Reviewers Recommend My First Sex Teacher 88 - review by Captain Jack Starring: Kayla Paige, Skylar Snow, Rachael Cavalli, Armani Black [I] (2020s), Bunny Madison. Read review
You've got the same watch as me and I've mislaid mine. Give it back! I noticed while watching you boff Deauxma on that My Friend's Hot Mom site.
Porn Stars? Girl girl is fine, but maybe a little more exclusive a club to enter. Think Janine or Sandy. As for number of movies I'd guess more than a few, but less than a lot. Make of that what you will. 6 or more for feature? around 20 for gonzo? I'm really just pulling numbers out of my ass.
Being a big enough cheese to be on more than a few boxcovers probably doesn't hurt. Though the phrase is so ubiquitous many just use "porn star" in place of "porn performer".
s/more than a few boxcovers/more than a few boxcovers of "decent/well-known (outside of the raincoater niche) companies"
Some boxcovers for more or less obscure conmpanies do not count. A boxcover for anything other than Vivid, Wicked, Private, DP, EA (in Europe add Goldlight/Dorcel/Colmax produced/distributed movies) does not count.
Just because you are on the cover of movies some Basque hat wearing Gauloises smokers are familiar with doesn't make a movie star, being the hip babe of raincoaters does not make a pornstar.
So you're saying, for example, that Lanny Barbie's spectacular covers for 3rd Degree (and others) over the past year "don't count"?
And, yes, I'd consider Lanny Barbie a "pornstar" by any standard.
FYI, I'm not a Lanny Barbie SFB (slathering fan boy). I just think that being the "cover girl" for certain limited studios is just a ridiculous standard.
I can accept the idea that, IF you are a cover girl for a major studio, you are virtually, by definition, a "star." However, there are many stars that seldom, if ever, get the cover.
I can also think of spectacular two-scene career girls like Peaches who did get the cover (Breakin' 'em In #2 ) on their very first shoot! As spectacular as many of us think Peaches was, two scenes does not qualify you as a "star."
In general, I think anyone who has five or more scenes to their credit can be referred to as a "pornstar." That said, all pornstars are not "stars."
Christian, what's wrong? I answered your question. Peter North and Lexington Steele for example are stars, because people buy their releases no matter what's the contents. People buy because its Peter or Lex, hence they are stars.
If you think getting a cover on the production of some obscure companies (1000 or 2000 copies?) with a shelf time of around 3 month can even remotely be compared with productions which (in its soft versions) make it into free TV and stay on the shelf for years, you live indeed on another planet.
Interesting. I remember reading some years ago that Jessie James, who had done a buch of amateur, some Seymore Butts , and a few 'pro' movies, getting a bunch of shit from other 'stars' because at a convention she billed herself as a 'porn star'.
For me it is a generic term for men or women who have done hard core porn for commercial distribution, g/g included. Number of scenes does not matter. 'Star' can also mean for some a person who has larger popularity and recognition with the buying public, but I exclude that in this context. Many who watch porn don't know one screen name from another, except whomever idiot radio personality tells them is good.
On my planet, or at least in the United States, porn "in its soft versions" does NOT appear on "free TV" -- no matter which company produced it. Paid cable, yes. Paid hotel pay-per-view, yes. Free TV, no way.
On my planet, "1000 or 2000 copies" is the typical sell through quantity for virtually all titles made by virtually all companies. I believe Dave Cummings has explained to us that he has to calculate budgets based on about 1500 units being sold.
But, I'm sure you'd consider Dave, his studio and his many websites to be "obscure" known only to a "fringe group." If so, please let Attorney General Gonzalez know that Dave is but a bit player and that he shouldn't bother him with regards to the 2257 mess
I think you guys have missed something here. Seems like everyone thinks being a porn "star" has to do with box covers and quantity of flicks sold. What about quality of the performance? What about her personality {i.e. relationship with fans.} Stars of the caliber of Jenna Jameson, Christy Canyon, and Belladonna are star because they're unique, gorgeous, and have produced consistent top-quality performances.
I'll shut up and climb down from the pulpit now.
{You ask the same question of Hollyood too. Then again, they're just "acting" as opposed to porn stars who are performing.}
Please note my use of the words "typical" and "virtually."
I hope we can all agree that Jenna Jameson is a huge exception to what is typical in the world of porn. Jenna has become an industry and a brand-name unto herself. She's the "go to" name and reference for all those outside the industry as well.
I don't believe this at all. My first post in this topic, in fact, was to take issue with box covers as a stansard {excerpt):
I just think that being the "cover girl" for certain limited studios is just a ridiculous standard.
I can accept the idea that, IF you are a cover girl for a major studio, you are virtually, by definition, a "star." However, there are many stars that seldom, if ever, get the cover.
I can also think of spectacular two-scene career girls like Peaches who did get the cover (Breakin' 'em In #2 ) on their very first shoot! As spectacular as many of us think Peaches was, two scenes does not qualify you as a "star."
In general, I think anyone who has five or more scenes to their credit can be referred to as a "pornstar." That said, all pornstars are not "stars."
Stars are not the typical bunch, and stars have a recognition value that goes beyond the hardcore fringe group of dedicated followers of the genre/discipline.
The numbers given by juha should make your point moot also.
If you think selling 1000 tickets for softball game is big a success you may be right. Nevertheless even the substitute player in a NFL match with 30 000 tickets sold is more star-like than the best softballer.
Patience is a virtue, but who wants to be virtuous? 4283 Posts 4/00
Posted - Oct 3 2005 : 12:37PM
I remember when girls who had a lot of potential but weren't widely known outside of the industry yet were called starlets. A starlet was a good thing. You were fresh, and had the potential to be a star if you did more movies with the same caliber performances that you had done. Star was reserved for not just contract girls, but also girls who were considered A-list performers. IMO, it seemed that the girls who were called stars were the ones who would be recognized by an average porn fan at a convention.
Gradually, it got to where if a girl did one movie, TV shows like Jerry Springer, radio like Howard Stern, and the feature dance circuit would call her a porn star. It went from seeming elite to seeming sleazy and ordinary.
My definition of a porn star is someone who has sex on film and then that product is sold. If you can purchase a movie of someone in an adult movie store, then yes they are a porn star. When Janine only shot girl/girl there was no arguement she was a porn star and a succesful one at that. Some girls shoot 50-60 videos in 10 years, while others shoot 300 in half that time. Both ways work and you can be succesful either way. Also since signing with Adam&Eve in March 05' I have shot 7 of my 8 movies I signed a contract for, its just they take a while to get out! Trust me if it was my choice all 8 would be done and out!!!!!
austyn, my sincere apologies, i wasnt insinuating anything negative, i only wanted an opinion. we have met at PSK and you are a very nice girl. seriously, hopefully i didnt offend. I am from Texas and the University of Austyn is the greatest porn title ever!
thanks for all the responses and i will now attempt to pull my foot out of my mouth. nice.
You didn't offend me at all. I was just giving my opinion on your question and then clarifying my movie count. How bout' I buy you a drink at the next PSK and you buy me a beer, then its all good!:) Luv ya----Austyn
But to really qualify, I think you would have to make enough impact to have some fan buzz, collect a few box covers, and stick around from one AVN convention to the next.
It's also attitude ...
[Link]
Lost Horizon Deactivated User
675 Posts 6/05
Posted - Oct 6 2005 : 9:09PM
Good to see jamesn has finally decided to stop hiding behind all those pseudonymns and admit his little obsession.