Exactly-he doesn't care. He knows he cannot have sex on camera & hasn't since 1997, yet when the cameras stop rolling he is more than happy to. I don't see any difference personally-he still had sex knowing he could potentially pass HIV onto that person which begs the question how many other porn actresses has he tried it on with & possibly succeeded with over the years? Did he pay her for this or did she find him so irresistible that she had to have unprotected sex with him right then? The only thing anybody cares about in the industry is money-the producers shoot so many scenes & largely because when an outbreak happens they have plenty of material to upload to keep their subscribers happy until the all clear happens. I have lost count of the number of performers on their social media going on about how condoms are evil or whatever & the minority who publicly support their use tend not to be used a great deal. Porn performers make a great play about the testing procedures, yet things like Mr Marcus faking his results made a mockery of that. I can remember a couple of years or so back a mainstream performer sucking off some random rock musician on stage at a concert. If performers are happy to engage in reckless behaviour like that then it makes the testing virtually redundant. Buttman has a massive company that gives good paydays. I guess also most will say I will work for the other directors but not him.
[Link]
Maxxx Stirner Deactivated User
319 Posts 11/14
Posted - Feb 26 2015 : 1:31PM
The thing is brit, this 'roulette' has yet to result in a structure of chronological casualties. If we go back to the 16+ years of AIM plus the current testing standards then there should have at least been some significant names that got infected throughout that 16+ year period OUTSIDE of just risk groups. All the 'hiv' infections thus far have ONLY been risk group members usually on the outside looking to get into the talent pool. That should clue you in. Again as my link to Henry Bauer's blog shows, these infections should have been showing up by now. The crossovers and shemales that you speak of may be more likely to have it, but again the only people that they can give 'hiv' to(really it's just an endogenous protein signature that can be contracted as opposed to being an infectious agent) are those with shared lifestyle factors. The current testing system will more or less catch those that engage in toxic 'hiv' inducing behavior(Cameron Bay for eg). Also not all male bodied/organ queers(these are the people we are talking about after all) engage in the toxic behaviors(meth and poppers) that can result in a Galo positive test. If you are going to discriminate, don't discriminate against the sexuality, discriminate against the lifestyle factors that bring cellular toxicity into the talent pool. 'HIV' as far as I'm concerned has never been shown to have a viral existence let alone do the things that is claimed it can do. Also I have brought up in my own topics the idea of doing health based testing(Organic Acid Tests being a good one) that really could go a long way in cleaning up the talent pool. In essence the queers that you so worry about would essentially be a-ok if they were to pass this cellular benchmark. And as someone who eventually wants to see porn become sexually integrated and bi-normative in presentation, this could be a great way to facilitate the process by weeding out risk group cohorts and toxic people as a whole. Cameron Bay and Rod Daily could have been spared the scarlet letter of 'hiv' had they been subjected to health based tests. I'm sure that all that cellular oxidation(which is what a Galo test is actually picking up) would have been caught before hand with the message to both being 'clean up your act'. Also ebola actually is just an African problem. I've actually looked into critically and not just taken the filtrated media talking points on what it is. Ebola is essentially a toxicological phenomena that is tied to the problematic colonial produced African mining procedures. The death rates that so scare people are partly a product of African specific poverty and sub standard health care along with other factors. I won't say more but I can give you links if you wish. Edited by - Maxxx Stirner on 2/26/2015 1:36:56 PM
[Link]
DAPistheBEST Deactivated User
36 Posts 8/14
Posted - Feb 26 2015 : 4:22PM
This is a bit different than people fucking civilians on the side, this is a guy who hires them to work which is more of a direct attack on their health. If the male talent doesn't care that one of their employers is willing to infect them with HIV, then I guess why do we as fans even have to care anymore. Fuck them to their choices, right? As far as I am concerned, since Stagliano is getting a pass here, then I am done caring about performers getting HIV. If a man who employs them is perfectly fine transmitting HIV into the talent pool, and the talent do not rise up in large numbers to oppose this, then they can live with their choices and I am done with worrying about it. If they don't care enough for their own bodies to stand together against this kind of disgraceful behavior by an industry employer, then nobody should be caring any more. Edited by - DAPistheBEST on 2/26/2015 4:26:56 PM
if Rob Black were still around he would be having a field day with this news.. before he had stopped associating with the industry he was wondering of Sheena's whereabouts
[Link]
Rosco Fuji Deactivated User
On the licking stick, Mr. Magic Dick! 3309 Posts 2/09
Posted - Feb 26 2015 : 4:55PM
I don't see what the big deal is. The women seem to have no problem with him, so why does everyone else? Edited by - rosco fuji on 2/26/2015 5:36:03 PM
[Link]
pervybrit50 Deactivated User
473 Posts 11/13
Posted - Feb 27 2015 : 2:39AM
I used to care but yes the performers & producers for the most part don't seem to care. To me it is all problematic-tests that can be faked, performers that can work before they have been cleared, a porn star blowing a random guy at a concert, potentially doing bareback escorting-heard stories about this, a porn producer/company owner with HIV having unprotected sex with a performer who then shoots other scenes, porn performers demanding condoms be kept out of porn etc. If they have such a blatant disregard for their own safety, their fellow performers safety etc then why should the fans care?
