I'm not at all a fan of Andrew Blake, but I have fond memories of a scene where Colt Steele had sex with Laura Palmer & (Holly Body ?) in parallel scenes. There was some use of sepia if my memory is correct.
"Hidden Obsessions" is my favorite Andrew Blake movie, and one of my favorite movies in general. I've seen two other films of his, but it's been such a long time I don't quite remember the titles. One I believe was called "Sensual Exposure", and I don't remember the other at all.
NIGHT TRIPS 2 HIDDEN OBSESSIONS LES FEMMES EROTIQUES
And to answer Respect, Andrew Blake's films are usually considered features, because there is some unifying (albeit, loosely unifying) storyline or plot running though his movies. For instance, NIGHT TRIPS is about a woman having her fantasies explored by a machine, SECRETS involves a madam reminescing about certain hooker/john encounters and so on.
I have only seen a few Andrew Blake movies, and I can say they are beautifully shot and the women are gorgeous -- his works looks like Helmut Newton photographs come to life. The one thing you can say about AB is that he knows how to photograph women and make them look like goddesses. This is a good thing in an industry where, ironically enough, most directors have absolutely no idea how to photograph a woman. On the other hand the constant cutting away in Ab movies breaks the flow of the film, leading me to throw something at the TV in exasperation. Pity.
The quick-cut editing was (is?) a big problem with most of his viewing audience. But more recent flicks have reduced that practice. As he explained in an interview from a few years back -
PornstarEmpire.com: I noticed that recently, probably beginning with Aria, you've had longer hardcore scenes with less intercutting. Are you just trying to change styles again, or...
Andrew Blake: Yeah, I mean you can't stay in the same place all the time. While I felt that the intercutting was kind of interesting, I think it breaks the flow for someone who's trying to masturbate or somebody that's trying to follow a certain girl. So, I kind of went back to longer takes, and in the next film which is coming out February, Girlfriends, I developed that further -- there are some very long takes, which I think helps with the masturbation factor.
Night Trips 1---Tori Wells was my "before I was of age to watch porn" dream gal Les Femmes Erotiques---c'mon, this spawned a CD soundtrack! ;P Julia Ann...and a pre-Jenna Jenna Jameson. Gorgeous film. FILM (not video) Night Trips 2---something about a girl and a doorknob...I dunno.
Paying trib-ute to SinncentVanSage 1412 Posts 12/04
Posted - May 17 2005 : 9:37PM
Damn, you're right, Orgazmik can't sell it. I haven't seen it but I guess it includes squirting ignorantly taken for peeing by our law. Can't imagine an Andrew Blake movie includes anything with children, animals, extreme violence or scat.
At least it's only illegal to sell squirting movies in Switzerland. Owning them is legal, you're just considered a sick fuck. But let's think positive: I can buy a squirting title in the US and automatically get a barely legal title along with it if it's not confiscated by customs.
Body Language contains several pee scenes including one where a girls pees another on her back. And this is something which is definitely against the law in Switzerland and the UK too by the way.This is not true. Movies containing "body excretions" in combination with sexuality are illegal by law. Illegal means it's forbidden to own and sell, trade or import them. And squirting is most likely also considered "body excretions" although there is no court decision so far.
We do offer Body Language to customers outside Switzerland and the UK by the way.
Paying trib-ute to SinncentVanSage 1412 Posts 12/04
Posted - May 31 2005 : 9:09PM
It is illegal to produce (including download), sell, trade, import them, but ownership of movies with body excretions is not illegal since it's also not illegal to perform sexual acts with faeces in privacy.
I try to translate that for those who don't speak German:
"But as far as it's about extending culpability on ownership of pornography, the federal council doesn't see enough reasons to justify putting ownership of illustrations depicting sexual actions with body excretions under punishment."
But I'm aware it could be illegal to import squirting movies because it could be reckoned to "body excretions". But sperm is no problem, either, so in the name of equal opportunities for both sexes women should be allowed to have wet orgasms in movies, too. I mean a GGG movie (without pissing) for example is reckoned as soft pornography and watching a woman having fun is almost on the same level as kiddie porn and bestiality, and that's fucking insane! When lovers of female orgasms are referred to as perverted, sick fucks it's no wonder Swiss guys are considered bad lovers.
Edited to add something and to say sorry for going off topic, but it had to be said.
Edited by - VincentVanGauge on 5/31/2005 9:23:54 PM
Paying trib-ute to SinncentVanSage 1412 Posts 12/04
Posted - May 31 2005 : 9:47PM
In the link I posted, some sentences before my quote, you can read that some people applied for reckoning watersports to soft porn in the future but our federal council saw no reason to check that because it didn't have anything to do with extending culpability to ownership since body excretions were not bothered by that, anyway. If it's not on the agenda, it's not interesting...
I guess the problem is most people wouldn't do anything about it because they don't want government to know they're into watersports. What if customs officers will be advised to be a little more nosy when a parcel goes to Joey Starr? And though ownership is legal, there's no legal way to come to ownership, so it's risky enough anyway without government knowing what you're into.
It could be so easy: Consenting adults --> legal. But no...
I'm still sorry but since no one seems to talk about Andrew Blake movies anymore I just keep the thread alive by derailing it.
Edit: I wrote that before I saw your post, threesomebody.
Edited by - VincentVanGauge on 5/31/2005 9:48:49 PM