I came accross some internet sites that described 2 guys on 1 lady as a gangbang. Perhaps it's not the number of guys banging the lady that matters. But how hard they do her. And whether she gets any rest. Five guys who leisurely take turns inside the lady's pussy with lots of long breaks in between looks to me a lot less like a gangbang than two guys banging the crap out of their sexy lady as though they are posessed. You can see only so much on the screen at one time. And two guys quickly tossing their lady from one position to another and porkng her holes for all they are worth can make the sex action look a lot more like a gangbang than five guys standing around and not doing much with the lady. Edited by - Dan on 7/10/2007 1:11:34 PM
I'm not sure, but at least 3 guys on 1 girl. I've seen 3 guys fucking the complete shit out of a girl... and 10 or more not doing it.. So I would say some of it is about the energy on set.
Perhaps it would be fair to say that to have a real gangbang you need to have both, the gang and the bang. A scene where the gang doesn't bang the lady that much isn't really a gangbang. And a scene where only a couple of guys bang the crap out of the sexy lady isn't really a ganbang either. Because you need to have more than two guys to call them a gang.
I've always heard that it was SUPPOSED to be 5 guys or more....but to be honest, I'm satisfied with all holes being filled at once. More than four guys going bezerko on a woman, while I'll watch it...isn't that appealing. Fill the ass, pussy, mouth, and maybe let her jerk one more....that'll suffice. lol
Yeah, but with more guys, you could have more time, more turns... I just think it's usually not done so well, or as I'd like it. Firstly, if they're all there, I think there should be more merry go round style one on one action. But more importantly, I don't think they all need to stand around in the shot touching themselves if they aren't in the action, go in the next room or hang out off camera until it's your turn guys! You're distracting just all crowding around in the shots. But, umm... I think you need at least 4. Cuz I think you can still say "foursome" if it's 3 guys on one woman, but nobody says "fivesome", so four guys is that start of "gangbang" territory. Edited by - zorge on 7/11/2007 2:11:10 AM
To me a girl and two guys is simply a threesome and a girl and 3 guys is a foursome. Like the orginal poster said, I really only think it becomes a gangbang when there are more cocks than holes. So really a gir + 4 or more guys qualifies as a gangbang for me. Nothing says romance like anal sex.
I believe the most sensible defiinitino is the following: If a girl has sex with more guys than it has holes, i.e. at least four.
[Link]
inetguy Deactivated User
8 Posts 8/07
Posted - Aug 25 2007 : 9:36PM
I think it is 3 guys to one girl. I would also vote for a gang bang being only more than 20 guys.
[Link]
Breetai Deactivated User
154 Posts 7/07
Posted - Aug 25 2007 : 11:39PM
Yes, that's the definition I've read. If there's going to be a "threshold", it makes sense that it's when there are more guys than holes for them to fuck.