it loses a lot without the context of her body wouldn't you say?
guess it is hard to look pretty doing the sex face.
but some performers have it down to an art. i was going to do the same thing to Jenna Haze but her sex face is too pretty
[Link]
| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| Caelm Member 32 Posts 4/09 |  Posted - Apr 14 2009 : 8:22AMIn the conversation about girls "too pretty for porn" someone made a comment about it being more unusual to find ugly girls in porn. My immediate response to this is nooooooooooo, but on further thinking about it there aren't that many girls I consider to be out-right ugly in the industry (and I shan't name those that I do). However, there are a few that are quite aatractive to look at but make the most unattractive expressions during their scenes! Prime example is the ubiquitous Kelly Wells - she's a very enthusiastic performer, but she pulls such ugly expressions that I can't stand to watch her! I know there are others in this category, but I think my mind is blocking them out! [Link] |
| empires Member 66 Posts 4/09 | Posted - Apr 14 2009 : 11:14AM it loses a lot without the context of her body wouldn't you say? guess it is hard to look pretty doing the sex face. but some performers have it down to an art. i was going to do the same thing to Jenna Haze but her sex face is too pretty [Link] |
| BigBobxxx Senior Member 2681 Posts 5/04 | Posted - Apr 14 2009 : 11:29AM Looks hot to me. [Link] |
| Caelm Member 32 Posts 4/09 | Posted - Apr 14 2009 : 11:31AM [Link] |
| backdoorman Senior Member Shake for me girl... I wanna be your backdoorman ! 2776 Posts 10/07 | Posted - Apr 14 2009 : 11:34AM [Link] |
 | |
| Caelm Member 32 Posts 4/09 | Posted - Apr 14 2009 : 11:41AM [Link] |
| BigBobxxx Senior Member 2681 Posts 5/04 | Posted - Apr 14 2009 : 11:52AM [Link] |
| Caelm Member 32 Posts 4/09 | Posted - Apr 14 2009 : 11:59AM [Link] |
| BigBobxxx Senior Member 2681 Posts 5/04 | Posted - Apr 14 2009 : 12:05PM [Link] |
| Caelm Member 32 Posts 4/09 | Posted - Apr 14 2009 : 12:18PM My point remains tho, names of girls that transform thus would be grand! :) [Link] |
| Bobcat Senior Member 1490 Posts 2/08 | Posted - Apr 14 2009 : 12:29PM [Link] |
| BigBobxxx Senior Member 2681 Posts 5/04 | Posted - Apr 14 2009 : 12:44PM Generally, you will see this referred to as First Amendment Rights. Speech and print are, for the most part, impervious to prosecution under our legal system. Pictures are another matter entirely. The religious right, and their conservative enablers, are always looking for ways to attack pornography. Their goal is to eliminate it (not merely regulate it). For the past eight years, the Bush Administration's Justice Department revised what is known as 2257 regulations to make it easier for the government to prosecute individuals for exercising their legal free speech rights with regards to pornography. How, you might ask? By creating paperwork regulations that make record-keeping burdens extremely burdensome with regards to pornography. These have been justified as "protecting the children" laws -- which, of course, is total bullshit. In any event, while it is clearly legal in the United States for anyone over the age of 18 to view and/or perform pornography, the government wants to now be able to convict you of a crime if you don't have the documentation to prove it -- it doesn't matter if the person in question is obviously of legal age. Finally, the government doesn't have to win its case to destroy you. Simply dragging you into court and driving you into financial ruin defending yourself is all it takes. Most people, finally, eventually wind up pleading out at this point to avoid prison time on top of it. Since there is no possible way that a website can have the required 2257 documentation, for pictures posted by visitors, that potentially risk prosecution by the "Justice" Department, most intelligent websites follow some version of an "ADT Image Policy" to protect themselves. [ invalid url ] can give you some more insight into these issues. [Link] |
| Caelm Member 32 Posts 4/09 | Posted - Apr 14 2009 : 1:49PM [Link] |
killbillvol69  All-Star Member ^Lucy Pinder 18634 Posts 4/08 | Posted - Apr 14 2009 : 1:53PM [Link] |
| Caelm Member 32 Posts 4/09 | Posted - Apr 14 2009 : 2:24PM [Link] |
| BigBobxxx Senior Member 2681 Posts 5/04 | Posted - Apr 14 2009 : 4:13PM When you stated, "Examples are the way forwards!!!! :)," I pointed out that, "No dick pictures please (it violates the ADT Image Policy)." In no way did I represent that "dicks" were the policy. Killbillvol69 has posted a link to the ADT Image Policy for you. Read it. [Link] |
| empires Member 66 Posts 4/09 | Posted - Apr 15 2009 : 2:31AM she only does G/G now but she used to be a firecracker when hopping on cocks [Link] |
| Loraine Senior Member 1559 Posts 3/04 | Posted - Apr 15 2009 : 5:56AM [Link] |
| Pagoda Senior Member Thread Killer 1747 Posts 10/05 | Posted - Apr 15 2009 : 3:49PM [Link] |
| Pagoda Senior Member Thread Killer 1747 Posts 10/05 | Posted - Apr 15 2009 : 3:51PM |
| JohnW Senior Member 1351 Posts 6/08 | Posted - Apr 19 2009 : 8:59PM [Link] |
| joachim Senior Member 03 12 15 16 18 04 07 13 18 2285 Posts 1/09 | Posted - Apr 19 2009 : 9:58PM And Annabelle Lee is still a firecracker in her lesbian scenes. [Link] |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |