All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 784 > When porn stars make fewer movies per year
AuthorPost
Rumplestilt Skin
Deactivated User


931 Posts
7/02
Posted - Dec 21 2002 : 1:32PM
I often go on the IAFD and check for the "latest" movies by my favorites.
I note that of late certain porn chicks have been making fewer movies than usual, or in other cases they're in "non sex roles" (what's the point of THAT in a SEX flick!?).
So, why do certain stars scale down their schedule, almost to the point of one or two movies per year?
Surely it cannot take long to suck a cock, fuck, or lick a pussy on set?
I think stars who have fans should make at least six skin flicks per year to keep their profile really high. Otherwise, the younger talent may pinch their crowns!
Looking at it from a promotional and money-making point of view, I understand it's in the studios best interests to release maybe just one or two skin flicks per year by an individual star.
It's just disappointing for the fans.
Who else agrees or disagrees?
Michael Saint
Photographer

Alexis Texas is always lovely
1062 Posts
2/01
Posted - Dec 21 2002 : 1:47PM
Usually their dancing schedule is a big factor in why certain women only make a certain number of movies a year. That is where they make the most money so that is where they concentrate their energy once they have built a name for themselves.

Their shooting schedule could also have to do with their contracts. Stephanie Swift's for instance only has her do 2 movies a year in which she stars but she does perform in other Wicked features depending on her schedule.




Jump To: