Okay, I'll admit it - I have a little bit of a foot fetish. Not one of those where I seek out fetish movies, though. A while back I ordered a PPV movie called "Barefoot Bedtime Stories 3" and didn't really like it. I like to see the girl's feet, and maybe see her rub the dude's unit with them a little, but not fixate on them, or rub chocolate sauce over them or all that weird stuff. Which makes me wonder just how the adult filmmaker decides whether or not the performers should wear shoes or not during sex scenes. I've heard that high heels make women look curvier, so it might be a psychological thing. I've also been told by guys that women look best when they're wearing nothing but a pair of high heels, but when I ask them why they feel that way they can't explain. In all the different movies I've seen, there's been a lot of variation. In one of my favorite scenes - Kylie Ireland and Randy Spears in "Playing With Fire", Kylie takes off everything but her heels, even though it looks like the points are going to rip through the couch upholstery at any moment. There's a great scene in "Sorority Sex Kittens 2" where the guy takes all his clothes off but the woman leaves her socks and tennies on. Or the lesbian scene in "Priceless" where Jenna Jameson and her roommate get friendly on a couch and strip down but don't remove their socks. Then there's the scene in "White Wedding" where Chasey Lain is barefoot when she's making out with a guy, but when they move to the bedroom, she has taken off all her clothes but put on a pair of tennis shoes. I've also noticed that some performers tend to go barefoot more than others, such as Serenity, Briana Banks and Suzy Sweet. And there are others who almost never go without wearing shoes. Like I said earlier, I'm not into foot fetish films (say THAT five times fast!) but to me it just looks weird when a woman is naked but is wearing shoes. Are the girl's feet distracting or something?
There are 3 kinds of people: those who love shoes, those who love bare feet, and those who couldn't care less. Personally I agree with UKDave - sexy shoes are very important to me, and I spend a lot of time trying to locate porn that features them. If I were a director, every girl would be wearing spike-heel platform shoes, start to finish. And those shoes would be on-camera, somehow, most of the time ...
well im the guy that likes; girls in sexy shoes and barefeet- BUT the porno scene has to show her feet and/or shoes in thw scene. I hate it when they dont show then e.g. when shes doin doggy and they show her from her knees or anckles only
Girl's feet are too sexy to hide in shoes through the whole scene. I think it's great when a sexy woman wears sexy shoes (sandals, heels, etc) to start off a scene, but once the sex really kicks in, i wanna see those pretty toes and the soles of her pretty feet!
"I guess you could say it's extremely vulgar; I like it a lot." 161 Posts 11/06
Posted - Aug 12 2007 : 2:46PM
No, there are also the people who think feet are just plain nasty. I'm kind of at both extremes: if I see feet I like, I really like them. But if they aren't perfectly up to or close to my specifications, I don't want to see them.
I want to know why porn almost never shows girls in flip-flops? I mean, who the fuck wants to see girls always wearing hooker-heels and the like? Give me a bit of reality...some tight cut-offs or miniskirt, a cami and flip flops. That's what I want to see.
[Link]
Porn Scout Deactivated User
3735 Posts 10/02
Posted - Aug 12 2007 : 4:27PM
Girls should be wearing high heels in every scene as far as I'm concerned. I guess I'm kind of set in my ways.
Yes - gotta be wearing sexy high heels throughout for me - if at all possible (OK - some REALLY acrobatic stuff might require losing them occasionally). I know everyone has different tastes, and I'm sure some people get off on naked feet, but to me those ridiculous porn-star shoes just add to the 'slut factor' - they scream exotic sex, whereas barefeet look kinda tame and normal. I was wacthing one of the 'Double Decker Sandwich' films the other night and after the initial tease with a couple of hot girls in these gorgous costumes and heels the guy comes in, and he IMMEDIATELY removes the girls shoes - I was practically screaming at the TV set - 'Guy - what are you doing that for!?!' It goes in line with my other bugbear - girls in really hot underwear that are suddenly stripped completely naked for a scene, when really, all they need to lose is their knickers (and these can even be pushed to one side they are often so flimsy). Why go to all that effort of dressing girls up sexily and getting rid of it all for the actual scene - are they trying to save on cleaning bills or something?
In short: Girls wearing gorgeous underwear and high heels: sexy. Girls butt-naked: boring. Edited by - loz on 8/12/2007 6:21:39 PM Edited by - loz on 8/12/2007 6:22:40 PM
I get disappointed if the girl takes the shoes off during a scene. Sometimes stockings or crotchless fishnets/pantyhose with a pair of heels is also nice, imo. But, yeah, the sexy shoes are a must for me. More for me... please.
[Link]
Porn Scout Deactivated User
3735 Posts 10/02
Posted - Aug 12 2007 : 10:15PM
Stockings are good too. I like high heels and somewhat light lingerie, like stockings and a garter belt. But no platform hooker shoes. I hate those. They need to be banned. Immediately.
I'm with you on that one Scout....who the fuck thought some of those platform hooker shoes looked sexy? I swear to god, everytime I see a pair of those, I think of this:
I'm a sucker for nicely pedicured feet, but more so because I love reverse cowgirl and to have the girl's feet front and center on the guys legs. So I'm also a big fan of no shoes. And I'm out...
[Link]
dvd4dvd Deactivated User
292 Posts 6/07
Posted - Aug 12 2007 : 10:48PM
no shoes, but she's gotta have nice clean feet with one hell of a nice pedicure. but then again! if she's belladonna, I'd probably bang her 500 ways from sunday even if she had dirty feet!
I couldn't agree more TRD. This question has come up before and that's usually my reply. It's one of the reasons I love the scene with Satine Phoenix and Franchezca Valentina in Finger Licking Good 4. At the start of the scene Franchezca has a cute pair of boots on and Satine has sneakers and socks IIRC. It's a pretty long hot scene and about halfway through they both are barefoot and toe-tally naked. mod: snipped the quote - see the Forum Etiquette Edited by - hardware on 8/13/2007 7:47:14 PM
I'm so anti-Foot fetish and you know what that means. I truly love Heals on a chick. They make her look even sexier and gives more definition to her body. So Ironically my fav Directors are Jules and Van Styles coz they always shoot chicks wearing Heals and that is hot. I'm not a fan of Mark Davis,Rod Fontana and the other guys who have Foot fetishes and suck toes.......yuck!
[Link]
dvd4dvd Deactivated User
292 Posts 6/07
Posted - Aug 13 2007 : 9:30AM
dude check out manhandled 2, the 2nd scene is with ashley blue. she's barefooted and her feet are dirty, but letme tell you something, I am sure that you would eat off of them feet trust me. that's one hell of a scene for feet fetish guys indeed!!!
I think the high heels the girls wear in porn are fucking ridiculous. I'm not into shoes anyway, so I'd rather the girl be barefoot. The heels really came to my attention when I was watching "Freshly Fucked #2" the other day. The scene had John Strong and Katrina Isis. In the middle of the action they get up and walk to another room, and Katrina has on the heels and is now taller than John Strong; it just looked weird. And then add in the clopping noise the shoes make on the floor which is reproduced even louder since the rooms they shoot in are pretty big and have good acoustics; it's all just too much for me. The only thing I have seen that is worse than the high heels, was a scene with Jasmine St. Claire where she had on thick wool socks whicle getting DPed. And the socks were dirty.
For work. I prefer no shoes. It's easier to hop on top and fuck the shit out of the male performer. But for looks I definitely prefer shoes they make it classy and plus u can do all types of nasty things with shoes.
Love heels but hate platforms. Johnni Darkko generally dresses his women in nice shoes for his movies. I'm definitely a shoe person so much so that that's the first thing I look at on a women. Keep the shoes on ladies.
[Link]
dvd4dvd Deactivated User
292 Posts 6/07
Posted - Aug 15 2007 : 12:08AM
for those that are either shoe lovers or feet lovers (shoes or not) check out the last babe that fucks on Manhandled 2, but I must warm you, make sure you have a fire extinguisher near your cock and when you see that shit shaking! your head pulsating, and your balls steaming. don't fucking hesitate..remember..(P)ull...the pin, (A)im ..at the head of your cock..(S)queeze the extinguisher..and finally (S)weep from side to side..or in this case Ball to Ball..this is one hell-of-a foot and shoe scene you and your COCK will never forget! ~dvd4dvd
Well, I don't have a feet fetish either, but still I love fashion ads showing only legs, feet and shoes. I think it's about the enigma and the elegance. In porn I don't think about it much and shoes or no shoes doesn't make or break a scene.
Welcome to the darkside....we have cookies. 598 Posts 11/03
Posted - Aug 15 2007 : 1:28PM
Often it's not the performers choice...the director will sometimes want the shoes on the whole scene. If I have it my way they are gone (as a performer) - easier to fuck that way and I am here to fuck. As a director it depends on the scene, sometime a sweet pair of shoes or boots take the look further.
Check out Anal Expedition 8, Cindy Crawford is wearing these incredibly high shoes, impossible to walk in. In the BTS she's crawling! She's teamed up with Michael Stefano and the scenes is hot though. On some other set it could've been a complete disaster.
[Link]
the unknown pervert Deactivated User
I'd like to stay but I've got a plane to catch. 3243 Posts 5/06
Posted - Aug 15 2007 : 11:07PM
I don't care. As long as she doesn't have a pegleg or hooves it doesn't matter what, if anything, she has on her feet.
Well like I said earlier, in that first scene in Playing With Fire, I thought for sure those high heels you had on were going to poke through the upholstery on that couch. Bet that would've made the director do a
Talk about opposite opinions - I actually find that clopping sound of high heels a turn on - certainly whenever I hear that sound in the street I turn around to check out the talent...
Bare feet are never distracting, but shoes most certainly can be. Why not have both? The high heels can appear during the start of the scene, perhaps during the tease segment, but when the sucking and fucking begin, off they go. I want to see the girls' feet (assuming they're pretty and well pedicured) just like I want to see every other part of them. Why would anyone want to forgo the eye candy a pair of cute, sexy feet can provide? Besides, fucking with shoes on looks downright tacky. And as for sneakers, forget it--those shits must go.
it's a total woodkiller if a chick takes off her shoes and her feet are all dirty or fucked up looking with callouses. It isn't tacky if they leave their shoes or boots on, it's hot, there's a reason they're called fuck me shoes. sneakers can be hot, such as white keds with no socks.
For me it is like that: I generally prefer shoes on no-shoes, but I have to see the toes. Any sex scene where I don't see the toes is absolutely nothing for me. If the feet are not clean, pretty and well pedicured, the girl shouldn't be in porn in the first place.
Re: seeing toes, I'm right there with you. In fact, the best shoes IMHO cover as little of the foot as possible. They're really an ornamentation for the foot, with a little bondage and domination thrown in :-)
No shoes for me but the girl has to have nice feet. If not then she should wear combat boots. Its a real turn on to see a beautiful women with nice feet.