[Link]
Sweat Equity 5 - review by Captain Jack| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| tritone Deactivated User 1009 Posts 4/03 |  Posted - May 24 2005 : 5:03AMLook, I am a big fan of POV movies. But what I can't stand is when a POV cameraman has a good view going, and then will for no good reason, go do this "side" view. The most recent example is Jenavive Jolie in "About Face #2". Mr. Streams has a great POV view of her ass while riding cowgirl. But then, the camera just drifts off to the side ... WHY???? Laziness & indifference I'm sure. THIS IS A POV MOVIE. We did not buy it for shot variety. We want it to be almost always a "POV" camera. If you can't do this, don't call it a POV movie!!!! At least "About Face #2" is more POV than the first entry. That one was truly a disgrace form a POV perspective. People to learn from: Rodney Moore, Mike John, and lately ... Tony T (who did an execellent job with the POV for Perveted POV #7 & #8).
Edited by - tritone on May 24 2005 [Link] |
| MiamiDude Member 25 Posts 4/05 | Posted - May 24 2005 : 7:54AM [Link] |
| TheLoner Member 157 Posts 4/03 | Posted - May 24 2005 : 3:07PM [Link] |
| MiamiDude Member 25 Posts 4/05 | Posted - May 31 2005 : 7:54AM [Link] |
| Cyberchicken Member 900 Posts 4/02 | Posted - May 31 2005 : 3:41PM There's simply not a better camera position for showing penetration. How else can the viewer tell how the girl deep the girl is getting pumped. I even prefer it for dps, because shots from the back are simply too dark to see anything. I also think directors shooting dps from the back, because it's more difficult to notice if the anchor is going soft. [Link] |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |