Yeah i hope she s already booked for all her period in US. One of my fav actress of course. I wonder if she has ever worked with katrina jade and kristina rose, two actresses i would love to see her with. and a scene with dredd!
Oh my! This is what I was waiting for. Valentina at Legalporno. I hope that she follows the likes of Belle Claire. This scene is a good start. Looking forward to a Blackbusters scene as well . I hope it happens; Excellent news.
"Pornography: That which excites, whether from approval or disapproval." ~ Leonard Rossite 2345 Posts 12/17
Posted - Aug 23 2018 : 4:10PM
Yes because right now, he is the biggest hung man in the industry. You can look up a fellow prior to Dredd who was known for being a behemoth called Mr 18 - the original nightmare for any woman wanting to keep her intestines intact.
My #1 scene I watch out of all of my lesbian porn is her with Violet Starr together on Lesbian X Stacked. Its the only scene I need from her. Fantastic.
It really annoys me the way she tries to look smarter than she is. She uses a language too fake even for a leftie poser. Eterotopia? Well it should actually be eterocronia but after Einstein... Come on!!! Did she really say: "relativismo acefalo"? (7.27) Realtivism wihtout a head? Please, be serious... It made me really sad when I found out that she used to write articles for Micromega. They really reached a low point by getting along with this "intellectual pornstar" facade.
Who are you to make any kind of judgment on how intelligent she is? Is it because you can cherry pick parts of her statements out of context? If that's the long and short of your argument then all you're really doing is throwing stones from a glass house, because there's no way you haven't said things that can be perceived similarly and I doubt you'd agree with someone judging your intelligence based on that alone. It's pretty disturbing if her thoughts that really don't concern or involve you at all "really annoy you/really makes you sad".
First of all it concerns me and the whole society if children are exposed to pornografy or not. But that's not the point. If you feel I have been too superficial maybe I can be more specific. I didn't want to bore you to death but here we go. She clearly didn't understand the postmodern concept of "weak thought" (7.50) when she refuses it and advocates a "strong rationalist thought" against religion. How can it be strong if it denies any ground that might bound you to a predetermined truth? It's weak becouse of its limited and temporary nature, not becouse it lacks strenght. But since it's become pop and trendy to talk about it, she uses the term "pensiero debole" without knowing where it comes from (Vattimo and his Nietzsche studies) and by saying that rationalism should be "strong" she is claming a rationalism that works exactly as the religion she does not approve. She clearly confused the technical use of a common term with the common meaning of it. Using big empty words just to show off she ends up contradicting herself. And people in the end applaude... and you are mad at me.