I assume they do this so they can still have on girls who don't do creampies but then I'm pretty sure they do it with girls who DO creampies, it's insulting.

[Link]

For fake cumshots its simple. Men cant cum or have a hard time cumming when they should. As one male talent told me straight up when I called him out on fake cumshots. He told me he shoot sometimes three times a day. So he didnt deny that he uses fake cumshots.

I think its gotten to the point where people are losing the point of what sex is. I get porn isnt 100% authentic but there are elements that should be 100% authentic. Like a guy getting naturally hard. Shouldnt have to use a penis pump. And I dont watch a ton of mainstream B/G. If I watch B/G its usually amateur OF type scenes where I know there isnt any fake cumshots but I watch trans content and there was one video where I just looked at it and wonder how many fake cumshots were there? And Ive heard a performer talk about the fake cum that they have put on them at the end of scenes to make it look like a big load in the B/G scenes. Again its really sad mainstream has gone down that road where everything has to be questioned even the parts that should be close too if not 100% authentic when it comes to sex.

[Link]

I do mind when there is a lack of effort to make it look real. It is 2024. I realize that fake cum technology hasn't kept pace with other inventions like electric powered vehicles, but cum on people! Okay, that was a typo ... but come on people! Spend an extra 30 minutes to make it look good! Keep up the illusion! Make me WANT to spend more on your product.

One last point ... for those that are insisting on absolute realism ... there are plenty of fake tits, fake smiles, and fake orgasms from the ladies side. I'm a big fan of natural tits (even if they are small), but I think a lot of people like looking at big, beautiful fake tits. As for the fake performances, I would rather enjoy a really good fake performance as opposed to a really dull authentic one.

Edited by - froccer on 1/29/2024 12:40:24 AM

[Link]

So thats why Im a big supporter of performers doing their own thing outside of mainstream bc I know we dont have to worry for the most part about all that fakeness. What porn has done is ruined what real sex looks like. It has people thinking real sex is boring and even fake bc it doesnt look like what studios are showing us. If a guy legit cums multiple times then great. Its rare and the scene has to be hot. But if you have to sit there and questioned if all those cum shots even one of them is fake then something is seriously wrong with that picture. If you have to sit there and question a guy staying hard the entire scene bc of a built in penis pump then something is wrong with that picture.

[Link]

I think the reason why most male performers now have to rely on drugs to get and retain an erection has little to do with desire and everything to do with biology. At some point no matter how hot you think your partner is. The fact that you have had sex multiple times in the last week means that the little engine is out of fuel and rest is the only remedy. You don't actually think that all the women who have on screen orgasm actually have onscreen orgasm. They fake it but if you are really lucky then you can't tell. Guys don't have that advantage and while drugs can give them an erection. Those drugs don't guarantee an orgasm. If you look at the all time greats of cum shots then you will notice they were from an era where the number of shoots they did per week was quite small compared to todays male performer.

[Link]

Getting back to the problem of the guy, let me ask the members among us who have penises: Do you remember being young? Maybe you already are, but I already know for a fact a lot of us are becoming fossilized already. You remember going to the rental store and picking up a quadruple-feature for that special night alone? Picture yourself on the fourth feature. You probably saved the one with your most favorite girls to the end. You're at the peak of your virility, you're alone in your apartment, all your favorite girls are up on that huge 32-inch CRT, and no one is spying on you. How difficult was that fifth orgasm? Remember? You get to number five, and that well is running pretty dry.

There just isn't that much sperm in the world. It's a precious commodity.

As porn consumers, we've become conditioned to scenes being terminated when the guy or guys gush quarts. (Never mind if she's cum even once, when the guy cums, ta-be, uh-ta-be, uh-ta-be, uh that's all folks!) If the performance is even part-way real, rather than just realistic, how is that even possible? The man spends ten minutes inside Sophie Dee's asshole and didn't explode? Talk about a scene not being real!

So the answer to the big question, "Why are fake cumshots becoming a thing more often?" is because directors plan their shooting one way or the other to let the gusher signal the scene's conclusion. So as viewers, we need to ask ourselves, what's sexier to us: A real male orgasm six minutes in? A premature male orgasm edited out of sequence so it's at the end? Or that rubber dick that shoots Elmer's Glue? Given that performance sex will always have an unreal element to it, which would we prefer?

RFB3

[Link]

What Im saying is there are elements that should be 100% real. Just like in wrestling if you cant take a back bump no way you can be a wrestler. Thats 100% real all the time and it can hurt depending on the situation. So with porn at least can a male performer get a real erection. Yes its about money thats why performers shoot alot but you would like to think based on many performers interviews on how they got into the industry that they got started bc they love sex and they want to explore their sexuality. Ive maybe heard very few talk about they got started in the industry bc they needed money badly and that was the avenue to go. So yes money is the bonus but being in the industry you would hope for many performers is that they love having sex and thus getting naturally aroused should be 100%. Maybe not all the time bc I do get it that it could be a very long day, shooting with someone that just doesnt have chemistry with, shooting in an environment that you would rather not shoot in but thats the scenario for the shoot. Like all of that can not turn someone on. So I get sometimes, but you would figure most of the time getting a natural arousal should key. And plus people know their bodies so what turns them on naturally and how much their bodies can take. If they are pumping out plenty of scenes in a short period of time, if they know its not going to produce the most organic of scenes most of the time then dont try to cheat the fans.

And as a fan, do I even want to support those who care more about the money than they do services the fans with really good quality content? Like I can go on and on about this bc Ive been watching porn for going on over 3 decades and Ive seen it change over time. Ive seen directors come and go, performers come and go, studios come and go. I try to support the performers and studios but I mainly side with the performers bc I also feel like they could be treated better by the studios. Plus as much as many people complain about performers doing their own content for their own platforms I feel like that content is more real and authentic than most scenes shot by studios.

[Link]