Featured New Release
Box cover for Livestream Wet Dream 2
Livestream Wet Dream 2
Studio: PornFidelity
Release date: 7/28/2026


all new releases
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 797 > Where to from here?
AuthorPost
ozmatt
New Member


4 Posts
9/02
Posted - Sep 28 2002 : 11:01PM
For the past decade I have travelled along to the smut shacks here in Melbourne and regularly swapped my videos/dvd's. Ten years ago, the norm for a porn scene seemed to be generally oral and some pussy fucking. Sure, there were some chicks that did anal, but it was nowhere near as common as today.
As the years have rolled by I have seen porn get generally more hardcore. The porn companies have generally pushed each 'type' of sex to the limit, which is great I guess, except that I often wonder where porn goes in the next decade.
We have seen anal, go from something that limited girls did, to now something that almost all girls do. And it seems that if they dont do anal then they leave the biz quicker than when they arrived. But we didnt stop there. One dick in the ass wasnt enough, so now, we are starting to get a number of scenes and series devoted to double anal. So now we have girls getting fucked by 2 cocks in the ass at once. Its great from a freakshow point of view, and it turns me on to see a girl behave in such a slutty manner. I feel a bit queazy about the 2 cocks rubbing together as I have no interest in male/male gay sex, but the thought of how much of a slut the girl is to do that overides the 2 cocks rubbing thing.
But what next for anal scenes? We cant logically get 3 or 4 cocks in the one hole?
Facials is another area that has changed. As a kid I remember geting pissed off why these guys would just pull out of the girls' and jerk off on their butt or stomach. I think it was Tori Welles in Night Trips that first delivered a facial to my young eyes, and at the time I remember it was awesome. So we went from closed mouth cumshots, to girls getting a bit of cum on their tongue but pushing it out, to actual swallowing! WOOHOO! About time! So the last few years the industry has developed the swallowing them, to now when we have girls hold multiple loads in their mouths at once then swallow them. These type of cumshots are, IMO, the best, as they promote the sluttiness of the girl. Of course, I understand and respect that not everyone will share my opinion.
Bukkakes went from closed mouth facials to swallowing, as the fans got fixated on the swallowing concept. But where to from here for swallowing or facials?
I am eagerly awaiting Gangbang Girl 34, starring Shyla.. This tape I am led to believe has a double or triple anal and multiple cumshot ending, I read somewhere where she takes all 15 loads in her mouth at once? (Can anyone clarify that?) Assuming it will be a fantastic disc to own, having pushed the limits of a gangbang to the extreme, I wonder what anabolic can possibly do in the next 10 volumes of their series to out do this one? By Gangbang Girl 50 will we see 50 men fuck a girls brains out? Triple anal from every girl? Swallowing 50 loads at a time? Pissing? I doubt it!
But seriously, where does the future lie?
RonK All-Star Supporter
Big Double Everything Fan

Poor Turkey running for her life with Christmas Hat
3713 Posts
9/01
Posted - Sep 29 2002 : 12:49AM
Shyla does double anal in GBG 34 and supposedly a triple vag. No triple anal. Anyway Kat Langer has done 2 triple vag's, that is definately verifiable. I have never seen a clearly shot triple anal although there are scenes that are passed off as triple anal. We will find out shortly (2 days time) whether Shyla's triple vag is well shot and verifiable or whether it is one of those that is sufficiently unclear from editing/camera angle that it could be fake for all I know. I do not count it as a true triple unless the scene is clearly not fakeable.

Ron

Planet Sex
Deactivated User

1951 Posts
6/01
Posted - Sep 29 2002 : 12:57AM
Why don´t we go back to those scenes where women appear fully clothed, strip slowly and just fuck? Today´s porn is starting to look like a can-you-top-this contest. Real life sex isn´t as nearly as acrobatic and crowded as portrayed in movies...
Speelie
Senior Member

Fort Collins, CO
1191 Posts
5/01
Posted - Sep 29 2002 : 1:53AM
In Europe, to some extent, they are moving away from "more anal" scenes. This forum has been full of comments on how Private has been getting softer, and my reviews of Nachoribas movies demonstrate that there really isn't very much anal in them. The trend these days, at least in the stuff I watch, is to have a good rapport between the performers and to include very high energy in the sex. It isn't enough to just have pretty girls. There's so many pretty Eastern European girls that the directors just hire the ones who put out energy and enthusiasm.
Cognex
Member

126 Posts
2/01
Posted - Sep 29 2002 : 2:26AM
I for one hope they chill on the anal stuff for a while. I wouldn't miss any of the freak show crap to be honest. I like facials, however, the swapping and mixing? Pretty nasty, and not a good nasty. I wish more studios would keep their films couples friendly, but without all the slow motion shit.

I think it's fine to make films for people who want gonzo with gapes and extreme sex acts, but so much porn is really plagued with it. I see nothing wrong with performers who simply want to have sex, yet still be accepted. Not wanting to do extreme stuff or even anal is their right. Not sure why seeing a hot chick on film isn't enough anymore without degrading them.

 
Planet Sex
Deactivated User

1951 Posts
6/01
Posted - Sep 29 2002 : 3:05AM
The problem with anal scenes on european movies is that they´s virtually non-sequitur. Dick starts in pussy, quick cut and SHAZAM!, it appears deep inside some asshole! C´mon! If you ever did anal sex in your life, you know that pluggin´ a bungholio isn´t THAT easy!

BTW, anal fisting is pretty common in german movies by Magma. Sometimes there´s even TWO entire fists inside an arse at the same time. Pretty much freakshow, if you ask me. I like assholes just like my budget: pretty tight.

(actually I don´t like the fact that my budget is tight, but that was the only stupid metaphor I came up with this time of the night, so bear with it!)

Edited by - Planet Sex on 9/29/2002 3:08:30 AM

Laszlo
Member

153 Posts
4/01
Posted - Sep 29 2002 : 4:35AM
ozmatt brings up an interesting issue. The current trend toward more extreme, freak-show type sex-acts has to hit the limit sometime. I also am not a big fan of DAPs..or multiple-APs..VPs whatever. It reaches a point where the spectacle is more important than any erotic value whatsoever. Sure there are people out there who find it erotic (many in this forum) ..but I don't see much appeal in a close-up of a DAP anymore than a fog-filled, soft-focus couples-tape scene. It's actually good to hear that Private is moving away from "more anal" by focusing on the energy of the performers. I'd rather see a med. close-up of Michelle Wild's face as she's getting into it, than an ECU of a DV-DAP anyday.

It seems like a there's a potential struggle for porn companies to create product that is marketable....yet still considered erotic by the consumers. Hopefully it won't always be as simple as just increasing the number of X acts on one girl. That would be an oversimplification of eroticism and the adult-video market.

Edited by - Laszlo on 9/29/2002 4:39:42 AM

menace
Member

Of all the fishes in the sea, the mermaid is the one for me!
410 Posts
6/02
Posted - Sep 29 2002 : 5:18AM
It's really gratifying to know that there are others here who are not into the constant ratcheting up of the freak show acts. What scares me is the constant pressure for anal, double anal, atm's, etc. is going to lead to a slip-up & we'll find ourselves in another AIDS scare. This is especially a problem as many new girls come into the business. I hate to see them pressured right off the bat into doing things they would not normally do, to satisfy what the producers think they need to make a good selling flick.

As a porn consumer, all I want is to see an influx of new girls, having good, enjoyable sex. Also good bj's & facials to finish the scene off. The only other requirement I have is good, clear audio & video. I like anal ok, but it's not going to make or break a movie for me.

As for ozmatt's original question, I think that as long as there is a demand for any particular act & as long as it's legal, the producers of porn will try to satisfy the demand.

Edited by - menace on 9/29/2002 5:30:35 AM

MLyons
Senior Member

1617 Posts
8/02
Posted - Sep 29 2002 : 9:03AM
I second menace's post.

I'm not looking for extreme sex acts, I'm just looking for girls involved in sex that they have fun with, in many different erotic situations and machinations. I like anal but it's not a make or break element. Gimmee new faces that have sex that's erotic (and to me, erotic sex can certainly include elements that some would consider "freak-show"), and top it off with a facial. I love facials--that kind of ... IS a make or break element for me. On the other hand, I like them in context. I don't like bukakkes.

To be fair though, I find that there is plenty of porn out there that still satisfies this need without going into freakshow territory, and I can certainly appreciate that there's a market for DPs, DAPs, and DPPs, I'm just not a part of it. I do have my own tastes though, and I suppose some of them could be considered freakshow-esque, but ratchetting up the number of cocks that can fit inside a girl is not a part of them.

ML




Jump To: