Here is another note of thanks for Jack Lumber for putting this together. I appreciate it, Jack! While we're at it, is there any chance you will do a sub-category poll for anal, girl/girl, and so on?
Also, is there any chance that you could do an NCAA bracket style contest?
Anyhow, thanks again. It was kind of fun having some of my picks validated by other voters.
Ah OK, I tallied them by points scored, not total votes - even though this is an unusual way to score it IMO, you clearly spelled it out and I missed that! With that tweak I think most of the top 70 still ranks the same but the 70-100 range is completely different and matches what you posted.
Sorry for ruining this - no doubt about it, what I did was classless. Sorry to you and the many people who were looking forward to the rest of what was an outstanding countdown presentation of the rankings.
I'm just checking back in to see if we can convince Jack Lumber to resume his reveal of the top 100. I know it was revealed by another poster, but it may have been an attempt to help, or show support, rather than to steal your thunder. Anyway, Jack, I'm appealing to you to resume the reveal, complete with photos and bios. Maybe other fans will agree. If you decide not to, please know that I and many others appreciate what you have done so far.
My guess is that the chances are slim, and that's too bad. From reading the thread, I wasn't alone in enjoying turning my mind to a response to the poll. I think the guy who organized it, Jack_Lumber, is gone now. I don't think he's posted here since January. Running the poll must have been relatively complex, and while a lot of us had fun with it, others questions the methods. I think the last straw was a member revealing the entire list of winners when Jack intended to draw that out for a long time. I'll admit that I was losing interest and that he probably should have revealed the winners in groups of ten rather than one per day, but it was his choice to make.
The bottom line is that I suspect seeing this very poll again is unlikely. Then again, if you are so inclined, you could start a new one.
Yeah, poor Jack. What's also bugging is how the other guy isn't that active on the board either. As if disrupting Lumber's presentation was his sole mission on here lol.
I'm entertaining the idea of hosting it (and I actually like his method fine, until we hear a better idea) but after a head count. Like at least twenty-thirty participants, which is unlikely tbh given the pace of postings here on a daily basis.