Could you expand your 'eccentic (sic) judgement' and post it as a review?
DenverDon
Introducing Natasha Carter| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| David-J Member 155 Posts 8/02 | I noticed Aybesea's scathing review of 'Up Your Ass #20" (only 2 stars) and thought I would offer a quick alternative opinion. No doubt this vid isn't for everyone. If you don't like interracial sex, girls with tattoos, or small tits, then you won't like this one. Also, like most Anabolic movies, the sets, 'costumes' and camerawork are rudimentary. However, if you like previous volumes in this series, you should like this one. Maybe it isn't quite up to the standard of #18 and #19, but it isn't far off. The girls, with the exception of Aimee Tylor and Sandra, may not be raving beauties, but they all give good enthusiastic performances. (Aybesea describes Karianna (credited as Kirianna)'s performance as 'lackluster' - compared to what????) Maybe Aybesea just doesn't like interracial scenes. I notice he gives only 2 stars for 'male looks'. Since the guys in the vid are Lexington Steele, Franco Roccaforte and Mr Marcus, this might seem an eccentic judgement. [Link] |
| DenverDon Benevolent Firmly Embedded in Depravity 5914 Posts 7/02 | |
| Hardz Member Hell on Earth 877 Posts 6/01 | |
| Blackshade Member 66 Posts 8/02 | |
| Asmodeus Lord of Lust az-mo-day-us 6338 Posts 10/01 | "Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law" - Aleister Crowley 1875-1947 |
| Bill All-Star Member 5334 Posts 6/00 | |
| aybesea Senior Member Caroline Cage - Hungarian Hottie! 1485 Posts 5/02 | Next time, before you start to read between the lines and decide what it was that motivated a particular reviewer, you might just want to read their reviews! |
| David-J Member 155 Posts 8/02 | I'm still puzzled about your judgement of 'male looks'. I checked out your review of Balls Deep 5, which gives 4 stars to 'male looks'. The male performers in that movie are Lex Steele, Sean Michaels, and Erik Everhard. The male performers in UYA 20 are Lex Steele, Mr Marcus, and Franco Roccaforte, and you gave them only 2 stars for 'male looks'. Since Lex is in both movies, you must think that Marcus and/or Franco (Teo) are very ugly indeed. Does anyone else agree with you? |
| DenverDon Benevolent Firmly Embedded in Depravity 5914 Posts 7/02 | David-J, you most certainly are entitled to your opinion. I strongly suggest that if you want to continue the discussion of male performers in this title, you take it to email. Trolling or flaming is not allowed, and you are walking on the edge. Bill also made a suggestiion, rather than reviewing a review, how about writing a review of the DVD. Like everyone else, I have my favorite performers (male and female). However, that does not mean that just because they are in a movie, that the movie will be great. It depends upon the presentation (makeup, clothes), camera work, editing skills, lighting, etc. A favorite (hot) performer can still be presented or done poorly in a movie. Sad, and I may have purchased the movie based on the performer, and then been disappointed. I would give it lower marks because of the presentatioin. Edited by - DenverDon on 5/26/2003 6:45:11 AM |
| Cyberchicken Member 900 Posts 4/02 | CC |
| David-J Member 155 Posts 8/02 | I just thought his review of UYA 20 was eccentric [sic!], even allowing for differences in taste. Leaving aside the question of male performers, his assessment of the female talent was also very severe, with an overall mark of 1 1/2 stars out of 5 for 'female looks'. The girls in the vid were Aleksandra, Aimee Tyler, Karianna, Sandra, Angel Long, and Melanie Jagger. With the arguable exception of Karianna (whom I personally find quite attractive, in a freaky kind of way), I don't think any of these girls would normally get less than 3 out of 5. But let's agree to disagree. |
| cal444 Independent Editor CalCutterPost.com 927 Posts 10/01 | Everyone is entilted to thier opinion but what kind of UYA chip did you have on your shoulder when you reviewed this piece. You slammed even the technical aspects, which I know stack up against anyone in the industry. A review is one thing misleading people is another. You went far into the misleading on this one and I'm calling you on it . I'd like to see some other reviews on this video because frankly I think your review was totally offf the mark, enough so I'm bringing it up here, now.
|
| BIGmike B-I-G-m-i-k-e 2335 Posts 3/01 | That he does, there have been some statements that he made, that I felt like venting in anger, the way he comes out bluntly and says something sucks, but hey opinions are like assholes, everyone's got one... I can counter his negative review with a positive revew, if I don't agree with his. Just as he can counter my negative review with a positive review if he doesn't agree with mine. And the same goes for ya'll out there. None of the reviewers, that I know of, get paid, or compensated in any way, on ADT, and many of the DVDs reviewed by reviewers are bought with hard earned money, and getting a subpar disc, that you had to pay $20 or more for just plain sucks. |
| Speelie Senior Member Fort Collins, CO 1191 Posts 5/01 | I guess I am rather alone in that regard, but no one should hesitate to tell me what an idiot I am for feeling a certain away. It will then be my pleasure to counter your argument, and show you the error of your ways Seriously, it is something I enjoy, even if it really bothers other reviewers to be publicly questioned. But I get so little comment on my reviews that I'll take any I can get! |
| cal444 Independent Editor CalCutterPost.com 927 Posts 10/01 | level. As Cyberchicken so eloquently stated,"it's worth it just for the first scene". I generally don't come back on reviews or reviewers but as far as I'm concerned this review was a one sided negative slam. Totally uncalled for.
|
| Hardz Member Hell on Earth 877 Posts 6/01 | It would a good idea for someone who liked this dvd to write a review and just because there isn't one doesn't mean there aren't people out there who think it's great. You know I often get on your case about the technical aspects of some of your past releases' but this was, IMO a very good dvd. The scene with Sandra is fan-fuck'in-tastic. The only real problem I have with this release and a number of Assman and Debauchery titles is the poor lighting. Buy a brighter bulb for fuck sake! |
| aybesea Senior Member Caroline Cage - Hungarian Hottie! 1485 Posts 5/02 | Anyway, you ask what kind of chip I had on my shoulder when reviewing this. The answer is that I had absolutely NO chip at all. I picked this up to review because I truly thought I'd like it! That is the fact. However, I was really displeased with what I saw. I'm not getting personal here, so I don't want you to either. I'm gonna try to be objective about this. 1) The video was blurry. Not clear. Not sharp. Not vibrant. Blurry. That is a technical problem. 2) The scenes are poorly lit. There are lots of shadows. This makes it difficult to see detail. This is a technical problem. 3) The audio is okay, but (because it is gonzo), it is not spectacular. I didn't slam it, but I'm not gonna go wild over it either. These were my prime technical complaints. Now for the other problems: 4) The girls (and you can read the review to see that I like Melanie a lot) were not dressed or made up to look very good. This, for me, is a BIG issue. 5) One of the girls was dog ugly. Sorry, but it's the truth. 6) There is absolutely no tease in this flic, and I like tease. Subjective? Yep! 7) I felt like both the girls and the guys were just going through the motions. No sparks flying anywhere. For me, this is an issue. Now, when I add up these issues, it makes for a bad grade. This is my honest opinion. I wasn't paid to do this review. I wasn't cajoled into slamming it. I have had some e-mail conversations with Mike Johns discussing my points. He isn't flipping out on me. I've loved some of his other stuff, but this one just didn't cut the mustard (IMHO). Now, I don't think this can be construed as having a chip on my shoulder, but if that's the way you want to take it, I can't stop you. I can only tell you that it's not the fact. I'm not sure why it is that everyone is freaking out about this review. Haven't any of you ever watched something and thought it sucked? Did everyone else you know have to have the same opinion? If you don't agree with me, go ahead and review it yourselves! It's no skin off my teeth. Simple bottom line, I didn't like this DVD and I don't think it's worth buying. Period. |
| cobalt60 Knuckle Dragger 2046 Posts 2/03 | Point is: the reviews here are a service by consumers for consumers, not a mouthpiece for the studios. Thank you for being such a prolific and seemingly honest reviewer. It's mostly YOUR reviews and a couple of others that brought me here in the first place (via RAME). Keep it up, in a manner of speaking! |
| Cyberchicken Member 900 Posts 4/02 | |
| cal444 Independent Editor CalCutterPost.com 927 Posts 10/01 | |
| aybesea Senior Member Caroline Cage - Hungarian Hottie! 1485 Posts 5/02 | |
| Wally Senior Member 1821 Posts 8/01 | |
| Wally Senior Member 1821 Posts 8/01 | |
| T Mac Member 166 Posts 1/03 | |
| cal444 Independent Editor CalCutterPost.com 927 Posts 10/01 | I respect and expect any and all reviewers to be candid and call them as they see them. I just don't remember UYA 20 being sub par in any respect. As I said before I'm going to give the DVD a once over after work to see if there was any problem with transfers or authoring.
|
| Wally Senior Member 1821 Posts 8/01 | |
| cal444 Independent Editor CalCutterPost.com 927 Posts 10/01 | our videos and DVDs are up to snuff. When I read a review that says fuzzy picture poor lighting ect. it becomes an albatross to me and I have locate the source of the problem. My recall of editing the piece was a standard Mike John effort, putting the video well above the average FBI to FBI fill. As I said, after work today I'm going to go over it with a fine toothed comb. I'll either owe ABC a vote of gratitude or a review of his review. ABC has usually been on the money in his opinion and this one just threw me off balance.
|
| cal444 Independent Editor CalCutterPost.com 927 Posts 10/01 | Funny, it's been the same usual suspects making video. The girls are not hot You're standards are pretty high if this crew didn't Sets were sparse Duh, you havn't seen enough Mike movies to grab on to the whole anti glamour thing? The technicals suck No your monitor, speakers and DVD player suck. I just
|
| Wally Senior Member 1821 Posts 8/01 | |
| cal444 Independent Editor CalCutterPost.com 927 Posts 10/01 | review. The only thing lackluster about that DVD was how weak that review was. Didn't even mention the xxxtra scenes, music on off option or anything else. ABC you gave us better DVD extra credits when there weren't any. Go figure.
|
| Ramsey Senior Member Trina Michaels fan 10332 Posts 10/02 |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |