Just bought Super Buns 1-3 and there are many pretty girls with big round butts. However, you get about 20 seconds of butt tease, and then the eurodudes show up for the same old. In many of the scenes, it's difficult to even see what the girls really look like. Plus there's tons of vag sex. Yo, Sineplex, a title called "Super Buns" should not be all about eurodudes and vag sex.
Actually the way I see it: every director should be forced to watch Stagliano movies before picking up a camera. His movies are perfect lessons how to shoot movies and especially for directors who want to shoot butt-theme movies.
[Link]
gapeape Deactivated User
usa 106 Posts 2/06
Posted - Feb 25 2006 : 5:45PM
i love what stagliano has done over the years. however, i also love what sineplex has done in their unique style. it's not hard to do butt tease. if it's not in the movie, then the director must not have wanted it that way. that's the way i see it anyway.
cubesnake, I believe that many studios hop on bandwagons and start releasing themed vids of what's selling, rather than pioneer their own field.
And with that said, I am not the biggest fan of Buttman's work, not saying he is bad or anything, just not my style.
And after reading:
Would you guys want to see every single movie copying a formula that made Stagliano? It would get redundant to see the same stuff, or multiple attempts trying to be Buttman.
It's great that many directors don't copy him, it's great that many directors would love to learn half of what he knows about shooting video.
But I wouldn't attempt to copy him because his style is not mine, and probably will never be.
- -B -I -G -m -i -k -e, here and there, over and out! - -
My complaint with Sineplex is that they just concentrate on the old in and out, with very little attention paid to the women.It pisses me off because many of their babes are spectacular, but they just don't get it. Strictly sex by the numbers, probably by gay directors. The opposite of Stagliano.
[Link]
gapeape Deactivated User
usa 106 Posts 2/06
Posted - Mar 1 2006 : 9:12PM
fired for what? not doing what you want?
[Link]
gapeape Deactivated User
usa 106 Posts 2/06
Posted - Mar 1 2006 : 9:27PM
[/quote] My complaint with Sineplex is that they just concentrate on the old in and out, with very little attention paid to the women.It pisses me off because many of their babes are spectacular, but they just don't get it. Strictly sex by the numbers, probably by gay directors. The opposite of Stagliano. [/quote]
i respectfully disagree. i like stagliano as much as the next guy, but he's not infallible. he's done some stuff that is just bad and not erotic at all. some of the women he's used are just plain ugly and some of them have fat, unshapely, unattractive asses. i don't know if i can say that for sineplex. pretty much every thing i've seen by them (a lot) has featured very attractive girls. more so than stagliano in my opinion.
every company has their bad stuff and good stuff. stagliano is no different than sineplex or any other company for that matter. so stop putting him on a pedestal. he could probably learn some things himself.
i acually like the camera angles that sineplex uses in many of its movies and also the way the directors have the girls asses positioned for ultimate viewing pleasure. i like the 2 girls/1 guy scenes where one girl is spreading the other girls ass cheeks apart as the guy is ass fucking her. this gives you a great view of the ass. i find these things to be unique and erotic and something stagliano doesn't really do.
I don't see what "gay directors" has to do with anything either.. unless you think that "gay directors" have no idea what people appreciate about the female body which seems quite silly.
Still wanking after all these years. 8082 Posts 10/00
Posted - Mar 2 2006 : 3:19AM
Maybe he's refering to cookie cutter gay directors that also direct straight porn, like Herve Bodilys, his stuff makes me yawn (well I try to avoid it nowadays).
I haven't seen any that I'm explicitly aware of but I'd suggest that anyone with an eye for the erotic who has enough talen to shoot for their audience can understand that lingering on a girl's arse for someone into girls is just like lingering on a guy's ass for someone who's into guys. A blowjob isn't all that different, nor is a huge cock pumping away into an asshole.
Focus on a girl laying back on a bed, fondling and opening up her pussy for the camera/focus on a guy laying back on a bed jerking his cock. Oh, actually, we already get both in straight porn, no?
Most, or at least, WAY too much straight porn is also mechanically and/or poorly shot. Presumably by straight directors.
"Straight" porn already has a massive fetish with large, hard, throbbing, glistening cocks (just read the box copy of 75% of straight porn).
See what I'm getting at?
Assuming shit porn is shit because the director "is gay" is a weak excuse. No Fist.
Note: I'm not inferring that Sineplex is either shit or anything about their directors' sexuality. I haven't seen enough of their stuff to have an opinion.
I just want to see directors direct these kind of movies who have the same passion for butts like Stagliano, I guess that's why I don't understand why directors like Zupko and William H are directing butt-theme movies. Their movies lack real butt-passion.
I don't want everybody to copy Stagliano, but they could learn a thing or two about camera work and especially about his passion for his work. Stagliano still has that "I am the luckiest guy in the world to be able to do this kind of work" attitude in stead of the "It's a job that pays the bills" attitude of a lot of the cookie cutters.