Reviewers Recommend
Rissa Wants Some CockRissa Wants Some Cock - review by Sean DPS
Starring: Rissa May. Read review
All Forums > The Feature Side > The Feature Side Forum Page 56 > Thoughts on "No, No Briana" -- kind of brilliant
AuthorPost
ObiBong
Senior Member


1162 Posts
12/02
Posted - May 4 2005 : 5:17AM
This is a great concept from writer David Stanley and director Chuck Lords (Paul Thomas). Evan Stone plays a lunkhead porn star who can't get it through his head that not all women want to be roughed up. All he wants to do is call them dirty little whores, smack the bitches up and ram various things up their asses. Briana, playing herself, tries to get across the concept of "no." (A behind-the-scenes interview indicates that this is in some way based on her interaction with Rocco.)

It's played for comedy, and Evan's arrogance and frustration are pretty goddamn funny in more than one scene. Of course, he ends up getting a predictable comeuppance courtesy of the entire female cast of the movie.

The movie pretty much gets to have its cake and eat it. The first scene, between Evan and Naudia Nyce, is a prototypical "rough" scene -- slapping, spitting, choking, verbal abuse, non-consensual role play, the usual shit (though when he slaps her in the face, there's a quick, discrete cut to the title card with the name of the movie; we see the swing, and we hear the smack, but are spared the sight of the impact). It's a little ironic that a Vivid movie about the perils of rough sex would open with this kind of ravaging, but it wakes you up.

It's pretty intense, but the second scene lightens things up. Here we have Briana and Naudia in a three-way with Tommy Gunn, with comic interruptions by Evan. Then comes the heart of the movie: Evan and Briana, and their failure to communicate. Talk about a grudge fuck. Evan ends up with a black eye, and Briana... I would hate to include a spoiler on the denouement of this scene, but I laughed out loud. And rewound and replayed about 20 times.

Briana moves on to have friendlier sex with Joel Lawrence, and we wrap up with Evan vs. Samantha Ryan, Kelly Kline and Jamie Brooks.

Pros: Briana looks as if she does have about one ounce of fat on her, which is a big improvement over when she really had none. She looks better here (for my taste) than I've seen her with Vivid. But she should stay away from her "Oh" face (you know, from "Office Space" -- "Oh! Oh!"). When she breaks into a smile, she's about 14 times hotter. She's really quite pretty, and the smile is much better than the sex snarl.

*Once again, a porn movie about porn is a cheap way of giving the sex scenes a reason for being, but it works. It's better than the narrative-killing throw-in scenes that plague most features.

*A lot of the dialogue appears to be improvised, in that loose "Curb Your Enthusiasm" style. It's accomplished better than you might guess. Some of the handheld camerawork supports this vibe as well.

Cons: Some apparent looping of sex, but at least it's from a different camera angle. I guess this replaces Vivid's "multiple angle" feature. It didn't happen so much that it annoyed me, though, and it wouldn't take much of it to piss me off. Worth noting, however.

*Those goddamn unskippable ads at the beginning of the disc. I won't stop complaining until they stop putting them there.

*The picture quality is better than in some of the piss-poor Vivid transfers I've been seeing lately, but it's still subpar.

Verdict: My favorite feature of 2005, not that that's saying so much so far. I think there are themes here that could interest a lot of youze.


arthur
Deactivated User

165 Posts
9/04
Posted - May 4 2005 : 11:34AM
If it's anything like some of the other stuff from Paul Thomas I've seen recently, it'll be a big bore.
Flash All-Star Supporter
Golden Age Classic

11017 Posts
5/01
Posted - May 4 2005 : 11:40AM
MOD:
Arthur, usually it helps to have seen the movie before offering critism of it. If you can offer constructive critism of the film in question, please do so, which requires seeing the film first. If not, don't post. The Feature Side will not become a "Vivid Sucks" type forum.

Edited by - flash on 5/4/2005 11:40:14 AM

arthur
Deactivated User

165 Posts
9/04
Posted - May 4 2005 : 12:03PM
To each his own. I was just giving you my opinion. Some of Vivid's features are good - eg Another Woman's Eyes. For the most part, however, I find the substance doesn't match the suggestion. That is entirely my view, and I have no intention of turning this into a "bash Vivid" thread.
vodka tonic
coolest cucumber

who
1243 Posts
11/02
Posted - May 4 2005 : 12:41PM
I was exposed to the trailer for "No, No, Briana" on a recent Vivid DVD and, in its minute-length summary, it just felt like its rough sex denounciation premise was just an excuse to shell out a series of, well, rough sex scenes. You know, feed the hand that bites you... Apparently, I was wrong.
Obibong, what did you feel was the difference between this "Chuck Lords" video & the usual Paul Thomas ? With earlier releases like "Civilian Sex" & "Hard Candy", I felt Chuck Lords was focusing on barely-scripted features, which doesn't seem to be the case here. Are the sex scenes longer, and is the focus on the sex rather than on the storyline ?
 
ObiBong
Senior Member

1162 Posts
12/02
Posted - May 4 2005 : 2:21PM
Well, this is the first Chuck Lords movie I've seen, and I probably haven't seen more than three or four PT DVDs in the last year or so. It is not one of those movies like Heart of Darkness with truncated sex scenes -- there's only five (plus one abbreviated solo diversion by Kelly Kline), and they seemed basically full feature length.

Again, the thing I like is when the sex is the story. The sex scene between Stone and Banks conveys plot instead of interrupting it. The movie moves things along with title cards, and there's really only one, maybe one and a half significant non-sex stretches of dialogue. So I guess this would fit in with the Chuck Lords m.o.

astroknight All-Star Supporter
Questionable Moderator

Tastes so good...
4187 Posts
11/99
Posted - May 4 2005 : 2:38PM
I'm not much of a PT fan, but this one sounds interesting (and David Stanley writing it definitely caught my eye!)...

"Vegetarianism for me is about saying ‘yes’ to things - even meat." - Coupling




Jump To: