Why is it when i see old 80's stars Jeannie Pepper, Ebony Ayes, Sahara, Purple Passion, Angel Kelly, Lady Stephanie, Cherry Layme, Ray Victory, Long Johnny Blackbone (Steve Hennessey) and FM Bradely in flick, I feel i am looking at better porn movies.
I like the big booty video girls of today, but seeing all of these old stars in old black movies is more exciting to me! Their sexy bodies, and thick wide long dicks seem to get the job done. But i know they only fucked the hairy pussy for about 3 minutes, to me the pussy had to be real good to bust a nut that quick. No lubricant back then or repeating of the same angle over and over too make it a 40 mintue scene. Funny acting that got right to the point.
I remember watching the Western Visual's Blacks and Blonde series and the Diamond Series that had King Paul. He was just great in the acting and his style really appeal to me.
It too bad tht Pleasure Productions who purchase a lot of the Western Visual content; has still not re-release any of these works. With consumer technology it is so easy to do too; you can burn it from master tape on to a DVD-r and then release it. I know it cost alot for a true DVD copying production but the -r is almost nothing.
It amateurish but those who want it really don't care!
The reason black porn from the 80's are so much a turn on, the girls and guys are so into there characters. No stupid shit talking like "Wesley Pipes", or so much moaning, that you can not enjoy the flick like girls do today.
I feel that the girls were sexier, better breats, better pussies, and had better bodies. The guy's had better looking "Natural" dicks and balls (NO HOMO!!!!!!) When they undressed they had the shrimp penis, that turned into a monster. Just look at Ray Victory's, FM Bradley, Tony El-Ay, and Steve Hennessy (Long Johnny Blackbone) dicks, they were thick, long, and not abnormal. And had a set of balls that you saw 2 big ones.
Look at today's stars, balls all enclosed in which you can not see any nuts, dicks look like they have been surgically inhanced. When they pull out they are alread at 12' soft. That is not real or average. Example Mark Anthony, Lex Steele. Mark Everyoneknows has the big not on his dicj head, too weird for me!! LEx's dick is to striaght look so enhanced!
Give me natural guys for natural girls. Ebony Ayes, Jeannie Pepper, Lady Stephanie worked with what the had, no breast implants or ass implants!!!!
So what if the scene is 4 minutes long, you tell me you would bust a quick nut seeing these girls from the 80's!!!
I still enjoy watching videos from the 80's/90's... but the 70's porn is my favorite (and I wasn't even old enough to watch porn in the 70's or 80's.
Anyway, the stuff shot in the 70's was great because they were films. They had real scenes and setups... unlike the fast food set up of today's porn.
The 80's stuff was cool, but looking back... some of the girls look stupid. The content certainly didn't age well... but that's the decade I really started digging porn so it holds a special place in my heart.
The 90's was pretty cool, too. I was a big Ashlyn Gere fan along with the Vivid girls.
It seems like in today's porn, they just have a little checklist next to them with things like: 3 minutes of anal, 2 minutes of oral, 5 minutes of double team, etc...
Another reason it was better because it was Taboo! This was someone new, and only a few actresses had done porn, and even less Black men. We have to remember the time period also. The schools in my town did not fully intergrate until the mid 70s believe it or not. They were indeed pioneers, and its ashame that there are not more photos, and information concerning Sahara, Jeannie Pepper, Satin Summer, Sade, Lady Stephany, Desiree West, and the many one hit wonders of the day!
My private site is http://www.dualtowers.info/ You will luv it!
[quote=Porn Addict]It seems like in today's porn, they just have a little checklist next to them with things like: 3 minutes of anal, 2 minutes of oral, 5 minutes of double team, etc...[/quote]
That is one of my pet peeves with today's porn, it seems WAAAAY to formatted. Everybody follows a cookie-cutter pattern and after a while all the action looks the same.
I ran the running commentary of Gloria Leonard on the "Barbara Broadcast" DvD and she said that with shooting on film you had 'depth-of-field' that's absent with video. Having taken a photography class in high school I knew what the phrase was. But she was nevertheless correct.