Just because a dual layer Blu-ray disc can hold multiple hours of HD footage doesn't mean it should. Customers willing to pay more for a physical copy want a higher bitrate (non-adult movies & TV shows have better quality on Blu-ray vs streaming); the adult industry shouldn't intentionally underachieve a basic standard already established.
I was looking up old porn Blu-ray reviews and was surprised some were encoded at 720p (what!?) but unsurprisingly the vast majority didn't have lossless audio.
If companies stick to 4 or 5 scenes (around 2 or 3 hours total) like they already do for DVD, the bitrate should be good and there shouldn't be any compression issues. Get too greedy that more space = more content and they can't blame anyone but their own stupidity for not knowing how to utilize disc space properly and that picky customers won't purchase their Blu-rays that look and sound worse than bootleg quality (on that topic, DON'T USE BD-R! Use pressed discs!)
Assuming Combo Packs return both Blu-ray and DVD copies should have the same content so it wouldn't make sense to include an extra scene or 2 exclusive to the Blu-ray. If there's leftover space use it for HD BTS and other extras.
And for those who think lossy audio is fine (Dolby Digital) for Blu-ray; it shouldn't. Sound is underrated. Watch your favorite webscene muted and let me know if you think it's still as good vs when watched with the audio turned on. Lossless audio would enhance the scene. Nobody is demanding for 5.1/7.1 surround or a Dolby Atmos mix, but default LPCM stereo shouldn't be unreasonable...
Doubt many studios have thought too far ahead but the ones already shooting their scenes at 24 fps will have a much easier time than those shooting at 30 or 60 fps. The latter would either have to spend additional time and effort to convert the footage to 24 fps for the Blu-ray release or risk criticism for 1080 interlaced encodes instead of the objectively better looking 1080p.
Mind giving a source?Unless very recent Lesbian MILFs is a Zero Tolerance title released back in March of this year.
If getting rid of "movies" then why keep them (with promotional coverart) on their website for upcoming stuff?
https://www.zerotolerancefilms.com/en/movies/sort/upcoming
If streaming only wouldn't the upcoming videos section alone suffice?
https://www.zerotolerancefilms.com/en/videos/sort/upcoming
Companies aren't releasing Blu-ray because it's still too expensive for most of them and probably lack of knowledge and resources for how to author a Blu-ray disc.
Taking Vinegar Syndrome out of the discussion (they themselves don't consider themselves a porn company or part of the industry) there hasn't been any modern content releases on Blu-ray to study sales numbers and customer interest so unsurprising an industry primarily run by old white men with outdated thinking are probably still thinking data from 10 years ago is still relevant.
Edited by - Big_Tits_Addict on 7/26/2022 9:54:06 PM


