| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| R.B. Member 7 Posts 2/03 | First of all I want to say that I don't actually own any movies directed by Jim Holiday, and I've also only seen about ten or so movies thats hes made, but I've noticed that there is a theme that runs through all of these movies. Whenever I do happen to see one of these movies I can't help, but think whats going on here? Now I think its important to know that I don't think Jim Holiday is a bad porn director. When it comes to filming the sex scenes I think hes a pretty basic director, which isn't really good or bad. One of the things I always question in the sex scenes is the feet licking and fucking, which seems to be in every fucking scene! If he wants to show foot fucking why not just make a foot fetish tape? Does Jim Holiday think that every porn fan likes foot fucking? It really wouldn't be a big deal once in a while to see some foot sucking, but in moderation. I don't mean to offend any foot lovers, but it is an acquired taste. While I'm on the topic of feet, has anyone noticed that pretty much all of the women in his movies have their finger and toe nails painted pink? Like I said the sex scenes are ok but its the rest of these movies that leave me with a sense of confused wonderment. I guess you would consider his movies to be "features", but I thought features were supposed to have some kind of story, which these movies are devoid of. These movies consist of a bunch of women in the desert who fuck each other while hokey 60's sounding surfer music plays in the background while every once in a while a girl will make some ridiculously dumb comment, and once the scenes are over theres always these little scenes with dialog, and the scenes never make any sense, its always just a bunch of pointless ramblings that don't tell a story! In some porno you have guys who at times seem to be degrading the women physically, in Jim Holiday's case, it seems like he degrades the women by making them all look like complet idiots by making them say the dumbest things possible, its stereotyping at its worst. And why does he always have the woman saying dumb tongue twisters? Whats the fucking point of all of this? Why does this guy even try to tell a story? If you took out all of the dialog and story (story, HAH HAH!) then you might have an ok porno. Am I the only one whos noticed this about Jim Holiday's movies, does anyone agree with me on this? I would like some thoughts. Also just a quick sidenote, has anyone else noticed a stricking resemblance between Jim Holiday and the Unabomber? R.B. [Link] |
| Rumplestilt Skin Deactivated User 931 Posts 7/02 | |
| PornoBoy Member 145 Posts 7/02 | I think the biggest criticism about Holliday's movies is that they are indistiguishable from each other...they all look the same, but I think he shoots sex better than most directors out there. |
| brock solid Deactivated User 39 Posts 12/02 | |
| Walter Burns Legendary Quoter IAFD, supporters of beastiality. Just say no. 7564 Posts 11/02 | (Please note that "evidence" is placed within inverted commas to indicate the epistemological problems surrounding that concept. Hence my second sentence.) |
| Maximum Booty Member New Orleans 347 Posts 9/02 | |
| brock solid Deactivated User 39 Posts 12/02 | First off he's the reason Jill Kelly and all of the old VCA girls don't do black guys in their films.People have come out and mention him in past conversations about the fact that he tells new girls who work for him not to do IR cause it will ruin your career. This was mentioned alot on the old Mr. Marcus forum and on the old Gene Ross site he did an interview with Veronica Caine and they were talking about how much of a jerk he was and then she told Gene about when on set of Sorority Sex Kittens 4 & Sorority Sex Kittens 5, they took a break and he was talking to her and other girls saying all this bad stuff about a girl on set with them named Diana Devoe and she walked up behind him and cursed him out in front of every one when she heard what he was saying about her which made him cringed because some of the crew was black so for the rest of that day he was apologizing to all of them so they don't quit. There you all are I always prove my point when I make them.
|
| Janitor Retired Porno movies, sexy videos, xxx. Adult DVD Talk at your service. 6409 Posts 11/99 | |
| Walter Burns Legendary Quoter IAFD, supporters of beastiality. Just say no. 7564 Posts 11/02 | I can see that you really investigated this. Have you even talked with any of these people, including Jim Holiday, yourself? Have you ever been on one of his sets? If he is a racist, then why would he hire any black crew member at all? And why would he beg them to stay? And why would you rely on hearsay to form such a definite opinion on anything? Why don't you ask questions about what you read and hear and see, at least to yourself, before voicing an opinion like this in a public forum? Let's see how this works? I don't know Brock Solid at all, but that is all right. I have "learned" from reading a couple of posts on a forum that he is not a very critical person, who has no problem calling people names based on nothing more but hearsay. Is this comment anywhere near the "truth" about you, Brock? I don't think so, but there you have it. It has been written on a forum for everyone to read. If someone started a new thread on a different forum about the fact that he "knows" that Brock Solid is a simpleton, he can always "back up" his claim by referring to this post. "Evidence" indeed. And I don't know what Maximum Booty is going to do, but I won't be kissing any ass. Not tonight anyway. |
| R.B. Member 7 Posts 2/03 | R.B. |
| Diesel Member 516 Posts 3/00 | I believe that he thinks he's being extra clever with his parody on porn cliches, but his "jokes" rarely rise that which he is parodying. And he has this general disdain for critics and criticism (well, who doesn't?), especially when you hear his whining during the DVD commentary. I wish he would go back to being a porn historian and not a director. Diesel Edited by - Diesel on 2/24/2003 9:32:52 PM |
| futureofporn Member 658 Posts 1/03 | I have always known about his foot fetish. I quickly realized in every movie he had lots of anal sex and lots of foot sex. Besides SSK4, I dont own or watch anymore Jim Holliday movies, because I have one. Why would I need another when they are all the same with basically the same girls. Who wants to see Shayla Lavauex all the time? Jim Holliday may want to make his own "style" or whatever, but for me, its not going to help sell tapes. |
| Hardware All-Star Member Your other left 14595 Posts 3/02 | I agree Jim Holiday's plots are so thin they're transparent but he gets lots of women together, so there's an attraction for a lot of fans, and he has them doing tame (by today's standards) sex which isn't going to offend 90% of VCA's market. Since it sells, why shouldn't the company support him? PS - It's Laveaux, not Lavauex |
| Diesel Member 516 Posts 3/00 | |
| Hardware All-Star Member Your other left 14595 Posts 3/02 | |
| PornoBoy Member 145 Posts 7/02 | |
| futureofporn Member 658 Posts 1/03 | |
| futureofporn Member 658 Posts 1/03 | |
| T Mac Member 166 Posts 1/03 | |
| charper1 New Member 1 Posts 4/04 |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |