Hello Skeeter, I just saw Sodomy Cream Pies (I'm a bit behind I know) and I gotta say that the action was great. However there were a few suggestions that I have to offer:
1. Shooting outside looks scenic and all (nice house, man ) but with it comes the problem of hard lighting and shadows. I think gonzo movies are best done on the inside, while the outside is more important for feature films that don't necessarily focus on the action.
2. I really wish you work on your camera angles a bit. For example, I much prefer seeing a doggy anal from behind (like you did a couple of times) than seeing it from the side or at an angle. Another example: An RCGA looks best when shot from a low angle with the girl's legs raised up in the air. I realize this is very subjective, but I know a lot people agree with me here. A look at the work of Jonni Darkko/Tom Byron/Jules Jordan might help here since I'm not a director myself so I can't get more specific with terminology :-)
3. Most of cream pies in this movie were done "from a distance" as opposed to cumming inside. While this solves the problem of the disappearing cum, it's also very retro. It reminds me of what Private used to do in the 90's. I prefer the modern-day style of Ass Cream Pies 1-3, etc. . But to each his own.
Dick, I am not very clear on what you mean. All 103 movies I have shot since April 2002 show doggy filmed from behind and RCGA shot from below. Cumshots to the face is of course very retro. Cumshots into the ass from a 2 to 6 inch distance, then having fingers and cocks push it in, insert into mouth, then have the girl cum fart out the cum is not retro, nor will you find it in Private movies from the 90's. I am the only American Private director for a reason, because I shoot nastier sex then they have ever had. I like the cum to be shot in a girls ass so I can see the proof on anal creampie, then I like the girl to take her fingers and scoop it out or cumfart it out. You do not see stuff like that in Private movies from the 90's. My Metro movie "Marked for Anal filmed last sept. 9th, has over 48 minutes of doggy from behind, standing reverse and cowgirl anal shot from below, missionary anal shot from below, all of which clearly shows the girls face and the cock clearly stretching ass. Also lots of D.P. filmed from behind cowgirl and reverse. Standing D.P. shot from below. This stuff is in all of my movies. Obviusly the Heel grab blowjob I started using in April of 2002 is in all of my movies. The way I introduce the girls is no interview. The viewer alone with the girl for 4 minutes, smoking and music. Not the reach out and grab and talk for 2 to 10 minutes. That is retro and has been done for over a decade. Have you seen the heel grab blowjobs used previously to april 2002 or the girls left leg up, right leg straight, anal beads hanging out while bending over and blowing the guy! When myself and 13 other guys cummed into Bridgettes open gaping ass while she was in piledriver and I turned her over and had her cumfart out every single drop, that sure wasn't retro. It was filmed in June of 1999. Elegant Angels "Gang Bang Angels # 5". Some itdiot over at DVD Empire reviewed my movie Stick It. The guy said everything I do has been done by every Tom Dick and Harry! Is he referring to the heel grab blowjob? The anal beads being pulled out by the girls high heel? The way I dress every single girl with fetish clothing I own, so it will not be in anybody elses movies? I present the girls with no interview, music only! Lots of smoking if they smoke, who in the fuck is that copying? I do not get it. I film what I like! If my names on it, it turns me on! Girls smoking while waliking around sexy turns me on in fetish attire. The guy gave me a good review for Anal Excursions 2 years ago, now the guy slams me for doing differant original positions and presentation and outfits and says every Tom Dick and Harry has done it? Where I ask! Skeeter Kerkove "King of Sodom" over 500 sex scenes filmed, every single one has had anal! Porn producer, director, performer. I am a huge fan of hardcore porn and I love all of the women in porn. "God Bless Pornography" A womans ass is a beautiful thing" Woman rule!
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE list the male cast!!! My worst fear is renting something without knowing who the male talent is and then finding out that Julian St. Jox is in the cast!!!
Thanks a lot for the reply, Skeeter. A few comments below...Maybe they do include those shots but they certainly don't seem to focus on them. I personally own Anal Excursions 1&2 and Sodomy Cream Pies. I noticed this in all 3 which has been holding me back from buying more.
Let me give you an example -- If you don't mind, stop by adultdvdempire.com and look at the screen shots they have for Anal Excursions. You will see: Page 1, bottom right -- Doggy anal from the side Page 2, top right -- doggy anal from the side and at a distance Page 3, top right -- doggy anal in profile (not behind) So, that's what I'm talking about Sorry I didn't pick more recent examples. Perhaps your recent work is different?
OK, that one I agree with. But I've noticed that, while many directors shoot RCGA from below, many forget an important part: lifting the girl's legs up in the air. This is great because it accentuates her round ass. JYLC was the first director I saw doing this in his Matador series, but others like Tom Byron did it a lot, too. I think every RCGA should do thisAs listed above, this stuff isn't retro. But I'm talking specifically about these elements as being retro: 1. cumming "into the ass" from a 2-6 inch distance (usually very little actually ends up in there) 2. cock pushes it in. Pierre Woodman did that in most of his Private movies. Sodomy Cream Pies mainly adds the cum farting and (optional swallowing) to some scenes. I prefer completely internal cumshots that then get squirted out (although that can be hard sometimes). You had a couple of scenes that were completely internal in Sodomy Creap Pies, and they were the best, IMHO. On the other hand, I really bought the movie for Taylor Rain, and I was disappointed that all her scene concluded with cumming on her open ass rather than inside it, and then not even having the dick push it in! That definitely seemed like the "poor man's ACP's" that Private did in the 90'sSounds interesting. adultdvdempire.com doesn't seem to carry it, hmmm. Who sells that movie?
Thanks for caring enough to read and answer viewer feedback!
Edited by - Dick Johnson on 6/18/2004 2:02:21 AM
[Link]
bbrudy Deactivated User
chicago 537 Posts 7/03
Posted - Jun 18 2004 : 12:53PM
Skeeter I think the vids that you shoot are KICK-AZZ you definitely know what us pervs want.I have a request could w see bridgette and or Karina do a BLOW-BANG scene if so at least 5 big load blowers in each scene I`d luv to see bridgette or karin`s EYES GLUED SHUT!!! what do you think skeeter can you make this happen?? bad boy rudy
I'd like to echo Dick Johnson's comments on the Creampies and shooting outside:
Creampies: Skeeter in your movies, you shoot creampies where the guy's dick is outside of the girls ass and then he aims it into the gape. Where as I and Dick Johnson seem to prefer it when the cock is fully inside the ass when the load is shot!
Skeeter, the trouble with your latest movies being outside is that they all look the same now. I've lately stopped buying your stuff simply because of this. Every movie I buy seems like its the same scene over and over. I think you should take things back inside!
Other than those two issues, everything you do is excellent!
No, I don't think I'm being subjective here Just like cinematography in regular movies is an art, I believe it's the same for Porn. Just because porn viewers have varying tastes doesn't mean that anyone can shoot crap and say that many like it. People like Jonni Darkko clearly demonstrate that some Porn cameraman get this
First you say it's an art, but then you imply that there is a right and wrong way to do it.
I'm sure there are a number of specific NO-NO's, but isn't alot of it subjective?
I have no camera experience, but I do understand the aesthetic differences between say, directors who shoot more full body shots, and directors who shoot more full screen penetration shots.
