please change the thread title, as it is inaccurate and misleading. 'most desirable' means it's most preferred/most convenient. this is because society is much more busy nowadays. everything needs to happen faster. more efficiently. which sucks. at least double that time is a minimum for me.
This article is too short and too funny not to be reproduced in full:For some reason, I initially read the last bit as "The findings are published in The Journal of Sexual Mediocrity." Anyway, I think insemination to the public would better change their expectations of getting laid and would also be more preventative of distress.
Dang... why all the hating on the quickies? I am totally down with this. I really don't like sex that goes on and on and on and on. I just get sore and aggravated and want to quit. If I'm going to have an orgasm, it's usually going to happen in less than 5 minutes or it's not going to happen. I would rather have 5 ten minute quickies in one day than 1 hour long bang-a-thon. I'd have more orgasms, more fun, and less pain.
No hating. I just think these particular therapists sound like goofs.Make mine 3 ten-minute quickies and a 1/2 hour bang-a-thon. Then I'd be good to go. . Only thing is, I don't think those sex therapists have either of our ideals in mind.
I guess this is purely about bang time. I probably will be accused of sounding fem , but the lead up , anticipation , and things like eye contact are part of the connection as well even for men. But as male it can be confusing regarding the banging part. I think most conscientious guys believe quickly unloading or being premature is the worst sin of all, so I have ran a few marathons in the past. But another apart of me thinks a woman wants the guy to rip her panties off sometimes , and not waste a second , it is not always an easy read for a guy to make.