What is so different about Teagan or Jenna Haze? (page 2)

Author	Post
Naturally_Perverted Deactivated User 215 Posts 5/07	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 6:30AM CrouchingBear wrote: Naturally_Perverted wrote: Maybe her photo's on her website and myspacec aren't photoshopped, but that isn't the issue i was focusing on. The issue is that MOST pictures of her ARE photoshopped. Click to expand The issue is that you are trying to fabricate an issue where one doesn't exist. If you are going to go off on photoshopping of models, take a look at what Digital Playground does with its contract girls. On the other hand, with Jenna Haze, what is there to photoshop? She doesn't have any tattoos, not an ounce of cellulite, and her complexion is gorgeous. So, what is it that you are really trying to "establish?" That she isn't a beautiful woman? Click to expand Fabricate? If you want to go ahead and call me a liar please do, there's no need to beat around the bush here. There's no need for me to 'fabricate' anything, enhancement of photo's is something ALL modeling agencies do; porn industry included. Perhaps i should use the word enhance instead of photoshop. By enhancements i mean airbrushing to make the skin smoother, getting rid of any wrinkles, making the lighting brighter, etc. If you've read my posts you'd know i'm not trying to imply that she isn't beautiful, i'm just saying that enhanced images make people seem more beautiful than they are, her included. I've repeatedly said i think she's pretty, but i believe people on ADT grossly overhype the way she looks. I don't want to seem rude but that's the truth, you could easily compare her to other girls in the industry who look like super models, or get into measurements etc. and you'd then see that i'm right. I honestly don't see how she's any different looking than the average attractive girl on the street. Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/15/2008 6:43:56 AM [Link]
Naturally_Perverted Deactivated User 215 Posts 5/07	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 6:36AM purplehayes2006 wrote: Naturally_Perverted wrote: purplehayes2006 wrote: ^The fact you don't know how to do a simple search is not going to change the fact that there is a BAZILLION of untouched pic of hers in internet. There is LOTS of pics taken by fans in different flickr accounts, just as an example. You are too lazy to even do a simple search over here in ADT, but you talk anyway about pictures you DIDN'T even see! I don't care what you think or not, but the photo sets she is doing for her website are NOT photoshopped and OF COURSE her personal pics in myspace are NOT photoshopped either, and Jenna herself answered to you in that way over here. So YES, you are defaming her. Click to expand The fact that you replace the world 'are' with the word 'is' in the wrong context is proof that you don't know what you're talking about. In all seriousness though, what makes you think i can't perform a simple search? I clearly told you how i found the pics i'm describing to you, i used google and typed in her name. Maybe her photo's on her website and myspacec aren't photoshopped, but that isn't the issue i was focusing on. The issue is that MOST pictures of her ARE photoshopped. If you can't see that from doing a simple google search i suggest you get your eyes checked and learn a little bit about how image enhancement works. OK fine, maybe i'm defaming her a little bit, but anyone with a modicum of sense and honesty knows what i'm saying is the truth. By the way, the link you just posted; the one where we had our little discussion before, the photo's posted of her by Johnothan Pedak and Xformyzombie are CLEARLY photoshopped. If you deny that, i'm sorry but you really need your eyesight checked...badly. Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/14/2008 11:04:38 PM Click to expand And I suggest you to get some brains first. "Maybe her photo's on her website and myspacec aren't photoshopped, but that isn't the issue i was focusing on." that's the only thing I care about. That "maybe" is out of place. I don't care about how many untouched pics of hers you think there is/are in internet, but there is/are BAZILLIONS. Did you do a search in google typing her name? really? WOW That's AWESOME! you have to show me how you do it! BTW: "myspacec". Yes, I guess you could teach me how to improve my Photoshop skills....... Keep your "truth" for you dude; I'm done and it has no sense get over it again. BTW: If I replace the "world" 'are' with the word 'is' maybe it is because I live in Spain, I am Spaniard and English in not my native language. "Quien no quiere saber es como el que no ve." Click to expand your childishness makes me smile. You couldn't debate me with formality and logic so you resorted to crazy-fan outrage and personal attacks. There was no need to insult my search skills and my intelligence; you created the hostility. Yes i said MAYBE they aren't photoshopped, because i already explained i can't see the ones on her myspace. As for the ones on her webpage i'm not going to go into detail and post all of them and say which ones are enhanced and which aren't, but if you go to jennahaze.com you can clearly see the entry page photo of her is enhanced, and if you take the tour there are more. I've also already said the pictures posted by Xformyzombie and Jonothan Pedak are enhanced. Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/15/2008 6:38:59 AM [Link]
Naturally_Perverted Deactivated User 215 Posts 5/07	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 6:41AM Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/15/2008 6:43:03 AM [Link]
Clam Digger Deactivated User Many a man fails as an original thinker simply because his memory is too good. 2268 Posts 1/05	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 8:59AM The fanboys smell blood in the water... [Link]

