper (and system) they use. The low end Kodak paper (kodak edge) is shit. Kodak Royal is the bomb. I haven't been able to discern the differences between Fuji papers because they're not marketed separately like Edge, Endura, and Royal. They're all called Crystal Archive and main difference seems to be their thickness and whether it's matte or glossy. They all seem to look fine to me.
Another point. If all a place says is that they use Kodak paper... It's probably the shitty Edge. If they use a better version like Royal or Endura, they would definitely market that.
Note that with low-end consumer places (like your local Walmart or drugstore), the quality can be astoundingly inconsistent even if they have decent equipment. One day, you might have some sleep-deprived college kid working graveyard at pennies above minimum-wage, just slamming stuff through the machine without a care; another day, you might have someone who will actually care enough about previewing the image. Or you might get a management change and the new one decides to reduce the frequency of chemistry changes to cut costs. Also, your local joint may not care about customer service, especially if photo finishing isn't their main business.
However, online consumer sites like Shutterfly, Ofoto, Snapfish, etc. live and die by what they do. I've only had to contact Shutterfly's customer service a couple of times, and each time they were very responsive. The online services get a truly wide range of clientele, so they really do have to do a decent job. What they won't have are all the machines and specialist operators that a high-end pro lab would have.
I've used shutterfly for 4x6s they look very good.
I've also used the local Target to have some 4x6, 5x7 and 8x10s done. What I found is the 4x6 look great at target and the other sizes aren't that good. YOu can see banding.. yuck! they wouldn't give me a refund or a discount for the poor quality.
I've also made posters at Kinkos, 5 feet by 5 feet, they came out looking nice.
Porno movies, sexy videos, xxx. Adult DVD Talk at your service. 6409 Posts 11/99
Posted - Apr 1 2005 : 2:19PM
So I gave Shutterfly a shot. I can't believe how cheap and easy it is. I thought the upload of the massive files would take forever (only took about 10 minutes.) The 8x10s came out really nice, love the matte finish. I'm psyched! Our walls are going to be covered in photos.
We'll probably make our own frames, but if anyone knows where you can get plain, wood frames (aside from ikea) I'm all ears.
My stupid canon i850 (that prints black bars on photos) was such a waste of money.
At least in my neck of the woods, I'd probably head to Michael's, Aaron Brothers, or Cheap Pete's for pre-made frames. I don't know if they are regional or national chains.
University Art is a local chain; I'm most familiar with the store in Palo Alto. They have a pretty impressive selection of frames, especially simple wood ones. Also, one of the nice photo stores (non-chain) has a great selection of pre-cut mattes.
If you really want to treat yourself (or a photo) nice, use a real framer. Have fun!