Featured New Release
Box cover for Angel Anthology: Angela White, The
Angel Anthology: Angela White, The
Studio: Vixen
Release date: 7/31/2026


all new releases
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 767 > The state of the classics
AuthorPost
sdc
Member

236 Posts
4/03
Posted - Apr 19 2003 : 7:27AM
I watched Through The Looking Glass for the first time last night and thought it was excellent - one of the most ambitious and provocative adult movies I've ever seen. However, my enjoyment was countered by the shoddy presentation of this movie on disc. The visual quality oscillated between average and awful and this is pretty typical of movies from this period. Are soft looking, cropped versions of classic adult movies the best we can expect?
I started wondering if we will ever see pristine copies of seventies classics in their original aspect ratio's. Is the poor presentation of classics on disc due to incompetence, disdain or the lack of quality elements? I wonder if the original negatives for movies like Through The Looking Glass or The Devil In Miss Jones still exist? Do 35mm prints exist anywhere? It strikes me as a real shame that so many of the classics are only available in versions that resemble home made bootleg videos.

Edited by - sdc on Apr 19 2003

GoldenAgeFan
Member

Toronto,Canada
44 Posts
3/03
Posted - Apr 19 2003 : 9:27AM
I agree it is really sad that these gems are in such poor shape.I hope that in future thing will improve

Bella Forever

Flash All-Star Supporter
Golden Age Classic

11018 Posts
5/01
Posted - Apr 19 2003 : 1:01PM
I'm going to guess that you have mostly been looking at VCX titles on disc from your descriptions (and titles used). They have some of the worst classic titles (in terms of shape of the print) out of all of the companies releasing the classics. If you check out Mitchell Bros, Arrow, I-Candy, VCA, etc, you'll find some much better looking discs that what VCX is producing. And the worse thing is some of VCX's titles look worse that Through the Looking Glass.

Flash
-------------
[ invalid url ]

sdc
Member

236 Posts
4/03
Posted - Apr 19 2003 : 3:38PM
There's no doubt that some companies take more care than others and that VCX are one of the worst offenders in terms of producing below-par discs. However, even companies like VCA appear (and I should point out that I don't have any first hand knowledge of DVD production) to use cropped video masters as the source for their discs of Golden Age movies. I just wonder if this is for economic reasons or simply because superior elements for 70's movies no longer exist?

Edited by - sdc on 4/19/2003 3:42:33 PM

GaySatyr
Senior Member

Half dirty ol' man; half horny ol' goat!
1684 Posts
10/00
Posted - Apr 19 2003 : 4:44PM
Many of the early porn classics were shot & circulated on 16mm film well before videotape was readily available. In some cases, the original masters no longer exist or are damaged beyond economical (at least for porn company budgets) repair.

As a result, some of the DVDs of these titles were created from circulation copies of the original films - copies which may have been broken and spliced a few - or many - times over the course of their life in circulation. Even worse, some of the DVDs have been made from VHS copies created from old circulation prints of the original films because VHS copies are all that remain.

It is really sad that many of these pornographic treasures have not be better cared for. Unfortunately, pornography is not likely to be considered a mainstream art form any time in the near future.

~ GaySatyr

All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 767The state of the classics

Previous topic: nope
Next topic: Best Ass in the World???



Jump To: