assuming that the girl you're with is healthy,clean and disease free,which is generally safer to fuck unprotected? okay,i'll put it another way-say you fuck your girl normally for a month w/o a condon then you do strictly anal for a month w/o a condom. what would you guys consider a safer bet? less chance of catching something?
[Link]
NewRomancer Deactivated User
under THEIR avatar 738 Posts 7/08
Posted - Oct 19 2008 : 9:35PM
If you're both healthy and clean you won't catch anything... It's not like STD's spontaneously create themselves in people....
you could catch an infection from unprotected anal, she could catch pregnant from unprotected vaginal. i'm pretty sure there are some rare STIs that the body can create. you can't catch HIV for instance, but poor hygiene breeds unfriendly bacteria.
yes, pregnancy risk is lower for anal, If you both don't have any STD's, there are risks from intestinal coliforms, parasites, etc from anal, but that's about it. Stay clean, wrap it up. Myk
^ If you're with the same girl for that long, & you're both faithful to each other, why use condoms? I can understand for birth control or anal sex, but otherwise I'm not sure why you would use them.
Why use condom? -> CHILDREN prevention. That's my personal main reason. I love children, I just prefer that when they start screaming at 3 in the morning, they be at someone elses house and not belong to me.
If she has an STD, you'll get it no matter how you fuck her, if it's unprotected. Even if a girl keeps herself clean, the ass is overall dirtier than the pussy. I've seen men get urinary track infections from too much anal, especially if they cum in her ass. So, if you don't want to use protection, I say fuck the pussy more.
[Link]
Clam Digger Deactivated User
Many a man fails as an original thinker simply because his memory is too good. 2268 Posts 1/05