Mike South been working overtime imploring to various directors and studios about this fact it seems
[Link]
Sheena Shaw @ AnalVids| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| orgymaster Member  150 Posts 10/14 |  Posted - Mar 26 2015 : 2:58PMI know the previous thread got locked because of some horrible comments, so please refrain from such acts on this one. But I am wondering what happened to her comeback, it seems that these days she's back to stripping in Minneapolis. Wish she came back after all, she's an absolute porn goddess. [Link] |
| TDTxx Member 682 Posts 12/11 | Posted - Mar 26 2015 : 6:57PM Mike South been working overtime imploring to various directors and studios about this fact it seems [Link] |
Mister Fahrenheit  All-Star Member Meh 4655 Posts 10/13 | Posted - Apr 21 2015 : 2:07AM [Link] |
| JulieMasonFOREVER Senior Member Rain makes everything GROW 4447 Posts 4/13 | Posted - Apr 21 2015 : 9:04AM [Link] |
| steelbill Senior Member 1456 Posts 9/03 | Posted - May 16 2015 : 7:53PM [Link] |
| pat362 Senior Member 10081 Posts 3/10 | Posted - May 16 2015 : 9:04PM [Link] |
| Canadian_Cindy Deactivated User 1102 Posts 2/15 | Posted - May 16 2015 : 11:58PM [Link] |
| Maxxx Stirner Deactivated User 319 Posts 11/14 | Posted - May 17 2015 : 12:29PM Edited by - Maxxx Stirner on 5/17/2015 12:29:25 PM [Link] |
| SkyHigh Member 412 Posts 4/11 | Posted - May 17 2015 : 12:49PM [Link] |
| Canadian_Cindy Deactivated User 1102 Posts 2/15 | Posted - May 17 2015 : 6:43PM All I am saying really is to enjoy her body of work, because she probably is not going to be booked for many scenes going forward. Edited by - Canadian_Cindy on 5/17/2015 6:45:51 PM [Link] |
| killbillvol69 All-Star Member ^Lucy Pinder 18631 Posts 4/08 | Posted - May 17 2015 : 7:22PM In other words, you'd do best to just ignore whatever he writes. [Link] |
| Canadian_Cindy Deactivated User 1102 Posts 2/15 | Posted - May 17 2015 : 10:51PM [Link] |
| Maxxx Stirner Deactivated User 319 Posts 11/14 | Posted - May 18 2015 : 1:49AM https://hivskeptic.wordpress.com/2009/06/13/porn-industry-proves-that-%E2%80%9Chiv%E2%80%9D-is-not-sexually-transmitted/ What the entire data we have on modern porn testing going back to 1998 shows is that 'hiv' positivity corresponds to risk groups more then anything. Ironically in Mike Souths comment section one person said that it's going to have to be a big name performer that tests positive one day and not a classic risk group candidate that is usually positive. That there hasn't been at least a small string going back nearly 17 years now should tell you something. My issue with HIV is that it has been a spectre that has been haunting modern sexuality for over 30 years now. It's a large reason why we don't see anything approaching a sexual revolution sequel. it has also greatly hampered porn and all that it could be. If there is any possibility that this has been a big scientific mistake(and yes people scientists make big mistakes), then people in porn should investigate the hypothesis of non existence/non causation very closely. The world that Bill Hicks talks about(when they cure AIDS)may actually be closer then you think. ^^^Cindy, we don't the full context of Shaw and Stagliano. For one thing Stagliano consistently tests undetectable, and that might have factored into her choice to have sexual relationship with the man. There is a big difference between someone who is fully treated and someone who isn't. The official position on HIV admits this as much. [Link] |
| murdock Member I'm not an actor, but I play one on TV 911 Posts 4/06 | Posted - May 18 2015 : 1:21PM The only thing the porn industry has proven is that HIV isn't particularly infectious (something we already knew) and that the transmission rate isn't 100% (again, something we already knew) Suggesting that an absence of HIV outbreaks in the porn industry is proof that HIV isn't sexually transmitted is no different than suggesting skydiving without a parachute can't be fatal because Joan Murray survived a fall. (despite dozens of skydiving fatalities on record) You can't point to an exception and say it is true of everything. Absence of proof is not proof of absence. http://www.logicallyfallacious.com/index.php/logical-fallacies/54-argument-from-ignorance [Link] |
| Maxxx Stirner Deactivated User 319 Posts 11/14 | Posted - May 18 2015 : 9:42PM There's a difference between something that is sexually transmitted and something that is infectious. Pregnancy is sexually transmitted but not infectious. I don't deny that there are certain proteins and free radicals that can be sexually transmitted from toxic seamen generating a Gallo positive test. However, this tends to be aided by toxic lifestyle and other factors. Usually someone who's Gallo positive has underlying oxidative and other stress factors that make them fertile for contraction. When you look at people like Laura Roxxx, Cameron Bay, Derrick Burts and the others they are all classic risk group cases. On the gay side you have endemic use of meth and poppers that make all those cohorts fertile for a sexual transmission that generates a Gallo positive test. As to the low 'infection' rate, if we look at the Padian study, the infections were overwhelmingly male to female (inserter to receiver), and they were overwhelmingly anal sex based. In the few cases where men tested positive, it was ambiguous. The non two way transmission combined with being tied to risk groups and mostly anal sex suggests that you are not dealing with an infectious agent. I think people in porn ought to consider whether they are wasting precious sexual time on a baseless disease agent. Edited by - Maxxx Stirner on 5/18/2015 9:55:10 PM [Link] |
