Reviewers Recommend
Naughty Teacher Needs PussyNaughty Teacher Needs Pussy - review by Danielmayu33216
Director: Mike Quasar
Starring: Myra Moans, Gigi Dior. Read review
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 445 > The anal sex today
AuthorPost
Mister Milkman
Member


46 Posts
8/08
Posted - Aug 19 2008 : 7:30PM
Hello!
This is my first participation here.
First off all, I'm from Brazil and English isn't my first language. Sorry about that :)
I would like to start my participation here talking about the way to make anal sex on camera today's. I'm not a kid. When I start to watch porn, the anal sex was more rare (the bad thing) and much more REAL.
I mean.... The anal sex on camera was like the "normal people" do at home with your wife or girlfriend. I’m sure everybody knows what I’m talking about.
The anal sex from 80's and 90's was made with much more passion and reality as today.
I still watching porn and there's very good anal scene today, but in the most cases, those scene are much more an "empalation section" than SEX. There's no truth in those scene.
The girl, most of time dressed like a “professional” (why???) come already "done" for anal intercourse and the guy takes her as if was so "easy". It’s not easy.
Where's the sensuality? Where's the realism?
Where’s the foreplay to anal sex?
Where's the truth?
I’m asking too much?
Edited by - Mister Milkman on Aug 19 2008
Edited by - Mister Milkman on Aug 19 2008
Edited by - Mister Milkman on Aug 19 2008
stinkfist
Senior Member

Subterfuge......
7401 Posts
4/07
Posted - Aug 19 2008 : 7:41PM
Are you looking for a dirty dirtbox Mister Milkman.
Mister Milkman
Member

46 Posts
8/08
Posted - Aug 19 2008 : 7:54PM
Sorry. I don't get it.
stinkfist
Senior Member

Subterfuge......
7401 Posts
4/07
Posted - Aug 22 2008 : 11:51AM
Sorry MM that was my attempt at some humor,from your post i thought you meant you wanted to see anal sex scenes with "normal people"..which could be messy if not prepared..or you wanted to see anal scenes in movies along the same theme.
The girl, most of time dressed like a “professional” (why???) come already "done" for anal intercourse and the guy takes her as if was so "easy". It’s not easy.
Where's the sensuality? Where's the realism?
Where’s the foreplay to anal sex?
Where's the truth?
bunkerpad
Member

33 Posts
4/08
Posted - Aug 23 2008 : 3:07AM
What you are saying about anal sex is true for all other types of sex acts. That's Gonzo.
In gonzo, there are no foreplays. The girls are already undressed or wearing a fishnet, answer a few boring questions (if any), do the usual catwalks back and forth of the camera, spread their pussy and ass and then something gets into their mouth, make them choke and you'll never hear them talking again... so they can't show any personnality or character.
Lanny Barbie must have done 200 scenes... What kind of personnality has she ? Gonzo lovers will answer: "Who cares ? As long as her asshole gets dilated." Gonzo actresses have no persponnality. Same for the boys. They are 'non-existing', many times you don't even see them.
Worst, the couples sometimes rarely touch each other. There is no 'relationship' between them. I mean that to be able to shoot gonzo style, they need to stay apart from each other to leave room for the camera... so besides the cock getting into the 3 holes, the contacts between the bodies are sometimes rare (but for cowgirl position) and they never talked to each other.
I saw scenes (30 minutes long, how more boring can you be?) in which they kept showing the in and out of the pussy or ass so long that I did not even remember how the girl looked like.
They all do the same thing, all shot the same way with the same high key lighting you find in clinical laboratories. You could shoot half of a scene simply by using some Vivid sexual toys like Belladonna's ass and pussy and the imitation of some guy's cock... just push one into the other, shoot in close-up and it is done. Very cheap to shoot! You don't need the girls or boys.
That's the big thing about gonzo : cheap. That's why girls have no personnality so they can not become pornstars and ask more money. That's why producers give only first names to the girls and change their name from one producer to the other.
Don't look for (real or faked) sensuality or foreplays. Gonzo is anti-sensuality, anti-individuality, anti-pornstars, anti-fun (you rarely see them laugh because you rarely see them!!! and they don't exchange a word.) I would add that it is not even 'sexual relationship', that's why there are more and more machine fuck movies. You don't need guys, a machine does the job.
Gonzo is about the mighty gaping A. How wide it can be delated ? How long and deep the girl can take it in her mouth without puking ? Gonzo is not about sex and people. It is the story of a prick getting into 3 holes. Who cares about the owners of these holes and that prick as long as the holes are delated and the girls showed haow slutty she is ?
 
Spoonbender
Member

352 Posts
1/06
Posted - Aug 23 2008 : 3:23AM
I see your point bunkerpad but I think youre exaggerating, and overgeneralizing gonzo a little bit. A lot of times you do see kissing, talking and the girls laughing and having fun. It a lot of the time depends on the style of the director. I find Joey Silvera do a great job of bringing out the personality of the girls and puts them in positions to be creative (eg. roleplaying), same with Jules Jordan. Something like Anabolic yeah, I can see your point. But at the same time gonzo fans do not want to see a lot of talking or useless fluff. I know I dont, if there is too much I'll fastforward through it. If I want a lot of talking, I'll watch a real movie.
bunkerpad
Member

33 Posts
4/08
Posted - Aug 23 2008 : 3:59AM
Yeah... I know I exaggerating. I am just a fan of the old school porn and I love to see a girl with clothes getting naked instead of being already almost naked. I like to see how sexy she looks when she is dressed and walking alone.
You are are right, I am mainly talking about the Anabolic stuff.
But you know, as long as the talking being too long before the action, I personnally think that the catwalks, the poses, etc... sometimes take more time than the talking of some movies with plots.
I don't like it either when the talking is too long, unless the girl is there and is playing sexy. A too long set-up of guys talking together is rarely interesting.
The other thing is that in a 90 minutes Italian movie with a plot you see more girls and more sex scenes than in a 2-hour Anabolic film showing only 4 girls in 30 minute scene each.
In a 10 minute scene, a good Italian director gives you a dressed girl getting undressed, cunnilingus, blow job, vaginal sex in different positions and anal sex in different posiitons.
A too long sex scene bores me more than the waiting... but there is something for everybody. It is all good. Sometimes I think it may be a question of generation. Someone that started watching porn around 2000 and an other one around 1990 will probably have a different taste.
Mister Milkman
Member

46 Posts
8/08
Posted - Aug 24 2008 : 10:57PM
I agree 100%



Jump To: