^ It's often hard to tell if a male porn star is circumcised or not, because uncircumcised guys or their partner roll back their foreskin, when the camera is focused on it. Generally, male actors who are originally from Europe or some other non-US country, are uncircumcised. These include Manuel Ferrara, Steve Holmes, Ramon Nomar, Omar Galanti, and others. The one big exception is Rocco Siffredi. He wasn't circumcised at the start of his porn career, but he decided to get circumcised later on. And from what I've seen, virtually all American male actors are circumcised.
Actually, Steve Holmes got circumcised later on like Rocco did (something to do with his foreskin splitting and bleeding during erections). I don't know if he still hangs out here or not - if so maybe he can clarify. Peace and Love, B
^ I'd say that you've made this up. Because the latest porn films, Steve Holmes has made last year and this year, show that he is still uncircumcised, just like before. The links below are for films where Steve Holmes was the only male performer, which means that it's his uncircumcised cock every time: Screenshots of Steve Holmes in German POV 3, made in 2013 Back cover of German POV 5, made in 2014 Circumcision is associated with religion and politics, especially in USA and some other countries too. Which makes it a topic for trolls and propagandists seeking to influence the opinions of others even by lying.
Nobody can be sure technically I'm uncircumcised yet almost all the top of my dick is free even at rest , and so were my brothers ,when I last saw them naked , years ago when we were all still kids , don't know about my father and obviously didn't ask to my mother (hey mom how was dad's dick? ) Mine was regularly covered roughly until I turned 12 then my dick continued to grow but the foreskin did not and the top begun to show out , as the years passed it was free almost completely , no blades down there , I'm a natural circumcised so to speak. No religious propaganda here I'm agnostic.
^ It's only dirty if you don't wash it and it's only dangerous if you tug too hard.
[Link]
Mass Facialties Deactivated User
"Facialized Vol. 7" 2021 AVN Awards Winner: Best Oral Movie 9308 Posts 9/13
Posted - Jul 18 2014 : 1:44AM
There are too many uncircumcised guys in American gonzo porn, if you ask me.
[Link]
realtip Deactivated User
2301 Posts 6/04
Posted - Jul 18 2014 : 1:51AM
^That's quite a funny joke.
[Link]
Mass Facialties Deactivated User
"Facialized Vol. 7" 2021 AVN Awards Winner: Best Oral Movie 9308 Posts 9/13
Posted - Jul 18 2014 : 3:04AM
^ Actually, I was being quite serious. Maybe it's not a matter of too many uncut guys in the biz, but rather that there are just too many scenes with uncut cocks, as far as I'm concerned. Maybe I'm exaggerating, but it just seems like uncirumcised guys, most notably Manuel Ferrara, appear in like half of all the gonzo scenes that are made by top studios like HardX, Jules Jordan Video and Elegant Angel nowadays. Edited by - Mass Facialties on 7/18/2014 3:28:18 AM
Ramon Nomar has to be uncircumcised because Madelyn Marie at times goes to great lengths to prove that uncircumcised is more healthy and good for health and sex and some people have over the past tweeted back attacking her for it as well but she is a fighter and not one to back down Hmm on that note i wish she returned
Why did Rocco get circumcised?(If I read that right) Edit, found an article: http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2010/02/circumcision/rocco-siffredi-penis-circumcision "Adult film star Rocco Siffredi (nom de guerre: Italian Stallion) says he found that out the hard way when he was circumcised at 31 for hygiene reasons. Siffredi, who calls his decision "catastrophic," says that with a foreskin, "you can feel much more fun." Poor guy. I wonder who fooled him into believing the hygiene myth. Edited by - 2bollocks on 2/1/2015 2:19:50 PM
[Link]
Mass Facialties Deactivated User
"Facialized Vol. 7" 2021 AVN Awards Winner: Best Oral Movie 9308 Posts 9/13
Posted - Feb 2 2015 : 1:08AM
^ LOL, of course, it's all myth, nevermind all of the extensive medical studies and research that have proven otherwise. It's also been proven that circumcision in adulthood is extremely risky, whereas there's virtually no risk in circumcision for a newborn. Considering that Rocco waited until the age of 31 to have it done, obviously Rocco isn't going to enjoy the feeling of being circumcised because he lived the first 31 years of his life uncut. Also, he might have dealt with medical conditions related to the foreskin in the past and that's why he decided to do it. Frankly, I find it kind of amusing that Rocco "Watch me slap this girl around and treat her like shit" Siffredi now hates his penis and regrets making the "catastrophic" decision to get circumcised.
^I can't even tell with that sarcasm mixed in there, are you for or against circumcision? Just to be sure that I firmly stand by what I said about it being a myth, and that the legitimate research in favor of foreskins completely blows the pro-cut propaganda out of the water. Like it's not even remotely close if this is turned into a debate.
ADT Chatroom Survivor, Large Breast Connoisseur 176 Posts 8/08
Posted - Feb 2 2015 : 11:41AM
I'm circumcised, but I probably wouldn't do that to my son if we have one. I think mine was mainly about religion, and while I'm not upset about it, I don't see any reason to put his on the chopping block just because mine is clipped.
^Now that's a good dad. I just hope your woman isn't the type who thinks she can decide for the child and you because she thinks 'it looks better'. Unfortunately that happens a lot and it's extremely selfish and wrong imo.
[Link]
Mass Facialties Deactivated User
"Facialized Vol. 7" 2021 AVN Awards Winner: Best Oral Movie 9308 Posts 9/13
Posted - Feb 2 2015 : 11:14PM
I'm a circumcised American male (like the vast majority of American males) who is all for circumcision. Personally, I always have been, and always will be glad that my parents chose to have me circumcised after birth and I don't know how you uncut guys can live with that shit (foreskin) always getting in the way. I feel sorry for ya, I've heard of uncut guys wishing they had been circumcised, but I've never once heard of a circumcised guy complain that he wished he wasn't circumcised after birth. As for this cut/uncut debate, other than the fact that having foreskin allows for "increased sensitivity," I haven't heard anything to suggest that being uncircumcised is better than being circumcised. On the other hand, a quick Google search led me to this article, Circumcision rates declining in U.S., study says., which started out with this troubling finding:
^You're very uninformed and have an agenda because you're cut yourself. There are many, many circumcised guys like you who are very much against circumcision because they actually have the courage to realise how they have been wronged. They're all over the internet and are called intactivists and the fact that you're unaware of this shows your lack of knowledge. There is a very vast archive of studies that disprove all of the myths that pro-cut crowd claim and they show how thousands of nerve endings are in the foreskin, what its role is during intercource and how the skin keeps the glans which are a sexual organ, protected, moist and clean. Tons of sites like this which are supported by scientific research, not the sites you posted because you know why they are pro-cut? Because it's actually a very lucrative business in the medical community that they want to keep going but that's not what they tell uninformed parents. http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/info/foreskin.html These docs have a plethora of details on it. http://www.intactamerica.org/learnmore There are many testimonies of men who had it done when they were adults and they explain it best, hell I just provided a quote from porn God Rocco who called his circumcision the biggest mistake of his life. "Gets in the way?" LOL, when I'm erect it looks almost the same as a cut penis, and it's the opposite, it doesn't get in the way it helps during sex and makes masturbation much more enjoyable and easier(which is btw why this practise was created, to prevent males from whacking it). The difference is a natural penis the way it was meant to be isn't scarred, dried and severely lacking sensitivity and it makes sex more enjoyable both for the male as well as female. The vast majority of men in the world are uncut and all they have to do every day when they shower is pull the skin back and wash it with soap and there are zero issues. I don't care if you're cut but the way you came into this thread claiming your side is all fact and the way you descriminate against intact performers rubbed me the wrong way.
ADT Chatroom Survivor, Large Breast Connoisseur 176 Posts 8/08
Posted - Feb 3 2015 : 11:23AM
Nah, my wife is pretty much "I don't have that equipment so I really don't know what it would be like" mindset. I just think if you met someone that had never heard of circumcision and explained to them what it was, they'd wonder why the hell we do it so much in the first place. I'm not upset I was circumsized, and I'm good with it, but unless it's necessary for some medical reason, I'm not going to pass it down.
[Link]
Mass Facialties Deactivated User
"Facialized Vol. 7" 2021 AVN Awards Winner: Best Oral Movie 9308 Posts 9/13
Posted - Feb 3 2015 : 3:59PM
In response to 2bollocks: In a quick internet search, I have found that some of the foremost authorities on public health, like the Centers for Disease Control and the World Health Organization, have come out in the past year in strong support of male circumcision right after birth. Along with the findings I previously quoted in the linked article, the Mayo Clinic Proceedings came to this conclusion: "The study says the benefits of newborn circumcision exceed the risks by at least 100 to 1." To counter this, you post links to two sites with their own agendas, which I've never even heard of. Not only that, but you preceded that by stating your own unfounded conspiracy theory that the medical community is promoting circumcision simply for financial gain. Sorry, but I'll go with the information provided by the CDC and WHO over organizations/sites that I've never heard of. (You kind of lose credibility when you throw out conspiracy theories.)Hey, if one simply prefers not being circumcised, that's fine, everyone's entitled to their opinions. But when you decide to essentially call extensive medical research counter to your argument bullshit, and you dole out misinformation and conspiracy theories, you need to be called out on it. Same goes for the "No to childhood vaccinations!" crowd, if you don't believe in these vaccinations, fine, but don't go trying to spread misinformation while ignoring the extensive evidence that disproves your theories. In regards to this thread, you got the ball rolling by bringing up the "hygiene myth." The study I referenced found that "over their lifetime, half of all uncircumcised males will contract a medical condition related to their foreskin," but that's all a myth, right? Finally, in regards to the uncut male talent in the American gonzo porn industry, sorry, but it's always been a "pet peeve" of mine-these uncut Euro guys all over American gonzo porn. If this was porn produced over in Europe or somewhere outside of the U.S., I would have no problem with these guys showing up. However, while the porn I watch is produced here and features essentially nothin' but American girls, uncut Euro guys like Manuel Ferrara, Mick Blue and Danny D show up in all too many scenes. Again, the vast majority of American men are circumcised, but yet so many of these scenes produced here have these uncut Euro guys; it's always irked me.
Its the same old story. Its always the guys who are not circumcised who raise all the fuss about it. And don't give me all that mutilation crap. Do you have any tattoos or piercings or anything of that nature? Guess what-you are mutilated, too!! I was circumcised at birth and I wouldn't have it any other way.
^ The thing about tattoos and piercings is that most of the time an individual will choose to have them. There's no individual choice for a baby having his foreskin removed. Why can't it be left until maturity so the individual can decide for himself?
^^ Are you sure about that? Most of the whining I read comes from those who ARE circumcised and a lot of them ignorantly think those who aren't are unhygenic/disgusting/beneath human (delete as appropriate).
That's the full extent of your knowledge on this subject: quick internet searches hoping to find something that validates your thoughts. Like you said, you have never even heard of some of the things intactivists speak about supported by scientific research, and that says more about you than them.Is that what constitutes as a legit source or not now? If the website in question is one that is familiar with you, somebody who has already admitted that he knows very little about circumcision?And the ones I quoted say the opposite, and they were supported by doctors with medical degrees. You completely ignored my sources but I'll post it again: First read the part at "Alleged medical reasons for circumcision" where all of the myths about hygene and diseases are busted, and then scroll down to "Complications" to see the risks of circumcision so how that laughable '100 to 1' stat you posted holds up. http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/info/foreskin.html And here's a source that says 229 infants die because of circumcision every year http://www.cirp.org/library/death/ And that's for deaths, imagine the numbers for infants who get BOTCHED jobs as well, this cannot be ignored. You still think the "benefits outweight the risks 100 to 1?" I mean you literally said "there's virtually no risk in circumcision for a newborn" which is insane.The profit for circumcision is estimated at 150 to 270 million a year, but further estimates for extra costs that come with the treatment make the figure closer to 234-527 million. http://www.circumstitions.com/$$$.html It also causes ED in many males later in life due to calloused glans which goes hand in hand with the lost sense of sensation, and here are yearly proftis for Viagra in the US at close to 2 billion$: http://www.statista.com/statistics/264827/pfizers-worldwide-viagra-revenue-since-2003/ It doesn't take a genius to figure out that a lot of money would be lost if circumcision was completely abolished, and that is why there are sites that claim circumcision is necessary, THEY are the ones who have something to lose, not the intactivists who are against it. These numbers prove it.Like I said, your discrimination is pretty dispicable. You might have some mental problems if this bothers you that much, you're the only straight male(maybe you should put a question mark on that) in this thread who complains about this. What makes it more bizarre is that it's hardly noticable since these performers are mostly seen erect and it looks quite similar to cut dicks. I think that this resentment of yours could be due to the fact that you do see truth in what is said about anti-circumcision and that it upsets you, and seeing these intact male performers who have far more joy and sensation in their dicks than you ever will(unfortunately. I do feel for guys like you honestly) is like they're 'rubbing it in' for you. Edited by - 2bollocks on 2/4/2015 11:59:13 AM
Of cource it's mutilation. "to injure, disfigure, or make imperfect by removing or irreparably damaging parts" What would you say about female circumcision? That's always considered a horror to the likes of you, yet it has arguments similar to male-circumcision.
[Link]
JackSparrow Deactivated User
7235 Posts 7/11
Posted - Feb 4 2015 : 10:55AM
Siffredi has him self cut for health reasons,can be mean different things ,must not be the case for unclean health,could be because his girth was too tight in erect state.thats often the case if older men get circumsized.its a myth that uncut dicks are not clean,if you wash yourself daily in your private parts,its never a problem,not ever had a sexual disease myself as a uncircumsized dude,but know a few circumsized dudes who had a few.
^There are different stories about why Rocco got it done. That link says health reasons, another says that he got injured by the actress who bit his penis and had it done due to infection etc. I doubt he had phimosis because he was a very aggressive pounder before he got it done.
Which actress bit his dick?She did it for pleasure/fun or because she was mad at him?Any video of said biting?
[Link]
Mass Facialties Deactivated User
"Facialized Vol. 7" 2021 AVN Awards Winner: Best Oral Movie 9308 Posts 9/13
Posted - Feb 5 2015 : 2:58AM
Come on, I can accuse you of the same-providing links to sites that only support your case, one stating so right in the web address: "Doctors Opposing Circumcision." And the second link, as scary as it appears, comes off as nothin' more than a propaganda page for the "No to circumcision!" crowd, stating conspiracy theories like this (first sentence of the sixth paragraph): "Doctors are highly motivated to conceal the true cause of circumcision death." And that crowd loves stuff like that, it allows them to use disproven scare tactics like "you're putting your son's life in danger if you have him circumcised!" It's out of the same "playbook" as the "No to childhood vaccines!" crowd, using unfounded and disproven information to scare people into not trusting information and recommendations from the most respected and recognized medical organizations in the country. Even when I read the opinions of these doctors who strongly oppose circumcison, they also tend to resort to personal beliefs or speculation that they can't back up with data. Again, if I were an expectant parent, I would put more weight into research and recommendations of health organizations like the CDC (they have doctors, too, you know) than random, highly questionable web pages like those which you provided. On that subject, I think we could both agree that all expectant parents should speak to their doctors, face to face, and listen to the information that they provide on the subject; you'd be better served having that conversation than reading what pops up in an internet search. Unlike you, I know I'm in no position to tell curious_bystander what he should do with his soon-to-be-born son, although I would hope that both he and his wife have that conversation with their doctor since both parents should be informed on the benefits and risks of either choice. Additionally, I don't have a beef with uncircumcised male performers because I'm jealous that they "have far more joy and sensation in their dicks than I will ever have," I've just been bothered by them, for as long as I've been viewing gonzo porn (over 12 years), because the sight of their uncut dicks sometimes grosses me out and makes me cringe, especially during the blowjob portions of scenes. Actually, I'll admit that Mick Blue and Danny D don't bother me much, but Manuel Ferrara's dick has always grossed me out. However, this nuisance doesn't ruin the scene for me, I can still watch and enjoy the scene so long as I'm attracted to the girl(s) and the scene is well shot by a director like HardX's Mason. I'm by no means wishing that uncut guys be banned from the American gonzo porn industry, I just prefer to see guys like me, circumcised (regardless of skin color), instead of uncut guys; I'm sure every porn viewer has some sort of preference when it comes to the male talent, whether it's size, race, or "fucking style." Finally, as I tried to state earlier, I have no problem with anyone who believes that "uncircumcised" is the way to go, I'll respect anyone's opinion on the matter. I just have a problem when people promote misinformation and conspiracy theories in an attempt to scare people into believing and doing what they want them to, whether it's this subject or childhood vaccines.
ADT Chatroom Survivor, Large Breast Connoisseur 176 Posts 8/08
Posted - Feb 5 2015 : 10:57AM
I just don't think either my wife or I are as passionate about it as this thread's conversation. Big picture, I'm much more likely to listen to the CDC or WHO as a source on what's going on in the medical world. Once you start getting off the rails too far from the mainstream medical community, you get into single issue conspiracy land where there's likely to be a lot more bias. Granted, the CDC may be subject to some cultural bias itself about circumcision, being a US organization based out of Atlanta (there are a lot of good Southern folks working there). To me, it's just about doing what you need to do for a healthy kid. Most of what I've read about the health issues surrounding foreskin is regarding hygiene, where with modern hygienic practices, it's not so much an issue.
[Link]
Mass Facialties Deactivated User
"Facialized Vol. 7" 2021 AVN Awards Winner: Best Oral Movie 9308 Posts 9/13
Posted - Feb 5 2015 : 6:25PM
^ I was about to respond to you and say "congratulations and good luck to you and your wife on the birth of your son," thinking that you said she was pregnant right now. I just so happened to take another look at your previous post to realize that's not the case:That's why I mentioned you in my previous post from last night. Whoops.
You wrote a lot but hardly responded to anything, instead you attempt to discredit everything by thinking it's all just a conspiracy theory when the facts I provided have nothing to do with that, so it's just a cheap cop-out on your part. I don't see the point of going on with this debate if you're gonna keep going that route. I showed evidence that circumcision makes hundreds of millions of dollars of profit annually. I showed evidence that some men will get premature ED later in life and have to resort to viagra, which is an extremely rich industry as well. I ask you again, what do intactivists have to gain out of this? Their pure concern is for defenseless babies who don't have a choice. And what do pro-circumcision crowds have to lose out of this? If it was completely abolished? hundreds of millions, I already proved that. I don't believe in any conspiricy theories like about 9/11, Kennedy etc. But to think that pro-circumcision has no reason to defend it or has nothing to lose is wrong factually is naive.First of all, these websites call themselves terms like that to make it clear that that is their cause. But all of the information posted on it is backed up by research so that's another silly reason to discredit them. Second, disproven? I proved to you the dangers of circumcision with the source that states hundreds of newborns die every year because of cicumcision(which didn't include numbers which also mentioned botched jobs, or do you think it's black and white? Do you think they either die or have perfect circumcisions?) in the US alone. Here it is again, but do you best to ignore it again or just think it's in the same level of a 9/11 conspiracy: http://www.cirp.org/library/death/How ironic is it that you complain about my sources which prove your wrong, and yet the only link you have provided so far from your so called credible site, is the one that claims that the benefits of infant circumcision out weight the risks 100:1, and yet every year many babies die because of the complications of circumcision. here's another source: http://www.circinfo.org/USA_deaths.html "The study, by researcher Dan Bollinger, concluded that approximately 117 neonatal deaths due directly or indirectly to circumcision occur annually in the United States, or one out of every 77 male neonatal deaths. This compares with 44 neonatal deaths from suffocation, 8 in automobile accidents and 115 from Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, all of which losses have aroused deep concern among child health authorities and stimulated special programs to reduce mortality." So then you make an even more hypocritical comment like this:Kind of like how you came in this thread claiming that it's extremely safe and pretty much zero risks with that 100:1 stat.Unlike you, I tell people that they should merely avoid putting their babies through a horribly painful and traumatic, needless procedure that could result in death or other injuries, and I back it up with researched data. You on the other hand believe in old wives tales like hygene problems and would spread disinformation to people like this surgery is completely risk free. My last point is this, most of the world is uncircumcised. That's billions of men who grew up with uncut dicks, that's what nature intended. That's likely thousands and thousands of deaths avoided over the period of decades. You should read up on the origins of circumcision and see why it truly exists and has for a long time.Well, that's a very different tone than how you started in this thread, and it's good to see that you've toned down your discrimination.
While it's true that there is data that suggest there are slight medical benefits to circumcision, the same can be said for female circumcision according to some sources. I don't think many people would accept female circumcision at birth as being the choice of the parents. Furthermore the incidence of urinary infection and HIV in Europe is not greater than in the US despite European males predominantly being uncircumcised. Male circumcision in the US was primarily done to stop young boys from masturbating (I'm looking at you, Kellogs) and nowadays people seem to hide behind the hygiene and health issues to disguise the fact they are grossed out by uncircumcised penises. It seems that natural beauty is only for women. It's involuntary cosmetic surgery, on an infant's genitals no less. Edited by - bouf on 2/11/2015 2:17:38 PM
[Link]
Fknzz Deactivated User
525 Posts 8/16
Posted - Dec 28 2016 : 10:02AM
I was thinking about it and its weird because I found a link with lot of references saying the entire opposite about circumsized cock being more healthy than uncut cocks. http://www.noharmm.org/advantage.htm I still wonder if its really legit (references,books,tests and stuff) but if is, then the whole population has been spreading rumors the wrong way. And its also funny because there's a lot of article claiming the risks are higher for uncut men. The real question is who to trust since both part seems to have good arguments but we never had a real study with percentages and stuff. Having technically a bit more uncut guys contracting disease doesn't necessarily mean its the foreskin fault, theres a lot of factor. SO unless we ask two diferent guys to fuck a girl with STD and see the results, how can we "really" know ?
^Thanks for the video. Pretty much confirmed what I had been saying last year. The pro's would know, the ones saying circumcised are duped by the myths i.e. "it grosses me out". But really circumcised people had this done to them due to ancient religious practises and now they reject the science and evolution that supports the benefits of foreskin. Jade Nile said it best: It's there for a reason.
I ♥ the male gaze (and Palestine). 8737 Posts 11/13
Posted - Dec 28 2016 : 12:08PM
Earlier this year Dr. Christopher Guest MD gave a lecture titled "A Historical and Medical Critique of Circumcision." It's a fairly comprehensive introduction to the circumcision controversy imho. Edited by - misspornUSA on 12/28/2016 12:11:24 PM
[Link]
Fknzz Deactivated User
525 Posts 8/16
Posted - Dec 28 2016 : 4:02PM
Well that's a really informative video you got there, thanks. We finally see that having +50% chances to contract HIV is only a relative stats, its like having 1 case out of 200k for cut and 2 case out of 200k for uncut for example. Not to mention percentages are very low even compared to low(est) rate disease that can occur. As for the other video abour pornstar I already saw it and looks like the general thinking is that foreskin feels better (and makes easier handjobs. Altho ofc it also depends on how tight is the girl to feel it. But there is definately no argument (in this vid or in the internet) about the foreskin feeling bad or giving bad sensations/sex. Most of cons argument are that "it doesn't look good" to some girls. But hey just pull out the foreskin and bingo you have a cut penis lookalike, so what's the real problem? Feels like being cut is all about "looking good" and "looking like the others" (in America) Well aside of that I live in Europe and I'm uncut & proud of it (with a big black dick just a few centimeters behind Lex steele, just sayin'). As for porn itself I dunno if its because I'm european but I have no problem whatsover with the male performer being cut or uncut. But uncut makes a little more thing to look at if the girl plays with the foreskin.
Here's an interesting Youtube video that talks about and illustrates foreskin during sex versus circumcised. Note: The comments after 4:14 get a bit bizarre. Edited by - fanofman on 12/29/2016 11:22:51 PM Edited by - fanofman on 12/29/2016 11:32:28 PM
I ♥ the male gaze (and Palestine). 8737 Posts 11/13
Posted - Dec 30 2016 : 12:29PM
^Those who are interested can get some sense of the significance of the topic from the lecture I linked to.
[Link]
Fknzz Deactivated User
525 Posts 8/16
Posted - Dec 31 2016 : 11:00AM
Well maybe if u are cut u probably ok because you didn't even exist if u had the choice but being uncut I can say thanks to my parents for not making this decision before me. And above all if u have protected sex or make a test (together) with your girl and take a bath often then being uncut is great. The most funny/stupid thing is when I hear women saying "it looks weird and ugly" Plz its our natural skin since the human existence and our dicks looks as normal as a cut dick if you just pull the foreskin if you want to suck it like that. But I wonder how porn actors deal with hypersensitivity, is it a habit ? practice ? control of movements ?
[Link]
Friedrich Deactivated User
73 Posts 2/17
Posted - Apr 26 2017 : 9:35PM
Almost every cock in European porn is uncircumcised. Except Rocco (circumcised being an adult) Zenza Raggi (of Arabic origin as Hakan Serbes, also cut), I do not think there are many more actors. Of the European industry, I would highlight the cocks of Steve Holmes, Jean Yves Lecastel, Frank Major, Ian Scott and Omar Galanti, the sexiest in Europe. In porn USA there are also several uncircumcised, like Voodoo, Preston Parker, Sean Michaels, Mick Blue, Danny D, Danny Mountain (these last 3 of European origin) and some others I like both kind of penises, but I find cut cocks more aesthetical. Pretty cocks like LEX STEELE, MANDINGO, SCOTT NAILS, MARK ASHLEY, CHRIS CHARMING, JON DOUGH, ALEC KNIGHT, SCOTT LYONS, MIKE ADRIANO, SEAN LAWLESS, JAKE STEED, LOGAN LONG, JESSY JONES..... Edited by - friedrich on 6/21/2017 4:32:57 PM
and some people have over the past tweeted back attacking her for it as well but she is a fighter and not one to back down 
Which actress bit his dick?She did it for pleasure/fun or because she was mad at him?Any video of said biting?
