All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 10 > Who'd want to be a male porn star?
Page 1 of 2 Last
AuthorPost
MikeOxhard
Member


Hedonism = Porn = Good
267 Posts
3/07
Posted - May 5 2007 : 4:52AM
OK, you get to fuck hot girls. But you also have to :
1) Fuck women who don't turn you on
2) Take viagra, and suffer the side effects.
3) Be able to be hard on command
4) Resist cumming when you really want to cum
5) Get less money than the female talent
How can you have good sex with your real life partner, when you've been fucking all day?
Is it all worth it?
Ramsey
Senior Member

Trina Michaels fan
10332 Posts
10/02
Posted - May 5 2007 : 5:35AM
Is it all worth fucking the hottest women in the world AND getting paid for it? Yeah I think it is. I mean there's a reason why male pornstars who post here gloat all the time.
Al3x
Member

ex-Member
603 Posts
1/07
Posted - May 5 2007 : 5:39AM
i wanna be made
Alberto Rey
Member

191 Posts
10/03
Posted - May 5 2007 : 5:48AM
The use of VIAGRA is NOT mandatory and not all the male performers are using it !

As I wrote in another post when I first started porn around 15 years ago there was no VIAGRA or anything like that !
We've just heard about some injections but we were thinking it was just a legend !

Also we don't really fuck all day especially if you do gonzo in Cali. The scene takes if you're good around 40-50 min !
Not a big deal !

Porn is like sport, the more you shoot the more you are in shape !
It almost becomes like automatic !

deepudicks
Deactivated User

If The Good Times Did Not Last Then Believe Me Me The Bad Times Shall Also Passs
100 Posts
2/07
Posted - Jun 16 2007 : 10:21AM
@MikeOxhard:
Let me answer you point by point
1. Any girl I fuck tends to get hot and I've yet to see a woman who can turn me off without her clothes with me inside her.
2.That is a job hazard.If u cannot deliver on demand then what are u in porn for...to satisfy your creative urges>Be thankful that their is Viagra to help u out to remain Oxhard...else there are so many Mike's floating around whom nobody wants to even know?
3.Being able to be hard on command is a necessity not a thrill in porn so why fuss over it.
4.When you fuck on camera it's as per the desires of the director and not to satisfy your own whims and fancies.
5.Sure you get paid less than the female performers to do the same thing FUCK but then be thankful you get paid to Fuck when there are thousands of pussy starved hot blooded males who pay thru their butt to get a satisfying fuck with a porn starlet.
If you cannot have good sex with your real life partner then you simply have two choices to give up screen fucking...No guarantee she wud want you to fuck her when you're unemployed...so ur dream of asatisfying fucks with your real life partner may become a thing of the past...Else if you cannot satisfy her then just let her find her own means of getting sexually satisfied elsewhere...What you cannot see surely cannot hurt you?
The bottom line is that if it was not worth it then you would not continue doing it...But if you do plan to put in your papers then lemme know...No harm in trying to replace you.
Edited by - hardware on 6/16/2007 12:27:44 PM
 
BIGmike
B-I-G-m-i-k-e

2335 Posts
3/01
Posted - Jun 16 2007 : 2:38PM
Age seems to be a concern. I'm 26 going on 27. Most starlets seem to have issues with the younger man thing. So... I'll wait til I'm 40. I think I will still be able to get it up at the drop of a hat when I'm 40.
But I still gotta make it to and through my 30's.
My only true concern is disease. AIDS. HIV. Herpes. and so many other diseases I don't care to think about at this point in my life.
- -B -I -G -m -i -k -e, here and there, over and out! - -
francios
Senior Member

1802 Posts
2/05
Posted - Jun 17 2007 : 9:59AM
A few downsides to the job with more upsides.
Fuck some of the hottest women on earth.
Blow jobs, facials, swallowing, anal sex more times in a month than most guys get in a decade.
Paid to do so.
I don't see the downside to it.
Spoonbender
Member

352 Posts
1/06
Posted - Jun 17 2007 : 8:41PM
Something I've always thought of.
I think i could perform and finish on command but I'd have hangups about performing with other dudes.
I couldn't do a B/B/G scene, or a gangbang or blowbang. I wouldn't be able to get it up around other guys. Also I'd have issues with another guys cum on a girls mouth and putting my own into her mouth. Especially if my dick is touching another guys when she puts both in her mouth.
I give guys in porn a lot of props, because I couldn't do a lot of the stuff they do.
JackLawrenceXXX
Member

"A day without the Intimate Juices of a Woman... is like a day without sunshine!"
26 Posts
6/07
Posted - Jun 17 2007 : 10:02PM
I couldnt be happier... my only regret is waiting so long to get into Porn... (Actually my Escort client, Keisha talked me into getting into porn.. I was quite happy as an Escort for years before porn)
Spoonbender... the only guys who do BBG scenes, Gang Bangs, ect are those who dont mind it or cant get regular BG work.... or not enough BG work... I paid my dues when I first started... for about a year or so.. got thru that, and now that I am established, I only do BG and BGG, BGGG, ect...
-Jack Lawrence
JackLawrenceXXX.com
michelle aston
Member

"Hillary Scott is cute, but she looks cuter with my fist up her ass." from set of Upload f
22 Posts
3/07
Posted - Jun 18 2007 : 12:23AM
christianx
Senior Member

1883 Posts
9/04
Posted - Jun 18 2007 : 4:16AM
actually mike, most of the top male pornstars make more than the females each month (not per scene) but monthly totals.
Lance
Member

My Life Sucks
386 Posts
4/05
Posted - Jun 18 2007 : 12:11PM
I can do three scenes in a day and still get hot for my wife when I get home. There's no comparison to Porn Sex. As for being worth it, porn has enhanced our sex life. We have far less inhibitions, and communicate far better.
As for the pay, Christians right, I've done 2-3 times the scenes as my wife. Girls make more, but guys work way more.
www.makemoneyfucking.com
Spoonbender
Member

352 Posts
1/06
Posted - Jun 18 2007 : 1:06PM
Hey thanks for the reply Jack, I didn't even know that. Sounds like porn is like any other job where you work your'e way up and best guys get the best choices of what they want to do.
christianx
Senior Member

1883 Posts
9/04
Posted - Jun 19 2007 : 10:15AM
yes but what jack didnt say is that the best male performers in this business can do any kind of scene they throw at him. only doing b/g or b/g/g severely limits your workload sometimes. think about how many scenes are BBG or DP or gangbangs, etc etc. being able to do those scenes is what makes evan stone, manuel, mark wood, john strong, rocco, sascha etc etc such good performers.
Christopher256
Member

146 Posts
8/05
Posted - Jun 19 2007 : 11:15AM
I'd like to be a male porn star. It's not going to happen for several reasons. In some ways I think I'd be a good one, but a few others probably limit my possibilities. I tell you I would not at all have a problem with Gangbangs, DPs, etc.
 
JackLawrenceXXX
Member

"A day without the Intimate Juices of a Woman... is like a day without sunshine!"
26 Posts
6/07
Posted - Jun 19 2007 : 11:44AM
Christian is right... most of th top performers who 'Do Everything' work every day, twice a day, sometimes three times a day... and thats why they are bigger names... because you see them everywhere AND they are ABLE to perform in more difficult scenes.
I have done only 510 scenes in the last 4 years.. hardly a record, but I have enjoyed most of them.
I am sure Christian can attest that doing scenes with other male performers can be a lot more work... especially of one performer is having a bad day... Wood or Pop issues.... I dont wanna wait on another guy... and since I am not 'into' BBG, I dont want to be the one another performer is waiting on.... it also has to do with comfort levels... there were some cool guys in the past who were no problem to work alongside... but some were Pussy Hoggs... making out with the woman in Missionary leaves me nothing to do..
One of my last BBG Scenes, the performer took well over an hour to pop... OVER AN HOUR... and I had to keep hard(ish) after I poped so that when he finally poped, we would both look like we did at about the same time, (edited it looked fine) and that performer is a big name star... only the crew and the performers in the scene know that most of that hour plus he was in the bathroom trying to get close... those days are a waste of my time....
Off camera in a swinging situation it's a little different... a woman getting DP'd off camera.. for the enjoyment of it sends off a different excitement.... and it's all about her... it's funner.. ON Camera... DP's suck because you have 2 guys who have to open up for the camera.. and SIX legs to manage... it's more difficult to get a good rhythm going while everyone is in position on camera... the positions you end up in are usually very uncomfortable for all 3 performers... starting and stopping..
I gotta tip my hat to the guys who do DP's all the time... they are stronger performers than myself... I just like walking on set knowing that I am here to do my job, and will enjoy all of it... so theres no stress.... maybe I am selfish... I also dont really like to share....
-Jack Lawrence
JackLawrenceXXX.com
JackLawrenceXXX
Member

"A day without the Intimate Juices of a Woman... is like a day without sunshine!"
26 Posts
6/07
Posted - Jun 19 2007 : 11:52AM
P.S. For the record, Sascha was one of the best male performers to work with... because he's really into getting the woman off, and he's a very strong performer... and a cool guy... tells jokes, has fun, no stress...
Evan Stone and I did 2 BG scenes next to eachother and I got the same vibe from him... he's probably the coolest guy in the business, actually... whenever I run into him, he's always keeping people entertained.. professional and respectful of everyone on set... a working Legend...
Christian and I never worked together, but I know him and he's a great guy as well... probably one of the smartest guys in the business... and a strong performer too...
-Jack Lawrence
JackLawrenceXXX.com
Pagoda
Senior Member

Thread Killer
1747 Posts
10/05
Posted - Jun 19 2007 : 6:43PM
If I could take possession of a male porn star's body for one week, I would. I mean, if I'm going to spend a week as a man, I can't think of a better way to spend 7 days.
evillesurfer07
Member

36 Posts
6/07
Posted - Jun 19 2007 : 8:22PM
It would have it's advantages and disadvantages. On one hand you'd get to have sex with beautiful women and do things that you normally wouldn't do with a girlfriend/wife. On the other hand you'd be doing all this with many other people in the room and the level of intimacy that is involved with sex would be eliminated. Also, it's difficult to have a relationship when you're fucking other women. I'd like to do it, but only at a time in my life when I didn't plan on having female companionship.
realtip
Deactivated User

2301 Posts
6/04
Posted - Jun 20 2007 : 1:37AM
It is natural for those of us who watch porn to occasionally entertain the fantasy of being the guy who gets to fuck the chicks who we see as attractive on screen. Porn is based on this whole fantasy. Although it's a nice fantasy to have, there is also the reality that it is a job that seems to contain its drawbacks. Yet, what may be a drawback for one may be no problem for someone else. Personally, some of the downsides of the job that I would find as disadvantageous are:
-Risk of disease from frequent unprotected sex
-Ostracism from friends and family
-Possible limitations of future prospects outside of porn
-The lower likelihood of marriage to someone outside the industry
-The lack of provided insurance/health/retirement benefits
-Always having to think of a tactful way to answer the question, "What do you do for a living?"
-And last but not least: Having to shave your body hair
Though I must admit, the guys who do it do deserve their props.
P3-2A
Member

173 Posts
5/07
Posted - Jun 20 2007 : 2:53AM
I don't know why people say disease as a risk when I think its a lot safer in the industry than in real life. I think its the only place where you can get to bang as many chicks in life with more security against STD's because of the regulation, if you were extremely lucky in real life to do as many chicks as in porn, I would consider it to be a lot less safe.
As for being a pornstar, it seems kind of cool at times, but to me it would be an impossibility for a number of reasons. Except I once saw an old guy in a porn show, who would just bang the girls and he had like 8 cameras in the room and no camera guy (he looked like and 8 instrument man or something like that). Something like that maybe. Or something POV or like some movie I saw (Titty Worship, I think) when they didn't show the dude's face. Either way it's not happening.
Rogue
Member

105 Posts
4/05
Posted - Jun 20 2007 : 8:15AM
While those points above might be issues for the sexually average men, the successful porn performers don't have them:

1)They can fuck any women that is thrown to them and even
have a good time. Rocco has said in an interview that he had a great time having sex with three 70+ year old women, because they were turned on by him and , well, he is a pervert. If you have a huge sex drive, any woman is good.
2)And if you have that sex drive, you won't need any Viagra.
3)and 4)This is the hardest part that makes the true performers. It comes with experience (that the average guy outside of porn might not have) that gives you a complete control over your erection and ejaculation under any circumstances. It's a learned skill that most people don't bother to master in their private lives.
5)If the performer works a lot, he actually makes more money than the girls as stated above.
JackLawrenceXXX
Member

"A day without the Intimate Juices of a Woman... is like a day without sunshine!"
26 Posts
6/07
Posted - Jun 20 2007 : 1:00PM
realtip writes:
-Risk of disease from frequent unprotected sex
Actually we are all tested ever 30 days or less... we have a less than 1% STD infection rate, vs. the general public of 14% count in how sexually active someone is, and that 14% can grow... I actually feel safer having unprotected sex with a woman on set (or off is they visit me) than a civilian with a condom... half the STD's out there dont have symptoms... most women only get checked once a year IF they have healthcare, and the doctors wont test for STD's if the woman isnt forthright about how sexually active she is... (ever wonder if the woman is attracted to the doctor and wants to pretend shes's an Angel to date him?) Check out AIM.org to see more about how we test.
Rogue wrote:
5)If the performer works a lot, he actually makes more money than the girls as stated above.
Thats a statement from Christian XXX.... you gotta remember he's probably well within the top 10 in the whole business... and probably works everyday... I would say at least 90% of the guys make way less than the girls at the end of the month... the girls get about twice what we get paid... although there are a select few guys who command rates similar to the girls... but those guys have multiple AVN Awards, big fan bases, ect...
The good guys always have a longer shelf-life though.... like upto 10 years if they dont get burned out... I would say 80% of the girls are 'Shot Out' in 2 to 3 years.... some of them do very well Escorting after porn....
Most guys make $500.00 to $600.00 a scene... if you win an AVN Award (and deserved it) you usually add $100.00 to your rate... if you have 14 AVN Awards, like Tommy Gunn... you just name your price... I heard a few guys are getting $800.00 a scene
It would be interesting to see what all the guy's rates REALLY are... and how often people just pay it, or pass... generally, producers dont see us as marketable unless their product is high end.. where the ladies are watching too...
-Jack Lawrence
JackLawrenceXXX.com
Tyler Knight
Member

139 Posts
3/05
Posted - Jun 20 2007 : 4:20PM
This point is quite relevant. I have my personal solution, (which Ill keep private), however, quality of life issues are certainly a valid concern, and everyones outside porn sex partners probably have a different threshold of understanding, and patience.
threesomebody
Official BlowBang Judge

Would you like my autograph?
2491 Posts
12/04
Posted - Jun 20 2007 : 6:26PM
Me.
 
leglover1000
Member

177 Posts
3/07
Posted - Jun 20 2007 : 7:32PM

Jack, why does Lexington sTeele mention that it is a dangerous business in terms of STDS. Is he ignorant? I agree with you but Lex makes it sound like it is the other way around.
SUCKER4NICETITS
Member

MY FUTURE WIFE MADISON IVY
810 Posts
5/07
Posted - Jun 21 2007 : 10:42AM
I WOULD!!!! ME ME, PICK ME!!!!
(Have you seen how hot porno chicks are)?
JackLawrenceXXX
Member

"A day without the Intimate Juices of a Woman... is like a day without sunshine!"
26 Posts
6/07
Posted - Jun 21 2007 : 10:53AM
LegLover1000 I have no idea why Lexington Steel said that... don't get me wrong.. there ARE STD's in porn.. somewhere between Zero and 10 sometimes 20 cases a month.. but thats out of about 1,200 performers... average is less than 10... some performers seem to have a 'Dirty Test' more often than others... the people who have 'Dirty Tests' are sometimes the same people every month... reckless escorting, cheating boyfriend, who knows why... but since the vast majority of performers use condoms with non-performers... it's the ones who dont who have problems....
There was one female performer who just left the business who used to try to fake her tests, (I have seen proof!) She was known for fucking strangers without a test and without a condom at Swinger's clubs.. from a Top Star... to someone nodody wanted to work with at all in a very short time... she had a drug issue.... but to me that's no excuse... she deserves to be cast away.. drug use is no excuse to risk people's health as well as lives....
-Jack Lawrence
JackLawrenceXXX.com
realtip
Deactivated User

2301 Posts
6/04
Posted - Jun 22 2007 : 1:09AM
I remember reading an article in which someone wrote that anyone working in porn has to be a risk-taker. I think this is true. It is certainly not an industry to get involved in without knowing the risks. I'm sure you have more familiarity with this than I do since you work in the industry. But the frequent testing seems to be more of an acknowledgement of the high level of risks involved with working in the industry, just like any other precautionary measure people take for safety. However, precautions do not remove the risks, though they may be somewhat successful at reducing them. The risk is still always present.

I also did visit the AIM site you suggested. The correct web address is aim-med.org. The other address leads to the Accuracy in Media website. According the site, performers are tested for HIV and other bacterial diseases, but are not required to be tested for other viral infections such as herpes and HPV. These are only given as recommendations to be done twice a year, which I presume is at the performer's discretion. Is this true? If so, risk of disease is still a real concern. Plus, I'd always be thinking of all the horrible possibilities that might have transpired during the 30 days since the last test. You say that "the vast majority of performers use condoms with non-performers." Unless you are privy to the private practices of performers in their off-screen lives, how do you know this for sure?
Edited by - hardware on 6/25/2007 7:03:22 PM
JackLawrenceXXX
Member

"A day without the Intimate Juices of a Woman... is like a day without sunshine!"
26 Posts
6/07
Posted - Jun 22 2007 : 2:37PM
"the vast majority of performers use condoms with non-performers." Unless you are privy to the private practices of performers in their off-screen lives, how do you know this for sure?
How do we know for sure? Well, it's based on the honor system... we have to trust eachother with eachother's lives... (which is scary when you're dealing with people who are not even drug tested!)
One good thing is that our medical records are Public Record... and those who take chances off camera are exposing themselves to public scrutiny, if they come back with a 'Bad Test'.
-Jack Lawrence
JackLawrenceXXX.com
BigMatt
Member

Sunrise Adams, Queen of Cute.
498 Posts
12/04
Posted - Jun 23 2007 : 2:30PM
1. Sure. Most porn girls, although not my type at all, look healthy enough and I sure would'nt mind getting off with them.
2. No thanks. Not in a good number of years.
3. I guess I could do that.
4. One has to time that during regular sex too.
5. It's a job. If it was badly paid, I wouldn't be comfortable with that. One has to live too.
No, in total, I wouldn't. And certainly not as a full time job. Also, I don't think I'm the personality type.
codswallop
Member

39 Posts
11/06
Posted - Jun 24 2007 : 12:48PM
Most blokes would love to be a pornstar. Whether they can actually do the job is obviously open to debate. Reading the posts from the male pornstars themselves its obviously a proffession to them as well as having a great time. And its clear they're all level headed about it too. Good luck to them.
Johnothan Pedak
Senior Member

Catastrophe
1594 Posts
6/07
Posted - Jun 25 2007 : 4:47AM
Downsides exist in all jobs. But I think I'd rather have sex with someone I'm not attracted to, than work night shift at a gas station.
ballsonchin
Member

331 Posts
12/04
Posted - Jun 25 2007 : 10:35AM
mod: please don't talk about porn performers as if they are not here
Edited by - hardware on 6/25/2007 7:03:54 PM
Ryan1481
Member

210 Posts
1/07
Posted - Jun 26 2007 : 3:19AM
Depends on the kind of pornstar I would be. I don't think I could be a GGG pornstar, for example. I would feel uncomfortable with so many other men in the room. I definately wouldn't want to be an 'extra' in a GGG title because alot of the time, you get to put your cock in the girl's mouth after a dozen other men have already collected their sperm in her mouth. I would like to do one on one, though. Or, ten on one, just as long as the ten are women
 
amneth
Member

91 Posts
9/05
Posted - Jun 26 2007 : 9:11AM
I'd enjoy it. It would have to be a pretty hard on the eyes woman for me not to enjoy sex. I don't know if you've noticed, but the quality of female pornstars has improved over the years. There is so much competition porn companies have an easy time finding hot girls to have sex on film.
It's probably harder for them to find qualified males to give them the heat they want for the scene.
So the idea that you'll be banging ugly women doesn't seem too prevalent. The talent pool is bigger and more attractive now.
I probably wouldn't pop any Viagra. I'd just limit my work on a weekly basis and build up the testosterone, so you could do a few scenes without being drained. Keeping it up is alot about diet and exercise. If you want to be a male pornstar, you should keep in shape, sleep, and eat right. Then you won't have to plug as much Viagra.
I think you make it sound much worse than it is. Shit, you don't hear the male pornstars complaining. Being a male pornstar certainly isn't like working at fast food. You don't go, "Oh shit, male pornstar is the only job I could get. Son of a bitch, I hate this job. What am I doing here."
If you are a male pornstar, you gotta really want to be one. You don't just end up a male pornstar because you can't find another job. LOL.
khyber
Member

197 Posts
5/06
Posted - Jul 23 2007 : 1:41AM
I vaguely remember a quote from John Holmes, as best I can remember the question was :
"What would you recommend for guys that were thinking about working in porn?"
His rely was to laugh and say :
"A frontal lobotomy!"
"Don't do it, it's not worth it".
It does seem to be a difficult lifestyle, we always hear about guys that don't like their girlfriends working in porn, but I imagine it would also be difficult for the girlfriends of the male pornstars.
The Porn Doctor
Member

218 Posts
7/07
Posted - Jul 23 2007 : 7:02AM
Where do we go to sign up?
Edited by - hardware on 7/23/2007 1:58:52 PM
Joel
Member

331 Posts
5/05
Posted - Jul 23 2007 : 1:12PM
The rates are reasonable for guys, but not as high as the girls and unstandably so. It's because it is mostly Men who buy the films.
Men... and Threesomebody.
I think I would be a decent porn star, but I would not be one. The reason is because of my circumstance, I would suggest I make more than the very top male performers do - but that is all speculation of course!
christianx
Senior Member

1883 Posts
9/04
Posted - Jul 24 2007 : 9:50AM
joel, and you would be incorrect. there are about 20 guys who work everyday. maybe more than 20. so 600 a scene x 30 scenes a month. somehow i doubt you make that much. :)
and dont forget that the TOP TOP guys are directors as well and make more money from directing as well as performing.
Joel
Member

331 Posts
5/05
Posted - Jul 24 2007 : 9:55PM
'Sup Christian, as I stated it is speculation. And actually you would be wrong :)
My company, so not exactly me (although I own 98% of it) has made more than £50,000 in a single month, but it's up and down and a lot is reinvested. That is one thing which is not speculation, it's a matter of record.
However, I don't get to fuck hot girls and probably work longer hours than you guys do.
But you are certainly right regarding directing, I am sure folks like Jules Jordan are making a good deal more than $18k a month - the place he lures the girls back to looks like it might be worth a bit! ;)
Edited by - joel on 7/25/2007 6:55:38 AM
Edited by - joel on 7/25/2007 6:58:25 AM
Kulutues
Member

68 Posts
7/07
Posted - Jul 25 2007 : 3:28AM
Uhh, a lot of freaking people?
Hateball
Deactivated User

15 Posts
7/07
Posted - Jul 25 2007 : 7:09AM
I'm sure the whole argument/idea is relative...
If you want to fuck hot girls, get filmed doing that, get paid....sure, it's a sweet job....IF you can do it.
However, I'm sure at SOME point that idea wears off and you want to get paid MORE than you did when you started....if you got paid at all...ie...it gets BORING...
It's the same with ANY job.
I'm a subscriber of being happy at your work....Not a lot of people are..but if you find a job yer happy with, stick with it...that's the bottom line.
threesomebody
Official BlowBang Judge

Would you like my autograph?
2491 Posts
12/04
Posted - Jul 25 2007 : 8:50PM
Hey! I resemble that comment!
Who the hell are you anyway?
csh
Member

24 Posts
7/07
Posted - Jul 25 2007 : 9:00PM
As I see it, the only good thing about porn is the money. You can fuck beautilful women outside of porn, who are less likely to have STD'S. And unlike pornstars, the girls who you sleep with are actually interested in sleeping with you. Porn is filled with fat, ugly, disgusting men with old balls, and I can say with 100 certainty that outside of the porn world, these men would not be able to land the pussy they do in porn.
Joel
Member

331 Posts
5/05
Posted - Jul 26 2007 : 12:56PM
Resemble or resent?
I read these boards occasionally. I have noticed you love Christian X too
hellmutthead
Member

Hell hath no fury...
28 Posts
6/07
Posted - Jul 26 2007 : 3:05PM
I'm saving my porn career for after retirement. 60 is the new 20 in the porn world.
dvd4dvd
Deactivated User

292 Posts
6/07
Posted - Jul 26 2007 : 10:16PM
duh?????????????
Edited by - hardware on 7/26/2007 10:19:28 PM
brewski
Deactivated User

208 Posts
6/07
Posted - Jul 26 2007 : 10:28PM
um........."huh"?
scratches his head

Edited by - hardware on 7/28/2007 1:02:44 AM

Captain Cock
Member

NL
172 Posts
2/05
Posted - Jul 27 2007 : 7:51AM
Physically, I probably could. Having sex in public never really was a problem for me, so getting some instructions while doing it might actually be fun.

Mentally I would suck at it badly. If I were to be lined up 2 or 3 times with the same performer, I'd probably feel obliged to bring her flowers, and consider it a date. Line me up more, and I will probably propose to her.
threesomebody
Official BlowBang Judge

Would you like my autograph?
2491 Posts
12/04
Posted - Jul 27 2007 : 11:03AM
I don't believe in love. I do sweat him though.
Page 1 of 2 Last



Jump To: