A total throw back to the past Peter North was renowned for massive cum shots over girls in his career . Did he ever do a Creamiepie ? If so I'd love to see that !

[Link]

I recall a long, long time ago seeing documentary on the early days of modern porn when you could buy 8 mm movies. These were only a few minutes long, with most not running much past 10 minutes. The documentary explained that given the limitations of the cameras, and the fact that these were shot on a shoestring budget, there was no editing. When the camera started running, the talent was expected to get the job done before the film ran out. One thing this doc described is that the guy pulling out to ejaculate on the woman was done so the buyers knew it wasn't faked. Otherwise, the guy could tense up five minutes into the sex and claim that he came. With external cumshots, the buyer could know he was seeing the real thing.

I suspect that this thought carries forward to today. It isn't that people don't want creampies, it's just that they want to know what they are seeing is real. Yes, these days the camera can zoom in to see the model push the cum out, but that's easily faked too. Yes, many fakes are so fake that they are obvious, but I'm sure there are some fake cum products around that look convincingly real.

[Link]

One of the stupidest things our modern species does is censor sex. Back before the Japanese government started more seriously enforcing Article 175, the anti-censorship clause of its constitution, there were great porn products coming from Japan featuring some monumentally beautiful women. Many JAV discs followed a formula I wish the rest of the world followed: They featured one woman in four or five sex situations, often with a full-on group session as the last in the sequence. It's fair to say the men in these scenes were rarely as well-endowed as a Peter North, let alone a Jax Slayher. But since the true star of these JAVs was the woman's vagina, the dicks acted more like the "straight men" in a comedy sketch, there to trigger the emotion from the star. And among some producers, there was a clear feeling that the way to portray real sex was to come inside the woman.

This is the heart-stoppingly gorgeous Satomi Suzuki, from a JAV distributed at the time as "Sky Angel 108." (I would post a link here, but mods, I'm not 100% certain the sites that still present this movie have the legitimate rights to do so, so I'll forego for now.) Satomi's pussy is a thing of wonder, a forbidden jungle you can only enter while accompanied by a guide who's experienced with the territory.

The only way to cum, when you're with Satomi, is to cum inside. What stokes my primal passions is watching this woman's vagina oozing with fresh sperm.

Primal passions being what they are, they don't come with instruction manuals. In real life, I'd never allow some other man to invade my space and be the next object inside my partner's private area. However, in "Sky Angel 108," I'm perfectly happy with the next guy coming in and filling Satomi up further. Satomi is there to be worshipped, and the greatest way to pay her tribute is to ejaculate inside this holy space.

Now, for me, the only real problem with scenes like this, featuring women this fantastic, is that later scenes of non-JAV porn where the guy or guys cum on the woman's chest or tits or hair, seem disrespectful to the point of sacrilege. I've already seen where the tribute rightly belongs, and anyplace else feels like a mistake.

Other viewers clearly do not feel this way. For them, as rearadmiral points out, seeing the cum makes the scene feel real and legitimized. And because not every performer is keen on taking the risks Satomi clearly took, that legitimacy and validation is enough for them. Their primal instincts are touched off by the fact that the guy came. And there's just no way to argue with primal instinct - you can't talk it into behaving differently than it does. For me, "bukkake" (loading the woman's face with ejaculate so she can't breathe) is repulsive. For others, the second guy coming in the woman's pussy after the first guy already did, is gross. Our tastes are defined by our dicks, and we can't explain them.

So I don't think it's so much what Woof suggested, that viewers would rather the guy wank himself to climax rather than properly cum inside the girl. There are a number of factors at play here, the safety of the performers being one of them, and it's not always practical or even wise to load the performer up with foreign sperm. That said, I think a great many viewers would agree with me that cumming inside the woman, and watching the product of that action oozing from her orifice(s), is one of the most beautiful things that porn presents us. And if our species would evolve to the point where we can trash these stupid "obscenity" laws, we'd stop censoring beauty just because we can't explain our primal reactions to it.

RFB3

[Link]