purplehayes2006 Member 391 Posts 4/06	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 10:54AM Naturally_Perverted wrote: purplehayes2006 wrote: Naturally_Perverted wrote: purplehayes2006 wrote: ^The fact you don't know how to do a simple search is not going to change the fact that there is a BAZILLION of untouched pic of hers in internet. There is LOTS of pics taken by fans in different flickr accounts, just as an example. You are too lazy to even do a simple search over here in ADT, but you talk anyway about pictures you DIDN'T even see! I don't care what you think or not, but the photo sets she is doing for her website are NOT photoshopped and OF COURSE her personal pics in myspace are NOT photoshopped either, and Jenna herself answered to you in that way over here. So YES, you are defaming her. Click to expand The fact that you replace the world 'are' with the word 'is' in the wrong context is proof that you don't know what you're talking about. In all seriousness though, what makes you think i can't perform a simple search? I clearly told you how i found the pics i'm describing to you, i used google and typed in her name. Maybe her photo's on her website and myspacec aren't photoshopped, but that isn't the issue i was focusing on. The issue is that MOST pictures of her ARE photoshopped. If you can't see that from doing a simple google search i suggest you get your eyes checked and learn a little bit about how image enhancement works. OK fine, maybe i'm defaming her a little bit, but anyone with a modicum of sense and honesty knows what i'm saying is the truth. By the way, the link you just posted; the one where we had our little discussion before, the photo's posted of her by Johnothan Pedak and Xformyzombie are CLEARLY photoshopped. If you deny that, i'm sorry but you really need your eyesight checked...badly. Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/14/2008 11:04:38 PM Click to expand And I suggest you to get some brains first. "Maybe her photo's on her website and myspacec aren't photoshopped, but that isn't the issue i was focusing on." that's the only thing I care about. That "maybe" is out of place. I don't care about how many untouched pics of hers you think there is/are in internet, but there is/are BAZILLIONS. Did you do a search in google typing her name? really? WOW That's AWESOME! you have to show me how you do it! BTW: "myspacec". Yes, I guess you could teach me how to improve my Photoshop skills....... Keep your "truth" for you dude; I'm done and it has no sense get over it again. BTW: If I replace the "world" 'are' with the word 'is' maybe it is because I live in Spain, I am Spaniard and English in not my native language. "Quien no quiere saber es como el que no ve." Click to expand your childishness makes me smile. You couldn't debate me with formality and logic so you resorted to crazy-fan outrage and personal attacks. There was no need to insult my search skills and my intelligence; you created the hostility. Yes i said MAYBE they aren't photoshopped, because i already explained i can't see the ones on her myspace. As for the ones on her webpage i'm not going to go into detail and post all of them and say which ones are enhanced and which aren't, but if you go to jennahaze.com you can clearly see the entry page photo of her is enhanced, and if you take the tour there are more. I've also already said the pictures posted by Xformyzombie and Jonothan Pedak are enhanced. Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/15/2008 6:38:59 AM Click to expand Piensa el ladrón que son todos de su condición... Oh yeah? but I am the one who has to go and check out my eyesight and learn something about Photoshop (still waiting for your lessons...). Or should I say "is/are"?. "crazy-fan outrage"? why do not talk about your attitude? after Jenna (the owner of the stills in her website and myspace that you are talking about. Yes the same stills that you DIDN'T see but you keep talking about) answered to you, you are still picking on her, and saying "maybe this" "maybe that", even going through different threads to do so. How do you call that huh Let me show you some real logic: Your "logic" is based in your ignorance, in what you don't see and what you don't know about, ergo your "logic" worth nothing. "i'm not going to go into detail and post all of them and say which ones are enhanced and which aren't" -Really? ooohhhhh but if you keep a count of all the pics! even in percentages! this thread would look amazing with thousands of pics of Jenna all over it. You are no fun :-( "if you go to jennahaze.com you can clearly see the entry page photo of her is enhanced, and if you take the tour there are more" -HAHAHAHAHHA! No way, you didn't say that, don't you? lol oh man... you are not even capable of find still samples of her exclusive photo sets? "I've also already said the pictures posted by Xformyzombie and Jonothan Pedak are enhanced." I'm not talking about what other companies can do with Jenna's pics. I'm talking about stills from photo sets she exclusively does for her website. So are you really saying that this picture is enhanced? so what about this one? It is enhanced too? Oh and about her personal pictures in her MySpace... they are like this type of photos [Image not found DB] are they enhanced too? [Link]
purplehayes2006 Member 391 Posts 4/06	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 11:02AM Naturally_Perverted wrote: Click to expand PLEASE oh PLEASE show me some pics that YOU think have been "enhanced" I'd love to see them... :-) Click to expand if you want an example of what i'm talking about go to the thread titled "The Reason I Love Porn" and look at the pics of you posted by Jonothan Pedak and Xformyzombie you'll know what i'm talking about. As for the ones i've found on google, they're really too many to post. Click to expand huh? are you serious? how many enhanced pics do you see? See, I can show to you a button as an example. And my button is about hundreds of pictures. Flickr is just ONE site between many where you can find hundreds of non-"enhanced" pictures of Jenna. You have to sign-in in order to see all of them. My friend GJ posted last month in Jenna's Yahoo Group these "general" searches: http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/jennahaze/ [ invalid url ] oh my... None of them are photoshopped either. This one taken by my friend MrBlue is "enhanced" too? [Link]
David Starsky Senior Member We're gonna take it outside and I'm gonna show you what it's like! 1660 Posts 2/06	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 11:31AM Man this has got so far off topic. Basically there are many pretty at times beautiful girls. Some of whom are more popular than others. We are attracted to the ones we are attracted to and that's that, no amount of arguing and debating will change that. And as for the photoshopping etc. I'd think you simply can't tell just by looking at a photo whether it has been retouched unless you have an expert eye. And man that was a run-on sentence. Go to stillsbyalan.com and check out the "retouch" section. [Link]
Naturally_Perverted Deactivated User 215 Posts 5/07	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:04PM Piensa el ladrón que son todos de su condición... Oh yeah? but I am the one who has to go and check out my eyesight and learn something about Photoshop (still waiting for your lessons...). Or should I say "is/are"?. "crazy-fan outrage"? why do not talk about your attitude? Click to expand that was all in response to you telling me i don't have the intelligence to perform a simple search. If you check our posts you can see i said all of that after you insulted my intelligence, so you see, i was right, you did start the hostility. Thank you for proving my point. after Jenna (the owner of the stills in her website and myspace that you are talking about. Yes the same stills that you DIDN'T see but you keep talking about) answered to you, you are still picking on her, and saying "maybe this" "maybe that", even going through different threads to do so. How do you call that huh Click to expand I already told you i can't see the pics on her myspace, and i'm afriad she's wrong about the ones on her webpage. Go to jennahaze.com and check out the entry page and if you tell me that the picture there is not enhanced then you really do need your eyesight checked. Let me show you some real logic: Your "logic" is based in your ignorance, in what you don't see and what you don't know about, ergo your "logic" worth nothing. Click to expand This is how everyone's logic works my friend, including yours. You see logic is based on factors that we already know about, we see, hear, touch etc. and form our decisions based on the sensory information our brains gather. If we cannot see, hear, touch, see something etc. then we can come to 1 of 3 conclusions: either the something does not exist, we cannot see it due to our own deficiency, or it is too low in quantity for us to find easily. "i'm not going to go into detail and post all of them and say which ones are enhanced and which aren't" -Really? ooohhhhh but if you keep a count of all the pics! even in percentages! this thread would look amazing with thousands of pics of Jenna all over it. You are no fun :-( Click to expand the percentages were an exaggeration, i believe anyone who knows what an exaggeration is would gather that from reading what i said. "if you go to jennahaze.com you can clearly see the entry page photo of her is enhanced, and if you take the tour there are more" -HAHAHAHAHHA! No way, you didn't say that, don't you? lol oh man... you are not even capable of find still samples of her exclusive photo sets? Click to expand if said photo sets happen to be on her myspace then no, because as i've already said like a million times i cannot see the pics on her myspace because i would first have to create a myspace account and then i would have to have her accept me as a friend on myspace. [Link]
Naturally_Perverted Deactivated User 215 Posts 5/07	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:09PM "I've also already said the pictures posted by Xformyzombie and Jonothan Pedak are enhanced." I'm not talking about what other companies can do with Jenna's pics. I'm talking about stills from photo sets she exclusively does for her website. So are you really saying that this picture is enhanced? so what about this one? It is enhanced too? Oh and about her personal pictures in her MySpace... they are like this type of photos [Image not found DB] are they enhanced too? [/quote] Thank you for proving to me you cannot spot even the most enhnced pictures when you see them. The first two are CLEARLY enhanced, the fact that you cannot tell that is VERY sad. Can you not see how the lighting is ridiculously bright, how there are absolutely no anomalies on her skin, how her skin happens to appear smoother than a brand new glass table, how the subtle blurryness on her face is evidence of airbrushing, and how the shine is completely unnatural, even with extensive makeup? The other two after that i will admit are not enhanced. [Link]
CrouchingBear Deactivated User 299 Posts 5/08	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:12PM David Starsky wrote: Man this has got so far off topic. Click to expand jaynaoso_stalker wrote: This has really bothered me for a long time... What is it that makes Teagan and Jenna Haze so different from the other 10,000 "girl next door" girls. Its really been annoying me cause I cant figure it out. I've seen more websites, posts, reviews and general talk about these two girls. But really what makes them any different from a Mary Anne, or a Kissy Kapri or Brianna Blaze. I mean dont get me wrong, I think these girls are hot. Really hot... But I just dont get why they are so popular but the girls who seem to have more scenes than them, do more hardcore scenes than them, and (atleast to me) look just as good as them, are NO WHERE near as popular. Similarly I can understand the obsession with Keri Sable, Brianna Love... those are just two of the best in the past couple years in this category. But I just dont get it with Teagan and Jenna. What is it that makes them so different? Click to expand The thread made no sense to begin with. If the original poster is suggesting the Empress wears no clothes, then he has to consider this is porn we're talking about. It's all about fantasy and some girls are much better at fostering that fantasy than are others. The original poster offered Keri Sable and Brianna love as alternatives. The first girl quit the business after two years and the second girl has a fat butt and an odd mole on her face. The question here shouldn't be why is any one girl more popular than others. The question should be why aren't the purveyors of porn trying to replicate a formula that obviously works? - For the most part, audiences want attractive, thin, sophisticated looking yet adventurous girls (women like Jenna Haze or, back in the day, Shauna Grant). We don't want the mediocre looking, thick, dragged-from-the-trailer types that comprise 90% of the girls working today. When that's what we're offered, we won't buy it and we never will. [Link]
Naturally_Perverted Deactivated User 215 Posts 5/07	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:12PM purplehayes2006 wrote: Naturally_Perverted wrote: Click to expand PLEASE oh PLEASE show me some pics that YOU think have been "enhanced" I'd love to see them... :-) Click to expand if you want an example of what i'm talking about go to the thread titled "The Reason I Love Porn" and look at the pics of you posted by Jonothan Pedak and Xformyzombie you'll know what i'm talking about. As for the ones i've found on google, they're really too many to post. Click to expand huh? are you serious? how many enhanced pics do you see? See, I can show to you a button as an example. And my button is about hundreds of pictures. Flickr is just ONE site between many where you can find hundreds of non-"enhanced" pictures of Jenna. You have to sign-in in order to see all of them. My friend GJ posted last month in Jenna's Yahoo Group these "general" searches: http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/jennahaze/ [ invalid url ] oh my... None of them are photoshopped either. This one taken by my friend MrBlue is "enhanced" too? Click to expand The second is very SUBTLY enhanced, you can tell by the way her legs look in that picture. The shine is unnatural, the smoothness, and the SLIGHT blurryness, again is evidence of airbrushing. The first, third, and fourth however are all natural. [Link]
Naturally_Perverted Deactivated User 215 Posts 5/07	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:18PM Naturally_Perverted wrote: purplehayes2006 wrote: Naturally_Perverted wrote: Click to expand PLEASE oh PLEASE show me some pics that YOU think have been "enhanced" I'd love to see them... :-) Click to expand if you want an example of what i'm talking about go to the thread titled "The Reason I Love Porn" and look at the pics of you posted by Jonothan Pedak and Xformyzombie you'll know what i'm talking about. As for the ones i've found on google, they're really too many to post. Click to expand huh? are you serious? how many enhanced pics do you see? See, I can show to you a button as an example. And my button is about hundreds of pictures. Flickr is just ONE site between many where you can find hundreds of non-"enhanced" pictures of Jenna. You have to sign-in in order to see all of them. My friend GJ posted last month in Jenna's Yahoo Group these "general" searches: http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/jennahaze/ [ invalid url ] oh my... None of them are photoshopped either. This one taken by my friend MrBlue is "enhanced" too? Click to expand The second is very SUBTLY enhanced, you can tell by the way her legs look in that picture. The shine is unnatural, the smoothness, and the SLIGHT blurryness, again is evidence of airbrushing. The first, third, and fourth however are all natural. For a clearly enhanced picture look at this one: [Link]
CrouchingBear Deactivated User 299 Posts 5/08	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:19PM Naturally_Perverted wrote: [Image not found DB] Click to expand Can you not see how the lighting is ridiculously bright, how there are absolutely no anomalies on her skin, how her skin happens to appear smoother than a brand new glass table, how the subtle blurryness on her face is evidence of airbrushing, and how the shine is completely unnatural, even with extensive makeup? Click to expand Precisely which "anomalies" are you referring to? And, what exactly is your agenda here? [Link]
MissJennaHaze Member 401 Posts 4/06	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:20PM Naturally_Perverted wrote: purplehayes2006 wrote: Naturally_Perverted wrote: purplehayes2006 wrote: ^The fact you don't know how to do a simple search is not going to change the fact that there is a BAZILLION of untouched pic of hers in internet. There is LOTS of pics taken by fans in different flickr accounts, just as an example. You are too lazy to even do a simple search over here in ADT, but you talk anyway about pictures you DIDN'T even see! I don't care what you think or not, but the photo sets she is doing for her website are NOT photoshopped and OF COURSE her personal pics in myspace are NOT photoshopped either, and Jenna herself answered to you in that way over here. So YES, you are defaming her. Click to expand The fact that you replace the world 'are' with the word 'is' in the wrong context is proof that you don't know what you're talking about. In all seriousness though, what makes you think i can't perform a simple search? I clearly told you how i found the pics i'm describing to you, i used google and typed in her name. Maybe her photo's on her website and myspacec aren't photoshopped, but that isn't the issue i was focusing on. The issue is that MOST pictures of her ARE photoshopped. If you can't see that from doing a simple google search i suggest you get your eyes checked and learn a little bit about how image enhancement works. OK fine, maybe i'm defaming her a little bit, but anyone with a modicum of sense and honesty knows what i'm saying is the truth. By the way, the link you just posted; the one where we had our little discussion before, the photo's posted of her by Johnothan Pedak and Xformyzombie are CLEARLY photoshopped. If you deny that, i'm sorry but you really need your eyesight checked...badly. Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/14/2008 11:04:38 PM Click to expand And I suggest you to get some brains first. "Maybe her photo's on her website and myspacec aren't photoshopped, but that isn't the issue i was focusing on." that's the only thing I care about. That "maybe" is out of place. I don't care about how many untouched pics of hers you think there is/are in internet, but there is/are BAZILLIONS. Did you do a search in google typing her name? really? WOW That's AWESOME! you have to show me how you do it! BTW: "myspacec". Yes, I guess you could teach me how to improve my Photoshop skills....... Keep your "truth" for you dude; I'm done and it has no sense get over it again. BTW: If I replace the "world" 'are' with the word 'is' maybe it is because I live in Spain, I am Spaniard and English in not my native language. "Quien no quiere saber es como el que no ve." Click to expand your childishness makes me smile. You couldn't debate me with formality and logic so you resorted to crazy-fan outrage and personal attacks. There was no need to insult my search skills and my intelligence; you created the hostility. Yes i said MAYBE they aren't photoshopped, because i already explained i can't see the ones on her myspace. As for the ones on her webpage i'm not going to go into detail and post all of them and say which ones are enhanced and which aren't, but if you go to jennahaze.com you can clearly see the entry page photo of her is enhanced, and if you take the tour there are more. I've also already said the pictures posted by Xformyzombie and Jonothan Pedak are enhanced. Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/15/2008 6:38:59 AM Click to expand OK so I went to the thread "the reason I love porn" to see the pics of mine that are touched up. SO FUCKING funny! You really COULD have picked pics that were touched up but THOSE AREN'T. There's one from a Brazzers scene I did where I'm in a pink top and jeans.. (what could there have been to fix in this pic?) NOT photo shopped. There's a Darkside pic of me on my knees... The only fixing on that (if there is any) is on my forehead where I was sweating a bit at the shoot.. As you can see my old belly button piercing scar isn't photoshopped out, neither are those very slight circles under my eyes . don't you think I'd do those too if I were into fixing my pics? Now the actual boxcover of Darkside was "enhanced" I believe. On my lips. Jules wanted them RED for the boxcover. Then you refer to the pics that Xformyzombie posted. The first is from A-List 2. Van Styles shot that.. I can't see anything different or enhanced from that day... then there's one in a white bikini, hmm don't you think if it were touched up we'd erase my ribs and my (once again!) slight circles under my eyes? The next is from a steve hicks photo shoot. That pic is the same as the one I have on my cd that steve himself burned for me.. I don't think they did anything to it. But on this one I cant be sure. I don't know how to use photoshop programs so I'm no expert....just being honest here. And the last one is one I own. It was shot for my website by Van Styles. There's not a god damn thing done to that pic! There are plenty of girls and companies that photoshop the HELL out of their pics but I am definitely the least offender at this... if you want to pick on someone for "not keeping it real" go bark up one of their trees.... Jenna [Link]

Naturally_Perverted Deactivated User 215 Posts 5/07	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:22PM CrouchingBear wrote: Naturally_Perverted wrote: [Image not found DB] Click to expand Can you not see how the lighting is ridiculously bright, how there are absolutely no anomalies on her skin, how her skin happens to appear smoother than a brand new glass table, how the subtle blurryness on her face is evidence of airbrushing, and how the shine is completely unnatural, even with extensive makeup? Click to expand Precisely which "anomalies" are you referring to? And, what exactly is your agenda here? Click to expand This picture i said was natural. As for the anomalies i said there AREN'T any in the ones that have been enhanced. anomalies would include open pores, slight unsymmatry, any kinds of small marks, and sweat. See this picture is all natural because you can clearly see the shine of sweat, you can see the makeup clearly is covering up some normal human imperfections. As for an agenda, i don't have one except to finally shut up the raving fanboys who label anyone who disagrees with them as insane. Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/15/2008 12:23:58 PM Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/15/2008 12:28:30 PM [Link]
CrouchingBear Deactivated User 299 Posts 5/08	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:26PM Naturally_Perverted wrote: CrouchingBear wrote: Naturally_Perverted wrote: [Image not found DB] Click to expand Can you not see how the lighting is ridiculously bright, how there are absolutely no anomalies on her skin, how her skin happens to appear smoother than a brand new glass table, how the subtle blurryness on her face is evidence of airbrushing, and how the shine is completely unnatural, even with extensive makeup? Click to expand Precisely which "anomalies" are you referring to? And, what exactly is your agenda here? Click to expand This picture i said was natural. As for the anomalies i said there AREN'T any in the ones that have been enhanced. anomalies would include open pores, slight unsymmatry, any kinds of small marks, and sweat. Click to expand Dude, you should be playing with mannequins if you expect the kind of things you're asking for. [Link]
purplehayes2006 Member 391 Posts 4/06	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:27PM Naturally_Perverted wrote: purplehayes2006 wrote: Naturally_Perverted wrote: Click to expand PLEASE oh PLEASE show me some pics that YOU think have been "enhanced" I'd love to see them... :-) Click to expand if you want an example of what i'm talking about go to the thread titled "The Reason I Love Porn" and look at the pics of you posted by Jonothan Pedak and Xformyzombie you'll know what i'm talking about. As for the ones i've found on google, they're really too many to post. Click to expand huh? are you serious? how many enhanced pics do you see? See, I can show to you a button as an example. And my button is about hundreds of pictures. Flickr is just ONE site between many where you can find hundreds of non-"enhanced" pictures of Jenna. You have to sign-in in order to see all of them. My friend GJ posted last month in Jenna's Yahoo Group these "general" searches: http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/jennahaze/ [ invalid url ] oh my... None of them are photoshopped either. This one taken by my friend MrBlue is "enhanced" too? Click to expand The second is very SUBTLY enhanced, you can tell by the way her legs look in that picture. The shine is unnatural, the smoothness, and the SLIGHT blurryness, again is evidence of airbrushing. The first, third, and fourth however are all natural. Click to expand No dude! Thanks to you for make MY point. You DON'T know anything about what you are talking about! And even Noahped himsef told you that his pics of Jenna are NOT photoshopped. Keep living in your own world if that's what you want man, but stop defaming Jenna; and now Noahped too! [Link]
Naturally_Perverted Deactivated User 215 Posts 5/07	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:29PM CrouchingBear wrote: Naturally_Perverted wrote: CrouchingBear wrote: Naturally_Perverted wrote: [Image not found DB] Click to expand Can you not see how the lighting is ridiculously bright, how there are absolutely no anomalies on her skin, how her skin happens to appear smoother than a brand new glass table, how the subtle blurryness on her face is evidence of airbrushing, and how the shine is completely unnatural, even with extensive makeup? Click to expand Precisely which "anomalies" are you referring to? And, what exactly is your agenda here? Click to expand This picture i said was natural. As for the anomalies i said there AREN'T any in the ones that have been enhanced. anomalies would include open pores, slight unsymmatry, any kinds of small marks, and sweat. Click to expand Dude, you should be playing with mannequins if you expect the kind of things you're asking for. Click to expand When did i say expect perfection? I'm simply pointing out which images are enhanced and which aren't. Please don't put words in my mouth. [Link]
MissJennaHaze Member 401 Posts 4/06	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:31PM Naturally_Perverted wrote: purplehayes2006 wrote: Naturally_Perverted wrote: Click to expand PLEASE oh PLEASE show me some pics that YOU think have been "enhanced" I'd love to see them... :-) Click to expand if you want an example of what i'm talking about go to the thread titled "The Reason I Love Porn" and look at the pics of you posted by Jonothan Pedak and Xformyzombie you'll know what i'm talking about. As for the ones i've found on google, they're really too many to post. Click to expand huh? are you serious? how many enhanced pics do you see? See, I can show to you a button as an example. And my button is about hundreds of pictures. Flickr is just ONE site between many where you can find hundreds of non-"enhanced" pictures of Jenna. You have to sign-in in order to see all of them. My friend GJ posted last month in Jenna's Yahoo Group these "general" searches: http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/jennahaze/ [ invalid url ] oh my... None of them are photoshopped either. This one taken by my friend MrBlue is "enhanced" too? Click to expand The second is very SUBTLY enhanced, you can tell by the way her legs look in that picture. The shine is unnatural, the smoothness, and the SLIGHT blurryness, again is evidence of airbrushing. The first, third, and fourth however are all natural. Click to expand Lets ask the photographers... Noahped: is that second one touched up? It looks the same as the one I have on my cd.......and i think if it was going to be fixed he'd airbrush the wrinkles on my side from turning around. Chris Streams: Did you touch up that pic thats on my website? (I honestly don't know, this on may be photoshopped! I just know my makeup artist kicks ass and so does Chris!) [Link]
Naturally_Perverted Deactivated User 215 Posts 5/07	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:32PM No dude! Thanks to you for make MY point. You DON'T know anything about what you are talking about! And even Noahped himsef told you that his pics of Jenna are NOT photoshopped. Keep living in your own world if that's what you want man, but stop defaming Jenna; and now Noahped too! Click to expand Noahpad was referring to pictures that he has seen and the fact that jenna is known for taking many natural pics in comparison to other porn stars. He wasn't commenting on the pics you just posted. Also, the pic with noahpad written on the right hand side; i said that was a natural one. [Link]
CrouchingBear Deactivated User 299 Posts 5/08	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:33PM Naturally_Perverted wrote: CrouchingBear wrote: Naturally_Perverted wrote: CrouchingBear wrote: Naturally_Perverted wrote: [Image not found DB] Click to expand Can you not see how the lighting is ridiculously bright, how there are absolutely no anomalies on her skin, how her skin happens to appear smoother than a brand new glass table, how the subtle blurryness on her face is evidence of airbrushing, and how the shine is completely unnatural, even with extensive makeup? Click to expand Precisely which "anomalies" are you referring to? And, what exactly is your agenda here? Click to expand This picture i said was natural. As for the anomalies i said there AREN'T any in the ones that have been enhanced. anomalies would include open pores, slight unsymmatry, any kinds of small marks, and sweat. Click to expand Dude, you should be playing with mannequins if you expect the kind of things you're asking for. Click to expand When did i say expect perfection? I'm simply pointing out which images are enhanced and which aren't. Please don't put words in my mouth. Click to expand These are your words I'm quoting - which, I might add, are offending a great number of people as well as Jenna Haze herself. [Link]
Naturally_Perverted Deactivated User 215 Posts 5/07	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:37PM OK so I went to the thread "the reason I love porn" to see the pics of mine that are touched up. SO FUCKING funny! You really COULD have picked pics that were touched up but THOSE AREN'T. There's one from a Brazzers scene I did where I'm in a pink top and jeans.. (what could there have been to fix in this pic?) NOT photo shopped. There's a Darkside pic of me on my knees... The only fixing on that (if there is any) is on my forehead where I was sweating a bit at the shoot.. As you can see my old belly button piercing scar isn't photoshopped out, neither are those very slight circles under my eyes . don't you think I'd do those too if I were into fixing my pics? Now the actual boxcover of Darkside was "enhanced" I believe. On my lips. Jules wanted them RED for the boxcover. Then you refer to the pics that Xformyzombie posted. The first is from A-List 2. Van Styles shot that.. I can't see anything different or enhanced from that day... then there's one in a white bikini, hmm don't you think if it were touched up we'd erase my ribs and my (once again!) slight circles under my eyes? The next is from a steve hicks photo shoot. That pic is the same as the one I have on my cd that steve himself burned for me.. I don't think they did anything to it. But on this one I cant be sure. I don't know how to use photoshop programs so I'm no expert....just being honest here. And the last one is one I own. It was shot for my website by Van Styles. There's not a god damn thing done to that pic! There are plenty of girls and companies that photoshop the HELL out of their pics but I am definitely the least offender at this... if you want to pick on someone for "not keeping it real" go bark up one of their trees.... Jenna Click to expand Jenna this isn't about me 'barking up' your tree, in fact i'm flattered you've posted to me specifically as many times as you have. This is about me proving to purplehayes that he's wrong about certain pictures not being enhanced. This all started with him claiming that hardly any of your photo's are enhanced, when many of them clearly are. I'm not trying to be rude to you, i'm proving to him that the industry enhances photo's and that you are not an exception, and that in my opinion pictures can grossly enhance someones image. Jenna i don't know who shot these pictures but they are obviously enhanced, perhaps you can shed some light on them: Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/15/2008 12:46:07 PM Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/15/2008 12:46:40 PM Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/15/2008 12:49:14 PM [Link]
Naturally_Perverted Deactivated User 215 Posts 5/07	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:43PM These are your words I'm quoting - which, I might add, are offending a great number of people as well as Jenna Haze herself. Click to expand Please quote where i said i expect perfection. As for offending fanboys who are vehement about bullying others to accept their opinions are truth, i could care less. I will however apologize to jenna if i have offended her, that was not my intention. I am a very bluntly honest person, and sometimes that comes across as being rude, but all i'm doing is being truthful. [Link]
CrouchingBear Deactivated User 299 Posts 5/08	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:44PM Naturally_Perverted wrote: Jenna this isn't about me 'barking up' your tree, in fact i'm flattered you've posted to me specifically as many times as you have. TRANSLATION - I'LL MAKE A SCENE JUST TO GET ATTENTION. This is about me proving to purplehayes that he's wrong about certain pictures not being enhanced. TRANSLATION - I ALWAYS HAVE TO BE RIGHT. This all started with him claiming that hardly any of your photo's are enhanced, when many of them clearly are. TRANSLATION - I JUST CAN'T ACCEPT WHEN I'M WRONG. I'm not trying to be rude to you... TRANSLATION - I REALLY HAVE NO CLUE HOW TO TREAT A WOMAN... i'm proving to him that the industry enhances photo's and that you are not an exception, and that in my opinion pictures can grossly enhance someones image. TRANSLATION - I REALLY AM TRYING TO BE RUDE TO YOU. Click to expand What a fruit loop. [Link]

purplehayes2006 Member 391 Posts 4/06	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:46PM Naturally_Perverted wrote: No dude! Thanks to you for make MY point. You DON'T know anything about what you are talking about! And even Noahped himsef told you that his pics of Jenna are NOT photoshopped. Keep living in your own world if that's what you want man, but stop defaming Jenna; and now Noahped too! Click to expand Noahpad was referring to pictures that he has seen and the fact that jenna is known for taking many natural pics in comparison to other porn stars. He wasn't commenting on the pics you just posted. Also, the pic with noahpad written on the right hand side; i said that was a natural one. Click to expand No dude, YOU are wrong and you keep going over it. OK "HawkEye" here you have a link to the original picture. 3264px×2448px. If you re-size it and post it over here you will see that it is THE SAME PICTURE. http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h136/purplehayes2006/JennaPics/P6249741.jpg You don't know when you have to shut out huh. Out of all the girls in the biz to talk about airbrushing! you are soooo ridiculous. I will post another original one in a bit. I told ya. I have originals and I DO know about what I'm talking about. But you keep picking over Jenna and showing WHO you are and WHAT you are. [Link]
Naturally_Perverted Deactivated User 215 Posts 5/07	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:51PM CrouchingBear wrote: Naturally_Perverted wrote: Jenna this isn't about me 'barking up' your tree, in fact i'm flattered you've posted to me specifically as many times as you have. TRANSLATION - I'LL MAKE A SCENE JUST TO GET ATTENTION. This is about me proving to purplehayes that he's wrong about certain pictures not being enhanced. TRANSLATION - I ALWAYS HAVE TO BE RIGHT. This all started with him claiming that hardly any of your photo's are enhanced, when many of them clearly are. TRANSLATION - I JUST CAN'T ACCEPT WHEN I'M WRONG. I'm not trying to be rude to you... TRANSLATION - I REALLY HAVE NO CLUE HOW TO TREAT A WOMAN... i'm proving to him that the industry enhances photo's and that you are not an exception, and that in my opinion pictures can grossly enhance someones image. TRANSLATION - I REALLY AM TRYING TO BE RUDE TO YOU. Click to expand What a fruit loop. Click to expand YES! THERE IT IS! Personal attacks! Just what i've come to expect from certain idiot fanboys on this board who masqurade as intelligent and mature individuals, but degenerate into childishness when one of their gods are questioned or debated about! Good job! [Link]
CrouchingBear Deactivated User 299 Posts 5/08	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:55PM Naturally_Perverted wrote: Personal attacks! Just what i've come to expect from certain idiot fanboys on this board who masqurade as intelligent and mature individuals, but degenerate into childishness when one of their gods are questioned or debated about! Click to expand Hypocrisy in action. You gotta love this guy's inability/refusal to look at himself and his own actions. [Link]
Naturally_Perverted Deactivated User 215 Posts 5/07	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:56PM purplehayes2006 wrote: Naturally_Perverted wrote: No dude! Thanks to you for make MY point. You DON'T know anything about what you are talking about! And even Noahped himsef told you that his pics of Jenna are NOT photoshopped. Keep living in your own world if that's what you want man, but stop defaming Jenna; and now Noahped too! Click to expand Noahpad was referring to pictures that he has seen and the fact that jenna is known for taking many natural pics in comparison to other porn stars. He wasn't commenting on the pics you just posted. Also, the pic with noahpad written on the right hand side; i said that was a natural one. Click to expand No dude, YOU are wrong and you keep going over it. OK "HawkEye" here you have a link to the original picture. 3264px×2448px. If you re-size it and post it over here you will see that it is THE SAME PICTURE. http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h136/purplehayes2006/JennaPics/P6249741.jpg You don't know when you have to shut out huh. Out of all the girls in the biz to talk about airbrushing! you are soooo ridiculous. I will post another original one in a bit. I told ya. I have originals and I DO know about what I'm talking about. But you keep picking over Jenna and showing WHO you are and WHAT you are. Click to expand hmm.. i just took a look at the link you posted, and after magnifying the pic i came to the conclusion that i might be wrong about this particular picture. At first i couldnt see the sweat on the forehead, but after magnifying it i could, and the legs look much more natural when the picture is magnified. I'll admit i might be wrong about this one, a reply from noahpad himself about this particular picture would be helpful. These two however are clearly enhnaced, and if anyone says otherwise i will call him either ignorant of the situation or a liar: Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/15/2008 1:00:24 PM [Link]
Naturally_Perverted Deactivated User 215 Posts 5/07	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:58PM CrouchingBear wrote: Naturally_Perverted wrote: Personal attacks! Just what i've come to expect from certain idiot fanboys on this board who masqurade as intelligent and mature individuals, but degenerate into childishness when one of their gods are questioned or debated about! Click to expand Hypocrisy in action. You gotta love this guy's inability/refusal to look at himself and his own actions. Click to expand Not hypocrisy; you see my personal attacks are in response to personal attacks i've received. I only attack a person on a personal level when they attack me first. I was having a civilized conversation with you, and you were doing good hiding your immaturity until you couldn't contain your fanboy frustration anymore and lashed out like a child. How sad. [Link]
CrouchingBear Deactivated User 299 Posts 5/08	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:03PM Naturally_Perverted wrote: CrouchingBear wrote: Naturally_Perverted wrote: Personal attacks! Just what i've come to expect from certain idiot fanboys on this board who masqurade as intelligent and mature individuals, but degenerate into childishness when one of their gods are questioned or debated about! Click to expand Hypocrisy in action. You gotta love this guy's inability/refusal to look at himself and his own actions. Click to expand I was having a civilized conversation with you, and you were doing good hiding your immaturity until you couldn't contain your fanboy frustration anymore and lashed out like a child. How sad. Click to expand I think more than a few people here are questioning the "civilized" nature of what you perceive to be a "conversation." [Link]
purplehayes2006 Member 391 Posts 4/06	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:07PM Naturally_Perverted wrote: purplehayes2006 wrote: Naturally_Perverted wrote: No dude! Thanks to you for make MY point. You DON'T know anything about what you are talking about! And even Noahped himsef told you that his pics of Jenna are NOT photoshopped. Keep living in your own world if that's what you want man, but stop defaming Jenna; and now Noahped too! Click to expand Noahpad was referring to pictures that he has seen and the fact that jenna is known for taking many natural pics in comparison to other porn stars. He wasn't commenting on the pics you just posted. Also, the pic with noahpad written on the right hand side; i said that was a natural one. Click to expand No dude, YOU are wrong and you keep going over it. OK "HawkEye" here you have a link to the original picture. 3264px×2448px. If you re-size it and post it over here you will see that it is THE SAME PICTURE. http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h136/purplehayes2006/JennaPics/P6249741.jpg You don't know when you have to shut out huh. Out of all the girls in the biz to talk about airbrushing! you are soooo ridiculous. I will post another original one in a bit. I told ya. I have originals and I DO know about what I'm talking about. But you keep picking over Jenna and showing WHO you are and WHAT you are. Click to expand hmm.. i just took a look at the link you posted, and after magnifying the pic i came to the conclusion that i might be wrong about this particular picture. At first i couldnt see the sweat on the forehead, but after magnifying it i could, and the legs look much more natural when the picture is magnified. I'll admit i might be wrong about this one, a reply from noahpad himself about this particular picture would be helpful. These two however are clearly enhnaced, and if anyone says otherwise i will call him either ignorant of the situation or a liar: I've got news for you: you are an ignorant an a liar. "HawkEye". Here you have the original still: http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h136/purplehayes2006/JennaPics/_MG_6795.jpg Re-size it and post it here and you will see that IT IS THE SAME PHOTO. NONE of her pictures from this photo set or any other photo set she is shootin for her website are "enhanced". I'm not going to post any more original stills. Jenna is REALLY proud for the fact the pictures she is shootin for her website are not "enhanced", so even you should understand that she and everybody that care of her get annoyed when some random smartass keep saying her pics are "enhanced" when they are NOT. This is the point where you should show your apologizes to her. Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/15/2008 1:00:24 PM Click to expand [Link]
Naturally_Perverted Deactivated User 215 Posts 5/07	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:08PM I think more than a few people here are questioning the "civilized" nature of what you perceive to be a "conversation." Click to expand Let them question all they want, but unless they can prove that i've started any hostility towards someone about this topic with a personal attack that wasn't in retaliation to one of their own, i suggest they rethink. I haven't started any personal attacks on this thread or the one titled "the reason i love porn", all of my personal attacks were directed at people who discarded their fake persona's of civilized individuals and attacked me like immature brats first. I dare anyone to prove otherwise. [Link]
Naturally_Perverted Deactivated User 215 Posts 5/07	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:10PM I've got news for you: you are an ignorant an a liar. "HawkEye". Here you have the original still: http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h136/purplehayes2006/JennaPics/_MG_6795.jpg Re-size it and post it here and you will see that IT IS THE SAME PHOTO. NONE of her pictures from this photo set or any other photo set she is shootin for her website are "enhanced". I'm not going to post any more original stills. Jenna is REALLY proud for the fact the pictures she is shootin for her website are not "enhanced", so even you should understand that she and everybody that care of her get annoyed when some random smartass keep saying her pics are "enhanced" when they are NOT. This is the point where you should show your apologizes to her. Click to expand still looks enhanced. Just like this one, which by the way is from her website: Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/15/2008 1:12:23 PM [Link]
purplehayes2006 Member 391 Posts 4/06	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:17PM Naturally_Perverted wrote: I've got news for you: you are an ignorant an a liar. "HawkEye". Here you have the original still: http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h136/purplehayes2006/JennaPics/_MG_6795.jpg Re-size it and post it here and you will see that IT IS THE SAME PHOTO. NONE of her pictures from this photo set or any other photo set she is shootin for her website are "enhanced". I'm not going to post any more original stills. Jenna is REALLY proud for the fact the pictures she is shootin for her website are not "enhanced", so even you should understand that she and everybody that care of her get annoyed when some random smartass keep saying her pics are "enhanced" when they are NOT. This is the point where you should show your apologizes to her. Click to expand still looks enhanced. Just like this one, which by the way is from her website: Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/15/2008 1:12:23 PM Click to expand Which BTW is not from a photo set that she did for her website. "still looks enhanced"? At this point you just showed to everyone that you are pointless. [Link]

