Why is it that some European porn is apparently banned in the U.S? Take the company Euro X DVD. Have a look and see if you can see anything on the cover which would indicate why it would be banned in the U.S because I'm at a loss-
I have a few of these titles and there's nothing in them that Evil Empire, Private, etc wouldn't have. Anal, DP, blowjobs, gapes, ass smothering, etc. There is absolutely nothing in them that American titles don't have...
When you say "various other acts", what would they include? I honestly didn't know that fisting was considered so taboo in the U.S, not that it's something that I'm particularly fond of, anyway.
But surely it's false advertising if you put "Banned in America" when it contains no such content. OK, I must admit, there are some Euro X DVD titles which have fisting as the main subject but not all of them.
Anyway, "The Narcassist" is an American film, directed by Ariana Jollee and that features Audrey Hollander getting fisted. Or is that scene removed from the U.S. version since I have the version which also says "Uncensored" The company is actually Anarchy Films and the distributor Extreme Video, based in Holland, so that could explain it.
Many films have American actors but they are performed and distributed outside of the U.S.
Nothing is "banned" in the USA. Some things are pretty certain to get you prosecuted, though. Scat, for one.
[Link]
Lost Horizon Deactivated User
675 Posts 6/05
Posted - Apr 29 2006 : 10:09PM
All this company's dvds say "banned in America" on the cover. My guess: clearly their dvds are compilations, not original productions; I think they have bought up the rights to the scenes included on their titles but not the rights to distribute them in the US; this allows them to put "banned in America" on the cover, so implying some paticularly strong content, while actually being only a statement about the limits of their copyright. So the statement is not quite true, it is intended to deceive, but it is not so false as to be entirely indefensible if the need arose.
Quite right, Lost Horizon. I think you're bang on the mark. I also think they are compilations, particularly because they are 4 hours (well, they claim to be, in reality they are shorter)
So I assume that American actors who perform with scat, probably did not film in the U.S. but rather somewhere in Europe to avoid being prosecuted? Not that I own such films but just wondering out of curiosity.
[Link]
The Dude Deactivated User
In the Sex Palace 228 Posts 2/06
Posted - Apr 30 2006 : 5:16AM
Thats something kind of funny, us version is 25$, euro version is 60$ ...and you get what more in euro version? some white piss looking like water. Pretty hilarious.
I had a look at some of Max Hardcore stuff and tbo, the girls look like **** They all seem to be really skinny and below average looking. What a difference when you compare MH to Evil Empire, for example.
^ I went to MHs homepage some days ago to see what the fuss is all about. My mistake, I'm certainly not judging what turns other people on, but for me, that was disgusting.
I guess the girls are so thin because he likes them like that, imho most of them look deplorable even before he starts to degrate them. Added (and needed) bonus for Max is that their skinny bodies make his dick appear bigger.
The USA content editing goes far beyond that. Besides any golden shower footage, "edgy" dialog (anything related to young age or incest), fisting, and scat is edited out. I've not seen Max Hardcore titles with scat in them, but others have mentioned these scenes exist. The continuity of the scenes is preserved as well.
Well said, MissJanet. They do look deplorable before any sex actually takes place, don't they? Me personally, I can't stand girls being so skinny because they look positively unhealthy
Compare those to, say, Olivia O'Lovely. She has a lovely, healthy looking face and she glows all over. These look like they've just returned from a 2 month starvation in Chad.
Introducing Lady LorReign
Posted - Apr 29 2006 : 6:51PM
