Seems to be pretty nasty. The fact that Cindy Crawford is on the castlist really makes me want to order this one. Cindy doing a shemale must be hot ! Also a good idea doing this kind of movie with big stars.
When you're a fan, you usually follow your "idol" wherever he/she goes and simply avoid the stuff you don't dig, like you do with your music or film idols. Even though they may not be into T/S or f/m strap-ons, I'm sure Cindy's fans will simple skip this and continue to enjoy her other work. And she may gain other fans in the process.
But this "breaking barriers" thing isn't what I'm looking for in porn. I want good old fashioned b/g stuff.
[Link]
dogdays Deactivated User
66 Posts 8/05
Posted - May 24 2006 : 7:11PM
I dont know why porn companies feel the need to put this freakshow stuff out. I cant see the appeal of seeing some shemale and some chick getting it on its nasty and disgusting
Some are into anal gaping and A2M, some want to see the girls face saturated in cum, some want her fucked roughly and made to gag and some want to go back to 'old school' of vaginal sex with a pop shot on the tits.
Personally a girl with her ass opened so far thet it looks like your peering down a bottomless well...kind of puts me off her. But it seems to be a fairly popular genre.
Actually I'm pretty open minded for this type of movie, as long as the shemales do look hot and very feminine. I mean O.K., they do have a cock. But if the other parts of their bodies look like the ones of women, it's hot to see them fucking Cindy Crawford ! Of course, you can see this type of movies only from time to time.
[Link]
Midtown Deactivated User
299 Posts 7/05
Posted - May 24 2006 : 11:34PM
Yet another example of porn producers not really caring what the red blooded Amerian male porn buyer wants. Over the last few years, we wanted to see attractive girls and they dumped a bunch of fatties on us. Now, they're going to start injecting transvestites into mainstream videos? Someone wants to see this crap. But, I have a feeling its the porn producers more than it is the viewing audience.
Really? I thought it was gapes and spitting that were disgusting. I've been wrong all these years, but now that you've set me straight, I'll change my opinions posthaste!
On a serious note, I'd'a been much happier if the girls had been doing _real_ men like Christian or Jaeger, It just seems obvious to me that trannies aren't "chicks with dicks" but rather "boys with boob jobs". I don't browbeat the trannie-fans with this, though, as that would confict with the whole not-being-a-judgemental-asshole vibe that I've got going.
Oddly enough, most of the trannie fans will loudly protest that they're straight, because they see the trannies as "girls". I think it's stupid, but there ya go. As for me, if a trannie movie is the only place I can see MMF threesomes or girl-boy strapon action, well, I guess I'll just have to put up with the (IMO) idiotic conceit that a pair of silicone breasts and a bunch of female hormones will turn a guy into a girl. If only guys weren't so insecure in their masculinity, such cognative dissonance wouldn't be necessary. :-P
This I think is true... of course anyone has the right to be into whatever turns them on be it b/g, shemale, gangbangs ect. A performer has the right to do any scenes, and for me the greatest performers of all are those who can adapt and cater to all styles and give a stella performance in what ever genre of porn they choose to engage themselves in. I, as a performer am not defined by individual scenes, and neither are any other performers... it's not about alienating anyone, it's about including everyone.
I'm very curious about Cindy's scene. She's so damn hot and is able to handle some of the most perverted action. Now I'd like to see if she enjoyed her fuck in this movie.
You're right, ultimately, it's about pleasing the fans. That's what sells dvds and that's what keeps the industry running. People would be surprised to see how many guys (and gals) are into transsexual porn. Not everyone's cup o' tea...hell, it's not mine...but i'll defend any consenting adult's right to see it.
Christian, you should know by now that every time any poster on this (or any other porn board ) expresses a personal opinion, that they also speak for the majority of porn fans, everywhere.
right?
don't like it? don't watch it!
After all, there's millions of people in the world (and probably in the US alone) who think that all porn is disgusting and should be banned.
I'll agree that too many producers make their porn for themselves in an attempt to not be bored with making the same DVD over and over again and overlook the consumer, but you might need to just change what you've been looking at if you think that "they dumped a bunch of fatties on us".
Trannies are a niche and always will be, just because someone makes a DVD with a bunch of TVs in it doesn't mean that your regularly scheduled g/g scene will be replaced by a TV/m scene or a TV/g scene.
+1 Bob.
As for my own opinion, these threads come up every so often and always make me wonder why someone doesn't start up a series with attractive shemales (or shamales) doing chicks.
I've never watched a TV vid, as I'm just not interested in seeing guys pork or be porked by shemales. Just not my thing, shrug. But I'd be curious enough to check one out if someone took the risk to produce an all-girl/tv one, IF all of the performers were attractive and feminine looking. Sadly though, most TVs seem to be uglier than my neighbour's dog, and often the girls that they're with are equally unfortunate looking.
Most companies that I'd consider most likely to take that risk, unfortunately seem to get a lot of their female performers for b/g scenes from the $2 shop, so bearing that in mind I guess I'll never get around to answering my curiosity on that one...
Then again, maybe this DVD is the one I've been waiting for to check out. Will it repulse me? Will it weird me out? Will I like it? Who the fuck knows?
And yeah, anyway, I'm not sure how a chick screwing a modified guy is gay? Borderline-Lesbian "gay", maybe.
They put it out because people buy it. They buy it because it's nasty, if it's done right. I guess disgusting is in the eye of the beholder.
[Link]
duffy Deactivated User
208 Posts 4/06
Posted - May 26 2006 : 5:48PM
Look, if you read this forum enough you begin to realize that most posters are in love with male cum. The girl is irrelevant. They all wish/fantasize/dream they could be chugging cum. All you need to know.
Watched the trailer, and it seemed a bit odd to me, in more ways than one. I have to openly question what the point is of having a TS/G movie where half of the scenes' focus seems to be the real chicks doing the TS' with strap-ons.
The whole point of male equipment + chicks is to see them get together, really. Doesn't pretty much the rest of the TS genre feature the TS being the one on the recieving end?
Then again, when casting something like this you'd want the TS to be attractive, femininine, and with working/operative equipment. Any two out of those three is kind of pointless.
As for Duffy, he seems pretty keen on the thought of chugging down some semen, doesn't he? Grow up mate, else you won't last too long here.
This isn't entirely off the mark. So many posts express an infatuation with some form of degradation of women that some analysis of the situation is in order. At this point, I wonder whether the porn industry is like the Catholic Church - corrupted beyond recognition by a small cadre of sick (and mostly gay) bastards. And, I'm not buying this "If you don't like it, don't watch it" argument. More and more, the sickest of gonzo/homosexually influenced crap is making its way into mainstream adult video. When I want to watch a porn flick, I want to see beautiful women engaged in scenarios that I can reasonably imagine (not torture/physical abuse/gang bangs, etc.)
P.S. - Below is a perfect example of what I am talking about. This poster is infatuated with the prolapsing of a woman's ass. If you dare to look at the photographs he is referring to, you can tell that this woman has been physically injured. And, this jack ass thinks that's a good thing?
Not sure what you mean in the first point. There's a world of difference between what, say, *I* consider the sickest of gonzo's crap and homosexuality .
You might do well to actually explain what it is you're talking about. If you're talking about this particular video, it's a one-off niche, and it's far from mainstream porn. or do you mean DP? Or DAP and DPP? Double-BJs? At what point do you define "homosexual"?
On the seocnd point, I don't mind seeing a multi-guy scene, but I like to know what to expect going in. I'm not into physical abuse or any of that stuff (fishhooking, choking, throat-fucking) at all.
An answer? Be careful what you buy. I don't see that stuff in, say, Private's products, or Marc Dorcel. Otherwise, there's a good decade of decent porn out there, and I'm sure that nobody (besides perhaps den ) has seen all of it, or even all of the good stuff...
Cindy Crawford @ Adult Empire
Posted - May 24 2006 : 4:39AM
400 LOADS!! That's alot! I'm not sure you could handle all that cum. However, I'm sure somebody out there in porn land would be willing to shoot it. 
I agree.
) has seen all of it, or even all of the good stuff...