 | |
| murdock Member I'm not an actor, but I play one on TV 911 Posts 4/06 | Posted - May 18 2015 : 10:55PM How many of the couples in that study delivered children during the course of the study? If it was zero would you therefor conclude that Pregnancy isn't sexually transmitted? Because that's exactly what you're doing with HIV. The HIV virus is present in different levels in different bodily fluids, and different tissue barriers present different layers of protection so pointing out that blood (highest concentration) to blood (no tissue barrier) transmission is much riskier than vaginal fluid (low concentration) to penile skin (good barrier) is simply noting what science has already confirmed repeatedly. Not to mention that the majority of couples in the study wore condoms throughout (something that science has said will reduce the likelihood of transmission significantly) and the vast majority of couples wore condoms at least some of the time. So not a huge surprise that there weren't and noted transmissions in those groups. A lot of people changed their behavior after entering the study (for example practicing abstinence or refraining from anal intercourse which would both lower the likelihood of transmission) But once again, the study simply doesn't address the known cases of non-risk sexual transmission of the disease. Different diseases have different levels of infectiousness. Pointing out that HIV isn't as infectious as Chlamydia doesn't mean that HIV isn't sexually transmitted. It means that it isn't as infectious. It's the most basic level of logic and I'm sorry if you can't see that. But the Padian Study in no way shape or form suggests what you say it does. [Link] |
| Maxxx Stirner Deactivated User 319 Posts 11/14 | Posted - May 19 2015 : 4:21AM Not sure what point your trying to make with the pregnancy point. I used pregnancy to illustrate that not all sexual transmissions are infectious. Obviously things like family planning come into play. Yes the anal tract offers easy entry, but the other guys can get in and infect by vaginal as well. 'HIV' needs the lowest entry barrier via the anal tract and its presumed infection rate still hovers on the level of noise. Again there is also the lack of two way movement between inserter and receiver that the data shows which is yet another blow to the infectious hypothesis. It doesn't have to be 50/50(obviously receivers on balance get infected more then inserters), but there does have to be unambiguous two way movement. As to the condom cannard, condoms fail, are not always used throughout intercourse, their use is based on the couples word thus not entirely verrifiable and it doesn't prevent the overall blows to the HIV hypothesis. Condoms have been used in most gay porn yet there is still numerous Gallo positives said to be in the industry. There is also interesting data from the CDC which compared discordant couples with the competing variables of treated/unprotected vs protected/untreated. Guess which variable was more likely to sexually transmit positivity. There was also another recent long term study out of Australia which undermines the infectious hypothesis. The risk hypothesis works simply because 'HIV' has never spread outside the risk groups. The non risk sexually transmitted data that does exist tends to be ambiguous. 'HIV' it should be stressed, has never been isolated based on direct markers. It has NEVER been purified as The Perth Group have so meticulously demonstrated. This is why I say the sexual link might be based on other toxic free radicals and proteins that can make the test react. And it is essentially a non specific sensitivity test that while not meaningless (I think it can predict and indicate ill health to come), is unspecific. Again, not everything sexually transmitted is an infection. My logic isn't the problem. What the Padian study shows(as The Perth Group so well demonstrate) is that 'HIV' theory is the problem. Edited by - Maxxx Stirner on 5/19/2015 4:30:38 AM Edited by - Maxxx Stirner on 5/19/2015 11:24:48 AM Edited by - Maxxx Stirner on 5/19/2015 11:27:16 AM [Link] |
| murdock Member I'm not an actor, but I play one on TV 911 Posts 4/06 | Posted - May 19 2015 : 1:00PM Your premise fails at the most basic levels. [Link] |
| Maxxx Stirner Deactivated User 319 Posts 11/14 | Posted - May 19 2015 : 2:16PM Again, HIV remaining confined to the risk groups is not debated or contraversial. Even ideologues like Nick Bennett don't deny this. [Link] |
| Rosco Fuji Deactivated User On the licking stick, Mr. Magic Dick! 3309 Posts 2/09 | Posted - May 19 2015 : 2:17PM [Link] |
| Mister Fahrenheit All-Star Member Meh 4655 Posts 10/13 | Posted - May 19 2015 : 4:13PM [Link] |
| Maxxx Stirner Deactivated User 319 Posts 11/14 | Posted - May 19 2015 : 4:32PM [Link] |
| murdock Member I'm not an actor, but I play one on TV 911 Posts 4/06 | Posted - May 19 2015 : 5:03PM I'm all for people having differing opinions, but I won't stand for the perpetuation of outright lies on a topic as serious as this. [Link] |
| Maxxx Stirner Deactivated User 319 Posts 11/14 | Posted - May 19 2015 : 5:32PM [Link] |
| murdock Member I'm not an actor, but I play one on TV 911 Posts 4/06 | Posted - May 19 2015 : 7:54PM [Link] |
| bootz Member 46 Posts 10/11 | Posted - Jun 14 2015 : 5:35AM She was an amazing performer. [Link] |
| xmotox3 Member 14 Posts 6/15 | Posted - Jul 5 2015 : 2:09PM [Link] |
| killbillvol69 All-Star Member ^Lucy Pinder 18631 Posts 4/08 | Posted - Jul 5 2015 : 10:21PM Unless you're the father, that second question is not your business. [Link] |
| misspornUSA Senior Member I ♥ the male gaze (and Palestine). 8737 Posts 11/13 | Posted - Jul 6 2015 : 12:05AM [Link] |
| xmotox3 Member 14 Posts 6/15 | Posted - Jul 6 2015 : 12:21PM [Link] |
| xmotox3 Member 14 Posts 6/15 | Posted - Jul 6 2015 : 12:28PM [Link] |
| pat362 Senior Member 10081 Posts 3/10 | Posted - Jul 6 2015 : 1:15PM [Link] |
| xmotox3 Member 14 Posts 6/15 | Posted - Jul 6 2015 : 1:31PM [Link] |
| connoisseurofporn Member 581 Posts 10/13 | Posted - Sep 28 2015 : 12:12PM [Link] |
| jeffandersonn Deactivated User 1605 Posts 3/13 | Posted - Sep 28 2015 : 3:16PM [Link] |
 | |
| FlacFan Deactivated User 10088 Posts 8/15 | Posted - Sep 30 2015 : 12:22AM Silicone Is Evil, Razors Aren't Much Better [Link] |
| Canadian_Cindy Deactivated User 1102 Posts 2/15 | Posted - Oct 11 2015 : 6:29AM She was a fantastic performer. However, there are consequences to being reckless, and she has had to face them. In reality, many girls are far more reckless than her as they are barebacking guys form bars or guys from the gay side of the industry quite often. She happened to do it with a publicized HIV carrier and has had to take the heat. Enjoy her back catalog as much as you can! Edited by - Canadian_Cindy on 10/11/2015 6:33:45 AM [Link] |
| Cuckservative New Member 2 Posts 10/15 | Posted - Oct 23 2015 : 10:35PM [Link] |
| JulieMasonFOREVER Senior Member Rain makes everything GROW 4447 Posts 4/13 | Posted - Oct 24 2015 : 8:08AM [Link] |
| Cuckservative New Member 2 Posts 10/15 | Posted - Oct 24 2015 : 12:55PM Edited by - Cuckservative on 10/24/2015 4:13:20 PM [Link] |
| ultimate_sperminator Deactivated User 837 Posts 12/12 | Posted - Oct 24 2015 : 5:04PM [Link] |
| pacificat New Member 2 Posts 10/15 | Posted - Oct 25 2015 : 3:07AM Watched a lot of your video scenes. Are you naturally as wild and nasty in real life sex scenes? [Link] |
| 2bollocks Senior Member 3586 Posts 3/10 | Posted - Oct 25 2015 : 6:50AM [Link] |
| Superdeluxe Deactivated User 211 Posts 1/14 | Posted - Oct 25 2015 : 9:40PM If Sheena was completely aware of what she was doing it was wrong, but much like Mr. Marcus, once you put puss in pussy, you are a done deal. Sheena could have had about any man, I really wonder what it was about John that attracted her. She's not a kid, so hopefully she is making better decisions these days. [Link] |
| Canadian_Cindy Deactivated User 1102 Posts 2/15 | Posted - Oct 25 2015 : 9:51PM I do wish her all the wonderful best. If she can put out good scenes on her own site maybe she can make a nice living with subscriptions there. [Link] |
| killbillvol69 All-Star Member ^Lucy Pinder 18631 Posts 4/08 | Posted - Oct 25 2015 : 10:13PM No more directing? That doesn't really make sense since directing doesn't put performers at risk. No more fucking talent off-camera? Well I certainly hope so, but how can that possibly be enforced? Have people spying on him 24-7? In other words, what could the industry as a whole do to John that would make sense here? [Link] |
| connoisseurofporn Member 581 Posts 10/13 | Posted - Oct 25 2015 : 10:20PM [Link] |
| 2bollocks Senior Member 3586 Posts 3/10 | Posted - Oct 26 2015 : 6:49AM @ Canadian_Cindy how can you say it's too much. Have you really read about what she did? The way she put others in danger knowlingly is the ultimate sin in the industry. Once you do that you have permanently lost any sense of trust. I think people who do that should be charged with a crime. [Link] |
| killbillvol69 All-Star Member ^Lucy Pinder 18631 Posts 4/08 | Posted - Oct 26 2015 : 7:25AM But that's off topic here. [Link] |
| Hyena Deactivated User 124 Posts 5/15 | Posted - Oct 26 2015 : 7:36AM [Link] |
| 2bollocks Senior Member 3586 Posts 3/10 | Posted - Oct 26 2015 : 9:19AM [Link] |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |