Green-toke , it has been evident from your initial post where you stand on Skeete's guilt or innocence. If not, you are a terrible writer!
It seems to me that you have come to your decision based on unrelated past incident(s). You continually refer the points that you seem to believe do not necessarily prove him innocent...but there is no mention there of anything that proves him guilty , either.
I would hope the people throughout our legal system who become involved with this case approach it with more equanimity and a less pre-decided, vengeful mind than yours!
You couldn't be more further from the truth. I was merely saying that, based on his past record, he has a history of doing some bad shit. A jury will be strongly swayed by this but they will look at the other evidence as well. I do not feel that the prosecuters will need to build as strong of a case against him because his rap sheet already speaks volumes about Skeeter's character. Now, he may have changed his ways and we both understand that.
However, I feel that in the Michael Jackson case that it is the prior accusations against him that will cause him to get convicted and not simply just the evidence at hand. In conjunction, the evidence and past history will likely lead to Jackson's downfall.
Nothing says I love you so much as a tongue in the ass. 2884 Posts 1/03
Posted - Jun 6 2005 : 4:48PM
I am far from Skeeter's biggest supporter here. I think that the rumor mill is turning this into OJ redux. I do know this much. Marriage break-ups and custody battles have produced far too many accusations like this one. The family court judges have heard it a million times. They absolutely have to investigate, but are usually skeptical. The child will be seeing a psychologist. According to Gene Ross there is no physical evidence. I'm not siding with Skeeter. All I'm saying is get real. Hardly anybody here knows this man and can't possibly comment on the veracity of the charges. One thing I do know is that he's been stained by this no matter his guilt or innocence. Let the justice system muddle through it.
People are way too quick to fly off the handle. Let the system work. I just hope potential jurors don't make up their minds before hearing the evidence. If it goes that far.
Listening to the way people react and assume the worst based solely on accusations really bothers me. If the shoe were on the other foot, you'd want to be able to tell your side of the story...
Rumors about their marriage have been flying for a long time. Brigette is notorious for freaking out on girls on set because she thinks they fooled around with Skeeter. Or so goes the gossip.
To be falsely accused of this kind of crime is one of the worst things that can happen.
DAC , if you're going to start exercising self-restraint, you're going to take all the fun out of this bored! Take that stuff to the nonsense thread where it belongs!
Split in early 2004... Hmmm that's interesting. This is about the time frame Bridgette stopped answering fan mail on her website. Also, I noticed only Skeeter's shoot were posted, no new Bridgette pictures. This is obviously Skeeter making money using Bridgette's ass.
As for their divorce, is there any public records to support it has actually occurred?
Correct on all accounts. Skeeter constantly wrote in to this site and others pretending to BE Bridgette. Constantly lying and telling anyone who'd listen that Bridgette and him were together even though they've been broken up since 2004. Skeeter was making money off of Bridgette anyway he could. Just wait-Skeeter can cry and pretend to be O.J.-prior to Bridgettes police report(an on going investigation)Skeeter had already been under investigation; an internal Adult investigation, and Federal;now County. His Megan Law conviction is infact Rape by force of a foreign object on a minor under the age of 17. As well as a coviction of child porn.He was sentenced to 3 years. Myself like several others smart enough in the adult business;went downtown and obtained a copy of his convictions,(public record)to see for myself what the industry may be facing. As well,he has a conviction of selling 3 kilos of cocain to an undercover sherrif;selling of weapons;beating a spouse(on videocamera in front of a 7/11,no less!)Then when he got home from that conviction he went back for another year because he violated that restraining order. His childhood he spent in and out of mental institutions, His adult life he has been in and out of prison.So all you saying"he's a great guy".Well people said the same about Scott Peterson.The whole time hes been in the adult industry-is the longest he's ever been out of prison!Who knows what he's been up to these past few years-there's people who might start coming forward.Thats why all, smart enough, in the adult business are standing up and taking notice,and completely want to disassociate themselves with him. The companies I've been talking to are currently pulling him off of their product. Also in court records Skeeter had never filed for ANY type of custody.The children have only ever been with mother. So Skeeters statement that this is over custody seems a smoke screen. And to think we thought he was a nice person!
It worked two ways: she made a lot of money off of his promotion.That 20-year-old conviction was a misdemeanor, right? It's hard to believe it's a "rape" under common English usage; I'd suspect a "rape" under legal definition. He was probably out with some high school girl - he would have been about that age - and got caught with a dildo ("foreign object" and "force" since it presumably didn't fall in there by itself, and "rape" because a minor cannot by law consent, no matter how much she agrees and says "yes"). Can't read too much into that conviction without the trial record, other than to note it wasn't a felony.It was posted on porn forums along with links back to the state databases, which are online.
Most of Skeeter's record is fairly old: I think there were only two things in the last ten years. I was bothered by a spousal abuse charge: without knowing when his first divorce was it's hard to say this might not be a real problem for me.
Bridgette filed police reports claiming Skeeter killed his first wife: my understanding is that wife has been found OK, and that there is nothing supporting Bridgette's other claims. Bridgette may well be the only one to face a criminal trial over this mess. She's certainly put an end to her porn career (would you want to hire someone who claims to see dead bodies every time she gets mad?).
Skeeter's future is probably better, if all of Bridgette's claims really do turn out to be fabrications. Skeeter was not on the run, hiding or operating under any sort of alias so anyone who really cares would have already seen the police record (it's all on the Internet). He's hardly the first guy in porn with a criminal record, and I doubt it's a particularly serious record compared to many. As long as there's nothing serious in the last few years, certainly not since he's been in the porn industry, I don't think it's necessarily a career-ender. Nobody's looking for a pure & spotless guy in porn, just one who can do the job and not get into trouble.
I don't think anyone believes Skeeter was a choirboy. The rap sheet makes clear he's had his problems in the past. It's just not clear that he still has these problems, or if Bridgette's just trying to hurt someone she doesn't like.
PS. There's nothing more irrationally vicious than an ex.
Who are you? I think it's part of the board's policy that adult pros don't join anonymously.
The whole thing doesn't surprise me. I always thought its strange that Skeeter answered all questions on ADT which were adressed to Bridgette personally. He said Bridgette lost her password and asked him to answer.
But why does it all come to the public right now, although they split up more than a year ago? Have the sales of Skeeter films dropped recently?
Exactly. Why now? Bridgette left him long ago-if she were vendictive why know? That doesn't add up.And if I don't have his record then how would I know the time served.Or that he beat his pregnant wife in front of a 7/11-caught on camera?! In his conviction it clearly states the girl is a minor UNDER the age of 17. Thats not giving her age-who knows how old she was.He has a MISDEMEANOR of child porn.A FELONY-conviction of rape of a minor. I'm stating facts. Your stating smokescreen for your apparent friend. Like I wrote he was under investigation before Bridgette became involved on a separate matter. I found no report she saw dead bodies.
Who knows? Probably money. Maybe tactics in divorce proceedings. Or maybe just an ex- trying to inflict pain, no matter what the collateral damage might be.Ah - that makes a little more sense - it was hard to imagine statutory rape as a misdemeanor. Probably the same girl - hint, if you're 20+ and dating an underage girl, don't take pictures...Uh, I hate to point this out, but most police officers are not in the habit of sharing notes from ongoing investigations with pornographers. It won't be in the public record until and unless Skeeter is charged with murder or Bridgette is charged with making false statements, and I'm hearing the ex-wife is definitely alive & fine.
If you've seen the trial record on the spousal battery conviction I'm curious to know if his wife was injured.
If people in the industry are disassociating themselves from Skeeter, name yourself, hellya. Or are you afraid he will be cleared and you might need work from him if he returns?
hellya also puts not date on Skeeter's offenses, meaning what he said doesn't contradict what was said before.
Not that I am supporting Skeeter, but these are holes in the arguement.
skronker, I'm aware of the problem since I opened up this thread.
But Skeeter never claimed to be Bridgette. What I mean is, he claimed to have spoken to Bridgette. And his excuse why Bridgette didn't answer herself is really ridiculous.
BTW, most of his posts are soo over the top, that it doesn't surprise me either that he has been charged as drug offender in his past.
For all we know, Skeeter could either be the victim or the villain of this story. With all this gossip flowing, it's impossible to decide if you're not an insider.
I myself prefer to think of him as innocent in that resoect until I know more facts.
I confess, I'm biased since I don't like his porn.
But I don't like Bridgette's porn either.
I think both are no choirboys/-girls.
I think the true victims are the children, no matter what has happened. A parents divorce is always hard for the kids. But with all this smut stired up, its even harder.
Is there here any script writer, please? Hollywood, look at this!
[Link]
yesterdaysnews Deactivated User
tampa bay 3 Posts 7/05
Posted - Jul 26 2005 : 11:06AM
Give me a break...if the adult industry declared a ban on ex-cons directing, producing or acting then virtually everything on the shelves would disappear before our eyes. it's the nature of the beast. Take it one step further and black-list anybody who's ever been involved in a spousal abuse situation? I think not.
I'm not advocating criminal acts of any sort but who is really surprised that one of the industries most famed perverts has a record of crimes against women? Is this news? Should we round up an industry panel and declare that it's okay in product only to depict women being choked, spit on, gagged and fucked so rough they cry but that in no way will people who actually enjoy treating women this way in real life be allowed to recreate this shit on tape?
There's no prep school for porn workers....most people come up from the streets and not many shy away from smacking the fuck out of someone if they are challenged. Not saying it's right, but I sure as fuck wouldn't pose as someone in power in the xxx biz then preach about ex-cons being scumbags or deserving of my disrespect. Very shady shit...and dangerous too.
This is just one of my many smells. Would you like to sample the rest? I wonder if I farted in a bottle, capped it quickly and mailed it across the pond, if it would still stink as richly when you opened it as when I ripped it.
It appears no one is answering whether there is public record of the Kerkoves divorce. I couldn't find where to look for the public records on the web for the Kerkoves divorce. Anyone out there help me!!!