Reviewers Recommend
Oil Explosion 10 (All Anal)Oil Explosion 10 (All Anal) - review by Captain Jack
Director: Pat Myne
Starring: Angela White, Christian Clay, Vince Karter, Zac Wild, Emma Rosie, Victor Ray, Rissa May, Cheerleader Kait. Read review
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 243 > What happened to MMF Porn?
AuthorPost
fanman44
Deactivated User

474 Posts
1/13
Posted - Dec 21 2013 : 11:25PM
Seems like this type of porn is dead unless its in a DP which of course it's neccesary. Seems like every new girl got an MMF scene, and it was different just because it changed up the scenario. What happened to this type of scene? It was a cool type of porn.
fanman44
Deactivated User

474 Posts
1/13
Posted - Dec 23 2013 : 3:42PM
Anybody?
Joe Mayo
Deactivated User

Sure Thing, Joe Mayo.
533 Posts
10/13
Posted - Dec 23 2013 : 4:42PM
It hasn't gone away. I don't know what makes you think it has.
AJerkReaction
Member

15 Posts
12/13
Posted - Dec 23 2013 : 5:21PM
I'm a huge fan of MFM porn, which is funny because I used to hate it.
I think some of the earlier scenes that turned me off about it was that it either seemed too "rape-y" or it delved into Bi territory (which would technically make it MMF porn), which I am definitely not into.
Now, I prefer watching a hot girl getting spit-roasted.
I like them better than gang-bangs because it seems more realistic and the girl is more interactive, rather than just being a meat-hole. Yes, watching a girl be treated as a meat-hole is hot once in a while, but nothing makes my blood rush more than seeing a hotgirl being banged doggy style, then reaching for another cock to put in her mouth.
I wish that there would be more MFM porn with out DP.
Maybe more DV, because it seems more realistic, but DP isn't necessary for a hot MFM scene.
I love that both Dakoda Brooks and Nicole Rays' very first scene were MFM.
fanman44
Deactivated User

474 Posts
1/13
Posted - Dec 23 2013 : 11:51PM
you see it much less. its a rarity these days
 
fanman44
Deactivated User

474 Posts
1/13
Posted - Dec 23 2013 : 11:51PM
you see it much less. its a rarity these days
pat362
Senior Member

10083 Posts
3/10
Posted - Dec 24 2013 : 1:06PM
The first thing we need to say is that less porn is being shot these days so this type fetish is bound to suffer like all the others but this one in particular may be far harder hit for two reasons. Reason 1 A scene involving 2 guys and a girl will cost more to produce because you are paying for the extra guy and also costs more for the girl because she is no longer getting the standard b/g rate but the extra b/b/g rate. Not sure how much that is but I guess that depends on what she does with the guys. The second reason is related to the first because the extra investment the producer pays for a b/b/g will not translate into extra money and therefore they may wind up losing money instead of making some.
ninja1
Senior Member

2939 Posts
1/08
Posted - Dec 24 2013 : 7:03PM
^Always someone brings up cost in discussions such as this. So...one extra guy plus "bonus pay" for the girl is probably somewhere around $2000 or less. If the margins are so slim that $2000 breaks the budget, then they probably shouldn't be in business. Also, if it's all about the performer costs, why aren't we seeing more and more solo scenes, which will have a minimal payroll?



Jump To: