Males have had enough trouble historically with DIRECT HITS from point blank, let alone the ejaculatrickery you describe
[Link]
Audrey Madison Interview| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| Randomizer Member 234 Posts 6/08 |  Posted - May 26 2009 : 3:01AMI recently saw something rare -- that I could actually call "innovative", in terms of porn. For the money shot at the end, with the girl kneeling, the guy intentionally stood above her face and aimed his dick absolutely straight up in the air and pulled the trigger, resulting in a cumshot the shot upwards and rained down on her face and tits in a way that actually looked VERY cool. Some of it landed on his own hand/cock/balls, but it quickly dripped down on her. I think the next generation of "showoff" male stars would be wise to adopt this kind of thing as a trademark style, the way Rocco in his prime always added visual flair to his scenes. [Link] |
| JONNYESS Member 217 Posts 12/06 | Posted - May 27 2009 : 6:58AM Males have had enough trouble historically with DIRECT HITS from point blank, let alone the ejaculatrickery you describe [Link] |
| Cuddly Wombat Senior Member Just another bare bum in the shiower 1739 Posts 12/04 | Posted - May 27 2009 : 7:15AM However, there is always a real risk that there will only be a pathetic dribble trickling down the side of the shaft. I always believe that the safest option is to press the head of the cock against an outside corner of the girl's mouth - that way the girl will at least get some cum on her face and the scene isn't ruined by a small load or a foul shot. That technique also looks spectacular when the guy shoots a heay load, as there is a huge trail of cum across one cheek from mouth to ear. It also has the benefit of avoiding her eyes. [Link] |
| NewRomancer Deactivated User under THEIR avatar 738 Posts 7/08 | Posted - May 27 2009 : 11:52PM [Link] |
| LubeNLuv Senior Member 1854 Posts 3/06 | Posted - May 28 2009 : 12:22AM [Link] |
| cand86 Member 164 Posts 8/08 | Posted - May 28 2009 : 1:33AM So where is it that we can see this cool vertical cumshot? You didn't say. [Link] |
| JONNYESS Member 217 Posts 12/06 | Posted - May 28 2009 : 7:11PM Regarding the "...masturbating himself to completion...", there are scores of threads on this forum expressing increasing disgust and dismay at the prevalence of this practice at the culmination of an otherwise erotic and stimulating scene. In the context of both freedom of choice and ignorance of your own personal preferences, I defer commentary on any self-doubts you may have as to your choice of forums. [Link] |
| stinkfist Senior Member Subterfuge...... 7401 Posts 4/07 | Posted - May 28 2009 : 8:05PM [Link] |
| LubeNLuv Senior Member 1854 Posts 3/06 | Posted - May 28 2009 : 9:04PM I get off more on watching a woman being fucked (dick, toy, whatever) and having a convincing sounding/looking orgasm. It doesn't matter to me if it's real or not as it is a performance, but I do find some performers more convincing than others. So how is the focus on the male penis spewing ejaculate any more arousing to the hetero male than the female form being penetrated? I've heard people say that they like seeing the woman "accepting the cum" as a sign of submission or even degradation, and of course we've all heard about needing to see the male ejaculate as some form of 'proof' that the scene wasn't faked. But lets say you could show this without ever introducing a cock into the field of view of the screen....would this be deemed acceptable? Or is it the view of the cock itself that makes the scene satisfying for you? Why is the cock actively being manipulated (usually by the male peformer himself) to ejaculate such a necessary component of a satisfying sex scene? If the absence of this makes the scene "not strokeworthy," but the inclusion makes it so.....how is this about the woman? [Link] |
fu_q  All-Star Member Marv Montag (@PornOfYore) 2506 Posts 2/09 | Posted - May 28 2009 : 9:36PM [Link] |
| fu_q All-Star Member Marv Montag (@PornOfYore) 2506 Posts 2/09 | Posted - May 28 2009 : 9:43PM It's also about the visual of the actress getting hosed down, etc., etc. I wouldn't worry about it so much, though--it would probably require more introspection than it's really worth. If you (one) like it, just sit back, enjoy it, and don't sweat the small stuff. 
[Link] |
| JONNYESS Member 217 Posts 12/06 | Posted - May 28 2009 : 10:01PM In order of your questions: 1) No. The male orgasm as "accepted" by the female is the culimination of the typical hetero male viewing pleasure. Males inclined towards bi-sexuality probably find the male orgasm in and of itself the end-all, with or WITHOUT female involvement. I cannot speak confidently for this cross-section. 2) Focus on ejaculation isnt NECESSARILY more arousing to the hetero male than the female being penetrated, contingent upon the male finding the act of itself pleasurable via personal experience. Again speaking for the masses, the male climax itself is - with limited exception, almost ALWAYS immensely pleasurable...with or even without female accompaniment. Thus, a visual of a healthy male spouting fountains of pleasure at the hand or mouth of an encouraging starlet is considerably more pleasurable than the act of penetration itself, which is in this regard, an extension of foreplay. 3) Your provocative concept of male climax without some "proof" would not be acceptable to me from a pleasure-voyeur perspective. Sorry, but it's too late and we've become jaded - we've all seen too many premiere female starlets on the receiving end of too many spectacularly cascading male orgasms to go back now. The view of the spewing cock itself is not necessarily mandatory for maximum viewing pleasure, but observing the female's reception of same is abolutely mandatory. We've all cringed in horror at the clueless producer who elects to focus on the guy's hidesouly distorted O-face right during the very throes of orgasm, while the female object of our affections works her magic just below viewable camera range. As a matter of fact, some memorable scenes to me have been where the guy's cock is throbbing just off-camera, yet the female is still seen enthusiastically receiving her payload. 4) The cock being "...actively manipulated to ejaculate..." is such a necessary component of a satisfying sex scene because in real life - THAT'S HOW IT WORKS!!!. Without manipulation, it's effectively nocturnal emmission. (NOT HOT, unless the bed is surrounded by a bevy of fascinated females in provocative attire with their first views of the male mechanics - but I digress..) The "usually by the male performer himself" is a point of increasing consternation as stated earlier. In cases like this, I still tend to focus on the female to the extent possible. On the other hand, if the male's pleasure is not directly proportionate to at least passive involvement by one or more on-screen females, this concept is lost on me... [Link] |
| LubeNLuv Senior Member 1854 Posts 3/06 | Posted - May 28 2009 : 10:47PM ^ "4) The cock being "...actively manipulated to ejaculate..." is such a necessary component of a satisfying sex scene because in real life - THAT'S HOW IT WORKS!!!. Without manipulation, it's effectively nocturnal emmission. (NOT HOT, unless the bed is surrounded by a bevy of fascinated females in provocative attire with their first views of the male mechanics - but I digress..) " I was specifically referring to self-manipulation. Is this how this works in real life? Because if so, I fucked up fucking 101. I never jack myself off to orgasm with my wife or any other partner. I have jacked myself off when masturbating solo, sometimes with an audience. But not during sexual intercourse or oral sex. So maybe I'm the abnormal one....who knew? [Link] |
| fu_q All-Star Member Marv Montag (@PornOfYore) 2506 Posts 2/09 | Posted - May 28 2009 : 10:49PM [Link] |
| JONNYESS Member 217 Posts 12/06 | Posted - May 28 2009 : 11:08PM Rare event for sure, but memorable for its relative infrequency or unique circumstances [Link] |
 | |
| RealHardSex Member 50 Posts 1/09 | Posted - May 29 2009 : 12:08AM [Link] |
| LubeNLuv Senior Member 1854 Posts 3/06 | Posted - May 29 2009 : 8:40AM [Link] |
| fu_q All-Star Member Marv Montag (@PornOfYore) 2506 Posts 2/09 | Posted - May 29 2009 : 10:22AM [Link] |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |