I can only guess that they look at it as disdainfully as I look at the old time porn I saw from Europe that had chicks with hairy underarms. I found that to be gross.
[Link]
Tres Vias - review by Captain Jack| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| MikeOxhard Member  Hedonism = Porn = Good 267 Posts 3/07 |  Posted - Jun 18 2007 : 3:53AMI've been watching a few 70s porn movies recently. The thing that are is very noticeable is that ALL the girls had real tits, pubic hair and no tattoos. It was strange to see such natural looking women in porn. It started me thinking about what the good and bad changes in porn have been since the 70s. I'd say the good changes are the number of women in porn, the improved sexual technique (especially the deep throat skills), the improvements in camera work, lighting and length of scenes. The bad changes are (for me anyway) the number of girls with boob jobs, tattoos and the total absence of pubic hair. [Link] |
| Dean Wormer Senior Member Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son. 1048 Posts 7/04 | Posted - Jun 18 2007 : 5:27AM I can only guess that they look at it as disdainfully as I look at the old time porn I saw from Europe that had chicks with hairy underarms. I found that to be gross. [Link] |
| conquistador Deactivated User Hellhamster. 2947 Posts 10/03 | Posted - Jun 18 2007 : 5:35AM [Link] |
| Lingus Member Australia 45 Posts 9/04 | Posted - Jun 18 2007 : 8:01AM [Link] |
| modano Member 316 Posts 12/05 | Posted - Jun 18 2007 : 10:33AM [Link] |
Hardware  All-Star Member Your other left 14595 Posts 3/02 | Posted - Jun 18 2007 : 10:49AM [Link] |
| Draxxx Senior Member 3831 Posts 2/07 | Posted - Jun 18 2007 : 11:14PM (1) The sex scenes back then were waaay too short. Not only were they short but it seems like much of the time there wasn't even any real penetration actually going on. Too many angles that didn't show penetration and too many prolonged shots of the star's faces. (2)Too much time wasted on "story" and not enough on sex. The stories and acting was usually pretty bad so spending that much time and effort on them seems kinda pointless. I don't mind a "story" or senerio but I don't think the story should take up more screen time than the sex scenes. (3) There wasn't that much to choose from. There's far more varity now. Back then it was a limited amount the type of porn you could get/see. (4) I personally think the girls in porn today are prettier and sexier overall. It seems to me when some people talk about the girls from back then they tend to only remember ceratin girls they liked or looked good and conviently forget about all the so-so looking women that actually outnumbered to pretty ones. And yeah, more of the girls back then may have been more natural but that doesn't always translate into "prettier". (5) Going by what I've seen of the older stuff there seemed to be more of an effort to make the sex look more "loving". Absolutely nothing wrong with that but sometimes I like to see more raw, sweaty "pounding" type stuff in the mix.from what I've seen of the old stuff there wasn't much of that (But that's an opinion type thing). (6) To me the sex scenes of today are just more visually interesting to watch. More positions, more angles, more intensity, often better lighting, and more creative places and ways to have sex. [Link] |
| Christopher256 Member 146 Posts 8/05 | Posted - Jun 19 2007 : 1:20AM [Link] |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |