New Pornstar Interviews - [more]
Tiny Khloe: 2026 Exxxotica Interview

"I’m attracted to people’s intelligence. I like some substance. I want to be able to hold a conversation."
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 265 > Something I have never understood in porn
AuthorPost
angelus113
Member

164 Posts
2/10
Posted - Mar 7 2013 : 10:49AM
Short and sweet, but why, when a performer uses a condom in an anal scene, does he then proceed to pull it off and cum all over and on the female's asshole, with his cum ultimately sinking in?
Doesn't this defeat the whole purpose of a rubber? Yet I've seen it many times.
mharris127
Senior Member

1844 Posts
8/09
Posted - Mar 7 2013 : 1:49PM
The condom is mainly to prevent pregnancy as talent is tested for VD monthly. Anal contact with cum may be gross but a woman hasn't ever got pregnant from it. In the US most performers choose to not use a condom and the women use Depo-Provera injections instead for pregnancy prevention. Also many male performers choose to cum on a woman's stomach, tits or face to reduce the chance of pregnancy and VD even more. The biz tried condoms once and people complained, it seems that most viewers like the sight of cum (I personally think it is gross, especially on a woman's face).
Some companies have a policy against anal creampies as well because of past HIV transmission during the Marc Wallice debacle.
Edited by - mharris127 on 3/7/2013 1:50:21 PM
utopiaa
Member

610 Posts
7/11
Posted - Mar 7 2013 : 1:55PM
The real purpose of condoms in porn is to protect the male not the female. If they want to be safe blowjobs etc need to be done with condom on too. There is lot less good male perfomers so if couple gets sick it can mean a halt to the shooting. But of course it aint marketed like that :=
angelus113
Member

164 Posts
2/10
Posted - Mar 7 2013 : 2:33PM
I appreciate the answers--Mr. Harris I understand the whole birth control/pregnancy prevention thing. But in a specifically anal scene where the guy has worn a condom all the way through, only to shed it and shoot on and in an open asshole, what gives? Is Utopiaa right and it's to protect male talent from anally transmitted diseases?
I thought "tops" (person doing the inserting) rarely could catch anything because they're not the ones receiving body fluids?
Macko69
Senior Member

Gone for a walk.
1985 Posts
5/08
Posted - Mar 7 2013 : 3:04PM
That's what Magic Johnson thought too.
 
angelus113
Member

164 Posts
2/10
Posted - Mar 7 2013 : 7:23PM
Touche.
geralt
Member

495 Posts
7/11
Posted - Mar 8 2013 : 5:22PM
I've thought about exactly the same thing, however the amount of semen that goes into the girl's ass is tiny compared to a creampie and/or precum during fucking. Less risk, but still a risk.
Rosco Fuji
Deactivated User

On the licking stick, Mr. Magic Dick!
3309 Posts
2/09
Posted - Mar 9 2013 : 12:05AM
You're making a broad assumption that he was a top!
viewer-x
Member

32 Posts
2/12
Posted - Mar 9 2013 : 2:03PM
I'm worried that you think that : (
Going by that logic, men would never (rarely) catch from women, and, indeed, gay men would only ever catch if they were penetrated, rather than penetrating.
I must be missing your point, surely?? : (





Jump To: