The warmest of all hot welcomes to you! LargeJohnson, this welcome is for you: [:p)] [:p)] [:p)] Sometimes these things just die on the vine. I switched your main question to the subject line. Might draw a few flies that way.
pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world 12377 Posts 9/07
Posted - Sep 26 2008 : 2:27AM
Powers started way back with Gillis didn't he? That is way before Woodman.
[Link]
Len801 Deactivated User
754 Posts 9/07
Posted - Sep 26 2008 : 8:50AM
Ed started out around 1987 and has been featured in over 700 movie titles (in many of them he has had more than one sex scene), so you can do the math. It's not even a question of who fucked more on screen...
if you take Ed's More Dirty Debs series alone..thats 39 hex 4 thats 1,560 then toss in the global warming and deep inside and dirty dirty series etc I'd say thats another 550 for a rough total of say 2100. Toss out the flicks with only 3 instead of 4 or where Ed had Jay or Jake standing in for him and lets call it 1900 on camera fucks with a total of 750 flick credits on IAFD if you look at Pierre's credits for acting and directing....it's just not in the same league I think...I mean only 116 performer credits. all very approximate but Ed seems to be the clear winner
One man's trash can be the next man's treasure. 1187 Posts 1/04
Posted - Sep 26 2008 : 4:31PM
Ed Powers had a radio program that lasted for only a short time. His flagship station was in Los Angeles and he mentioned that he'd had sex with 7,000 women. That could be realistic. I doubt Pierre had sex with that many women. Wilt Chamberlain once remarked that he'd had sex with 20,000 women. I find that hard to believe. If a guy has sex with a different women every day of the week and two on Sunday that would be about 400 women/year. He died at age 62 and if he started having sex at 18 that would be 44 years of 400 women and that's under 18,000 but he would have slowed down after age 45 or so like most men do so half of 20,000 women might be more plausible.
^Shortly after Wilt made the 20,000 prediction, a few people did the math like you did and brought it back to him saying how it was basically impossible, and then he rescinded, saying it must have been a lot less than 20,000, but still a lot. Really Wilt? Less than an impossible number, huh? That's a surprise. Still a lot? Yeah that's a surprise too. Usually famous athletes have all sorts of trouble getting laid.
Death is caused by swallowing small amounts of saliva over a long period of time. George Carlin 1567 Posts 2/07
Posted - Sep 26 2008 : 6:00PM
all of the rolling stones. BTW, I don't really find that it so extraordinary that ed powers fucked all those women, i find it amazing the money he spent to do it. It have to be in the millions. Getting laid for money isn't really so special, wilt never spent a dime. Powers could have saved a third world country.
The real question is who's fucked more girls that actually wanted to have sex with them? I think that would take us back to the single digits for both.
[Link]
Len801 Deactivated User
754 Posts 9/07
Posted - Sep 26 2008 : 8:39PM
While I believe he pays well to get hold of newbies in the porn business, the consumers are the real losers who have bought his inferior quality productions for years and years...
Amen. Someone like Ed Powers having a five digit number means nothing because he paid for it. He made films specifically so he could get laid. It's like someone having fucked 70,000 prostitutes over 20 years. Whereas women who fucked Wilt Chamberlain wanted to fuck Wilt Chamberlain. He didn't have to spend a dime. They just had to meet him in his hotel room. No dinner, no drinks, not even gas money. Edited by - DarkPlaces on 9/27/2008 10:24:16 PM