Naturally_Perverted Deactivated User 215 Posts 5/07	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:19PM Which BTW is not from a photo set that she did for her website. "still looks enhanced"? At this point you just showed to everyone that you are pointless. Click to expand I've already explained before why it looks enhanced, you on the other hand have made no effort to prove to me that it isn't enhanced. Why did you take it off photobucket? Now when i click the link it's not even there anymore. Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/15/2008 1:22:05 PM [Link]
MissJennaHaze Member 401 Posts 4/06	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:25PM Naturally_Perverted wrote: I've got news for you: you are an ignorant an a liar. "HawkEye". Here you have the original still: http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h136/purplehayes2006/JennaPics/_MG_6795.jpg Re-size it and post it here and you will see that IT IS THE SAME PHOTO. NONE of her pictures from this photo set or any other photo set she is shootin for her website are "enhanced". I'm not going to post any more original stills. Jenna is REALLY proud for the fact the pictures she is shootin for her website are not "enhanced", so even you should understand that she and everybody that care of her get annoyed when some random smartass keep saying her pics are "enhanced" when they are NOT. This is the point where you should show your apologizes to her. Click to expand still looks enhanced. Just like this one, which by the way is from her website: Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/15/2008 1:12:23 PM Click to expand The one from the from of my website was borrowed from Zero Tolerance. As you can see by the tagline at the bottom of the pic. So I have no Idea if that one is. BUT you seem to have a problem accepting my other ones as being "authentic". And frankly I'm tired of defending myself to you. Those pics of me on the white wall in the corset are not photo shopped. and thats that. ask van styles he took them. ask dan from genesis magazine he saw a few from this set before anyone else did, ask jules who saw them that day, when i showed them to him after they were shot. (the pics that day were so good we took over 400 of em, just for pretty girl shots!) But you are gonna believe what you want. I have to say though I am sorry you just cant accept that my pics are the real deal.. lol I'd hate to see what you'd say if you really saw me in person, I'm pretty much the exact same as my photos... [Link]
purplehayes2006 Member 391 Posts 4/06	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:31PM Naturally_Perverted wrote: Which BTW is not from a photo set that she did for her website. "still looks enhanced"? At this point you just showed to everyone that you are pointless. Click to expand I've already explained before why it looks enhanced, you on the other hand have made no effort to prove to me that it isn't enhanced. Why did you take it off photobucket? Now when i click the link it's not even there anymore. Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/15/2008 1:22:05 PM Click to expand I have a Pro account and I'm proud of it; any problem? hahhah. The link is there and working. The first one I posted it's not gonna be there when photobucket staff find it lol. I made NO effort? I'm showing the ORIGINAL stills to you! [Link]
Naturally_Perverted Deactivated User 215 Posts 5/07	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:33PM purplehayes2006 wrote: Naturally_Perverted wrote: Which BTW is not from a photo set that she did for her website. "still looks enhanced"? At this point you just showed to everyone that you are pointless. Click to expand I've already explained before why it looks enhanced, you on the other hand have made no effort to prove to me that it isn't enhanced. Why did you take it off photobucket? Now when i click the link it's not even there anymore. Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/15/2008 1:22:05 PM Click to expand I have a Pro account and I'm proud of it; any problem? hahhah. The link is there and working. The first one I posted it's not gonna be there when photobucket staff find it lol. I made NO effort? I'm showing the ORIGINAL stills to you! Click to expand the original still of the one in which she is dressed in pink looks just like the one that was originally posted by jonothan pedak or xformyzombie (forget which one posted that one) and looks enhanced. I've used my words to explain in detail how the lighting and presence of airbrushing etc is evident. You did however make me rethink my opinion of one of the pics. I should apologize for saying you made 'no' effort; you did make an effort, but i meant no effort it terms of using your words to prove mine wrong because i explained how the lighting, slight blurryness etc. is evidence of enhancement and you didn't counter that. Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/15/2008 1:39:09 PM [Link]
CrouchingBear Deactivated User 299 Posts 5/08	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:34PM Jenna, I'm really sorry you had to put up with this guy this morning. I tried my best to get through to him. Purplehaze did as well. You're right in saying that some people will just believe whatever they want to believe regardless of the truth. [Link]
Naturally_Perverted Deactivated User 215 Posts 5/07	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:36PM [quote[ The one from the from of my website was borrowed from Zero Tolerance. As you can see by the tagline at the bottom of the pic. So I have no Idea if that one is. BUT you seem to have a problem accepting my other ones as being "authentic". And frankly I'm tired of defending myself to you. Those pics of me on the white wall in the corset are not photo shopped. and thats that. ask van styles he took them. ask dan from genesis magazine he saw a few from this set before anyone else did, ask jules who saw them that day, when i showed them to him after they were shot. (the pics that day were so good we took over 400 of em, just for pretty girl shots!) But you are gonna believe what you want. I have to say though I am sorry you just cant accept that my pics are the real deal.. lol I'd hate to see what you'd say if you really saw me in person, I'm pretty much the exact same as my photos... [/quote] i have accepted some of them as being authentic jenna. Look at the posts right here on this thread where i said things along the lines of 'the first two are enhnced but the others look all natural'. I'm not denying that there are natural pics of you and that people have them, what i'm saying is that the enhanced ones outnumber the natural ones, and that isn't your fault. It's what the industry does. [Link]
purplehayes2006 Member 391 Posts 4/06	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:40PM Naturally_Perverted wrote: purplehayes2006 wrote: Naturally_Perverted wrote: Which BTW is not from a photo set that she did for her website. "still looks enhanced"? At this point you just showed to everyone that you are pointless. Click to expand I've already explained before why it looks enhanced, you on the other hand have made no effort to prove to me that it isn't enhanced. Why did you take it off photobucket? Now when i click the link it's not even there anymore. Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/15/2008 1:22:05 PM Click to expand I have a Pro account and I'm proud of it; any problem? hahhah. The link is there and working. The first one I posted it's not gonna be there when photobucket staff find it lol. I made NO effort? I'm showing the ORIGINAL stills to you! Click to expand the original still of the one in which she is dressed in pink looks just like the one that was originally posted by jonothan pedak or xformyzombie (forget which one posted that one) and looks enhanced. I've used my words to explain in detail how the lighting and presence of airbrushing etc is evident. You did however make me rethink my opinion of one of the pics. Click to expand EXACTLY, it is the ORIGINAL picture and looks THE SAME. And the pic taken by Noahped looks JUST THE SAME TOO! If you re-size the original picture you will see that gets way more clear, and after you post here, the quality of the picture slow down for a better internet board posting, which makes the pic look more blur. Jenna already explained with her own words all about the pictures and how ridiculous is to say that they are enhanced when you can see on the some "imperfections". You should rethink about many more stuff dude. Edited by - purplehayes2006 on 7/15/2008 1:43:46 PM [Link]
RandomPrecision Senior Member Enjoy! 8175 Posts 3/06	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:40PM First of all, some people are being lazy here with the quoting. It's very frustrating to read when you feel the need to quote five people (maybe a slight exaggeration). On the "enhancement" thing. As I said, Photoshop rarely enhances anything in the hands of someone who gets hammer-handed with it. Jenna is gorgeous without enhancement. For the guy who said she doesn't look better than any attractive girl on the street, well, that's what I'm looking for. I'm not looking for women who don't exist. But you also don't see too many girls on the street who are as attractive as Jenna. With or without Photoshop. [Link]
CrouchingBear Deactivated User 299 Posts 5/08	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:40PM Naturally_Perverted wrote: I'm not denying that there are natural pics of you and that people have them, what i'm saying is that the enhanced ones outnumber the natural ones, and that isn't your fault. It's what the industry does. Click to expand And numerous people - including the subject of the photos - have told you that you are wrong. And yet you insist on pressing on. [Link]
Naturally_Perverted Deactivated User 215 Posts 5/07	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:43PM CrouchingBear wrote: Naturally_Perverted wrote: I'm not denying that there are natural pics of you and that people have them, what i'm saying is that the enhanced ones outnumber the natural ones, and that isn't your fault. It's what the industry does. Click to expand And numerous people - including the subject of the photos - have told you that you are wrong. And yet you insist on pressing on. Click to expand As i told purplehayes once before: many people think jenna jameson is the greatest pornstar of all time, but anyone with any real knowledge of porn knows that isn't true. Obviously the subject of the pictures herself isn't going to go online and count all the pictures of herself and then seperate the natural ones from the unnatural ones and count which outnumber the other. [Link]
Naturally_Perverted Deactivated User 215 Posts 5/07	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:44PM CrouchingBear wrote: Jenna, I'm really sorry you had to put up with this guy this morning. I tried my best to get through to him. Purplehaze did as well. You're right in saying that some people will just believe whatever they want to believe regardless of the truth. Click to expand Jenna, I'm really sorry you had to put up with this guy this morning. I tried my best to get through to him. Purplehaze did as well. You're right in saying that some people will just believe whatever they want to believe regardless of the truth. Click to expand By 'getting through to me' did you mean attacking me personally after like 3 civilized posts? Please grow up, Jenna doesn't need you to be her knight in shining armor, she can take care of herself. Suck up all you want to; she's not going to have sex with you. [Link]
Naturally_Perverted Deactivated User 215 Posts 5/07	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:46PM RandomPrecision wrote: First of all, some people are being lazy here with the quoting. It's very frustrating to read when you feel the need to quote five people (maybe a slight exaggeration). On the "enhancement" thing. As I said, Photoshop rarely enhances anything in the hands of someone who gets hammer-handed with it. Jenna is gorgeous without enhancement. For the guy who said she doesn't look better than any attractive girl on the street, well, that's what I'm looking for. I'm not looking for women who don't exist. But you also don't see too many girls on the street who are as attractive as Jenna. With or without Photoshop. Click to expand jenna is pretty without enhancement. "well, that's what I'm looking for." -that's your opinion and your preference and i respect that. "But you also don't see too many girls on the street who are as attractive as Jenna." - that is a debatable and again a matter of taste. [Link]
noahped Senior Member 2978 Posts 8/02	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:46PM sigh I took this photo and I can tell you that it was NOT enhanced in any way...it's pretty much straight from my camera, minus the 'noahped' tag. You can only blame my camera and the hot Sun for that look. And unless I post a particular photo myself here or on my myspace page, I'd appreciate it if people wouldn't steal my flickr photos and post them without asking me first and/or the models I shoot by the way. My flickr account is set so photos cannot be directly saved...it's primarily used as my online portfolio. [Link]
purplehayes2006 Member 391 Posts 4/06	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:47PM Naturally_Perverted wrote: I'm not denying that there are natural pics of you and that people have them, what i'm saying is that the enhanced ones outnumber the natural ones, and that isn't your fault. It's what the industry does. Click to expand And how the hexk you know that man? how you ever know about numbers??? I showed to you before links to hundreds of natural pictures of Jenna Haze. And all of them coming from the same site! [Link]
Naturally_Perverted Deactivated User 215 Posts 5/07	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:50PM EXACTLY, it is the ORIGINAL picture and looks THE SAME. And the pic taken by Noahped looks JUST THE SAME TOO! If you re-size the original picture you will see that gets way more clear, and after you post here, the quality of the picture slow down for a better internet board posting, which makes the pic look more blur. Jenna already explained with her own words all about the pictures and how ridiculous is to say that they are enhanced when you can see on the some "imperfections". You should rethink about many more stuff dude. Edited by - purplehayes2006 on 7/15/2008 1:43:46 PM Click to expand Sorry i meant to put the words 'original still' in quotations because i have a very hard time believing the pic of her in pink that you posted is the original still. It looks way too enhanced, there aren't even dark circles around the eyes. Where did u get that still of her in pink from? How do you know it is the original? [Link]
Naturally_Perverted Deactivated User 215 Posts 5/07	Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:52PM purplehayes2006 wrote: Naturally_Perverted wrote: I'm not denying that there are natural pics of you and that people have them, what i'm saying is that the enhanced ones outnumber the natural ones, and that isn't your fault. It's what the industry does. Click to expand And how the hexk you know that man? how you ever know about numbers??? I showed to you before links to hundreds of natural pictures of Jenna Haze. And all of them coming from the same site! Click to expand you didn't show me hundreds, you showed me around 6 or 7. The reason i 'know' that the unnatural ones outnumber the natural ones is because everytime i google jenna haze pics that's what i see. As i said before as well, i don't have access to her myspace pictures, are there hundreds of natural pics on her myspace or just a few? [Link]

Author

Post

Naturally_Perverted
Deactivated User

215 Posts
5/07

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 6:30AM

Fabricate? If you want to go ahead and call me a liar please do, there's no need to beat around the bush here. There's no need for me to 'fabricate' anything, enhancement of photo's is something ALL modeling agencies do; porn industry included. Perhaps i should use the word enhance instead of photoshop. By enhancements i mean airbrushing to make the skin smoother, getting rid of any wrinkles, making the lighting brighter, etc.
If you've read my posts you'd know i'm not trying to imply that she isn't beautiful, i'm just saying that enhanced images make people seem more beautiful than they are, her included. I've repeatedly said i think she's pretty, but i believe people on ADT grossly overhype the way she looks. I don't want to seem rude but that's the truth, you could easily compare her to other girls in the industry who look like super models, or get into measurements etc. and you'd then see that i'm right. I honestly don't see how she's any different looking than the average attractive girl on the street.
Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/15/2008 6:43:56 AM

[Link]

Naturally_Perverted
Deactivated User

215 Posts
5/07

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 6:36AM

purplehayes2006 wrote:
Naturally_Perverted wrote:
purplehayes2006 wrote:
^The fact you don't know how to do a simple search is not going to change the fact that there is a BAZILLION of untouched pic of hers in internet. There is LOTS of pics taken by fans in different flickr accounts, just as an example. You are too lazy to even do a simple search over here in ADT, but you talk anyway about pictures you DIDN'T even see! I don't care what you think or not, but the photo sets she is doing for her website are NOT photoshopped and OF COURSE her personal pics in myspace are NOT photoshopped either, and Jenna herself answered to you in that way over here. So YES, you are defaming her.
Click to expand
The fact that you replace the world 'are' with the word 'is' in the wrong context is proof that you don't know what you're talking about. In all seriousness though, what makes you think i can't perform a simple search? I clearly told you how i found the pics i'm describing to you, i used google and typed in her name. Maybe her photo's on her website and myspacec aren't photoshopped, but that isn't the issue i was focusing on. The issue is that MOST pictures of her ARE photoshopped. If you can't see that from doing a simple google search i suggest you get your eyes checked and learn a little bit about how image enhancement works. OK fine, maybe i'm defaming her a little bit, but anyone with a modicum of sense and honesty knows what i'm saying is the truth. By the way, the link you just posted; the one where we had our little discussion before, the photo's posted of her by Johnothan Pedak and Xformyzombie are CLEARLY photoshopped. If you deny that, i'm sorry but you really need your eyesight checked...badly.
Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/14/2008 11:04:38 PM
Click to expand
And I suggest you to get some brains first.
"Maybe her photo's on her website and myspacec aren't photoshopped, but that isn't the issue i was focusing on." that's the only thing I care about. That "maybe" is out of place. I don't care about how many untouched pics of hers you think there is/are in internet, but there is/are BAZILLIONS. Did you do a search in google typing her name? really? WOW That's AWESOME! you have to show me how you do it! BTW: "myspacec". Yes, I guess you could teach me how to improve my Photoshop skills.......
Keep your "truth" for you dude; I'm done and it has no sense get over it again.
BTW: If I replace the "world" 'are' with the word 'is' maybe it is because I live in Spain, I am Spaniard and English in not my native language.
"Quien no quiere saber es como el que no ve."
Click to expand

your childishness makes me smile. You couldn't debate me with formality and logic so you resorted to crazy-fan outrage and personal attacks. There was no need to insult my search skills and my intelligence; you created the hostility.
Yes i said MAYBE they aren't photoshopped, because i already explained i can't see the ones on her myspace. As for the ones on her webpage i'm not going to go into detail and post all of them and say which ones are enhanced and which aren't, but if you go to jennahaze.com you can clearly see the entry page photo of her is enhanced, and if you take the tour there are more. I've also already said the pictures posted by Xformyzombie and Jonothan Pedak are enhanced.
Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/15/2008 6:38:59 AM

[Link]

Naturally_Perverted
Deactivated User

215 Posts
5/07

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 6:41AM

Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/15/2008 6:43:03 AM

[Link]

Clam Digger
Deactivated User

Many a man fails as an original thinker simply because his memory is too good.
2268 Posts
1/05

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 8:59AM

The fanboys smell blood in the water...

[Link]

purplehayes2006
Member

391 Posts
4/06

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 10:54AM

Naturally_Perverted wrote:
purplehayes2006 wrote:
Naturally_Perverted wrote:
purplehayes2006 wrote:
^The fact you don't know how to do a simple search is not going to change the fact that there is a BAZILLION of untouched pic of hers in internet. There is LOTS of pics taken by fans in different flickr accounts, just as an example. You are too lazy to even do a simple search over here in ADT, but you talk anyway about pictures you DIDN'T even see! I don't care what you think or not, but the photo sets she is doing for her website are NOT photoshopped and OF COURSE her personal pics in myspace are NOT photoshopped either, and Jenna herself answered to you in that way over here. So YES, you are defaming her.
Click to expand
The fact that you replace the world 'are' with the word 'is' in the wrong context is proof that you don't know what you're talking about. In all seriousness though, what makes you think i can't perform a simple search? I clearly told you how i found the pics i'm describing to you, i used google and typed in her name. Maybe her photo's on her website and myspacec aren't photoshopped, but that isn't the issue i was focusing on. The issue is that MOST pictures of her ARE photoshopped. If you can't see that from doing a simple google search i suggest you get your eyes checked and learn a little bit about how image enhancement works. OK fine, maybe i'm defaming her a little bit, but anyone with a modicum of sense and honesty knows what i'm saying is the truth. By the way, the link you just posted; the one where we had our little discussion before, the photo's posted of her by Johnothan Pedak and Xformyzombie are CLEARLY photoshopped. If you deny that, i'm sorry but you really need your eyesight checked...badly.
Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/14/2008 11:04:38 PM
Click to expand
And I suggest you to get some brains first.
"Maybe her photo's on her website and myspacec aren't photoshopped, but that isn't the issue i was focusing on." that's the only thing I care about. That "maybe" is out of place. I don't care about how many untouched pics of hers you think there is/are in internet, but there is/are BAZILLIONS. Did you do a search in google typing her name? really? WOW That's AWESOME! you have to show me how you do it! BTW: "myspacec". Yes, I guess you could teach me how to improve my Photoshop skills.......
Keep your "truth" for you dude; I'm done and it has no sense get over it again.
BTW: If I replace the "world" 'are' with the word 'is' maybe it is because I live in Spain, I am Spaniard and English in not my native language.
"Quien no quiere saber es como el que no ve."
Click to expand
your childishness makes me smile. You couldn't debate me with formality and logic so you resorted to crazy-fan outrage and personal attacks. There was no need to insult my search skills and my intelligence; you created the hostility.
Yes i said MAYBE they aren't photoshopped, because i already explained i can't see the ones on her myspace. As for the ones on her webpage i'm not going to go into detail and post all of them and say which ones are enhanced and which aren't, but if you go to jennahaze.com you can clearly see the entry page photo of her is enhanced, and if you take the tour there are more. I've also already said the pictures posted by Xformyzombie and Jonothan Pedak are enhanced.
Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/15/2008 6:38:59 AM
Click to expand

Piensa el ladrón que son todos de su condición...
Oh yeah? but I am the one who has to go and check out my eyesight and learn something about Photoshop (still waiting for your lessons...). Or should I say "is/are"?. "crazy-fan outrage"? why do not talk about your attitude? after Jenna (the owner of the stills in her website and myspace that you are talking about. Yes the same stills that you DIDN'T see but you keep talking about) answered to you, you are still picking on her, and saying "maybe this" "maybe that", even going through different threads to do so. How do you call that huh
Let me show you some real logic: Your "logic" is based in your ignorance, in what you don't see and what you don't know about, ergo your "logic" worth nothing.
"i'm not going to go into detail and post all of them and say which ones are enhanced and which aren't" -Really? ooohhhhh but if you keep a count of all the pics! even in percentages! this thread would look amazing with thousands of pics of Jenna all over it. You are no fun :-(
"if you go to jennahaze.com you can clearly see the entry page photo of her is enhanced, and if you take the tour there are more" -HAHAHAHAHHA! No way, you didn't say that, don't you? lol
oh man... you are not even capable of find still samples of her exclusive photo sets?
"I've also already said the pictures posted by Xformyzombie and Jonothan Pedak are enhanced."
I'm not talking about what other companies can do with Jenna's pics. I'm talking about stills from photo sets she exclusively does for her website.
So are you really saying that this picture is enhanced?

so what about this one?

It is enhanced too?
Oh and about her personal pictures in her MySpace... they are like this type of photos
[Image not found DB]

are they enhanced too?

[Link]

purplehayes2006
Member

391 Posts
4/06

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 11:02AM

PLEASE oh PLEASE show me some pics that YOU think have been "enhanced" I'd love to see them...
:-)

Click to expand

if you want an example of what i'm talking about go to the thread titled "The Reason I Love Porn" and look at the pics of you posted by Jonothan Pedak and Xformyzombie you'll know what i'm talking about. As for the ones i've found on google, they're really too many to post.

Click to expand

huh?
are you serious? how many enhanced pics do you see?
See, I can show to you a button as an example. And my button is about hundreds of pictures.
Flickr is just ONE site between many where you can find hundreds of non-"enhanced" pictures of Jenna. You have to sign-in in order to see all of them.
My friend GJ posted last month in Jenna's Yahoo Group these "general" searches:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/jennahaze/
[ invalid url ]

oh my...

None of them are photoshopped either.
This one taken by my friend MrBlue is "enhanced" too?

[Link]

David Starsky
Senior Member

We're gonna take it outside and I'm gonna show you what it's like!
1660 Posts
2/06

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 11:31AM

Man this has got so far off topic. Basically there are many pretty at times beautiful girls. Some of whom are more popular than others. We are attracted to the ones we are attracted to and that's that, no amount of arguing and debating will change that.
And as for the photoshopping etc. I'd think you simply can't tell just by looking at a photo whether it has been retouched unless you have an expert eye. And man that was a run-on sentence. Go to stillsbyalan.com and check out the "retouch" section.

[Link]

Naturally_Perverted
Deactivated User

215 Posts
5/07

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:04PM

that was all in response to you telling me i don't have the intelligence to perform a simple search. If you check our posts you can see i said all of that after you insulted my intelligence, so you see, i was right, you did start the hostility. Thank you for proving my point.

I already told you i can't see the pics on her myspace, and i'm afriad she's wrong about the ones on her webpage. Go to jennahaze.com and check out the entry page and if you tell me that the picture there is not enhanced then you really do need your eyesight checked.

This is how everyone's logic works my friend, including yours. You see logic is based on factors that we already know about, we see, hear, touch etc. and form our decisions based on the sensory information our brains gather. If we cannot see, hear, touch, see something etc. then we can come to 1 of 3 conclusions: either the something does not exist, we cannot see it due to our own deficiency, or it is too low in quantity for us to find easily.

the percentages were an exaggeration, i believe anyone who knows what an exaggeration is would gather that from reading what i said.

if said photo sets happen to be on her myspace then no, because as i've already said like a million times i cannot see the pics on her myspace because i would first have to create a myspace account and then i would have to have her accept me as a friend on myspace.

[Link]

Naturally_Perverted
Deactivated User

215 Posts
5/07

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:09PM

"I've also already said the pictures posted by Xformyzombie and Jonothan Pedak are enhanced."
I'm not talking about what other companies can do with Jenna's pics. I'm talking about stills from photo sets she exclusively does for her website.
So are you really saying that this picture is enhanced?

so what about this one?

It is enhanced too?
Oh and about her personal pictures in her MySpace... they are like this type of photos
[Image not found DB]

are they enhanced too?
[/quote]
Thank you for proving to me you cannot spot even the most enhnced pictures when you see them. The first two are CLEARLY enhanced, the fact that you cannot tell that is VERY sad. Can you not see how the lighting is ridiculously bright, how there are absolutely no anomalies on her skin, how her skin happens to appear smoother than a brand new glass table, how the subtle blurryness on her face is evidence of airbrushing, and how the shine is completely unnatural, even with extensive makeup? The other two after that i will admit are not enhanced.

[Link]

CrouchingBear
Deactivated User

299 Posts
5/08

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:12PM

jaynaoso_stalker wrote:
This has really bothered me for a long time...
What is it that makes Teagan and Jenna Haze so different from the other 10,000 "girl next door" girls. Its really been annoying me cause I cant figure it out. I've seen more websites, posts, reviews and general talk about these two girls. But really what makes them any different from a Mary Anne, or a Kissy Kapri or Brianna Blaze. I mean dont get me wrong, I think these girls are hot. Really hot... But I just dont get why they are so popular but the girls who seem to have more scenes than them, do more hardcore scenes than them, and (atleast to me) look just as good as them, are NO WHERE near as popular. Similarly I can understand the obsession with Keri Sable, Brianna Love... those are just two of the best in the past couple years in this category. But I just dont get it with Teagan and Jenna.
What is it that makes them so different?
Click to expand

The thread made no sense to begin with. If the original poster is suggesting the Empress wears no clothes, then he has to consider this is porn we're talking about. It's all about fantasy and some girls are much better at fostering that fantasy than are others. The original poster offered Keri Sable and Brianna love as alternatives. The first girl quit the business after two years and the second girl has a fat butt and an odd mole on her face.
The question here shouldn't be why is any one girl more popular than others. The question should be why aren't the purveyors of porn trying to replicate a formula that obviously works? - For the most part, audiences want attractive, thin, sophisticated looking yet adventurous girls (women like Jenna Haze or, back in the day, Shauna Grant). We don't want the mediocre looking, thick, dragged-from-the-trailer types that comprise 90% of the girls working today. When that's what we're offered, we won't buy it and we never will.

[Link]

Naturally_Perverted
Deactivated User

215 Posts
5/07

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:12PM

Click to expand

oh my...

None of them are photoshopped either.
This one taken by my friend MrBlue is "enhanced" too?

Click to expand

The second is very SUBTLY enhanced, you can tell by the way her legs look in that picture. The shine is unnatural, the smoothness, and the SLIGHT blurryness, again is evidence of airbrushing. The first, third, and fourth however are all natural.

[Link]

Naturally_Perverted
Deactivated User

215 Posts
5/07

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:18PM

oh my...

None of them are photoshopped either.
This one taken by my friend MrBlue is "enhanced" too?

Click to expand

[Link]

CrouchingBear
Deactivated User

299 Posts
5/08

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:19PM

Can you not see how the lighting is ridiculously bright, how there are absolutely no anomalies on her skin, how her skin happens to appear smoother than a brand new glass table, how the subtle blurryness on her face is evidence of airbrushing, and how the shine is completely unnatural, even with extensive makeup?

Click to expand

Precisely which "anomalies" are you referring to? And, what exactly is your agenda here?

[Link]

MissJennaHaze
Member

401 Posts
4/06

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:20PM

Naturally_Perverted wrote:
purplehayes2006 wrote:
Naturally_Perverted wrote:
purplehayes2006 wrote:
^The fact you don't know how to do a simple search is not going to change the fact that there is a BAZILLION of untouched pic of hers in internet. There is LOTS of pics taken by fans in different flickr accounts, just as an example. You are too lazy to even do a simple search over here in ADT, but you talk anyway about pictures you DIDN'T even see! I don't care what you think or not, but the photo sets she is doing for her website are NOT photoshopped and OF COURSE her personal pics in myspace are NOT photoshopped either, and Jenna herself answered to you in that way over here. So YES, you are defaming her.
Click to expand
The fact that you replace the world 'are' with the word 'is' in the wrong context is proof that you don't know what you're talking about. In all seriousness though, what makes you think i can't perform a simple search? I clearly told you how i found the pics i'm describing to you, i used google and typed in her name. Maybe her photo's on her website and myspacec aren't photoshopped, but that isn't the issue i was focusing on. The issue is that MOST pictures of her ARE photoshopped. If you can't see that from doing a simple google search i suggest you get your eyes checked and learn a little bit about how image enhancement works. OK fine, maybe i'm defaming her a little bit, but anyone with a modicum of sense and honesty knows what i'm saying is the truth. By the way, the link you just posted; the one where we had our little discussion before, the photo's posted of her by Johnothan Pedak and Xformyzombie are CLEARLY photoshopped. If you deny that, i'm sorry but you really need your eyesight checked...badly.
Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/14/2008 11:04:38 PM
Click to expand
And I suggest you to get some brains first.
"Maybe her photo's on her website and myspacec aren't photoshopped, but that isn't the issue i was focusing on." that's the only thing I care about. That "maybe" is out of place. I don't care about how many untouched pics of hers you think there is/are in internet, but there is/are BAZILLIONS. Did you do a search in google typing her name? really? WOW That's AWESOME! you have to show me how you do it! BTW: "myspacec". Yes, I guess you could teach me how to improve my Photoshop skills.......
Keep your "truth" for you dude; I'm done and it has no sense get over it again.
BTW: If I replace the "world" 'are' with the word 'is' maybe it is because I live in Spain, I am Spaniard and English in not my native language.
"Quien no quiere saber es como el que no ve."
Click to expand
your childishness makes me smile. You couldn't debate me with formality and logic so you resorted to crazy-fan outrage and personal attacks. There was no need to insult my search skills and my intelligence; you created the hostility.
Yes i said MAYBE they aren't photoshopped, because i already explained i can't see the ones on her myspace. As for the ones on her webpage i'm not going to go into detail and post all of them and say which ones are enhanced and which aren't, but if you go to jennahaze.com you can clearly see the entry page photo of her is enhanced, and if you take the tour there are more. I've also already said the pictures posted by Xformyzombie and Jonothan Pedak are enhanced.
Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/15/2008 6:38:59 AM
Click to expand

OK so I went to the thread "the reason I love porn" to see the pics of mine that are touched up. SO FUCKING funny! You really COULD have picked pics that were touched up but THOSE AREN'T. There's one from a Brazzers scene I did where I'm in a pink top and jeans.. (what could there have been to fix in this pic?) NOT photo shopped. There's a Darkside pic of me on my knees... The only fixing on that (if there is any) is on my forehead where I was sweating a bit at the shoot.. As you can see my old belly button piercing scar isn't photoshopped out, neither are those very slight circles under my eyes . don't you think I'd do those too if I were into fixing my pics? Now the actual boxcover of Darkside was "enhanced" I believe. On my lips. Jules wanted them RED for the boxcover. Then you refer to the pics that Xformyzombie posted. The first is from A-List 2. Van Styles shot that.. I can't see anything different or enhanced from that day... then there's one in a white bikini, hmm don't you think if it were touched up we'd erase my ribs and my (once again!) slight circles under my eyes? The next is from a steve hicks photo shoot. That pic is the same as the one I have on my cd that steve himself burned for me.. I don't think they did anything to it. But on this one I cant be sure. I don't know how to use photoshop programs so I'm no expert....just being honest here. And the last one is one I own. It was shot for my website by Van Styles. There's not a god damn thing done to that pic! There are plenty of girls and companies that photoshop the HELL out of their pics but I am definitely the least offender at this... if you want to pick on someone for "not keeping it real" go bark up one of their trees....
Jenna

[Link]

Naturally_Perverted
Deactivated User

215 Posts
5/07

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:22PM

Precisely which "anomalies" are you referring to? And, what exactly is your agenda here?

Click to expand

This picture i said was natural. As for the anomalies i said there AREN'T any in the ones that have been enhanced. anomalies would include open pores, slight unsymmatry, any kinds of small marks, and sweat. See this picture is all natural because you can clearly see the shine of sweat, you can see the makeup clearly is covering up some normal human imperfections.
As for an agenda, i don't have one except to finally shut up the raving fanboys who label anyone who disagrees with them as insane.
Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/15/2008 12:23:58 PM
Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/15/2008 12:28:30 PM

[Link]

CrouchingBear
Deactivated User

299 Posts
5/08

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:26PM

Click to expand

Dude, you should be playing with mannequins if you expect the kind of things you're asking for.

[Link]

purplehayes2006
Member

391 Posts
4/06

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:27PM

oh my...

None of them are photoshopped either.
This one taken by my friend MrBlue is "enhanced" too?

Click to expand

No dude! Thanks to you for make MY point. You DON'T know anything about what you are talking about! And even Noahped himsef told you that his pics of Jenna are NOT photoshopped. Keep living in your own world if that's what you want man, but stop defaming Jenna; and now Noahped too!

[Link]

Naturally_Perverted
Deactivated User

215 Posts
5/07

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:29PM

Dude, you should be playing with mannequins if you expect the kind of things you're asking for.

Click to expand

When did i say expect perfection? I'm simply pointing out which images are enhanced and which aren't. Please don't put words in my mouth.

[Link]

MissJennaHaze
Member

401 Posts
4/06

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:31PM

oh my...

None of them are photoshopped either.
This one taken by my friend MrBlue is "enhanced" too?

Click to expand

Lets ask the photographers... Noahped: is that second one touched up? It looks the same as the one I have on my cd.......and i think if it was going to be fixed he'd airbrush the wrinkles on my side from turning around.
Chris Streams: Did you touch up that pic thats on my website? (I honestly don't know, this on may be photoshopped! I just know my makeup artist kicks ass and so does Chris!)

[Link]

Naturally_Perverted
Deactivated User

215 Posts
5/07

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:32PM

Noahpad was referring to pictures that he has seen and the fact that jenna is known for taking many natural pics in comparison to other porn stars. He wasn't commenting on the pics you just posted. Also, the pic with noahpad written on the right hand side; i said that was a natural one.

[Link]

CrouchingBear
Deactivated User

299 Posts
5/08

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:33PM

Naturally_Perverted wrote:
CrouchingBear wrote:
Naturally_Perverted wrote:
CrouchingBear wrote:
Naturally_Perverted wrote:
[Image not found DB]
Click to expand
Can you not see how the lighting is ridiculously bright, how there are absolutely no anomalies on her skin, how her skin happens to appear smoother than a brand new glass table, how the subtle blurryness on her face is evidence of airbrushing, and how the shine is completely unnatural, even with extensive makeup?
Click to expand
Precisely which "anomalies" are you referring to? And, what exactly is your agenda here?
Click to expand
This picture i said was natural. As for the anomalies i said there AREN'T any in the ones that have been enhanced. anomalies would include open pores, slight unsymmatry, any kinds of small marks, and sweat.
Click to expand
Dude, you should be playing with mannequins if you expect the kind of things you're asking for.
Click to expand

When did i say expect perfection? I'm simply pointing out which images are enhanced and which aren't. Please don't put words in my mouth.

Click to expand

These are your words I'm quoting - which, I might add, are offending a great number of people as well as Jenna Haze herself.

[Link]

Naturally_Perverted
Deactivated User

215 Posts
5/07

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:37PM

OK so I went to the thread "the reason I love porn" to see the pics of mine that are touched up. SO FUCKING funny! You really COULD have picked pics that were touched up but THOSE AREN'T. There's one from a Brazzers scene I did where I'm in a pink top and jeans.. (what could there have been to fix in this pic?) NOT photo shopped. There's a Darkside pic of me on my knees... The only fixing on that (if there is any) is on my forehead where I was sweating a bit at the shoot.. As you can see my old belly button piercing scar isn't photoshopped out, neither are those very slight circles under my eyes . don't you think I'd do those too if I were into fixing my pics? Now the actual boxcover of Darkside was "enhanced" I believe. On my lips. Jules wanted them RED for the boxcover. Then you refer to the pics that Xformyzombie posted. The first is from A-List 2. Van Styles shot that.. I can't see anything different or enhanced from that day... then there's one in a white bikini, hmm don't you think if it were touched up we'd erase my ribs and my (once again!) slight circles under my eyes? The next is from a steve hicks photo shoot. That pic is the same as the one I have on my cd that steve himself burned for me.. I don't think they did anything to it. But on this one I cant be sure. I don't know how to use photoshop programs so I'm no expert....just being honest here. And the last one is one I own. It was shot for my website by Van Styles. There's not a god damn thing done to that pic! There are plenty of girls and companies that photoshop the HELL out of their pics but I am definitely the least offender at this... if you want to pick on someone for "not keeping it real" go bark up one of their trees....
Jenna
Click to expand

Jenna this isn't about me 'barking up' your tree, in fact i'm flattered you've posted to me specifically as many times as you have. This is about me proving to purplehayes that he's wrong about certain pictures not being enhanced. This all started with him claiming that hardly any of your photo's are enhanced, when many of them clearly are. I'm not trying to be rude to you, i'm proving to him that the industry enhances photo's and that you are not an exception, and that in my opinion pictures can grossly enhance someones image.
Jenna i don't know who shot these pictures but they are obviously enhanced, perhaps you can shed some light on them:

Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/15/2008 12:46:07 PM
Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/15/2008 12:46:40 PM
Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/15/2008 12:49:14 PM

[Link]

Naturally_Perverted
Deactivated User

215 Posts
5/07

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:43PM

Please quote where i said i expect perfection. As for offending fanboys who are vehement about bullying others to accept their opinions are truth, i could care less. I will however apologize to jenna if i have offended her, that was not my intention. I am a very bluntly honest person, and sometimes that comes across as being rude, but all i'm doing is being truthful.

[Link]

CrouchingBear
Deactivated User

299 Posts
5/08

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:44PM

Naturally_Perverted wrote:
Jenna this isn't about me 'barking up' your tree, in fact i'm flattered you've posted to me specifically as many times as you have.
TRANSLATION - I'LL MAKE A SCENE JUST TO GET ATTENTION.
This is about me proving to purplehayes that he's wrong about certain pictures not being enhanced.
TRANSLATION - I ALWAYS HAVE TO BE RIGHT.
This all started with him claiming that hardly any of your photo's are enhanced, when many of them clearly are.
TRANSLATION - I JUST CAN'T ACCEPT WHEN I'M WRONG.
I'm not trying to be rude to you...
TRANSLATION - I REALLY HAVE NO CLUE HOW TO TREAT A WOMAN...
i'm proving to him that the industry enhances photo's and that you are not an exception, and that in my opinion pictures can grossly enhance someones image.
TRANSLATION - I REALLY AM TRYING TO BE RUDE TO YOU.
Click to expand

What a fruit loop.

[Link]

purplehayes2006
Member

391 Posts
4/06

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:46PM

No dude, YOU are wrong and you keep going over it.
OK "HawkEye" here you have a link to the original picture. 3264px×2448px. If you re-size it and post it over here you will see that it is THE SAME PICTURE.
http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h136/purplehayes2006/JennaPics/P6249741.jpg
You don't know when you have to shut out huh. Out of all the girls in the biz to talk about airbrushing! you are soooo ridiculous.
I will post another original one in a bit.
I told ya. I have originals and I DO know about what I'm talking about. But you keep picking over Jenna and showing WHO you are and WHAT you are.

[Link]

Naturally_Perverted
Deactivated User

215 Posts
5/07

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:51PM

CrouchingBear wrote:
Naturally_Perverted wrote:
Jenna this isn't about me 'barking up' your tree, in fact i'm flattered you've posted to me specifically as many times as you have.
TRANSLATION - I'LL MAKE A SCENE JUST TO GET ATTENTION.
This is about me proving to purplehayes that he's wrong about certain pictures not being enhanced.
TRANSLATION - I ALWAYS HAVE TO BE RIGHT.
This all started with him claiming that hardly any of your photo's are enhanced, when many of them clearly are.
TRANSLATION - I JUST CAN'T ACCEPT WHEN I'M WRONG.
I'm not trying to be rude to you...
TRANSLATION - I REALLY HAVE NO CLUE HOW TO TREAT A WOMAN...
i'm proving to him that the industry enhances photo's and that you are not an exception, and that in my opinion pictures can grossly enhance someones image.
TRANSLATION - I REALLY AM TRYING TO BE RUDE TO YOU.
Click to expand
What a fruit loop.
Click to expand

YES! THERE IT IS! Personal attacks! Just what i've come to expect from certain idiot fanboys on this board who masqurade as intelligent and mature individuals, but degenerate into childishness when one of their gods are questioned or debated about! Good job!

[Link]

CrouchingBear
Deactivated User

299 Posts
5/08

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:55PM

Hypocrisy in action. You gotta love this guy's inability/refusal to look at himself and his own actions.

[Link]

Naturally_Perverted
Deactivated User

215 Posts
5/07

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:56PM

purplehayes2006 wrote:
Naturally_Perverted wrote:
No dude! Thanks to you for make MY point. You DON'T know anything about what you are talking about! And even Noahped himsef told you that his pics of Jenna are NOT photoshopped. Keep living in your own world if that's what you want man, but stop defaming Jenna; and now Noahped too!
Click to expand
Noahpad was referring to pictures that he has seen and the fact that jenna is known for taking many natural pics in comparison to other porn stars. He wasn't commenting on the pics you just posted. Also, the pic with noahpad written on the right hand side; i said that was a natural one.
Click to expand
No dude, YOU are wrong and you keep going over it.
OK "HawkEye" here you have a link to the original picture. 3264px×2448px. If you re-size it and post it over here you will see that it is THE SAME PICTURE.
http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h136/purplehayes2006/JennaPics/P6249741.jpg
You don't know when you have to shut out huh. Out of all the girls in the biz to talk about airbrushing! you are soooo ridiculous.
I will post another original one in a bit.
I told ya. I have originals and I DO know about what I'm talking about. But you keep picking over Jenna and showing WHO you are and WHAT you are.
Click to expand

hmm.. i just took a look at the link you posted, and after magnifying the pic i came to the conclusion that i might be wrong about this particular picture. At first i couldnt see the sweat on the forehead, but after magnifying it i could, and the legs look much more natural when the picture is magnified. I'll admit i might be wrong about this one, a reply from noahpad himself about this particular picture would be helpful.
These two however are clearly enhnaced, and if anyone says otherwise i will call him either ignorant of the situation or a liar:

Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/15/2008 1:00:24 PM

[Link]

Naturally_Perverted
Deactivated User

215 Posts
5/07

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 12:58PM

Not hypocrisy; you see my personal attacks are in response to personal attacks i've received. I only attack a person on a personal level when they attack me first. I was having a civilized conversation with you, and you were doing good hiding your immaturity until you couldn't contain your fanboy frustration anymore and lashed out like a child. How sad.

[Link]

CrouchingBear
Deactivated User

299 Posts
5/08

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:03PM

I think more than a few people here are questioning the "civilized" nature of what you perceive to be a "conversation."

[Link]

purplehayes2006
Member

391 Posts
4/06

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:07PM

Naturally_Perverted wrote:
purplehayes2006 wrote:
Naturally_Perverted wrote:
No dude! Thanks to you for make MY point. You DON'T know anything about what you are talking about! And even Noahped himsef told you that his pics of Jenna are NOT photoshopped. Keep living in your own world if that's what you want man, but stop defaming Jenna; and now Noahped too!
Click to expand
Noahpad was referring to pictures that he has seen and the fact that jenna is known for taking many natural pics in comparison to other porn stars. He wasn't commenting on the pics you just posted. Also, the pic with noahpad written on the right hand side; i said that was a natural one.
Click to expand
No dude, YOU are wrong and you keep going over it.
OK "HawkEye" here you have a link to the original picture. 3264px×2448px. If you re-size it and post it over here you will see that it is THE SAME PICTURE.
http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h136/purplehayes2006/JennaPics/P6249741.jpg
You don't know when you have to shut out huh. Out of all the girls in the biz to talk about airbrushing! you are soooo ridiculous.
I will post another original one in a bit.
I told ya. I have originals and I DO know about what I'm talking about. But you keep picking over Jenna and showing WHO you are and WHAT you are.
Click to expand
hmm.. i just took a look at the link you posted, and after magnifying the pic i came to the conclusion that i might be wrong about this particular picture. At first i couldnt see the sweat on the forehead, but after magnifying it i could, and the legs look much more natural when the picture is magnified. I'll admit i might be wrong about this one, a reply from noahpad himself about this particular picture would be helpful.
These two however are clearly enhnaced, and if anyone says otherwise i will call him either ignorant of the situation or a liar:

I've got news for you: you are an ignorant an a liar. "HawkEye".
Here you have the original still:
http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h136/purplehayes2006/JennaPics/_MG_6795.jpg
Re-size it and post it here and you will see that IT IS THE SAME PHOTO. NONE of her pictures from this photo set or any other photo set she is shootin for her website are "enhanced".
I'm not going to post any more original stills. Jenna is REALLY proud for the fact the pictures she is shootin for her website are not "enhanced", so even you should understand that she and everybody that care of her get annoyed when some random smartass keep saying her pics are "enhanced" when they are NOT. This is the point where you should show your apologizes to her.
Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/15/2008 1:00:24 PM
Click to expand

[Link]

Naturally_Perverted
Deactivated User

215 Posts
5/07

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:08PM

Let them question all they want, but unless they can prove that i've started any hostility towards someone about this topic with a personal attack that wasn't in retaliation to one of their own, i suggest they rethink. I haven't started any personal attacks on this thread or the one titled "the reason i love porn", all of my personal attacks were directed at people who discarded their fake persona's of civilized individuals and attacked me like immature brats first. I dare anyone to prove otherwise.

[Link]

Naturally_Perverted
Deactivated User

215 Posts
5/07

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:10PM

still looks enhanced. Just like this one, which by the way is from her website:

Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/15/2008 1:12:23 PM

[Link]

purplehayes2006
Member

391 Posts
4/06

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:17PM

Naturally_Perverted wrote:
I've got news for you: you are an ignorant an a liar. "HawkEye".
Here you have the original still:
http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h136/purplehayes2006/JennaPics/_MG_6795.jpg
Re-size it and post it here and you will see that IT IS THE SAME PHOTO. NONE of her pictures from this photo set or any other photo set she is shootin for her website are "enhanced".
I'm not going to post any more original stills. Jenna is REALLY proud for the fact the pictures she is shootin for her website are not "enhanced", so even you should understand that she and everybody that care of her get annoyed when some random smartass keep saying her pics are "enhanced" when they are NOT. This is the point where you should show your apologizes to her.
Click to expand
still looks enhanced. Just like this one, which by the way is from her website:
Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/15/2008 1:12:23 PM
Click to expand

Which BTW is not from a photo set that she did for her website.
"still looks enhanced"? At this point you just showed to everyone that you are pointless.

[Link]

Naturally_Perverted
Deactivated User

215 Posts
5/07

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:19PM

I've already explained before why it looks enhanced, you on the other hand have made no effort to prove to me that it isn't enhanced. Why did you take it off photobucket? Now when i click the link it's not even there anymore.
Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/15/2008 1:22:05 PM

[Link]

MissJennaHaze
Member

401 Posts
4/06

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:25PM

Naturally_Perverted wrote:
I've got news for you: you are an ignorant an a liar. "HawkEye".
Here you have the original still:
http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h136/purplehayes2006/JennaPics/_MG_6795.jpg
Re-size it and post it here and you will see that IT IS THE SAME PHOTO. NONE of her pictures from this photo set or any other photo set she is shootin for her website are "enhanced".
I'm not going to post any more original stills. Jenna is REALLY proud for the fact the pictures she is shootin for her website are not "enhanced", so even you should understand that she and everybody that care of her get annoyed when some random smartass keep saying her pics are "enhanced" when they are NOT. This is the point where you should show your apologizes to her.
Click to expand
still looks enhanced. Just like this one, which by the way is from her website:
Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/15/2008 1:12:23 PM
Click to expand

The one from the from of my website was borrowed from Zero Tolerance. As you can see by the tagline at the bottom of the pic. So I have no Idea if that one is. BUT you seem to have a problem accepting my other ones as being "authentic". And frankly I'm tired of defending myself to you. Those pics of me on the white wall in the corset are not photo shopped. and thats that. ask van styles he took them. ask dan from genesis magazine he saw a few from this set before anyone else did, ask jules who saw them that day, when i showed them to him after they were shot. (the pics that day were so good we took over 400 of em, just for pretty girl shots!) But you are gonna believe what you want. I have to say though I am sorry you just cant accept that my pics are the real deal.. lol I'd hate to see what you'd say if you really saw me in person, I'm pretty much the exact same as my photos...

[Link]

purplehayes2006
Member

391 Posts
4/06

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:31PM

I have a Pro account and I'm proud of it; any problem? hahhah. The link is there and working. The first one I posted it's not gonna be there when photobucket staff find it lol. I made NO effort? I'm showing the ORIGINAL stills to you!

[Link]

Naturally_Perverted
Deactivated User

215 Posts
5/07

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:33PM

the original still of the one in which she is dressed in pink looks just like the one that was originally posted by jonothan pedak or xformyzombie (forget which one posted that one) and looks enhanced. I've used my words to explain in detail how the lighting and presence of airbrushing etc is evident. You did however make me rethink my opinion of one of the pics.
I should apologize for saying you made 'no' effort; you did make an effort, but i meant no effort it terms of using your words to prove mine wrong because i explained how the lighting, slight blurryness etc. is evidence of enhancement and you didn't counter that.
Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/15/2008 1:39:09 PM

[Link]

CrouchingBear
Deactivated User

299 Posts
5/08

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:34PM

Jenna,
I'm really sorry you had to put up with this guy this morning. I tried my best to get through to him. Purplehaze did as well. You're right in saying that some people will just believe whatever they want to believe regardless of the truth.

[Link]

Naturally_Perverted
Deactivated User

215 Posts
5/07

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:36PM

[quote[
The one from the from of my website was borrowed from Zero Tolerance. As you can see by the tagline at the bottom of the pic. So I have no Idea if that one is. BUT you seem to have a problem accepting my other ones as being "authentic". And frankly I'm tired of defending myself to you. Those pics of me on the white wall in the corset are not photo shopped. and thats that. ask van styles he took them. ask dan from genesis magazine he saw a few from this set before anyone else did, ask jules who saw them that day, when i showed them to him after they were shot. (the pics that day were so good we took over 400 of em, just for pretty girl shots!) But you are gonna believe what you want. I have to say though I am sorry you just cant accept that my pics are the real deal.. lol I'd hate to see what you'd say if you really saw me in person, I'm pretty much the exact same as my photos...
[/quote]
i have accepted some of them as being authentic jenna. Look at the posts right here on this thread where i said things along the lines of 'the first two are enhnced but the others look all natural'. I'm not denying that there are natural pics of you and that people have them, what i'm saying is that the enhanced ones outnumber the natural ones, and that isn't your fault. It's what the industry does.

[Link]

purplehayes2006
Member

391 Posts
4/06

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:40PM

Naturally_Perverted wrote:
purplehayes2006 wrote:
Naturally_Perverted wrote:
Which BTW is not from a photo set that she did for her website.
"still looks enhanced"? At this point you just showed to everyone that you are pointless.
Click to expand
I've already explained before why it looks enhanced, you on the other hand have made no effort to prove to me that it isn't enhanced. Why did you take it off photobucket? Now when i click the link it's not even there anymore.
Edited by - Naturally_Perverted on 7/15/2008 1:22:05 PM
Click to expand
I have a Pro account and I'm proud of it; any problem? hahhah. The link is there and working. The first one I posted it's not gonna be there when photobucket staff find it lol. I made NO effort? I'm showing the ORIGINAL stills to you!
Click to expand
the original still of the one in which she is dressed in pink looks just like the one that was originally posted by jonothan pedak or xformyzombie (forget which one posted that one) and looks enhanced. I've used my words to explain in detail how the lighting and presence of airbrushing etc is evident. You did however make me rethink my opinion of one of the pics.
Click to expand

EXACTLY, it is the ORIGINAL picture and looks THE SAME. And the pic taken by Noahped looks JUST THE SAME TOO! If you re-size the original picture you will see that gets way more clear, and after you post here, the quality of the picture slow down for a better internet board posting, which makes the pic look more blur. Jenna already explained with her own words all about the pictures and how ridiculous is to say that they are enhanced when you can see on the some "imperfections".
You should rethink about many more stuff dude.

Edited by - purplehayes2006 on 7/15/2008 1:43:46 PM

[Link]

RandomPrecision
Senior Member

Enjoy!
8175 Posts
3/06

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:40PM

First of all, some people are being lazy here with the quoting. It's very frustrating to read when you feel the need to quote five people (maybe a slight exaggeration).
On the "enhancement" thing. As I said, Photoshop rarely enhances anything in the hands of someone who gets hammer-handed with it. Jenna is gorgeous without enhancement.
For the guy who said she doesn't look better than any attractive girl on the street, well, that's what I'm looking for. I'm not looking for women who don't exist. But you also don't see too many girls on the street who are as attractive as Jenna. With or without Photoshop.

[Link]

CrouchingBear
Deactivated User

299 Posts
5/08

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:40PM

And numerous people - including the subject of the photos - have told you that you are wrong. And yet you insist on pressing on.

[Link]

Naturally_Perverted
Deactivated User

215 Posts
5/07

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:43PM

As i told purplehayes once before: many people think jenna jameson is the greatest pornstar of all time, but anyone with any real knowledge of porn knows that isn't true.
Obviously the subject of the pictures herself isn't going to go online and count all the pictures of herself and then seperate the natural ones from the unnatural ones and count which outnumber the other.

[Link]

Naturally_Perverted
Deactivated User

215 Posts
5/07

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:44PM

By 'getting through to me' did you mean attacking me personally after like 3 civilized posts? Please grow up, Jenna doesn't need you to be her knight in shining armor, she can take care of herself. Suck up all you want to; she's not going to have sex with you.

[Link]

Naturally_Perverted
Deactivated User

215 Posts
5/07

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:46PM

jenna is pretty without enhancement.
"well, that's what I'm looking for." -that's your opinion and your preference and i respect that.
"But you also don't see too many girls on the street who are as attractive as Jenna." - that is a debatable and again a matter of taste.

[Link]

noahped
Senior Member

2978 Posts
8/02

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:46PM

*sigh*

I took this photo and I can tell you that it was NOT enhanced in any way...it's pretty much straight from my camera, minus the 'noahped' tag. You can only blame my camera and the hot Sun for that look.
And unless I post a particular photo myself here or on my myspace page, I'd appreciate it if people wouldn't steal my flickr photos and post them without asking me first and/or the models I shoot by the way. My flickr account is set so photos cannot be directly saved...it's primarily used as my online portfolio.

[Link]

purplehayes2006
Member

391 Posts
4/06

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:47PM

And how the hexk you know that man? how you ever know about numbers??? I showed to you before links to hundreds of natural pictures of Jenna Haze. And all of them coming from the same site!

[Link]

Naturally_Perverted
Deactivated User

215 Posts
5/07

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:50PM

Sorry i meant to put the words 'original still' in quotations because i have a very hard time believing the pic of her in pink that you posted is the original still. It looks way too enhanced, there aren't even dark circles around the eyes. Where did u get that still of her in pink from? How do you know it is the original?

[Link]

Naturally_Perverted
Deactivated User

215 Posts
5/07

Posted - Jul 15 2008 : 1:52PM

you didn't show me hundreds, you showed me around 6 or 7. The reason i 'know' that the unnatural ones outnumber the natural ones is because everytime i google jenna haze pics that's what i see. As i said before as well, i don't have access to her myspace pictures, are there hundreds of natural pics on her myspace or just a few?

[Link]