[Link]
Lesbian Students - review by Danielmayu33216| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| hollywood woody Senior Member  Death is caused by swallowing small amounts of saliva over a long period of time. George Carlin 1567 Posts 2/07 |  Posted - Feb 12 2009 : 8:21PMHow can POV be made better? What would you like to see in a POV? [Link] |
| bouges Member 101 Posts 11/08 | Posted - Feb 12 2009 : 8:48PM [Link] |
| von_swine Member Dominance & Persecution. 919 Posts 1/04 | Posted - Feb 12 2009 : 9:01PM [Link] |
| backdoorman Senior Member Shake for me girl... I wanna be your backdoorman ! 2776 Posts 10/07 | Posted - Feb 12 2009 : 9:15PM [Link] |
| Macko69 Senior Member Gone for a walk. 1985 Posts 5/08 | Posted - Feb 12 2009 : 9:16PM [Link] |
| htb066 Member 69 Posts 11/08 | Posted - Feb 12 2009 : 10:17PM [Link] |
| cand86 Member 164 Posts 8/08 | Posted - Feb 12 2009 : 10:57PM I do think it'd be pretty fun to employ POV into a narrative style/feature film- maybe a semi-humorous set-up where a guy goes undercover with a hidden camera (maybe to get dating/sex help from someone on the other end) and we get to see the scene POV-style. Gonzo-style gets old fast. There cannot be enough female POV stuff, too, in my opinion, whether it's straight or lesbian. It's just so rare. I'm not much of a fan of POV for actual fucking, because things are invariably far too bouncy/shaky; I prefer it for blowjobs and handjobs. But I would like to see a little more creativity. I actually think it could be pretty awesome to give the GIRL a camera for a handjob- imagine a spunky chick turning the camera on him, on her own face, and the action . . . the right girl could make it work, I think. [Link] |
| skronker Notable Legendary Icon Scopophiliac 9780 Posts 9/02 | Posted - Feb 12 2009 : 11:14PM [Link] |
| RandomPrecision Senior Member Enjoy! 8175 Posts 3/06 | Posted - Feb 13 2009 : 12:10AM [Link] |
| The DMan Senior Member 1844 Posts 6/07 | Posted - Feb 13 2009 : 12:15AM [Link] |
mrbluelouboyle  All-Star Member mrbluelouboyle and Alexis Tae 1334 Posts 12/03 | Posted - Feb 13 2009 : 12:20AM If there's a POV scene or two in a movie , I can deal with it. But if it's an all POV film , I wouldn't even bother watching. I'd like to see more POV from the girls angle. For example, let the girl hold the cam while the guy is going down on her. Or get real whacky and let the guy and girl both have cameras, filming each other while fucking. Edited by - mrbluelouboyle on 2/13/2009 12:22:02 AM [Link] |
| skronker Notable Legendary Icon Scopophiliac 9780 Posts 9/02 | Posted - Feb 13 2009 : 12:35AM [Link] |
| wraithlead Member 264 Posts 12/08 | Posted - Feb 13 2009 : 12:55AM for example. i'd love a pov blowjob that happens with a girl that's getting doggy from another guy... [Link] |
| von_swine Member Dominance & Persecution. 919 Posts 1/04 | Posted - Feb 13 2009 : 2:17AM [Link] |
| Bobcat Senior Member 1490 Posts 2/08 | Posted - Feb 13 2009 : 3:42AM The important thing for me, is that the girl makes lots of eye contact into the camera, she also needs to have some convincing dirty talk at the same time. She needs to be a better actress for this type of porn! Newsensations new series, Schoolgirl POV has been very good. Edited by - Bobcat on 2/13/2009 3:43:45 AM [Link] |
| Lange Member Make Gapes not War 230 Posts 3/04 | Posted - Feb 13 2009 : 7:34AM Edited by - lange on 2/13/2009 7:36:05 AM [Link] |
| stewed06 Member 9 Posts 2/09 | Posted - Feb 13 2009 : 9:56AM [Link] |
| Dan Senior Member 2056 Posts 6/07 | Posted - Feb 13 2009 : 11:52AM A lot of POV movies turn the sex action into a kind of artificial 'show and tell' kind of sex. They drop all pretense of passion and great pleasure. And they simply show the mechanical sex-action to the camera and to the viewer with some obscene remarks thrown in about it. Which does make the viewer feel included in the sex-action. But the camera's intrusion obviously distracts the actors and makes their sex-action less sincere, less genuine and less hot. Which is a bit of a turn-off. A better way to do it would be for the camera-man to intrude into the sex-action, while the lady and the guy(s) mostly ignore him (or her) and go at each other as if they are full of passion, great desire, and great pleasure. And this way the viewer gets to feel a part of some really good sex-action, where the participants appear to be having real sex and not just doing it for show. Which is turn on for the viewer. When the stud and the slut are so passionate for each other that the camera-man has to watch-out and scramble out of their way in order to avoid being accidentally smeared with the lube, or horror of horrors, come into contact with another man's cock. Then this POV sex-action does looks genuine, sincere, and hot to the viewer. (A good way to show this kind of POV passion would be to have two camera-men. So that when one of them scrambles out of the way, then the other will show this to the viewer.) POV is good. But it's even better when the actors concentrate on performing their sex-action well without being distracted too much by the viewer's presence there. Some acknowledgement of the viewer's presence from the actors is good. As long as the lady and the guy don't let their sex-action suffer as a result of that. Edited by - Dan on 2/13/2009 11:59:37 AM [Link] |
| BigBobxxx Senior Member 2681 Posts 5/04 | Posted - Feb 13 2009 : 12:18PM But, non-stop and by itself, it is usually poorly done and tedious. When well-done, it can be exciting. But, I think the conceit gets old fast. [Link] |
| shank Member 119 Posts 2/09 | Posted - Feb 13 2009 : 12:27PM [Link] |
| xxaru Member 128 Posts 6/07 | Posted - Feb 13 2009 : 12:54PM And I'm talking about "true" 1st person POV, not 3rd person. [Link] |
| Schmse Senior Member I'm not here, this isn't happening! 2571 Posts 6/04 | Posted - Feb 13 2009 : 1:19PM But I want to see more missionary with eye contact and reverse cowboy. [Link] |
| fatalbert Member Diagonally parked in a parallel universe 576 Posts 5/03 | Posted - Feb 13 2009 : 2:32PM And I'd like to bitch-slap the first guy who decided that it somehow "enhances" the view when the camera is rotated out of level. IMO, the ubiquity of this practice has helped to ruin all porn, not just POV. [Link] |
| Assanova Member balls deep 296 Posts 1/04 | Posted - Feb 13 2009 : 7:03PM [Link] |
| spitty Member 730 Posts 12/04 | Posted - Feb 14 2009 : 12:13PM [Link] |
 | |
| Ramsey Senior Member Trina Michaels fan 10332 Posts 10/02 | Posted - Feb 14 2009 : 12:20PM [Link] |
| nibelungo Member "The trouble with our times is that the future is not what it used to be" P. Valery 145 Posts 6/07 | Posted - Feb 14 2009 : 12:35PM I'd like to watch more pov blowjob (like suck it dry from Darkko) and pov handjob (like tugjobs series from Bangbros, mmmmhhh...) [Link] |
| fatalbert Member Diagonally parked in a parallel universe 576 Posts 5/03 | Posted - Feb 14 2009 : 1:49PM He constantly strains for an "unusual angle" -- zooming wildly, rotating the camera out-of-level, and other annoying BS, the "star" seems to be the guy's dick instead of the girls' faces, i.e., we're too often seeing only half her face, or only her boobs during a tit job, etc. I love the concept of POV, and I am not singling out J. Darkko for criticism, for he has much company. I know there are many who post here who love the microscopic close ups and dizzying camera trickery (why else would there be so much of it?), but I can seldom if ever find a director/cameraman who puts a visually sensible perspective first. When someone hands you a photo to look at -- of a beautiful woman, of a race car, whatever -- do you turn it upside down, at a 45 degree angle, or peer at it two inches from your face? You are perfectly welcome to do so, but I'd like the option of not having to stand on my head to make visual sense of any picture or film frame. In short, is there POV (or any) porn out there made for those of us who just want a good clear, holistic view? who don't need fish eye lenses or MTV-type flash-bang shit to hold our attention? I can't seem to find it. [Link] |
| nibelungo Member "The trouble with our times is that the future is not what it used to be" P. Valery 145 Posts 6/07 | Posted - Feb 14 2009 : 2:52PM I like the eye contact and generally the close up on the girl's face that good pov oral movies show me. [Link] |
| hollywood woody Senior Member Death is caused by swallowing small amounts of saliva over a long period of time. George Carlin 1567 Posts 2/07 | Posted - Feb 17 2009 : 8:30PM If you can think of anything you really want to see in a POV let me know and we will make it for you. [Link] |
| typvgs Member 46 Posts 9/05 | Posted - Feb 17 2009 : 10:16PM Point me in the direction of good, L-POV and I'll buy every DVD available. [Link] |
| A-ten Deactivated User 581 Posts 8/07 | Posted - Feb 17 2009 : 10:21PM [Link] |
| killbillvol69 All-Star Member ^Lucy Pinder 18634 Posts 4/08 | Posted - Feb 18 2009 : 12:29AM I can't really imagine that selling very well... [Link] |
| tritone Deactivated User 1009 Posts 4/03 | Posted - Feb 18 2009 : 12:56AM P.S. - You are one the best mods we've had, killbill! Edited by - tritone on 2/18/2009 12:57:58 AM [Link] |
| monkey power Member Tim? 868 Posts 1/03 | Posted - Feb 18 2009 : 3:25AM People want to pretend like it's really them in the scene? Well it's still just a movie and not really sex for the home viewer, only now that movie is showing less. With normal porn at least you can say that even though it's not sex, it manages to show a better view than what you'd see while having sex. Now with POV you can't say that so it's a lose lose. To keep POV titles interesting to the wider audience I'd split it like 80% POV and 20% traditional porn so one still gets a decent view of what's going down. [Link] |
 | |
| hollywood woody Senior Member Death is caused by swallowing small amounts of saliva over a long period of time. George Carlin 1567 Posts 2/07 | Posted - Feb 18 2009 : 1:24PM [Link] |
| backdoorman Senior Member Shake for me girl... I wanna be your backdoorman ! 2776 Posts 10/07 | Posted - Feb 18 2009 : 7:14PM [Link] |
| JONNYESS Member 217 Posts 12/06 | Posted - Feb 18 2009 : 7:19PM Like everything though, way overdone since then to the point of erotic irrelevance... [Link] |
| Dan Senior Member 2056 Posts 6/07 | Posted - Feb 19 2009 : 11:33AM If the studs are any good at what they do. Then this lady will naturally show to the viewer with her facial expressions how their invasions, penetrations and banging make her feel. The viewer probably would be able to tell from the lady's wry or happy facial expressions if the guys are banging her pussy or ass. But to remove any doubt from the viewer's mind and to keep him informed. The studs should yell something lewd or rude about the lady's nice pussy or gorgeous ass before they plunge in between her pussy-lips or ass-cheeks. With her looking straight into the eyes of the viewer, the viewer will feel a personal connection with her. Which will make it easy for the viewer to imagine that he is the one having sex with her. Or at least this lady's personal and intimate gaze at the viewer will make him feel welcome to join the studs and have sex with her too. A very intimate and personal connection like that between the porn-lady and the viewer is bound to make him feel a part of the sex-action. And a very welcome part at that. No one can make the viewer feel more welcome and more included in the scene than the lady who is having sex with the guys. She is the natural hostess who can make all the men feel welcome to ride her, including the viewer. Or perhaps I should say, especially the viewer. Because including the viewer is the purpose of POV. [Link] |
| hollywood woody Senior Member Death is caused by swallowing small amounts of saliva over a long period of time. George Carlin 1567 Posts 2/07 | Posted - Feb 19 2009 : 7:32PM Your input is what makes Cezar capone tick. Edited by - hollywood woody on 2/20/2009 2:14:21 PM [Link] |
| Aplus Senior Member 1431 Posts 5/05 | Posted - Feb 19 2009 : 7:57PM [Link] |
| typvgs Member 46 Posts 9/05 | Posted - Feb 24 2009 : 8:30AM What I had in mind was POV that would---in certain instances, where it would be attractive---include the lady's point of view. Imagine, for example, a scene with the girl lying on her back getting fuck really hard with her legs dangling over the edge of a bed. The camera would be positioned at the top of her head, pointing in the direction of her pussy. You'd see the side of her face in clear focus, with lots of fear and pleasure and expression. You'd see her tits and torso in clear view. Near the edge of the frame, you'd see her getting fuck hard, basically from her point of view. L-POV wouldn't work quite as obviously or directly as standard POV would, I agree. The girl's face would need to be in frame, for the most part, but you'd show at least some of the action from her point of view. You can find these camera angles a bit more in solo vids. (Ron Harris comes to mind, for example.) Maybe L-POV could be mixed in with standard POV. You'd get his perspective, or her's. No 3rd person perspective. I don't like pure, standard POV. I find the camera angles too repetitive. [Link] |
| typvgs Member 46 Posts 9/05 | Posted - Feb 24 2009 : 8:42AM By the way, Cezar Capone looks like great site. Edited by - typvgs on 2/24/2009 8:43:13 AM [Link] |
| Boneless Deactivated User Sry for bad english, I am dumb Serb, we know how to fight, not to write ... 151 Posts 6/08 | Posted - Feb 24 2009 : 8:45AM [Link] |
| hollywood woody Senior Member Death is caused by swallowing small amounts of saliva over a long period of time. George Carlin 1567 Posts 2/07 | Posted - Feb 24 2009 : 3:29PM [Link] |
| Algaliarept Senior Member 3557 Posts 7/08 | Posted - Jun 25 2010 : 12:00AM I don't want to pile on, and I'm only making a review of sorts. Another thing that comes to mind is the director often cut integral stuff out of the shots. There were times in the BJ for example, that all you could see was the top part of Nicole's head, also his arm was often in the shot. Granted, I would be a bad cinematographer to if getting fucked by such a woman, but it happens in most scenes - and this is the 7th edition, you'd think the kinks would be ironed out by now. For those that disparage POV directors like Mike John, Von Swine, Mike Quasar (he shoots in POV style anyways), remember they always had witty, funny, interesting, comments and tease before and in BTS. Just some respectful criticism  Edited by - algaliarept on 6/25/2010 12:35:01 AM [Link] |
| THICK_LOVA54 Senior Member Wielding a sword without fear of it is to be unworthy of the blade. 1441 Posts 5/10 | Posted - Jun 25 2010 : 12:05AM Crimson Rain...What A Sight [Link] |
| Algaliarept Senior Member 3557 Posts 7/08 | Posted - Jun 25 2010 : 12:30AM The guys who do it well...do it very well, namely Mike John, Erik Everhard, Chris Streams, Tim Von Swine, Jules Jordan (when he used to do it anyway), John Strong, Michael Stefano, and Manuel Ferrara. (Honorable Mention to Mike Quasar - who although not a participant/director, shoots great POV style movies such as "Head Case" or the "Interactive Sex" movies) I'm not a gagging blowjob kind of guy, but if you are into it - Johnni Darkko shoots good POV in this regard (Suck it Dry series, etc) [Link] |
| Digmen1 Member 629 Posts 7/07 | Posted - Jun 25 2010 : 4:07AM [Link] |
| charn fubar 2880 Posts 12/09 | Posted - Jul 7 2010 : 6:05PM [Link] |
| Jonny Jay Outlier Moderator 5990 Posts 8/09 | Posted - Jul 7 2010 : 6:06PM [Link] |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |