At any rate, yes, much as I like anal I am more interested in the female performer's face than the inner lining of her colon. Nevertheless, porn is transgressive, so you have to expect this kind of stuff now and then.
[Link]
Introducing Kalani Luana| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| Rolf Muller Member  119 Posts 11/11 |  Posted - Nov 16 2011 : 8:42PMGotta say, I was somewhat shocked to see the inner colon shots in Belladonna's No Warning 6 during one particular anal play sequence. I got it based on the Sammie Rhodes scene and the Belladonna name, and there is good stuff in it, but one sequence kept showing us the inner large colon shots being forced through the rectum walls... is that hot for anybody here? It's just a bit too much for me, and fortunately the Sammie scene more than makes up for this deficit for me.. Edited by - Rolf Muller on Nov 16 2011 [Link] |
Hardware  All-Star Member Your other left 14594 Posts 3/02 | Posted - Nov 16 2011 : 9:35PM At any rate, yes, much as I like anal I am more interested in the female performer's face than the inner lining of her colon. Nevertheless, porn is transgressive, so you have to expect this kind of stuff now and then. [Link] |
| HollywoodBilderbergGroup Deactivated User Undiscovered Genius 361 Posts 7/11 | Posted - Nov 16 2011 : 10:22PM [Link] |
| celluloidferox Senior Member @EmperorCorndog 1438 Posts 1/10 | Posted - Nov 17 2011 : 1:59AM I love to watch anal sex, but the prolapsing shit is just disgusting to me. I don't want to sound like a prude, but damn. Pink sock is what's keeping me from buying very many Evil Angel dvd's anymore. Juelz Ventura's first anal scene was something the many people were looking forward to (myself included), but as soon as I saw the prolapse, I wanted nothing further to do with it. Good thing people like Jules Jordan and co. seem to be avoiding it. At least I hope so. [Link] |
| Gunzo Senior Member 1377 Posts 2/05 | Posted - Nov 17 2011 : 2:29AM But this is still a niche aimed toward the most perverted anal fans, not to those conservative anal fans needing plenty of time to adjust to the new world order. I love the stuff from Jay Sin and Mike Adriano, continuing the exploration of the ass instead of assuming it's all been discovered already. [Link] |
| SP_Love Senior Member "Freaky Deakies Need Love Too" 1181 Posts 2/11 | Posted - Nov 17 2011 : 9:17AM Hello. As a card carrying member of the "most perverted anal fans club" I must disagree with the title of this thread. There is no such thing as "too much anal detail". Anal gaping, prolapse, rose-butt and the pink-sock are here to stay. Get a couple of girls together, exploring each other's anuses turned inside-out with fingers, hands, toys and tongues and you've got yourself a scene that demands the beating of meat by the true anal fetishist! I also think that it separates the girls who are really into anal from those who just go through the motions. Especially the ones who can present the rose-butt at will. Ava Divine, Jayda Diamonde, Roxy Raye, Alysa, HotKinkyJo (etc.) will all tell you that they have very strong muscles down there. They all get checked out regularly by medical professionals and the myths are mostly untrue. No one is popping a prolapsed rectum whenever they sneeze. These women are just anally gifted, they are talented and they all show amazing control of the muscles in that area. So try to loosen up you puritans and enjoy the show! "It takes courage to enjoy it: the hardcore and the gentle...Big Time Sensuality!" [Link] |
| Simpsona Senior Member 2389 Posts 8/10 | Posted - Nov 17 2011 : 6:09PM Exactly,'the show',has little to do with sex really though. [Link] |
| Hardware All-Star Member Your other left 14594 Posts 3/02 | Posted - Nov 17 2011 : 7:08PM Given the way you think, I don't blame you for wanting to see more. However, it takes more than one man's opinion to make reality. Obviously, porn performers have an incentive to make us believe that they absolutely love doing whatever it is we want them to do, regardless of how they truly feel. This is no different than in mainstream cinema. The wonderful thing about theater and cinema is that we, the audience, convince ourselves that what we are seeing is real, emotions included, even though they obviously aren't. The fact is, porn is no different. You aren't seeing reality, you're seeing a little play being put on for the camera, the director and a bunch of mopes standing around. OK, maybe not for those guys. Why doesn't somebody make them go away? Now, where was I? Oh, right! In the real world, women tend to be up for anal sometimes, and not up for anal at other times. Many factors may contribute to which way they feel. In porn, performers have to be up for whatever it is they signed on to do, regardless of how they really feel. That's why there's a paycheck. That's OK, illusions can make for happy pants, and as long as they're making good money and in good health the performers are happy to cater to your illusions, my illusions, and the illusions of most anybody else, as well. Some of them are just more proficient at it than others. [Link] |
| SP_Love Senior Member "Freaky Deakies Need Love Too" 1181 Posts 2/11 | Posted - Nov 17 2011 : 8:05PM Who's a puritan or not? It's all relative. Yes (obviously) porn performers have an incentive to make us believe that they always love doing their job. And like any job somedays we're just not feeling it but we all do what we must. But this is besides the point. I've never understood those who pontificate on how porn is not real. I've never thought that it was. Notice how you never hear anyone go on about how..."well, you know the Fonze from Happy Days is not a real person" or "You know that Rachel from Friends is not really in love with Ross, it's just actors pretending to be in a relationship!" Granted Ross and Joey never ripped Rachel's clothes off and DP'd her but still I think that most rational individuals understand that porn stars don't f**k the pizza guy every time the door bell rings. I'm a realist and I've always seen porn as what it actually is: a tool for masturbation. Nothing more. My point in saying that those who (for lack of a better term) excel in the acrobatics of the anus are much more into anal sex than those with tight sphincters stems from a logical observation. No anal virgin is going into an Evil Angel studio and all of a sudden she's poppin' out the rose-butt. In my opinion a gaping anus and prolapsed rectum provides very convincing evidence that this is not the first time that the performer has put something up her butt. As you say... "...In the real world, women tend to be up for anal sometimes, and not up for anal at other times." I'd like to add that many women don't do anal at all. Many have tried it once, did not enjoy it and are not ever going to do it again. They don't care how much money you offer them to do anal sex privately or commercially it just ain't gonna happen! Of course this is a generalization which is to say that in most cases, not all, a performer who's pushing a basketball out of their anus with their prolapsed rectal muscles probably does not hate anal sex. :D "It takes courage to enjoy it: the hardcore and the gentle...Big Time Sensuality!" [Link] |
| David Cop-a-feel Deactivated User Trust me, honey, it gets better 323 Posts 10/10 | Posted - Nov 17 2011 : 9:00PM [Link] |
| rc7394 Senior Member 1109 Posts 8/04 | Posted - Nov 17 2011 : 10:14PM [Link] |
| Hardware All-Star Member Your other left 14594 Posts 3/02 | Posted - Nov 17 2011 : 11:57PM At any rate, what evidence do you have to prove that you aren't confusing ability with desire? In other words, why wouldn't someone perform these acts simply because they can and they want the extra money? For that matter, perhaps they just want the accolades. They don't give out awards for being in the middle of the pack, you know. No, I don't see that being really into a particular sex act has to be a qualification, nor do I know how you intend to prove it. After all, if there's one thing we humans are good at it is our ability to dissimulate. For myself, I am quite content to applaud a convincing performance. [Link] |
| shark1 Senior Member 1219 Posts 5/04 | Posted - Nov 18 2011 : 5:50PM [Link] |
| SP_Love Senior Member "Freaky Deakies Need Love Too" 1181 Posts 2/11 | Posted - Nov 19 2011 : 3:01PM As far as confusing ability with desire all one has to do is consider any other profession that involves using your body. Sports comes to mind. Riddle me this batman! Do you believe that Peyton Manning only plays football because he can or do you think that for most of his life he has had the desire to play football? Do you think that Tiger Woods only plays golf because he has great ability or do you think that he also has love for the activity? Obviously there are days when Lebron James does not feel like playing basketball but it's not a stretch to say that overall he loves what he does. Pick any man or woman who is considered to be the best at what they do and I'll show you a professional who had love/desire for their specific field of expertise way before the fruits of practice/training paid off with more money/accolades. These people were not born throwing touchdown passes or slam dunking. First comes desire, then practice and then money/recognition come later. But the desire is usually always there. Once the desire leaves then it's time to retire. Now just like no one who has never picked up a baseball bat or never swung a golf club or never dribbled a basketball will not magically have the skills as a Derek Jeter, Tiger Woods or Lebron James, no adult performer is going to show a camera man her mastery of her dilated anus if she hasn't already been intimate for some time with anal sex or insertions. The human body just does not work that way. For a butt to do the things that seem to be frowned upon by this establishment...I mean this thread...it takes some anal stretching, training and exercise (solo or with a partner). It all begins and ends with desire.
[Link] |
| Hardware All-Star Member Your other left 14594 Posts 3/02 | Posted - Nov 19 2011 : 6:28PM As far as confusing ability with desire all one has to do is consider any other profession that involves using your body... Whoa, hoss. Anal pays the most and it gets the most accolades, so there are incentives beyond love to attempt it. Katja Kassin was very good at anal sex, but I don't think you'll find that she did it because of 'love of the game', else she wouldn't have quit the game while she still enjoyed so much popularity. She did it because that was the act that gave her the best return on her investments of time and energy. In short, her primary incentive was money, and fame came in a distant second. PS - Pornography is not just a tool for masturbation. Ask any couple who watch it together. [Link] |
| SP_Love Senior Member "Freaky Deakies Need Love Too" 1181 Posts 2/11 | Posted - Nov 20 2011 : 12:13AM I've never seen Katja do the type of anal gaping and prolapse that this thread is talking about hence you are proving my point. Those who are not pushing out their colon and showing us their protruding anus in detail usually don't enjoy anal sex as much as the "anal acrobats" of the industry! PS-The type of porn that I enjoy (Solo female masturbation, hardcore lesbian, extreme anal and insertions) usually only attracts male fans/viewers. Soft-core and mainstream usually attracts couples. But that is not what this debate is about. [Link] |
| Hardware All-Star Member Your other left 14594 Posts 3/02 | Posted - Nov 20 2011 : 12:24AM [Link] |
| BlackSix All-Star Member pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world 12377 Posts 9/07 | Posted - Nov 20 2011 : 1:37AM [Link] |
| SP_Love Senior Member "Freaky Deakies Need Love Too" 1181 Posts 2/11 | Posted - Nov 20 2011 : 2:37AM Good point although I did say "usually" and not "exclusively". In response Hardware's idea that couples enjoy the same type of porn that I do I guess that a really kinky lesbian couple would work. But I don't think that's what Hardware was referring to. Lol...perhaps I'm a lesbian trapped in a man's body? I do really enjoy the cunnilingus...hmmm... :-) "It takes courage to enjoy it: the hardcore and the gentle...Big Time Sensuality!" [Link] |
| Hardware All-Star Member Your other left 14594 Posts 3/02 | Posted - Nov 20 2011 : 3:13AM Actually, I was responding to this comment of yours: I'm a realist and I've always seen porn as what it actually is: a tool for masturbation. Nothing more. Clearly, you didn't specify a particular category of porn. [Link] |
| Rolf Muller Member 119 Posts 11/11 | Posted - Nov 20 2011 : 12:50PM Edited by - Rolf Muller on 11/20/2011 12:55:18 PM [Link] |
| ButtMan New Member 4 Posts 12/11 | Posted - Dec 3 2011 : 9:55AM [Link] |
| BumBum Member 395 Posts 1/07 | Posted - Dec 3 2011 : 10:19AM "For me, anal is about the chicks ass as much as her asshole. I love seeing a good sized dick sliding in and out between perfectly rounded, soft ass cheeks. I can do without the gaping, prolapse, pink sock, etc. Give me a good old fashioned doggie-style butt fuck any day." I'm much more of a buttocks lover than an anus lover. I love to see the gal's ass getting fucked, but the gripping of the dick or toy by the anus is much hotter to me than seeing the hole wide open. Jeez, I guess I have too much time on my hands, just to be thinking about, let alone writing about this..... [Link] |
| kaiser1one Member Dark Avatar 142 Posts 10/07 | Posted - Dec 5 2011 : 11:56AM [Link] |
| jrockmovie Member 38 Posts 8/04 | Posted - Dec 5 2011 : 12:20PM I am curious about the scene in the OP for novelty's sake but I wouldn't expect it to be a particularly horny shot. As a side note, the movie "Into the Void" has a simulated internal conception sequence that was kind of erotic considering it was a non-porn film. [Link] |
 | |
| Ignatz Deactivated User 269 Posts 2/12 | Posted - Feb 19 2012 : 9:18AM [Link] |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |