New Pornstar Interviews - [more]
Introducing Lady LorReign

"Good oral on me turns me on. Also, knowing that my partner is enjoying themself,"
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 289 > Should porn talent get paid if they can't perform
AuthorPost
Fingerbangger
Member


164 Posts
3/07
Posted - May 21 2007 : 1:33PM
I was on a set yesterday and the male talent could not stay hard, had a tough time in certain positions because of his knee, he kept stopping in the middle of a good shot. The director was very frustrated and just could not get the shots he wanted. The guy finally poped after 20 min of jacking off. At the end of the day he got paid in full. Should these guys get paid if they are not doing a good job? The director now has to put a shitty scene in his movie unless he wants to spend another $3000.00 or so to reshoot.
devinnlane
Devinn Lane

429 Posts
1/04
Posted - May 21 2007 : 1:55PM
They get paid, but they don't get hired again. That goes with girls that are a pain in the ass on set or flakey(at least from where I sit). If he's with an agency the agent should also not charge you and issue you a credit for the next male talent you hire from them.

xoxo
Devinn

Porn Addict
Member

I Shoot Porn
218 Posts
12/05
Posted - May 21 2007 : 2:11PM
For female talent, I always pay... unless they change their mind in the middle of the shoot, walk out, show up drunk/drugged or are just an absolute pain in the ass to work with.(To date, I only had to cancel one shoot for the girl showing up drunk... and all she got from me was a cab ride home).

For male talent, if they can't perform or having trouble and it looks like a dead shoot, he'll get a kill fee of around $50.

- PornAddict

The Official Porn Addict Home Page

leglover1000
Member

177 Posts
3/07
Posted - May 29 2007 : 12:23AM
Finggerbanger,

Was the guy a newbie? If he was I feel sorry for him but he will be canned. If he has been around I say everybody has their bad days. I am sure even the stud legends have had bad days.

LadyB
Black and Blue, USA

161 Posts
2/05
Posted - May 29 2007 : 2:07AM
The difference is that the sud legends usually do give the production company a price break that day, or at least give them a promise of a price break the next time they use them.

Too many young guys are coming into the business that think it's all about popping a pill, and then they can't perform on time and as directed, and they still want to charge the same prices as the tried and true guys that can get wood and shoot on command everytime, with no chemicals needed.

The truth is that Viagra may get you hard and keep you hard, but most of the time, it means a very long, crappy performance that ends with the guy having to pull out and work for way too long to actually shoot off. I've watched sex scenes where the guy with the dam pill is pissing off the two or three veteran swordsmen that do it all naturally, and the chick that's laying there waiting for the money shot, because he can't get his Viagra erection to cum.

Unfortunately, some of these guys will only learn if directors will stop paying them if they don't finish the job they were hired for in the way they were expected. I like porn addict's way of handling it. But I hope you also give him a talking to about how this is not a responsible action as an employee in adult. :)

The same goes for women in porn. There are girls that will show up sick, drunk, drugged or just plain not into it and turn in the worst time consuming non-performances. They shouldn't be paid full rate either. If she can't show up ready to do a scene as a responsible employee for the day, then the least she can do is give the production company a price break, or offer to come back and do a scene for free, or at discount later.

Edited by - hardware on 5/29/2007 11:39:01 AM

 
BigBobxxx
Senior Member

2681 Posts
5/04
Posted - May 29 2007 : 6:00AM
I'm not being argumentative with you, just using your thought to raise another.

After discounting for bad performances, why should the porn consumer still pay full price when said bad performances are sold in the marketplace?

And, yes, I do understand that the producer sometimes has to eat the whole thing with the absolutely unusable stuff.

Edited by - hardware on 5/29/2007 11:40:18 AM

deepudicks
Deactivated User

If The Good Times Did Not Last Then Believe Me Me The Bad Times Shall Also Passs
100 Posts
2/07
Posted - May 29 2007 : 8:03AM
Porn Addict
Member

No matter what the reason, on the surface it stinks of discrimination.Why are you willing to pay the girl performer hee fee even when she fails to deliver while the poor stud(??)gets just $50 for a kill fee?When both are creating equal damage on the shoot.

While I agree no professional would leave his fee once he has been signed it goes without saying that he needs to slog his butt off till the director is satisfied.If a performer cannot deliver the goods then they certainly deserve another chance and are not made pariah dogs and stoned out of the industry...But the performer also needs to understand that it is more important to deliver especially after they have failed to deliver once...to satisfaction rather than expect full payments the next time around..
That's plain common sense but alas that's no so common these days!!!

LCF All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Non Prevalebunt!
10364 Posts
1/05
Posted - May 29 2007 : 8:45AM
maybe bacause one performs and the other do not?

Will you pay a tailor who gives you wrong clothes?

Will you pay a barber who trembles because he's drunk?

Will you pay for a wrong haircut?

if you are scheduled to perform the very least you must do is to stay sober and don't fuck the day before the shooting better if you stay sober and don't fuck 2 or 3 days before.

If you get sick and have a fever you might be excused , but if you get drugged ot drunk or fucked all night long and cannot perform , then you must pay for this

leglover1000
Member

177 Posts
3/07
Posted - May 29 2007 : 8:53AM
Devinn and All Directors,

What is the best way for a newbie to train to cum on command? Basically what are some the things a newbie can do to prepare for a life in porn? Some potential studs out there who never performed, claim to cum on command during sex(with their girlfriends) or masturbation rituals but what things can he do to prepare for interruptions and many people watching them perform? What is the least amount of time a performer is given to cum? Is it five, ten minutes into a scene? Lastly how long are the average scenes?

Devinn, would you consider producing and directing handjob and mutual masturbation videos?

_swede_
Deactivated User

579 Posts
4/05
Posted - May 29 2007 : 11:45AM
Porn Addict
Member

I Shoot Porn
218 Posts
12/05
Posted - May 29 2007 : 12:18PM
Of course there's a hint of discrimination. Porn is full of it. However, let me back up my reasonings.

First off, I want to preface by saying that I'm not part of the commercial LA porn scene. I do my little thing over here on the East coast and mainly deal with first timers and no-name talent (female and male). I'm sure the way it's done over there is different, but one of the advantages of owning your own little operation is that you can make the rules and those that want to play by them are more than welcome and those that aren't... need not apply.

Now, with that being said. Let's take a couple situations that either could/have or did arise.

Whether it's right or wrong is a matter of opinion but to me, the female is the star of the show. In my experience, people who join my site do so to see the girls perform (usually their first scenes). It is to be expected that the average "real" girl next door is not your standard LA porn chick who can takes multiple cocks up her ass and swear so much that truck driver's blush.

These girls may be submissive and just let the talent fuck her... or maybe we have to coach her along while she's either sucking or fucking. That's part of the charm with amateurs. So, in my head... as long as their providing a warm hole to fill, they're doing their job and should be paid.

Now, guys on the other hand. If they can't perform, the scene is thrown away. There's no salvaging it. Who wants to listen to a guy rattle off excuses as to why he can't cum or worse off... watch him furiously pump a limp noodle.

So I rationalize as the male didn't do his job and therefore, should not be paid. I could sit here and offer up many analogies but hopefully you get the point.

I also want to finish off by saying that with me, it's not a one strike and it's over situation. I am aware that everyone has their bad days. I've rehired many guys who failed the first time and came back better the next. I also rehired guys who failed several times... but I never go past 3 strikes. If you can't do it by then, maybe porn just isn't for them.

Oh, and the absolute last thing (and probably most important) is that the guys know my intentions before ever walking in the door for a shoot. They know that if they fail, they leave with gas and lunch money... which is more than enough in my opinion.

- PornAddict

The Official Porn Addict Home Page

fundo
Member

"All knowledge ultimately means self knowledge."--Bruce Lee
97 Posts
4/07
Posted - May 29 2007 : 6:01PM
The male performer should get an appearance fee and a separate fee for a sucessful scene. Alot of these directors don't have the gift to help stressed out male performers relax and sometimes it is the girls fault--in fact alot of times it is the female performer who can't turn on the guy. He starts feeling the pressure and then the director gets angry. If directors had better people skills this might never happen, especially if they had rehearsals like they used to do years ago.
LCF All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Non Prevalebunt!
10364 Posts
1/05
Posted - May 29 2007 : 6:43PM
if you put it that way it's the director who actually ruins the scene , not the performer
leglover1000
Member

177 Posts
3/07
Posted - May 30 2007 : 6:20PM
porn addict,

Is the pop shot so essential to your scenes? I do know of some movies that do not have pop shots (i.e. Bizarre, Canida Royale Films, one pussyman scene). Why is the popshot so essential to perform in every scene in pornography? I understand guys want to see this but can there be a hot sex scene without a pop shot? If the emphasis on the pop shot is eliminated, perhaps more new male talent can emerge and the expecatation for male peformers can be focused on maintaining an erection. I may be wrong but I think the expectation of the pop shot by directors may be the reason why we see very few male talent performing and very slow change in male talent. If I am wrong please tell me.

Porn Addict
Member

I Shoot Porn
218 Posts
12/05
Posted - May 30 2007 : 6:48PM
In my little videos, the pop shot is important for a couple reasons. The first is that the one dude I use (HP) can unload like a monster. It makes for very explosive finales and the second is that it puts the "finished" stamp on the scene. Whenever I see a scene without the pop, I feel like I was short changed. Therefore, I always use them in my videos.

I do have some other comments in regards to male talent...

Someone mentioned in an earlier reply that the director can be to blame by creating an uncomfortable atmosphere. While I do agree that can happen, I wanted to let the people know that I am far from an ogre to work with/for. If you were to watch any of my clips, you'd see my true personality in every video. My shoots are very light and fun. I also dont' have a big staff with light guys, audio dudes and all the other bells and whistles. It's usually me, the talent and someone to snap pictures. Sometimes I am the talent.

With that being said, if a guy can't perform in my scene... porn is, most likely, not for him.

I agree that chemistry can play a big role and I do take that into consideration. That's why I mentioned that I always give people a second chance with another shoot if they should fail.

Here's something that you need to consider if wanting to become male talent... or at least understanding what is needed by them (at least on my sets).

Even though I like to keep the shoots pretty spontaneous and loose, there still is a mini checklist of things I want to shoot before hand. It may be certain positions I want to film or what have you. Having sex on film for a director is a lot different than banging your hot girlfriend and frolicking around with a couple hot sluts you met at a bar. I'm the type of person who will stop the talent, reposition them into weird positions and then have them continue as if nothing ever happened. Some guys can do this no problem. Other guys look like they can bend spoons with their mind because they're concentrating so hard to stay erect while I get things situated.

I've also had situations where the male talent gets frustrated and asks if he can fuck the girl without me in the room and to just put the camera on the tripod... or he wants the girl to blow him for 30 minutes while he tries to get hard. These things make me look bad to the female talent so I curb that shit immediately.

I could go on forever with stories about male talent, but maybe for another post sometime in the future.

Sorry if I started rattling off. If you or anyone else has any other questions, comments or complaints... fire away.

- PornAddict

The Official Porn Addict Home Page

 
SWorldMegan
Shane's World

213 Posts
5/05
Posted - May 30 2007 : 7:56PM
We had a few scenes like that ... sex had amazing chemistry ... but no pop. Why? who knows!! various reasons.

You can't put that on a dvd, because most porn viewers would be disapointed ... but we finally found a place for these. Aside from sometimes showing them in BTS,We put them on our website in a section called cutting room floor. It ended up becoming a popular section on our website .. some of the scenes were over 30 minutes of good rocking out sex .. just no cumshot. The people who dont care about a cumshot loved the section.

We also started using it as a section for puting scenes of ideas we had tried .. but never ended up turning into a movie. Some times we have an idea for a trip/reality that well .. is only a really good idea.

xoxo,
Megan

P3-2A
Member

173 Posts
5/07
Posted - May 30 2007 : 8:34PM
If they can't perform, they should do what everyone does and get a mexican to do it.
SashaGrey
Member

472 Posts
7/06
Posted - Jun 3 2007 : 4:40AM
I was on a feature, my second day I was there for about six hours...male talent was five hours late, etc. etc. I got food poisoning- it hit me like a rock and I had to go home. I didn't get a kill fee and I had to come back two days later and wait several more hours. I think it's all dependent on the circumstances, and I feel I should have got something.
the fuck junkie ♠
ma meeshka
Iconoclastic Member

3939 Posts
4/06
Posted - Jun 3 2007 : 8:55AM
you did. you got food poisoning. and a great anecdote.

"always look on the bright side of life..."
Edited by - ma meeshka on 6/4/2007 10:04:02 PM
Lance
Member

My Life Sucks
386 Posts
4/05
Posted - Jun 4 2007 : 11:44AM
There's a lot of talk about the guys not performing, like not getting hard, not being able to cum, etc. One issue I've seen is male talent not listening to direction, getting into a "Zone" not listening to instructions, fucking like they just wanna feel good. While heat is definitely important, if a director cannot get the "pussy drunk" dude to open up, stop when told, or just plain listen to anything then he's more useless than a limp dick. Pun intended.
www.makemoneyfucking.com
TarynThomas
Senior Member

Taryn It Up
1013 Posts
2/05
Posted - Jun 7 2007 : 11:00AM
First off you get what you pay for male or female.
If male talent is or is known to be shakey, then don't hire him. If you don't want that type of scene. But sometimes guys have a hard time popping even if they are good male talent. So I feel as long as you get a pop, your good. Especially if the guy was struggling.
As for female talent if her ass or pussy is sore. They it's more than likely not going to be a good scene... But that's my own personally opinion. After all who wants to be in pain while fucking.
As for the agents they should be held responsible for booking the talent if the KNEW their talent was sore or shakey. That's why when it's all said and done you really need to have a good working relationship with your agent. You want to be able to tell your agent "No I don't feel well" or "No I am just not feeling that type of scene" So on and so forth...
On that note, I am done here.
mod: extraneous quote removed
Edited by - hardware on 6/7/2007 11:53:48 AM
skronker
Notable Legendary Icon

Scopophiliac
9780 Posts
9/02
Posted - Jun 7 2007 : 12:54PM
I think that was because the people making the movie would have had a hard time putting on a junior high school class play. But the BBQ was good ...
Lance
Member

My Life Sucks
386 Posts
4/05
Posted - Jun 7 2007 : 2:46PM
Good points Taryn,
As for the mod edit on an extraneous quote, was it a super long one, harmful to someone? Or is this just a good example of unnecessary censorship? "extraneous quote removed" seems a kind of flimsy reason to edit someones point being made.
www.makemoneyfucking.com
TarynThomas
Senior Member

Taryn It Up
1013 Posts
2/05
Posted - Jun 7 2007 : 3:06PM
I didn't think I even posted a quote... I thought it just said my name at the end...
Hardware could you please email me at xxxtarynthomas @ aol.com telling me what I wrote. Sorry for whatever I wrote that was out of line.
mod: I put spaces in your email address to confuse the web crawlers. And, again, I removed your quote of Lance's post, as you don't need to quote the person right above you.

Edited by - hardware on 6/7/2007 4:10:19 PM

Hardware All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Your other left
14595 Posts
3/02
Posted - Jun 7 2007 : 4:05PM
I didn't remove anything Taryn wrote. Since her post stands on its own, I removed the quote of Fingerbangger's original post.
Per the Forum Etiqutte: Please don't quote people's entire posts - quote only relevant sections or address the person by name.
@Taryn, the little icon of a letter with an arrow pointing at it that appears at the top of each poster's post is "Reply with Quote." To reply to a topic without quoting, use the "Reply to Topic" link at the top or bottom of the page.
 
Lance
Member

My Life Sucks
386 Posts
4/05
Posted - Jun 7 2007 : 6:03PM
Aaah, I see. Fair enough.
www.makemoneyfucking.com
Hardware All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Your other left
14595 Posts
3/02
Posted - Jun 7 2007 : 6:25PM
Well, I would agree that you see if you hadn't just quoted me, lol. The whole point is to stop all the unnecessary quoting and, really, nobody is likely to mistake who you are responding to.
TarynThomas
Senior Member

Taryn It Up
1013 Posts
2/05
Posted - Jun 7 2007 : 8:22PM
Cool! I had already did the quote thing when responding to Lance before I got your email. I apologise.
Hardware All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Your other left
14595 Posts
3/02
Posted - Jun 7 2007 : 10:46PM
S'Okay.
Ramsey
Senior Member

Trina Michaels fan
10332 Posts
10/02
Posted - Jun 14 2007 : 1:53PM
After seeing American Gokkun 2 I don't think Carly Parker deserved to be paid as much as Chelsea Rae for example for the same kind of scene. Chelsea handled everything like a pro while Carly obviously couldn't handle what she was hired for. JM paid her for a certain act and she couldn't do it so I think that should reflect her pay like less money. Of course JM still released the scene so it's not like they lost money, we fans just got less!
Jaktarn
Senior Member

4798 Posts
5/05
Posted - Aug 4 2009 : 8:37AM
The quotation tool doesn't work on this older thread:
Sasha Grey
I was on a feature, my second day I was there for about six hours...male talent was five hours late, etc. etc. I got food poisoning- it hit me like a rock and I had to go home. I didn't get a kill fee and I had to come back two days later and wait several more hours. I think it's all dependent on the circumstances, and I feel I should have got something.
the fuck junkie ♠
Jaktarn
Thats insane I guess there wer some continuity problems if replacing him since its a feature but its still fucked up? 5 hours? Did he call in and let the director know or were you guys just sitting around waiting?
Taryn Thomas
First off you get what you pay for male or female.
If male talent is or is known to be shakey, then don't hire him. If you don't want that type of scene. But sometimes guys have a hard time popping even if they are good male talent. So I feel as long as you get a pop, your good. Especially if the guy was struggling.
As for female talent if her ass or pussy is sore. They it's more than likely not going to be a good scene... But that's my own personally opinion. After all who wants to be in pain while fucking.
As for the agents they should be held responsible for booking the talent if the KNEW their talent was sore or shakey. That's why when it's all said and done you really need to have a good working relationship with your agent. You want to be able to tell your agent "No I don't feel well" or "No I am just not feeling that type of scene" So on and so forth...
On that note, I am done here.
mod: extraneous quote removed
Edited by - hardware on 6/7/2007 11:53:48 AM
Jaktarn
But cant soreness be spoted or felt in a closer timegap to the scene. I mean what happens if it comes overnight, then you dont have very much help of an agent.
Aplus
Senior Member

1431 Posts
5/05
Posted - Aug 4 2009 : 12:56PM
More than a little late on this topic, but glad someone bumped it.
I'm not crazy about the idea of a $50 appearance fee, but at the same time don't feel performers should necessarily be paid in full for a scene that is unusable or wasn't completed. I'm not talking about a pop-shot finish though. Porn guys are generally way over-worked due to there being relatively few of them, so sometimes there simply isn't anymore cum in the tank....so to speak. I consider paying or not paying male talent by their ability/inability to cum barbaric. Just my opinion.
Now what I would like to see is some directors or producers putting their foot down, by not continuously hiring male or female performers who give absolutely shitty performances. And to me, this is probably more a female performer thing than a male one. Is all that is required of some female talent is to simply show up?
RandomPrecision
Senior Member

Enjoy!
8175 Posts
3/06
Posted - Aug 4 2009 : 1:01PM
I think if someone gets booked, they should at least be paid for showing up. Maybe not the full amount but this seems to be a point of contention with some female stars. I have to wonder what happens when a girl really needs the money and the director wants her to do something she's not comfortable with. If the director insists and the girl absolutely refuses, what happens?

WRT male talent, the director (or whom ever) chose to book the guy. If the guy is someone who tends to have wood problems, why doesn't the person who does the hiring know that? Probably because they didn't do any real research before they hired the guy. They didn't ask people he's worked with. Etc.
Edited by - randomprecision on 8/4/2009 1:04:28 PM
Zoid
Senior Member

Boobies and Anal
2004 Posts
5/04
Posted - Aug 4 2009 : 1:51PM
I believe the girls usually know what they will be doing during a scene, at least main acts (i.e b/g anal swallow). It seems logical to me that this info is communicated to the agent during booking. If director suddenly wants something more and the girl refuses, then it's tough shit for director. I guess they'll proceed to shoot whatever the girl was originally booked for. Or I suppose he can send her home with a kill fee (assuming they haven't begun shooting).
Aplus
Senior Member

1431 Posts
5/05
Posted - Aug 4 2009 : 2:22PM
Well there is definitely room for abuse on the producer or director's side. Used to be called the bait-and-switch. Girl shows up expecting or being told they'll do one thing, then the director trying to get them to do other things in the middle or near the end of the shoot.
 
JohnW
Senior Member

1351 Posts
6/08
Posted - Aug 4 2009 : 2:31PM
I kind of disagree. These guys (and girls) are being judged in every possible way already. And considering how important the cumshot is (at least it is for me) you do expect a decent load. I agree that not paying a guy for a weak load is not right, but guys that shoot well should be paid more in the first place, and if you pay for that you kind of expect him to deliver.
Aplus
Senior Member

1431 Posts
5/05
Posted - Aug 4 2009 : 3:20PM
Again I disagree. These guys aren't machines or robots. I think that is one of the main mistakes producers make in assuming they are.
I know load size matters to a lot of consumers, probably to some directors too. Very few guys, who work alot, cum the same way all the time. I've seen dribblers sometimes shoot, and shooters sometimes dribble. Peter North is/was a freak-of-nature when it came to cumshots, but then I doubt I doubt he ever worked quite as often as today's male performers. In most cases, I don't think its something most guys really have that much control over. What happens, is what will happen.
As for the paying part, I just think it reasonable for anybody to expect to be paid something if their scene is used, somethere. If a guy gives you 5-10 minutes of set-up/foreplay, 10-20 minutes of sex with maybe 2-4 positions, but with a weak load that the producer ultimately uses anyway, then yes I think they can expect to get paid as least most of the agreed upon payrate, if not all of it.
Zoid
Senior Member

Boobies and Anal
2004 Posts
5/04
Posted - Aug 4 2009 : 5:11PM
I'm sure that happens quite frequently, but in my opinion, unless director threatens his talent somehow, then it's not necessarily abuse.
Hoya
Deactivated User

338 Posts
2/12
Posted - May 12 2012 : 7:38AM
Maybe a sliding scale?
I P Freely
Member

335 Posts
10/11
Posted - May 12 2012 : 9:11PM
I assume Carly got paid since she did her job, even if she did it poorly. But I don't believe she ever worked for JM again.
I don't know if Chelsie got paid more or not. But she did get hired again for American Gokkun 5 and did the best scene in the whole series.
In the long run -- a performer who consistently performs well will probably get more and higher paying roles. And a performer who consistently performs poorly will probably find work hard to get.
Hoya
Deactivated User

338 Posts
2/12
Posted - May 31 2012 : 11:52PM
Agree.
robospanker
Deactivated User

=)
118 Posts
1/12
Posted - Jun 1 2012 : 12:09AM
a lot of the female stars here in usa seem too spoiled. get into porn because its considered somehow "glamorous" (blame jenna jameson or other huge commercial success pornstars or not) but it has caused a surge in talentless porn actors who do not enjoy what they are doing. if you are in porn just for the money, i wish you get in a scene where you get a severe fucking, and then never be called again. first and foremost should be enjoyment of sex and in general what you are doing, then of course the money and you shouldnt even be aiming for celebrity status. that is seriously fucked up spoiled princess behavior.
Edited by - robospanker on 6/1/2012 12:10:40 AM



Jump To: