New Pornstar Interviews - [more]
Introducing Natasha Carter

"Dirty talk is a really big thing for me."
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 838 > Vivid Vs. Wicked which is better studio?
AuthorPost
PornBoy
Deactivated User


642 Posts
2/00
Posted - Mar 28 2001 : 3:03PM
Which studio has thge hotter girls and better movies? I vote for Vivid because of they have/had Raylene, Devon, Cheyenne Silver, Lexus, Kira Kener, Jenteal and Dayton Rains. It seems like Wicked gets all they girls that leave Vivid i.e Nikki Tyler, Jenna Jameson.
Saki
At-Large

2087 Posts
11/99
Posted - Mar 28 2001 : 3:06PM
Vivid has always been known for getting popular contract stars and keeping a good PR engine behind them. But in terms of budget, scripts, hot sex, and DVD quality, Wicked wins hands down in that Celebrity Deathmatch, IMHO.

- Saki

bono-ONE All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

SAMCRO
8570 Posts
8/00
Posted - Mar 28 2001 : 3:12PM
Vivid also has Cassidey who is very hot right now and Wicked has Serenity who is also very hot so for me it is probably a push on looks but Wicked seems to do more harder stuff of the two studios mentioned here. Jill Kelly Productions has a nice group which includes/included Jewel De'Nyle, Haven, Kerri Windsor, Tabitha Stevens, and Sylvia Saint so they are pretty good too. Extreme has had at one time or another Alana, Jessica Darlin, Kristi Myst, and Stryc 9 so that was a good group too.
Oneloa
Member

848 Posts
2/00
Posted - Mar 28 2001 : 3:21PM
Saki - I agree 100%!

Vivid does have gorgeous women... but it doesn't necessarily make for a great porn. Wicked has both in my opinion.

- [ invalid url ]

Magnet12
Member

488 Posts
1/01
Posted - Mar 28 2001 : 3:52PM
Great question! I was just thinking to ask you guys this question as well. Usually, I like Vivid studio cause Vivid has been doing a great job at promoting their girls and their beauty are truly undeniable to boot. I think that both Vivid and Wicked have different pros and cons in themselves. Vivid looks superior than Wicked in trems of apperance and beauty of their starlets while Wicked has big-bugget and good-quality film as their ultimate strength

Magnet12

 
HoustonDon
Member

Houston
561 Posts
11/99
Posted - Mar 28 2001 : 7:56PM
This is easy for me. Wicked has better movies, better sex and better women, and higher production values. Sure, Vivid has some cuties but they spend the money on a lot of contract stars that don't appear, for the most part, to like sex as much as performers at other companies.

If Vivid were to spend the money needed to improve their production facilities, find attractive women that enjoyed sex more, and stopped putting out so much crap that is heavily edited-Wicked and others would be in trouble. My thought on it is that they try and advertise more and lock some women into contracts so they can better control the market.

If the question had been Wicked vs VCA, it'd be a tougher call. Other companies are working hard to gain marketshare too so hopefully the overall market will get better releases. (fingers crossed)

If the question were Evil Angel vs Elegant Angel, Evil would put the smackdown on Elegant too.

Oneloa
Member

848 Posts
2/00
Posted - Mar 28 2001 : 8:00PM
Damn good point HD! I like these companies equally as much.

- [ invalid url ]

atome12
Member

47 Posts
3/01
Posted - Mar 28 2001 : 8:47PM
Vivid's glory days are past. Their current talent doesn't measure up to women they had under contract 4-5 years ago (with the exception of Raylene). I would vote for Wicked even given the recent loss of two of their contract stars. VCA is a close second.
Diesel
Member

516 Posts
3/00
Posted - Mar 28 2001 : 11:03PM
Vivid has a legacy of incredible Vivid Girls (Jamie Summers, Hyapatia Lee, Jennifer Stewart, Racquel Darrian and Ginger Lynn, among others) and some top-notch movies (BAD WIVES, VICTIM OF LOVE, THE MASSEUSE 2 and so forth...all of which have been butchered on DVD), but this studio can't compare in the quality in their DVDs to Wicked.

Vivid gives us chopped up movies, multiple angle gimmicks, and loads of so-called extras which are just unlabelled compilations of random scenes. Wicked gives us value for the dollar, and their transfers and bonus materials (behind the scenes and accurate biographies) are top-notch. Also, as much as I like Cassidey and Raylene, their performances can't compare [yet] to starlets like Inari Vachs and Stephanie Swift.

It does appear that Vivid is trying to improve their line, with a special edition of BAD WIVES, and the option to remove multiple angles. But Wicked has been producing great work from Day One, so my vote easily goes to Wicked.

Diesel
Check into Diesel's Den for news and commentary!

Edited by - Diesel on Mar 28 2001

astroknight All-Star Supporter
Questionable Moderator

Tastes so good...
4187 Posts
11/99
Posted - Mar 28 2001 : 11:45PM
I couldn't have said it better about the DVDs. I think that some of Wicked's releases are slightly overpriced for what all you get, but I'd pay that anytime over Vivid's massacred DVDs. Also, the girls in Wicked movies seem to enjoy themselves where a good portion of Vivid's girls (even though many of them are vrey cute) don't. From what I've seen Vivid is still coasting by on marketing and their reputation of ten years ago or so before Wicked came onto the scene.

Also, Vivid is very well known for not giving out copies where they know that they might not get an extremely good rating. Wicked, however, I know has been very gracious with supplying Adult DVD Talk copies of most of their new releases where they know that they will get an honest review. They also pay attention to the reviews. I know that I've had problems with some things with Wicked's movies that I've mentioned in reviews only to find David Crawford putting it onto the forum to see what everybody else thinks. Caring about the consumer to that extent also impresses me a lot from Wicked.

Of course, then there's Vivid that has so-called multiple angles and mandatory icons that consumers have complained about almost since day one that they haven't done squat about. They even seemed to have gone so far as when the consumers complained about having the movies edited to fit their lame extras on the DVD they basically told the consumers that their opinion on how they think a DVD should be made doesn't matter. Granted, some of that might be changing in the future from Diesel's report on the special edition of Bad Wives, but I'll believe it when I see it.

Of course, if this was a three way between Wicked, VCA, and Evil Angel I'd have to make their top girls jello-wrestle for the title of better studio.

Diesel
Member

516 Posts
3/00
Posted - Mar 28 2001 : 11:55PM
Ya know, Astroknight, I do wonder when Vivid will officially announce the new Special Edition of BAD WIVES
...

Perhaps they will release it at the same time as BAD WIVES 2 makes its way to DVD. Who knows?

Of course, Wicked would have done it right the first time around...

Diesel


Edited by - Diesel on Mar 28 2001

2dvd
Senior Member

Trading DVDs
1447 Posts
12/00
Posted - Mar 29 2001 : 12:52AM
I agree with Saki.
OJ
Member

22 Posts
3/01
Posted - Mar 29 2001 : 7:23AM
Well I think both of those companies suck bigtime! I see a lot of their movies on Playboy and Spice. I cant tell you how many of the stuff they put out suffer from really bad lighting ....ever seen orange people having sex? Many times the grainy or faded footage is also a turn off. I guess the people in this forum also have no problem with seeing condoms since these companies are also condom manditory. Wicked is probably a little better than Vivid because they actually try to make a good product.
David Lord
Member

236 Posts
9/00
Posted - Mar 29 2001 : 12:26PM
Oj

I have a satellite dish myself, and it’s something they do to it. I think they encode it for broadcast. I noticed not only on our titles, but others as well. It also sometimes looks like Mpeg 1 footage really pixilated. Pick up one of our DVDs or VHSs, and stay away from blond chicks………. killer.


David Crawford
Wicked Pictures

Edited by - David Crawford on Mar 30 2001

Daniel Leslie Metcalf
Public Relations

Los Angeles CA
70 Posts
12/00
Posted - Apr 10 2001 : 12:41PM
Hi,

This email is in response to Porn Boy's end-of-March posting regarding "Vivid Vs. Wicked: Which is the better studio." In his posting he states that Wicked seems to feature girls that have already been with Vivid, "like Jenna Jameson and Nikki Tyler."

Wicked Pictures, in fact, was the first company to ever sign Jenna Jameson to an exclusive contract (in the mid-nineties, long before she ever shot for Vivid). Nikki Tyler, on the other hand, has never been signed with the company (although she has worked with us.

I apologize for the tardiness of this reply (I've been working away from the office a great deal), but I want to thank everyone for their continued support of our DVDs. Our next big title, Jonathan Morgan's THE GATE, will street on DVD May 30th (the same day as the video!) and it's truly an amazing piece of work on all levels.

Daniel-Leslie Metcalf
WICKED PICTURES

 
Michael Saint
Photographer

Alexis Texas is always lovely
1062 Posts
2/01
Posted - Apr 10 2001 : 2:44PM
Wicked would win hands down even against VCA and they have one of my all time favorites under contract (Juli Ashton). On a movie by movie basis either of the big three could win but in overall consistency in quality Wicked rules in all catagories. Plus the fact no other studio IMHO has shown more concern in customer feedback then Wicked. At the shows most studios complain about the number of fans Wicked puts out surveys to get their opinions (the only studio I have ever seen do this in the last 8 years).
Trunks
Member

89 Posts
4/01
Posted - Apr 11 2001 : 11:03AM
Vivid has got some attractive looking females but they aren't always good performers. Lexus is a knockout, but for some reason she doesn't turn me on in her movies. I also don't like the production/layout of Vivid DVDs as much as some other studios.

I like Wicked's behind the scenes stuff and bios on the stars. Plus you can link to scenes with the stars so you know who they are. I think that Wicked has hot looking stars and they are equally hot in their performances. I like wicked's directors better too.

Between studios, I like Wicked better than Vivid. Overall, I just like the "feel" Wicked's pictures have over Vivid's. My two favorite fliks include one wicked and one vivid interestingly. However, the vivid was directed by Wicked's Brad Armstrong.

torris
Senior Member

Deep within Mila's anus
1827 Posts
1/00
Posted - Apr 19 2001 : 12:23PM
Vivid is the porn star's elephant graveyard. Where by virtue of the contract route women at the tail end of their careers wind up at Vivid and make extremely tepid sex before they retire. The girls on the billboard and box covers never look that good in the films themselves. I don't really have much of a comment on Wicked. Like Serenity but find that b/c of the condom requirements there's nothing that interests me from a fantasy viewing perspective. Give me Evil Angel/Rocco and Hustler Barely Legal. Private makes the best plotted movies in terms of heat and sex too without the need for the latex turnoff

Torris

PornBoy
Deactivated User

642 Posts
2/00
Posted - Jun 2 2001 : 12:16PM
Let all remember now that Vivid has the amazinging beautiful Cassidey/Paizley Adams under contract now.
astroknight All-Star Supporter
Questionable Moderator

Tastes so good...
4187 Posts
11/99
Posted - Jun 6 2001 : 3:41PM
Oh yeah. Cassidy. Hmmm. That would make it WICKED!!!
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 838Vivid Vs. Wicked which is better studio?

Previous topic: Anybody Seen SEARCH FOR SNOW LEOPARD?
Next topic: Ass to Mouth



Jump To: