seeing there's a new movie coming out with
a 12 year old dakota fanning being Raped
i mean why dos hollywood get a pass in
this ?
[Link]
Working Girls 3 (Reality Junkies) - review by Captain Jack| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| pornlaw Member  578 Posts 10/05 |  Posted - Aug 10 2006 : 11:20AMHere's a link to an article from GovExec.com and the National Journal's Technology Daily written by Andrew Noyes -- FBI official: Sweeps of adult entertainment industry off to 'good start' A series of FBI sweeps aimed at the adult entertainment industry's compliance with federal record-keeping laws are off to a good start, an agency official told reporters Tuesday. Pornographers "expected guns and battering rams, and we came in with suits and pencils," said Chip Burrus, assistant director of criminal investigations at the FBI. I wonder what the FBI means by "off to a good start?" Michael Edited by - pornlaw on Aug 10 2006 [Link] |
| lukemason Member 697 Posts 8/04 | Posted - Aug 10 2006 : 12:05PM seeing there's a new movie coming out with a 12 year old dakota fanning being Raped i mean why dos hollywood get a pass in this ? [Link] |
| lessthanzero Member 89 Posts 6/06 | Posted - Aug 10 2006 : 1:16PM This type of scene should be done with the insinuation of a rape about to happen, cut, and aftermath in the next scene. We will get the point and know what has happened in the story. It does not have to be graphic, she is not a 30 yare old woman like Jodie foster in the accused. She is 12 years old playing a 9 year old in the movie! But I'm sure that anything graphic will be cut before it will be distributed on dvd by any company. I remember the Ann Hathaway full frontal and Vibrator scene rumors for Havoc, Natalie Portman Nude scenes cut from closer, and the Evan Rachel Wood nude scenes from Down in the Valley. All scenes were cut by the director, heavily edited, or the rumor was exaggerated. Unlike the others above, I really hope that a graphic Dakota rape scene never make it to print, it is truly unnecessary, and potentially more detrimental to our society than any legal hardcore porn. [Link] |
| lessthanzero Member 89 Posts 6/06 | Posted - Aug 10 2006 : 1:27PM I guess the FBI is too busy watching gag factor, and Max Hardcore, all by consenting adults, for consenting adults, than to worry about what has actually gone on in hollywood by actual minors. I'm sure that they would say that is is art and thus protected by the 1st amendment, but not all porn made by adults. [Link] |
Jeff @ IAFD  Webmaster IAFD.COM 931 Posts 6/00 | Posted - Aug 10 2006 : 9:20PM [Link] |
 | |
| Harri Patel Senior Member #SDNY he's all yours. -- Michael Steele 5110 Posts 3/03 | Posted - Aug 10 2006 : 11:50PM [Link] |
| AlexPanzer Deactivated User 1593 Posts 6/03 | Posted - Aug 11 2006 : 7:28AM [Link] |
| TonyC Comstock Films 2523 Posts 8/03 | Posted - Aug 11 2006 : 8:44AM [Link] |
| AlexPanzer Deactivated User 1593 Posts 6/03 | Posted - Aug 20 2006 : 10:52PM [Link] |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |