ookz
Member
251 Posts
1/01
|  Posted - Feb 27 2001 : 1:37AMI think lots of us know that most of Virtual sex DVD use fake cum (computer generated cum). They just can't find man who could cum over than 10 times, why just they don't use 3 or more men with same look dick!
 [Link] |
2dvd
Senior Member
Trading DVDs
1447 Posts
12/00
| Posted - Feb 27 2001 : 1:46AM
Which one is it? or is it all of them? that is suck [Link] |
Michael Saint
Photographer
Alexis Texas is always lovely
1062 Posts
2/01
| Posted - Feb 27 2001 : 3:27AM
All of the Virtual Sex with.... use fake cum shots on all but the the blowjob cumshot.[Link] |
bono-ONE 
All-Star Member
SAMCRO
8571 Posts
8/00
| Posted - Feb 27 2001 : 5:18AM
I have the My Plaything Tera Patrick and also Jewel Denyle and both also use fake cumshots with real ones being used for the bj climax. I have seen both Virtual Sex dvds, Teras and also Nikki Tylers and I much prefer the My Playthings the picture quality seems much better in the My Playthings and also the little icons on the screen are so distracting with the Virtual Sex dvds and less so on the My Playthings.[Link] |
Saki
At-Large
2087 Posts
11/99
| Posted - Feb 27 2001 : 8:06AM
My understanding is that fake cum shots are used because the video is all shot on one day, and it's physically impossible for any guy to cum as many times as is necessary. With most virtual sex discs, you have 2-3 sex positions plus a blowjob, and each position has a "naughty" (lots of screaming and dirty talk) and a "nice" version. That means there has to be 6+ cumshots.As far as the stunt dicks go, I suppose that could be done, but I've seen so much porn that I can almost identify actors just by their pelvic regions and penises alone. I'm sure that if they used different actors that people would bitch about that instead. The only real alternative is to shoot the footage across multiple days with careful attention to continuity. But I don't think any studio would do that. - Saki [Link] |
| |
|
Michael Saint
Photographer
Alexis Texas is always lovely
1062 Posts
2/01
| Posted - Feb 27 2001 : 3:46PM
Actually Saki another alternative is to have the girl rotate around and do a facial from each position that way only about two real cum shots would be needed and the rest could be cut in.[Link] |
Oneloa
Member
848 Posts
2/00
| Posted - Feb 27 2001 : 4:32PM
I agree Saki, I can tell who people are too by that area. Even if I couldn't, no two guys look the same down there. So, the viewer would still be able to tell that it's a stunt dick. However, I'm willing to see a stunt dick in order to have real cumshots. A fake cumshot is as bad as overdubbing or looping (IMHO). Since most of the male stars jerk themselves off to orgasm (still don't get that one... but that's another topic), we mostly see their hand anyway.- [ invalid url ] [Link] |
Cognex
Member
126 Posts
2/01
| Posted - Feb 27 2001 : 5:45PM
Yeah, I agree that fake money shots are horrible. I would prefer having several takes with other guys who maybe look similar downstairs. I still don't understand why they can't film over several days. Maybe money is the issue, but they would probably sell more without fake editing and make up the difference. Either way, I don't buy the virtual titles for that reason.[Link] |
ookz
Member
251 Posts
1/01
| Posted - Feb 27 2001 : 6:34PM
Yes I think all the reason is "money issue".lee_carver idea is used in "Chasing Stacy",
all sex action ended by facial cum. [Link] |
2dvd
Senior Member
Trading DVDs
1447 Posts
12/00
| Posted - Feb 27 2001 : 8:50PM
I agree with the money issue.[Link] |
campflight
New Member
5 Posts
3/01
| Posted - Mar 2 2001 : 4:37PM
Yeah. I think those fake cumshots are weak. I was sooo disapointed when I saw that. At first I thought, what the hell is that crap, then I thought how lame. For all the money that I spent on that dvd at least have all the money shots worth the money I paid for the dvd. Knowing that the cumshots are fake, I wont be buying any more of those virtual ones. Oh well maybe if the companies realize how many people dislike the fake cumshots they'll change in the future. As for now im not buying...........[Link] |
Posted - Feb 27 2001 : 1:37AM
