New Pornstar Interviews - [more]
Rachel Rampage: 2026 Porn Crush Media Day Interview

"I fucked brothers one time, twin brothers. I totally ruined their entire relationship."
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 200 > What do you class as a gangbang?
AuthorPost
paulwolf
Member

374 Posts
3/12
Posted - Jul 6 2015 : 12:29PM
I'd class anymore than 2 guys performing with a female a gangbang.
karkla kush' new scene sees her taking on 3 guys, she said it's a foursome on her Twitter and not a gangbang.
I'd say it's only a foursome if there's two guys and two women.
3 guys on one woman is def a gangbang.
Thoughts?
Mister Fahrenheit All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Meh
4655 Posts
10/13
Posted - Jul 6 2015 : 12:59PM
I seem to recall a thread on this topic before, but I just did a search and couldn't find it.
I think Karla is right, foursome is the appropriate term for her scene. In my opinion anything less than five guys does not constitute a gangbang. If Mason put out a scene for Gangbang Me with just three guys in it I think people would riot.
Edited by - Mister Fahrenheit on 7/6/2015 1:01:09 PM
jeffandersonn
Deactivated User

1605 Posts
3/13
Posted - Jul 6 2015 : 1:22PM
3-5-10 guys without double penetration it's not a gangbang.
At least to me.
but nowdays porn is so lame that companies start using " gangbang " when they need it
ninja1
Senior Member

2940 Posts
1/08
Posted - Jul 6 2015 : 1:39PM
IMO gangbang is when there are too many guys for all to participate at the same time, so they have to take turns or switch off, to allow the "extra" guys to have a chance. Also gangbang implies multiple (2 or more) guys with the woman at all times. So 3 guys means there is 1 or (none) extra guy which is not enough.
paulwolf
Member

374 Posts
3/12
Posted - Jul 6 2015 : 3:28PM
Every day is a school day!
I stand corrected in the matter!!
 
CummingLinguist All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

5908 Posts
11/11
Posted - Jul 6 2015 : 3:44PM
Isn't this just a restatement of the angel density problem?
Edited to add: I just realized my mistake: The angel density problem addresses Reverse Gangbangs.
Edited by - cumminglinguist on 7/6/2015 4:00:56 PM
N00dlesDaddy
Senior Member

Layla...got me on my knees...
1793 Posts
7/13
Posted - Jul 6 2015 : 3:50PM
Five, minimum.
Not Lucy Lee (Fake Account)
Deactivated User

Liberté, Egalité, Sexualité!
355 Posts
9/14
Posted - Jul 6 2015 : 6:27PM
3 guys at same time
murdock
Member

I'm not an actor, but I play one on TV
911 Posts
4/06
Posted - Jul 6 2015 : 6:41PM
In porn I think you'll generally see it described as 3 or more guys having sex with one woman, but in my opinion a gangbang is less about the numbers and more about the situation.
With all due respect to Houston and Annabell Chong and Jasmine St. Claire, I wouldn't consider any of the "World's Biggest Gangbang" videos to be actual gangbangs. What they did was impressive for sure, but I would consider three guys totally dominating a woman to be more of a gangbang than 300 guys standing around with their HIV screen in one hand and their dick in the other, desperately not trying to make any eye contact with anyone else for fear of losing what little wood they have, while they're waiting for their number to show up on the "Now Serving" board.
Not Lucy Lee (Fake Account)
Deactivated User

Liberté, Egalité, Sexualité!
355 Posts
9/14
Posted - Jul 6 2015 : 7:15PM
i think its gangbang if you have dicks in pussy, ass and mouth at same time
whatsatelephonebill
Senior Member

2935 Posts
10/11
Posted - Jul 6 2015 : 8:46PM
In my personal opinion, it's 3 or more (hence why I called Karla's scene a mini-gangbang when I posted about it), but as far as marketing a scene, you probably shouldn't market it as a gangbang unless there's 4 or more (basically, enough that at least one guy is generally sitting out on the action at all times).
NomnoMnOm
Member

379 Posts
5/15
Posted - Jul 6 2015 : 10:25PM
At least 4 on 1 for gangbang or reverse gangbang.
If multiple females and males, at least 5 total.



Jump To: