| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| RichardtheLionheart Member 117 Posts 3/17 | There is a new law coming into force this April meaning that people in the UK will have to register their real name/age/address with sites like [MOD: No tube sites. This is warning number two] to view porn online. They're allegedly doing it to protect under 18's from easy access to porn. I ask how will my favourites i.e. Brazzers, Bangbros, Kink, Grooby sites, Blacked, Data 18 and this site be affected? http://metro.co.uk/2018/01/31/new-porn-laws-will-mean-pornhub-asks-name-address-wnking-begins-7275023/ Edited by - Flash on Feb 26 2018 Topic Moved by - Flash on Feb 26 2018 [Link] |
| cormac Senior Member 1093 Posts 1/14 | The worrying thing of course is the blocking of certain sites to anyone, not just kids, that offend the British Board of Film Classification's guidelines. Since those guidelines including fisting and certain bondage scenes, for example, then Kink.com may have a problem. When this was proposed back in 2016, it prompted Tim Berners-Lee to refer to "Dark, dark days"; but I prefer this from 'The Statesman' - "As British citizens ..... we must protect our rights as wankers of the world." |
| LCF All-Star Member Non Prevalebunt! 10364 Posts 1/05 | I mean would this like forcing thieves to prove they are indeed thieves and give an ID? also doen any of those know there are torrents out there and free storage site which do not require any registration at all? will the word backdoor entrance stay legal? Edited by - Flash on 2/26/2018 1:52:36 PM |
| Peter Mc Member 895 Posts 10/16 | |
| InigoMontoya Deactivated User 218 Posts 11/09 | And they keep coming up with new regulations that merely punish law-abiding, consenting adults in order that they be seen to be doing something, no matter how misdirected. It's all part of a current cultural obsession with an interfering nanny state. Cigarettes, alcohol, sugar, fat, plastic bags, online speech, advertising... they're constantly pushing to regulate, tax and police the public's activity. Sadly, there are a lot of people in society who are naively or malevolently supportive of ever greater government interference in private citizens' rights, freedoms and choices. It's regressive, yet they cynically label it "progressive". Obviously there are far more sinister undertones to this sort of behaviour from government. But in the case of porn I believe it's mainly prudish, out of touch, politically correct politicians who are being lobbied by censorious puritans to be seen to be doing something to protect children online. The concept of parental responsibility has taken a backseat to government regulation. |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |