New Pornstar Interviews - [more]
Little Puck Interview

"I’m a woman of varied tastes. I can get off to a lot of different things. I enjoy switching it up."
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 305 > spitting on camlens
AuthorPost
assmuscle
Member

157 Posts
8/08
Posted - Jul 5 2009 : 5:22PM
anyone else me like it too?any recommendation?
ps:if not pls dont reply,so that this topic should die fast.
Jamie Gardner
Member

demicomix.com Carnal Comics - True Stories of Adult Film Stars
105 Posts
6/04
Posted - Jul 6 2009 : 2:45AM
Cum Catchers 3
Prom Team
http://www.demicomix.com/Carnal01.htm http://groups.yahoo.com/group/carnalcomics
assmuscle
Member

157 Posts
8/08
Posted - Jul 6 2009 : 9:50AM
ty Jamie.
i think Anal Beach Buns from Jay Sin have a scene or two too
LubeNLuv
Senior Member

1854 Posts
3/06
Posted - Jul 6 2009 : 9:55AM
I've always viewed spitting on the camera lens to be indicative of the performers' opinions of the viewer, since the camera lens is the viewer by proxy.
As such, no likey.
loop
Senior Member

1409 Posts
9/03
Posted - Jul 6 2009 : 11:26AM
anything from martin del toro
 
lsnoop
Member

301 Posts
5/09
Posted - Nov 25 2009 : 11:19AM
I would also like to see more :)
smutlover65
Member

359 Posts
10/07
Posted - Nov 27 2009 : 8:32PM
Holly Wellin in Bangin Whitey. She covers the camera lens with her spit while blowing 5 black guys.
lsnoop
Member

301 Posts
5/09
Posted - Mar 11 2010 : 12:01PM
we need a good bump here
spitty
Member

730 Posts
12/04
Posted - Mar 12 2010 : 11:27AM
I love it when the girl spits on the lens....it's even better when 2 girls do it and lick each other's spit.
ChodeMasterJ
Perpetual Marxist

5405 Posts
4/03
Posted - Mar 13 2010 : 10:27PM
I'd be pissed if someone spit on my camera.
dommy
Member

96 Posts
1/10
Posted - Mar 13 2010 : 11:02PM
Id LOVE it of a hot girl spit on MY camera
RandomPrecision
Senior Member

Enjoy!
8175 Posts
3/06
Posted - Mar 14 2010 : 3:24AM
Would you be spat if someone pissed on it?
bootymeister
Senior Member

Gravity as Curved Space: Bootymeister's Theory of General Relativity
1589 Posts
11/08
Posted - Mar 14 2010 : 8:21PM
Ann Marie Rios does it often.
UnkwnUsr2
Member

443 Posts
2/05
Posted - Mar 14 2010 : 8:50PM
You are implying that spitting on someone indicative of having a low opinion of that person; clearly a social construct.
ChodeMasterJ
Perpetual Marxist

5405 Posts
4/03
Posted - Mar 14 2010 : 11:40PM
Haha. Probably.
 
spitty
Member

730 Posts
12/04
Posted - Mar 17 2010 : 10:54AM
I don't see it that way, my friend. It's most probably the director's fetish and it's likely part of the script. In my case, I love it when a girl spits in my mouth or face while we're having sex....just as long as she doesn't say anything afterward like "you like that, huh ?" or "beg for it, baby". To me that is just stupid cliche porn talk and it does nothing for me.
LubeNLuv
Senior Member

1854 Posts
3/06
Posted - Mar 19 2010 : 11:56AM

[/quote]You are implying that spitting on someone indicative of having a low opinion of that person; clearly a social construct.
[/quote]
Since we are talking about it solely in the context of porn, I think its a porn construct, not a societal one.
At any rate, last year I had the movie "Spit in your Face" in my rental queue. I chose it because it was supposedly heavy POV ass eating/oral from some very pretty performers.....Amy Reid, Penny Flame, Avy Scott (love her) and several others. The talk during the scenes clearly is aimed at those guys who enjoy humiliation and/or submissive fantasies. But other than supporting my point, that isn't what bothered me the most.
The whole movie is basically unwatchable. The camera guy clearly has a plex/glass plate over the lens that is spit upon repeatedly throughout the flick, obscuring most of the action and forcing you to watch the whole video through a haze of runny spit and smears. Totally the opposite of erotic camera shots in my opinion. Without that, even WITH spitting, this could have been some good porn.
So I'll stick with...me no likey. To each their own.
Len801
Deactivated User

754 Posts
9/07
Posted - Mar 19 2010 : 12:11PM
Spitting in many cultures is regarded as offensive to very offensive. It means you have a very low regard for that person you are spitting something on. In porn, it is even more so.
Spitting on a camera lens is ratherr stupid, non erotic and I don't even know if it even qualifies as a fetish. The lens is made to see the object you are filming clearly. Spitting on it obscures the vision, so what is the point? Would you film your daughter's birthday/wedding with guests repeatedly spitting on your camera lens?
johnshaft820
Member

271 Posts
1/05
Posted - Mar 19 2010 : 3:14PM
Len810 wrote:
I agree on the "non erotic" part, but how can you say it doesn't qualify as a fetish? What qualifies something as a fetish? A fetish is just whatever people fetishize. If it's not your particular fetish, it's bound to seem "non erotic" and possibly "stupid," but it's still a fetish.
As for the lens spitting, it's a fetish with a very small following, and it's so annoying to everyone else that companies are foolish if they include a lot of this in a movie without making it clear to customers that it's there. I would be really pissed if I paid good money for a movie and then got a deliberately distorted image.
Len801
Deactivated User

754 Posts
9/07
Posted - Mar 19 2010 : 3:46PM
In a psychological context a "fetish" is defined as "the centering of strong sexual emotion in objects or part of the body not normally assciated with such emotion" (Webster).
I was unaware that spitting on a camera lens is associated with some body parts or that it creates strong sexual emotions. If you at least agree that it's non erotic, what is the point of featuring it in an adult movie, which essentially is used for sexual stimulation/gratification?
If I make a movie (with some sex content in it) showing me raking the grass, do I call that a fetish and will it sell a lot?
johnshaft820
Member

271 Posts
1/05
Posted - Mar 19 2010 : 3:59PM
"Non-erotic" always means "non-erotic for me." Lens spitting not a fetish of mine, but if someone finds it erotic, then it's a fetish for them. It's what they call "subjective," see?
If I've learned anything at all from watching porn and reading this forum, it's that nothing is safe from commercial eroticization - lens spitting is not even close to the weirdest thing people have expressed enthusiasm for.
Len801
Deactivated User

754 Posts
9/07
Posted - Mar 19 2010 : 5:35PM
No, I don't see. A fetish as defined has to have some sexual connotation. Spitting on a camera lens, has no such connotation and does not produce strong sexual emotions. Perhaps you should be talking to a good psychiatrist and see what he thinks of it. I think someone just wants to sell it as such when it is not. Spitting on a camera lens is just as erotic as walking your dog outside.
But perhaps there is hope that my raking the lawn will take hold, and someone will buy my video. Gee all the money I could make. I'd be doing my regular gardening and make money out of it, if someone even remotely considers it a "fetish".
Jonny Jay All-Star Supporter
Outlier Moderator

5990 Posts
8/09
Posted - Mar 19 2010 : 6:04PM
1st time I saw this was some time back with Courtney Cummz and hated it,,,however since then I have seen the camera man get really in close and you see sometimes some vaginal fluid on the lens wich I think is great, but still find it hard to like the lens spitting or spitting in general.
RandomPrecision
Senior Member

Enjoy!
8175 Posts
3/06
Posted - Mar 19 2010 : 6:41PM
I'm glad you've cleared that up for me because I had no idea what to think of it myself.
I agree. But some people do like it, apparently. It's kind of foolish to put it in movies where the cover doesn't warn the viewer though.
I don't think it matters. I call all of these things fetishes even though the technical meaning of the word "fetish" is actually quite a bit more narrow than the way most people use the word.
That it is. Some lenses don't even do that right but that's another story (and another fetish) altogether.
Well, I doubt many people are thinking about sex when they film their daughter's birthday/wedding. When the subject shifts to sex and you're shooting porn for people with a million different expectations, most of the "normal" stuff goes out the window.
Personally, I found the spitting thing kind of intriguing for a while but once the novelty wore off, it was just annoying. Mostly because it had to be in every movie after a while like most porn fads.
quepasa
Deactivated User

2 Posts
3/10
Posted - Mar 20 2010 : 2:24AM
I think the pornstars SPIT on you people through the camera to indicate what low life shits u all are. So if u enjoy it then u must be one.
 
BonesJones
Member

Ass Is Everything
849 Posts
12/09
Posted - Mar 20 2010 : 3:22AM
If you're a fan of Jenaveve Jolie, she has a great scene in Big Titty Woman 3 where she spits in the camera lens like 4 or 5 times.
It's my fav scene of hers to date.
RandomPrecision
Senior Member

Enjoy!
8175 Posts
3/06
Posted - Mar 20 2010 : 5:21AM
I'm truly wounded. Please tell me you didn't mean that.
BonesJones
Member

Ass Is Everything
849 Posts
12/09
Posted - Mar 20 2010 : 5:46AM
I thought spitting on the lens in a porn films add more personal touch to the POV genre.
Also, the camera guy/director always wipe the saliva off within a few seconds after the spitting.
johnshaft820
Member

271 Posts
1/05
Posted - Mar 20 2010 : 10:05AM
Len801 wrote:
Len801 wrote:
Are we talking about psychology or are we talking about porn? I'll grant that Dr. Freud might not classify camera lens spitting as a fetish. But so what? Why should porn producers or viewers care whether the acts are official fetishes or not? Is the APA going to put its seal of approval on pornos that include only 100% certified fetishes?
Len801, you seem to be arguing that, since lens spitting isn't a real fetish, it shouldn't be in porn. But that's a bogus conclusion. The most you can claim is that we should stop referring to it as a "fetish." I agree. From this day forward I will refer to lens spitting as a "shmetish." This doesn't change the fact that, since some people enjoy this smetish, it will continue to appear in some porn.
Savoy All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Sucker for Sinners
1844 Posts
12/06
Posted - Mar 20 2010 : 11:16AM
quepasa - before you post anything again, read forum etiquette.
Rosco Fuji
Deactivated User

On the licking stick, Mr. Magic Dick!
3309 Posts
2/09
Posted - Mar 20 2010 : 1:13PM
Here's a blurb from a review I posted about Big Titty Woman #1:
Martin Del Toro should not be allowed to direct another video until he goes back to film school. He takes a perfectly good concept, hot big titted women, and completely blows it as far as I’m concerned. Half of this video is shot in a diagonal angle instead of straight on and he does not hold any shot for more than 30 seconds the camera shot constantly jumping around. In addition, for some reason Martin feels that viewers like to watch porn through an obscured lens. In every scene, the girl spits on the camera lens a minimum of 5 times.
UnkwnUsr2
Member

443 Posts
2/05
Posted - Mar 20 2010 : 1:49PM
If you look at clips4sale and the Japanese market, you will find that there are boatloads of productions that focus almost exclusively on girls spitting or drooling on the camera, or putting it in ones throat. In fact you might find productions entirely focused on licking the camera lens. Many of these are even on YouTube as they would be considered non-sexual by a non-fetishist. So to assume that this is not or can not possibly be a fetish is wrong indeed.
The spit does not "obscure" the camera lens or the action, as it is intentionally part of what is being filmed.
It is spit fetish. Some like it specifically because of the humiliation aspect, others don't see it as humiliating, but purely sexual.
However, what might be criticized is the inclusion of this act in regular DVDs as clearly only a limited subset of viewers enjoy it.
Edited by - unkwnusr2 on 3/20/2010 1:51:16 PM
ChodeMasterJ
Perpetual Marxist

5405 Posts
4/03
Posted - Mar 20 2010 : 9:28PM
Hahahaha. That is awesome!
I just spent $300 on a camera lens and if someone walked up and spit on it, they'd get a swift fist to the face.
lsnoop
Member

301 Posts
5/09
Posted - Mar 28 2010 : 2:18PM
There's nothing like a girl spitting with passion while sucking/taking cumshot. So I'll bump the thread.
dommy
Member

96 Posts
1/10
Posted - Jun 1 2010 : 6:30PM
sexy pornstars spitting on the lense??
LOVE it!!
 
pusciferleg
Member

55 Posts
2/10
Posted - Jun 2 2010 : 8:48PM
There's a small series called "In your face" by "Loaded Digital (Metro)" I'm pretty sure. I found it on the internet but there looks to be DVD's as well. It specializes in girls spitting into the camera lens. Every scene has it throughout the movie.
I don't think anybody has mentioned it yet, I skimmed through the topic and didn't see it. If someone has, sorry.
This series should be exactly what you're looking for.
Endless Loop
Senior Member

Tomatometer
1129 Posts
8/04
Posted - Jun 3 2010 : 4:15AM
Merely spitting spit?
Fuck that, I'll concur with LubeNLuv as a no likey.
There's little room to maneuver on this, and imo only one acceptable reason to ever spit on the lens.
When its purely cum, and for the sole purpose of allowing the viewer an opportunity to promptly see it hungrily slurped back off,
through a swap by another, or by the same pretty pair of open lips that churned it.
Edited by - Endless Loop on 6/3/2010 4:28:29 AM
Fernandez
Deactivated User

781 Posts
12/08
Posted - Jun 3 2010 : 4:34AM
You are implying that spitting on someone indicative of having a low opinion of that person; clearly a social construct.
Click to expand
Since we are talking about it solely in the context of porn, I think its a porn construct, not a societal one.
At any rate, last year I had the movie "Spit in your Face" in my rental queue. I chose it because it was supposedly heavy POV ass eating/oral from some very pretty performers.....Amy Reid, Penny Flame, Avy Scott (love her) and several others. The talk during the scenes clearly is aimed at those guys who enjoy humiliation and/or submissive fantasies. But other than supporting my point, that isn't what bothered me the most.
The whole movie is basically unwatchable. The camera guy clearly has a plex/glass plate over the lens that is spit upon repeatedly throughout the flick, obscuring most of the action and forcing you to watch the whole video through a haze of runny spit and smears. Totally the opposite of erotic camera shots in my opinion. Without that, even WITH spitting, this could have been some good porn.
So I'll stick with...me no likey. To each their own.
Click to expand
Snot only. Use the lens to blow her nose. Preferably yellow and green snot. Flu snot or severe cold snot. Not enough snot in today's porn.
stinkfist
Senior Member

Subterfuge......
7401 Posts
4/07
Posted - Jun 3 2010 : 9:08PM
Does it have to be spitting,how about lactating over the lens?
stinkfist
Senior Member

Subterfuge......
7401 Posts
4/07
Posted - Dec 13 2010 : 8:17PM
From the reviews the scenes take place with spit on the lens...
[ invalid url ]
SexDriven75
Member

193 Posts
8/04
Posted - Jan 15 2012 : 9:54PM
You are implying that spitting on someone indicative of having a low opinion of that person; clearly a social construct.
Click to expand
Since we are talking about it solely in the context of porn, I think its a porn construct, not a societal one.
At any rate, last year I had the movie "Spit in your Face" in my rental queue. I chose it because it was supposedly heavy POV ass eating/oral from some very pretty performers.....Amy Reid, Penny Flame, Avy Scott (love her) and several others. The talk during the scenes clearly is aimed at those guys who enjoy humiliation and/or submissive fantasies. But other than supporting my point, that isn't what bothered me the most.
The whole movie is basically unwatchable. The camera guy clearly has a plex/glass plate over the lens that is spit upon repeatedly throughout the flick, obscuring most of the action and forcing you to watch the whole video through a haze of runny spit and smears. Totally the opposite of erotic camera shots in my opinion. Without that, even WITH spitting, this could have been some good porn.
So I'll stick with...me no likey. To each their own.
Click to expand
I just watched the trailers of Spit In Your Face (1&2). They look pretty damned hot to me. I don't think the spit remaining on the cam lens would necessarily bother me (I hate unnecessary clean up).
In POV, the camera is intended to be from your viewpoint, and if the camera guy was wiping it off every time a girl spit on it, it'd be like you wiping your face off with a hand towel after every spitting. If you really got off on a girl spitting in your face, you probably wouldn't be wiping yourself down after each spit. (of course, if it was impeding your vision it would mean that she spat in your eyes, in which case you would blink a few times to clear off your point of view. Then again, POV isn't intended to be 100% true to form, so you could argue for realism on either side of the fence.)
BUT... the fact that is exclusively ass eating/oral (I generally don't like oral-only flicks), instead of a POV with fucking, is a big strike against it.
Another strike is that it appears that the girls only spit/drool on the camera lens and not onto themselves or their partners (other than maybe their cocks).
Third strike is, as the LuveNLuv mentioned above, that it's geared towards humiliation/degradation/domination-submission. Why porn seems completely unable to showcase spit-play without injecting heavy doses of "fuck you, you piece of shit", and instead include the same things without the added dissent, for those of us who fetishize bodily fluids and enjoy the wet-and-messy aspect in all its purity, is beyond me.
Edited by - SexDriven75 on 1/15/2012 9:59:26 PM



Jump To: