pregnant thing but std'd/ HIV? What's the reasoning?
[Link]
| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| angelus113 Member 164 Posts 2/10 |  Posted - Mar 20 2011 : 11:52AMI just watched yet another scene where the guy fucks the girl the entire time with a condom on, but then pulls it off and pops all over her asshole and pussy. This happens most often with foreign scenes (I stopped watching Vivid a million years ago because of it) and it just doesn't seem to make sense. If you're afraid of STDs/HIV to the point of wrapping it from the get-go, then why the hell would you let semen drip into open lips and orifices??? [Link] |
| biggins Member 657 Posts 5/09 | Posted - Mar 20 2011 : 2:05PM pregnant thing but std'd/ HIV? What's the reasoning? [Link] |
| hoochimama Deactivated User 1438 Posts 5/10 | Posted - Mar 20 2011 : 4:07PM 1- They think the risk is significantly lower than that of actual unprotected intercourse 2- Only the male talent is worried about STDs and doesn't risk anything with the cumshot [Link] |
| Rosco Fuji Deactivated User On the licking stick, Mr. Magic Dick! 3309 Posts 2/09 | Posted - Mar 20 2011 : 8:01PM [Link] |
killbillvol69  All-Star Member ^Lucy Pinder 18631 Posts 4/08 | Posted - Mar 20 2011 : 11:16PM As to the OP's question, well remember that cumming inside a girl isn't the only thing that can give her a disease. Often the virus in question can be spread via the blood on a worn-out dick mixing with the blood in a worn-out pussy or ass. Condom sex would prevent that from happening. Now, why cum inside the girl afterwards? Well, yeah, it does seem a bit stupid, and it is, but maybe the feeling is that some of the cum doesn't actually go in the girl, and so risk is decreased. Or something like that. Remember that all methods of "safe sex" are means of reducing risk, not eliminating it; I guess it just depends how much you want to reduce the risk. This "condom first, then cum on her pussy" style is more risk than keeping the condom on the whole time, but less risk than fucking without a condom at all. [edit: typo] Edited by - killbillvol69 on 3/21/2011 10:18:48 PM [Link] |
 | |
| Atticus Iscariot Deactivated User 56 Posts 9/10 | Posted - Mar 21 2011 : 12:35AM [Link] |
| BlackSix All-Star Member pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world 12377 Posts 9/07 | Posted - Mar 21 2011 : 5:41AM [Link] |
| Buttcracker Member Bust A Nut Inside Your Eye To Show You Where I Come From. 234 Posts 9/10 | Posted - Mar 21 2011 : 12:23PM [Link] |
| ninja1 Senior Member 2939 Posts 1/08 | Posted - Mar 21 2011 : 12:37PM Edited by - ninja1 on 3/21/2011 12:38:11 PM [Link] |
| angelus113 Member 164 Posts 2/10 | Posted - Mar 21 2011 : 1:15PM However, to be clear, this was one (of many, many I've seen) where the guy wears a condom the whole time and then shoots his cum right into the chick's open holes (she was reaching back and holding them open and tons slid inside). How does this make sense in any way??? [Link] |
| Dubious_Leftovers Senior Member And on that fateful day, the hatred consumed me... 1423 Posts 3/09 | Posted - Mar 21 2011 : 1:20PM [Link] |
| ZeroCool007 Senior Member I'm going to stab you in the throat with a spork!!! 1048 Posts 12/06 | Posted - Mar 21 2011 : 2:00PM [Link] |
| junglew Senior Member 1042 Posts 12/02 | Posted - Mar 21 2011 : 3:39PM Haven't seen a condum in movies for quite a while now. Just saw an actress in a scene recently who was infected in the recent scare. Can't remember her name but first name was Lady. Wayne In Dallas [Link] |
| pat362 Senior Member 10081 Posts 3/10 | Posted - Mar 21 2011 : 3:50PM Of course I've being watching European style porn for a long time and that is a common occurence in many of their movies. I tend to agree that f..g the girl and then taking the condom after you pull out to cum on her is not the way I'd like to see the scene go. I'd much prefer to see the guy cum inside the girl and then you see the deed once he pulls out. I always thought the pop shot was because filmakers wanted to prove that there was actual penetration instead of pretend penetration like there is in softcore porn. [Link] |
| tbetts12 Member 87 Posts 11/10 | Posted - Mar 21 2011 : 4:56PM is way lower for oral sex,plus when drop cum on a girls holes alot of the std's die once they hit open air or oxygen. example HIV transmision rates from oral sex is less than 1% and between 4-6% with vaginal sex and like 20% with anal sex. In regard to testing alot of those test are 2-4 weeks and they could have contracted STd's in between shots and their last testing date. [Link] |
| torris Senior Member Deep within Mila's anus 1827 Posts 1/00 | Posted - Mar 21 2011 : 5:17PM [Link] |
| torris Senior Member Deep within Mila's anus 1827 Posts 1/00 | Posted - Mar 21 2011 : 5:21PM Adorable anal slattern Siobahn Hunter with that silky long hair of hers, reached back and tore open Peter North's condom package with her teeth. I don't know if she applied it for him, but that could be a hot scenario. Instead porn "cheats" and hope we won't notice that a garbage sack is slipped over penis. Definite buzz kill I agree. It's the main reason I've soured on REality Kings product [Link] |
| Rosco Fuji Deactivated User On the licking stick, Mr. Magic Dick! 3309 Posts 2/09 | Posted - Mar 21 2011 : 9:58PM "Oral herpes can be transmitted to the genitals, and vice versa. Symptoms are similar. Auto-inoculation: An infected individual can spread the virus to other parts of his or her body by touching an area shedding virus and then touching, scratching, or rubbing another susceptible part of the body. Towels are especially conducive to this. It is possible for a person to contract genital herpes if the partner with oral herpes performs oral sex. Oral herpes can be transmitted to the genitals, and vice versa. Symptoms are similar." I will say that I've read the chances of HIV transmission is small from genital to oral contact based on the digestive properties in saliva. However; I stand my my statement that condoms are silly in porn given that it's been reported numerous times that the majority of porn performers have herpes, so the concept of using rubbers is silly, I repeat, silly. Edited by - rosco fuji on 3/21/2011 9:59:20 PM [Link] |
| killbillvol69 All-Star Member ^Lucy Pinder 18631 Posts 4/08 | Posted - Mar 21 2011 : 10:09PM If most performers have herpes, then herpes wouldn't be the issue, would it? Of more concern would be things like, say, HIV, which as you pointed out, has a low transmission rate via oral sex. That's why the condom goes on for the genital penetration, but not for the oral. [Link] |
| direct Member 20 Posts 9/10 | Posted - Mar 21 2011 : 11:10PM [Link] |
| ZeroCool007 Senior Member I'm going to stab you in the throat with a spork!!! 1048 Posts 12/06 | Posted - Mar 21 2011 : 11:12PM [Link] |
| bsavage Member 112 Posts 1/10 | Posted - Mar 22 2011 : 12:27AM Most STD'd die once airborne. Additionally, for an STD to be transmitted it must reach an open wound. These are obvious on the surface of the skin, but more incognito in the vagina and anus -- hence the use of condoms. A performer with an STD can pop on a torso or potentially the face withough transmitting the disease. It's just one mroe safe guard. The only exception to this rule is hepatitus, which has been proven to prosper outside of the body for up to 25 days. [Link] |
| elgringoviejo58 Senior Member 1460 Posts 1/07 | Posted - Mar 22 2011 : 12:51AM [Link] |
| BlackSix All-Star Member pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world 12377 Posts 9/07 | Posted - Mar 22 2011 : 2:52AM [Link] |
| ZeroCool007 Senior Member I'm going to stab you in the throat with a spork!!! 1048 Posts 12/06 | Posted - Mar 22 2011 : 3:20AM [Link] |
 | |
| Keith_1 Member 66 Posts 3/05 | Posted - Mar 22 2011 : 4:48AM [Link] |
| RandomPrecision Senior Member Enjoy! 8175 Posts 3/06 | Posted - Mar 22 2011 : 5:39AM Does it happen? Can it happen? Yes. Of course. It's a calculated risk. Everyone who works in porn knows they're taking a chance even with the testing. They also know that condoms utterly ruin porn scenes for the vast majority of the people who are paying for them. Testing is (and has shown itself to be) very effective for the most serious risk performers face and the customer doesn't end up with a vastly inferior product because of it. When everything goes right, testing is basically invisible to the average customer. Edited by - randomprecision on 3/22/2011 5:44:40 AM [Link] |
| angelus113 Member 164 Posts 2/10 | Posted - Mar 22 2011 : 1:29PM [Link] |
| direct Member 20 Posts 9/10 | Posted - Mar 23 2011 : 12:28AM [Link] |
| Savoy All-Star Member Sucker for Sinners 1844 Posts 12/06 | Posted - Mar 24 2011 : 3:44AM HSV1 prefers the oral area (mouth, chin, jaw). HSV2 prefers the genital area. It has to do with the ganglion under the surface. Each virus is more attracted to one bunch of nerves and likes to live there, but there are instances of HSV1 appearing on genitals and vice versa for HSV2. [Link] |
| backdoorman Senior Member Shake for me girl... I wanna be your backdoorman ! 2776 Posts 10/07 | Posted - Mar 24 2011 : 1:28PM [Link] |
| backdoorman Senior Member Shake for me girl... I wanna be your backdoorman ! 2776 Posts 10/07 | Posted - Mar 24 2011 : 1:31PM [Link] |
| j_daddy Member 84 Posts 7/09 | Posted - Mar 24 2011 : 4:48PM I have sex with condoms and it doesn't "ruin sex," I don't know why it ruins sex in porn films. It's not the coolest thing to look at, but it's not the soul crushing thing people make it out to be. My personal wish is that more porn movies featured condoms. Anytime a porn films use "sex with a hooker" as a set-up and the guy sticks his naked dick in a pussy or asshole I have to stop and think to myself "that'd be like suicide" in real life. Of course porn is fantasy, but at least acknowledging the dangers now and again might make the general public a little smarter. I'm not saying that porn has a responsibility to do this, porn doesn't, but it might be helpful now and again. I'd hate to see porn go the way of covered blowjobs (Teri Weigel used to do this, just pointless), but for intercourse it shouldn't be a deal breaker, especially if a girl can then finish her guy off with a blow/hand job or tittie fuck. [Link] |
| Rosco Fuji Deactivated User On the licking stick, Mr. Magic Dick! 3309 Posts 2/09 | Posted - Mar 25 2011 : 1:34AM [Link] |
| Cody McLarge Senior Member 2668 Posts 8/10 | Posted - Mar 25 2011 : 1:49AM Besides, it's two consenting persons. Both accept the risk. [Link] |
| RandomPrecision Senior Member Enjoy! 8175 Posts 3/06 | Posted - Mar 25 2011 : 1:58AM Answer = Fucking a condom is fucking a condom (not a person) and you're STILL taking an unnecessary risk (if you're really THAT worried about STDs) because the condom could break and you might get an STD anyway. If you're so terrified of STDs that you won't have sex without a condom (even with testing), you might as well just completely deprive yourself and abstain. You can jerk off and be 100% safe with no risk of STD. If you assign absolutely no value to full contact, it might not ruin sex for you. It does for me.That's your opinion and I'd bet most people who are paying to stroke to porn would not agree with it at all. The first time I rented porn, I didn't even think about it because I didn't expect it. I rented 4 movies and 3 of them had rubbers in every scene. Those were VHS days and I sat there for several hours fast forwarding waiting for something I could actually stroke to. In the end, I had one halfway decent scene on the one movie that wasn't condom only. The whole operation was almost completely pointless. I felt ripped off. There were all kinds of pictures of people fucking on the boxes but there wasn't one picture of a rubber. There should have just been a big honkin' condom on the front of the box so people like me would know not to waste our time and money.So don't watch "sex with hooker" setup and you get to relax and beat off knowing everyone has been tested. It's still not 100% safe but again, neither is the condom. It's safER but it ruins the show for many people.It is a deal breaker for me. And I hate tittie fucking and hand jobs. Edited by - randomprecision on 3/25/2011 2:00:18 AM [Link] |
| charn fubar 2880 Posts 12/09 | Posted - Mar 25 2011 : 1:58AM [Link] |
| direct Member 20 Posts 9/10 | Posted - Mar 27 2011 : 4:46AM [Link] |
| Savoy All-Star Member Sucker for Sinners 1844 Posts 12/06 | Posted - Mar 27 2011 : 9:07AM [Link] |
| BlackSix All-Star Member pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world 12377 Posts 9/07 | Posted - Mar 28 2011 : 2:52AM [Link] |
| Prophit Member 378 Posts 1/07 | Posted - Mar 29 2011 : 2:34AM Thank god it was only a rental. [Link] |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |